Upload
nicholas-andersen
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.ippr.org
Sarah Tough, ippr, 2nd February 2006
Trusts: A new future for schools?
Thursday 2nd February 2006
www.ippr.org
Trusts: A new future for schools?
“The trust school concept will be widely ignored by the vast majority of heads and governors”
- John Dunford, ASCL
“[there are] fears that the Bill will lead to a fragmented and fractured education system”
- John Bangs, NUT
www.ippr.org
Trusts: A new future for schools?
“Becoming a Trust school is a very simple way of making relationships [with partners] more sustainable, putting them on a firmer footing and ensuring more pupils have access to a wider range of opportunities.”
- Trust School Prospectus
“Not all schools have the same flexibilities. That causes confusion in the system. … We are trying to bring some coherence to the system...”
- Ruth Kelly
www.ippr.org
Characteristics
• Independent state schools - trust schools, like foundation schools, will own their own assets, employ their own staff and be their own admissions authorities.
• Governors - trusts will appoint governors for trust schools. Trusts can appoint either a minority or a majority of governors, depending on results of the consultation process. Some external partners already appoint school governors.
www.ippr.org
Characteristics
• Power to Innovate – trusts, like existing schools, can apply to the Secretary of State for additional flexibilities (e.g. freedoms over curriculum and pay/ conditions of staff enjoyed by academies).
• Admissions – own admissions authorities, must follow Code, no selection by ability.
• Funding – trust schools will be funded by LAs, like other state maintained schools. All trusts will be charities.
www.ippr.org
The potential of trusts
‘engine for real collaboration’ (DfES 2005)– long-term, sustainable involvement of
partners in leadership– efficiency gains where trusts run
more than one school– good practice and innovation spread
throughout the trust schools easily – shared ethos and identity/ ‘brands’– increased access to facilities
www.ippr.org
Interested groups
• Universities: Exeter, Portsmouth, UWE, Open University
• Businesses: Microsoft, KPMG
• Educational charities• Community groups• Other schools• Faith groups
www.ippr.org
Potential number of trust schools
• Ruth Kelly – “we are working with a lot [of organisations interested in setting up trusts]”
• “Trust schools, in law, are foundation schools with a foundation or a trust.” – 513 foundation schools (January 2005)– some foundation schools already have their own foundation
• Take up of foundation status slower than hoped/ expected
• “Firms say no to trust schools” (TES 25/11/05)
www.ippr.org
The process
(source: Trust School Prospectus)
www.ippr.org
Who has the strategic overview?
LAs Schools Adjudicator
Schools Commissioner
Major role in encouraging and brokering trusts in their area
Same powers with regard to enforcing the Admissions Code of Practice
Promoter and enabler – can help broker arrangements
Refer schools to the adjudicator if there are concerns with a school acquiring a particular trust
Settle disputes regarding the acquisition of particular trusts
‘Target disadvantaged areas and schools’
Appeal to the adjudicator if they object to a trust school’s proposal regarding use of assets
Settle disputes between LAs and schools regarding disputes over use of assets
Advise Secretary of State on powers
www.ippr.org
Key questions
1) Can we envisage a future where all schools are trust schools?
2) Do we like this vision?
3) What safeguards are necessary to ensure trust schools development in a positive way?