13
www.shift-study.co Systolic Heart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine Trial Objective, design and baseline www.shift-study.co Swedberg K, et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:75-81 dberg K, et al. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):875-885

Www.shift-study.com S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Objective, design and baseline Swedberg

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

www.shift-study.com

Systolic Heart failure treatment with

the If inhibitor ivabradine Trial

Objective, design and baseline

www.shift-study.comSwedberg K, et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:75-81Swedberg K, et al. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):875-885

www.shift-study.com

Primary objective

To evaluate whether the If inhibitor ivabradine

improves cardiovascular outcomes

in patients with

1. Moderate to severe chronic heart failure

2. Left ventricular ejection fraction 35%

3. Heart rate 70 bpm in sinus rhythm

4. Best recommended therapy

Swedberg K, et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:75-81 www.shift-study.com

www.shift-study.com

Study organisation

Steering Committee

Argentina: S. Perrone Australia: H. KrumBelgium: W. Van MieghemBrazil: E. BocchiBulgaria: T. KatovaCanada: P. LiuChile: J. JalilChina: D. HuCzech Republic: J. VitovecDenmark: L. KøberEstonia: T. UuetoaFinland: M. NiemeläFrance: G. Jondeau

Germany: K. WerdanGreece: D. KremastinosHong-Kong: C. YuHungary: K. TóthIndia: D. S. RaoIreland: K. Mc DonaldItaly: M. MetraLatvia: J. Jirgenson†

A. ErglisLithuania: A. KavoliunieneMalaysia: K. SimThe Netherlands: A. Voors

Norway: K. DicksteinPoland: G. OpolskiPortugal: L. ProvidênciaRomania: D. IonescuRussia: G. Aroutiounov Slovakia: R. HatalaSlovenia: M. SebestjenSouth Korea: B. OhSpain: F. AvilésSweden: R. WillenheimerTurkey: A. OtoUnited Kingdom: M. CowieUkraine: O. Parkhomenko

Executive CommitteeM. Komajda co-chair, K. Swedberg co-chair

M. Böhm, J. Borer, I. Ford, L. Tavazzi

www.shift-study.com

EuropeAustriaBelgiumBulgaria DenmarkFinland France

Czech RepublicEstoniaHungary

South AmericaArgentinaBrazilChili

North AmericaCanada

AsiaChinaHong KongIndiaSouth KoreaMalaysia

Australia

LatviaLithuaniaNorwayPolandRomania

RussiaSlovakiaSloveniaUkraine

A landmark trial in heart failure

6505 patients, 37 countries, 677 centres

Germany Greece Ireland Italy The Netherlands

PortugalSpainSwedenTurkeyUK

www.shift-study.com

18 years

Class II to IV NYHA heart failure

Ischaemic/non-ischaemic aetiology

LV systolic dysfunction (EF 35%)

Heart rate 70 bpm

Sinus rhythm

Documented hospital admission for worsening heart failure 12 months

Inclusion criteria

Swedberg K, et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:75-81

www.shift-study.com

Study design

HR and tolerabilityIvabradine 5 mg bid

Matching placebo, bid

Every 4 monthsD0 D14 D28 M4

Ivabradine 7.5/5/2.5 mg bid according to

3.5 years

Screening 7 to 30 days

Swedberg K, et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:75-81

www.shift-study.com

Study endpoints

Cardiovascular death Hospitalization for worsening heart failure

Primary composite endpoint

Other endpoints

All-cause / CV / HF death All-cause / CV / HF hospitalization Composite of CV death, hospitalization for HF or non-fatal MI NYHA class / Patient & Physician Global Assessment

In total population and in patients with at least 50% target dose of beta-blockers

Swedberg K, et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010;12:75-81

www.shift-study.com

Patients and follow-up

Median study duration: 22.9 months; maximum: 41.7 months

6558 randomized

3268 to ivabradine 3290 to placebo

3264 analysed1 lost to follow-up

3241 analysed2 lost to follow-up

7411 screened

Excluded: 27 Excluded: 26

Swedberg K, et al. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):875-885

www.shift-study.com

Baseline characteristics

Ivabradine3241

Placebo3264

Mean age, y 60.7 60.1

Male, % 76 77

Ischaemic aetiology, % 68 67

NYHA II, % 49 49

NYHA III/IV, % 51 51

Previous MI, % 56 56

Diabetes, % 30 31

Hypertension, % 67 66

Swedberg K, et al. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):875-885

www.shift-study.com

Baseline characteristics

Ivabradine3241

Placebo3264

Mean heart rate, bpm 80 80

Mean LVEF, % 29 29

Mean SBP, mm Hg 122 121

Mean DBP, mm Hg 76 76

eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 75 75

Swedberg K, et al. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):875-885

www.shift-study.com

Chronic HF background treatment

89 9184

61

22

3

90 91

83

59

22

40

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Beta-blockers ACEIs and/orARBs

Diuretics Aldosterone antagonists

Digitalis ICD/CRT

Patients (%)Ivabradine

Placebo

Swedberg K, et al. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):875-885

www.shift-study.com

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

BB at

randomization

At least 50%

target daily dose

Target daily dose

89

56

26

89

56

26

Patients (%)

Background beta-blocker treatment

Swedberg K, et al. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):875-885

Ivabradine

Placebo

www.shift-study.com

Main reasons for not achieving beta-blocker target dose, %

Ivabradinen=2099

Placebon=2126

Hypotension 44 45

Fatigue 32 32

Dyspnea 14 14

Dizziness 13 12

Bradycardia 6 6

Main reasons for not prescribing beta-blocker, %

Ivabradinen=344

Placebon=341

COPD 37 32

Hypotension 17 20

Asthma 10 11

Cardiac decomp. 7 9

Fatigue 5 6

Background beta-blocker treatment

Swedberg K, et al. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):875-885