1
X-ray Instruments X-ray Instruments Development of precision hard X-ray Development of precision hard X-ray multilayer optics with sub-arcminute multilayer optics with sub-arcminute performance performance Optics Assembly Optics Assembly Approach Approach • Graphite spacers are epoxied onto a mandrel and machined to the correct radius and angle. • Coated glass substrates are epoxied to the spacers. • After epoxy cure, the next layer of spacers is epoxied to the previous layer of glass. • These spacers are machined and another layer of glass is epoxied to the spacers. • In a similar way, subsequent layers are added to the optic. Thermally Formed Glass Thermally Formed Glass Q uartz M andrel a) c) G la ss M icro sh ee t b) d) Multilayer Coatings Multilayer Coatings Enhanced reflectivity from multiple interfaces of two materials with large optical contrast (e.g. W/Si). Metrology Metrology Techniques Techniques Non-focusing Detectors: • Previous instruments for hard X-rays: coded aperture (e.g. GRATIS) and collimated. • Detector background determines the minimum detectable X-ray flux. • Detector area Collecting area Focusing Telescopes: • Soft X-ray telescopes (e.g., ASCA, Chandra) focus via total external reflection. Crit 1/Energy very small incidence angles are required for hard X-rays. • Detector area << Collecting area • Improved imaging capability NASA/CXC/SAO • Glass microsheets (originally developed for the flat panel industry) are positioned on a Quartz mandrel in a commercially available oven. • As the oven is headed, the glass slowly assumes the large scale figure of the mandrel • The process is terminated just before it touches the mandrel by decreasing the oven temperature. • Near net shaped optic substrates are produced without perturbing the excellent initial X-ray properties of the glass micro- sheet (~3.5 Å roughness), even without the aid of highly polished and very expensive mandrels. • The formed shells are cut to the appropriate size – this also removes the curled edges Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory Jim Chonko, Chuck Hailey, Jason Koglin , Mike Sileo, Marcela Stern, David Windt, Haitao Yu Caltech Space Radiation Laboratory Hubert Chen, Fiona Harrison Danish Space Research Institute Finn Christensen, Carsten Jensen Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Bill Craig, Todd Decker, Kurt Gunderson Science Goals Science Goals • Imaging and spectroscopy of 44 Ti emissions in young Supernova remnants • Sensitive observations of obscured Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) • Spectroscopic observations of accreting high- magnetic field pulsars • Mapping the Galactic Center Correspondence: [email protected] , http://astro.columbia.edu/~koglin This work is supported in part by several NASA grants. A new generation of hard X-ray telescopes using focusing optics are required to dramatically improve the sensitivity and angular resolution at energies above 10 keV a)L ay dow n and m achine graphite spacers b)Lay dow n glass c)Lay dow n and m achine graphitespacers d)Lay dow n glass Assembly Metrology Assembly Metrology The Spacers are machined very flat and uniform. The ~1.5 m peak to valley spacer roughness is typically on a millimeter length scale, much shorter than the scale at which the glass can be deformed. The conformance of the glass directly on top of these spacers is superb (24" figure). Much of this can be attributed to the intrinsic figure of the substrate (~60") and not to errors in the assembly process, which is estimated to be only 8". 0 5 10 15 20 -200 -1 00 0 100 200 O ptica lA x is [cm ] A zim utha l A xis [degree ] -10 -5 0 5 10 H eig h t [ m] 0 2 4 6 8 10 A x ial L ength [cm ] -2 -1 0 1 2 H eig ht [ m] Prototype Development Prototype Development Several prototypes were built in two-bounce configurations with various size and thickness of AF45 and D263 glass – segments were cut to either 5 or 10 cm long and ~5 cm arclength (~35). • Sample LVDT measurements are shown for each type of glass • The results of X-ray pencil beam scans are also shown for each prototype with the Half Power Diameter (HPD) indicated. • The individual performance results for the 34 segments in the 10 cm x 300 m prototype are histogramed – this length and type of substrate has been adopted for HEFT. • The 200 m thick glass meet the Con-X HXT angular resolution requirement – in addition, these substrates are light enough to meet the severe weight restriction of this mission. • The performance of our thermally formed substrates is largely limited by axial bows that are introduced in the forming process – in this way, shorter segments yield improved performance. A two-bounce prototype optic with three full layers was built & characterized with three separate metrology techniques – LVDT surface metrology, & X-ray pencil beam scans, full illumination with UV – all yielded consistent results. 10 cm long, 300 10 cm long, 300 m thick substrates m thick substrates 5 cm long, 300 5 cm long, 300 m thick substrates m thick substrates 10 cm long, 200 10 cm long, 200 m thick substrates m thick substrates NASA/CXC/SAO/Rutgers J.Hughes NASA/CXC/SAO H. Marshall et al. F. R. Harnden (CfA) GRANAT 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 A zim uth [degree] O pti cAxis[cm ] 5 6 7 8 9 10 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 Height[ m ] 0 50 100 150 Perform ance[arcsec] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Fraction Enclosed -10 -5 0 5 10 O pticAxis [cm ] -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 Height[ m ] b) a) c) Upper Segm ents Low er Segm ents HPD = 45" X -ray data for 5 cm , 300 m segm ents -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Height[um ] 0 50 100 150 Perform ance [arcsec] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Fraction Enclosed -10 -5 0 5 10 OpticAxis [cm ] -10 -5 0 5 10 Height[um ] 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 A zim uth [degr ee] 0 2 4 6 8 10 OpticA xis[cm ] b) a) c) L ow er Segm ent Upper Segm ent HPD = 58" X -ray data for 10 cm , 200 m segm ents 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Azim uth [degree] 10 12 14 16 18 20 O pticA xis [cm ] -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 c) 0 50 100 150 Perform ance [arcsec] 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Fraction Enclosed 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 A zim uth [degree] -10 -12 -14 -16 -18 -20 O pticAxis [cm ] -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Height[um ] b) c) -20 -10 0 10 20 OpticA xis [cm ] -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 Height[um ] a) Low er Segm ents Upper Segm ents HPD = 54" Height[um ] Perform ance [arcsec] 0 2 4 6 8 10 25 45 65 85 105 125 145 35 55 75 95 115 135 155 d) e) X -ray data for10 cm , 300 m segm ents LVDT data for 10 cm , 300 m segm ents Broad-band energy response by using a range layer thicknesses.

X-ray Instruments

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Development of precision hard X-ray multilayer optics with sub-arcminute performance. X-ray Instruments. Science Goals. Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory Jim Chonko, Chuck Hailey, Jason Koglin , Mike Sileo, Marcela Stern, David Windt, Haitao Yu - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: X-ray Instruments

X-ray InstrumentsX-ray Instruments

Development of precision hard X-ray multilayer Development of precision hard X-ray multilayer optics with sub-arcminute performanceoptics with sub-arcminute performance

Optics Assembly ApproachOptics Assembly Approach• Graphite spacers are epoxied onto a mandrel and machined to the correct radius and angle.

• Coated glass substrates are epoxied to the spacers.

• After epoxy cure, the next layer of spacers is epoxied to the previous layer of glass.

• These spacers are machined and another layer of glass is epoxied to the spacers.

• In a similar way, subsequent layers are added to the optic.

Thermally Formed GlassThermally Formed GlassQ u ar tz M an d re l

a ) c )

G lass M icrosh e e t

b ) d )

Multilayer CoatingsMultilayer Coatings Enhanced reflectivity from multiple interfaces of two materials with large optical contrast (e.g. W/Si).

Metrology Metrology TechniquesTechniques

Non-focusing Detectors:• Previous instruments for hard X-rays: coded aperture (e.g. GRATIS) and collimated. • Detector background determines the minimum detectable X-ray flux. • Detector area Collecting area

Focusing Telescopes:• Soft X-ray telescopes (e.g., ASCA, Chandra) focus via total external reflection.• Crit 1/Energy very small incidence angles are required for hard X-rays.• Detector area << Collecting area• Improved imaging capability

NASA/CXC/SAO

• Glass microsheets (originally developed for the flat panel industry) are positioned on a Quartz mandrel in a commercially available oven.

• As the oven is headed, the glass slowly assumes the large scale figure of the mandrel

• The process is terminated just before it touches the mandrel by decreasing the oven temperature.

• Near net shaped optic substrates are produced without perturbing the excellent initial X-ray properties of the glass micro-sheet (~3.5 Å roughness), even without the aid of highly polished and very expensive mandrels.

• The formed shells are cut to the appropriate size – this also removes the curled edges

Columbia Astrophysics LaboratoryJim Chonko, Chuck Hailey, Jason Koglin, Mike Sileo, Marcela Stern, David Windt, Haitao Yu

Caltech Space Radiation LaboratoryHubert Chen, Fiona Harrison

Danish Space Research InstituteFinn Christensen, Carsten Jensen

Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryBill Craig, Todd Decker, Kurt Gunderson

Science GoalsScience Goals• Imaging and spectroscopy of 44Ti emissions in young Supernova remnants

• Sensitive observations of obscured Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN)

• Spectroscopic observations of accreting high-magnetic field pulsars

• Mapping the Galactic Center

Correspondence: [email protected], http://astro.columbia.edu/~koglin

This work is supported in part by several NASA grants.

A new generation of hard X-ray telescopes using focusing optics are required to dramatically improve the sensitivity and angular resolution at energies above 10 keV

a) Lay down and machine graphite spacers

b) Lay down glass

c) Lay down and machine graphite spacers

d) Lay down glass

Assembly MetrologyAssembly MetrologyThe Spacers are machined very flat and uniform. The ~1.5 m peak to valley spacer roughness is typically on a millimeter length scale, much shorter than the scale at which the glass can be deformed.

The conformance of the glass directly on top of these spacers is superb (24" figure). Much of this can be attributed to the intrinsic figure of the substrate (~60") and not to errors in the assembly process, which is estimated to be only 8".

0 5 1 0 1 5 2 0

-2 0 0-1 0 0

01 0 0

2 0 0

O p t ic a l A x is [cm ]

A z im u th a l A x is [d eg re e ]

-1 0

-5

0

5

1 0

Hei

ght

[m

]

0 2 4 6 8 1 0A x ia l L e n g th [c m ]

-2

-1

0

1

2

Hei

ght

[m

]

Prototype DevelopmentPrototype DevelopmentSeveral prototypes were built in two-bounce configurations with various size and thickness of AF45 and D263 glass – segments were cut to either 5 or 10 cm long and ~5 cm arclength (~35).• Sample LVDT measurements are shown for each type of glass• The results of X-ray pencil beam scans are also shown for each prototype with the Half Power Diameter (HPD) indicated.• The individual performance results for the 34 segments in the 10 cm x 300 m prototype are histogramed – this length and type of substrate has been adopted for HEFT.• The 200 m thick glass meet the Con-X HXT angular resolution requirement – in addition, these substrates are light enough to meet the severe weight restriction of this mission.• The performance of our thermally formed substrates is largely limited by axial bows that are introduced in the forming process – in this way, shorter segments yield improved performance.

A two-bounce prototype optic with three full layers was built & characterized with three separate metrology techniques – LVDT surface metrology, & X-ray pencil beam scans, full illumination with UV – all yielded consistent results.

10 cm long, 300 10 cm long, 300 m thick substratesm thick substrates 5 cm long, 300 5 cm long, 300 m thick substratesm thick substrates

10 cm long, 200 10 cm long, 200 m thick substratesm thick substrates

NASA/CXC/SAO/RutgersJ.Hughes

NASA/CXC/SAOH. Marshall et al.

F. R. Harnden (CfA)

GRANAT

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Azimuth [degree]

Optic Axis [cm]5

67

89

10

-15-10-5

05

1015

Hei

ght

[m

]

0 50 100 150Performance [arcsec]

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Fra

ctio

n E

ncl

osed

-10 -5 0 5 10Optic Axis [cm]

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

Hei

ght

[m

]

b)

a)

c)

Upper SegmentsLower Segments

HPD = 45"

X-ray data for 5 cm, 300 m segments

-6-4-20246

Hei

ght

[um

]

0 50 100 150Performance [arcsec]

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Fra

ctio

n E

ncl

osed

-10 -5 0 5 10Optic Axis [cm]

-10

-5

0

5

10

Hei

ght

[um

]

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Azimuth [degree]0

24

68

10Optic Axis [cm]

b)

a)

c)

Lower Segment Upper Segment

HPD = 58"

X-ray data for 10 cm, 200 m segments

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Azimuth [degree]10

1214

1618

20Optic Axis [cm]

-6-4-20246 c)

0 50 100 150Performance [arcsec]

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Fra

ctio

n E

ncl

osed

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Azimuth [degree]-10

-12-14

-16-18

-20Optic Axis [cm]

-6-4-20246

Hei

ght

[um

]

b)

c)

-20 -10 0 10 20Optic Axis [cm]

-15

-10

-5

0

5

10

15

Hei

ght

[um

]

a)

Lower Segments Upper Segments

HPD = 54"

Hei

ght

[um

]

Performance [arcsec]

0

2

4

6

8

10

25 45 65 85 105

125

14535 55 75 95 115

135

155

d)

e)

X-ray data for 10 cm, 300 m segments

LVDT data for 10 cm, 300 m segments

Broad-band energy response by using a range layer thicknesses.