Upload
oliver-cameron
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
WV Spatial Data Infrastructure
Kurt Donaldson Craig Neidig
WV Spatial Data InfrastructureWV Core Layers:
Orthoimagery
Hydrography
Transportation
Elevation
Boundaries(Governmental Units)
Land Ownership (Cadastral)
Structures
Geographic Names
Geodetic Control
Build Once, Use Many Times
Why build “Framework” base layers?
• Commonly used base spatial data – almost always need it to make a map
• High resolution spatial and temporal accuracies• Spatial databases complete in geometry and attribution• Standards-based, well-documented • Enhanced functionality (i.e., NHD stream flow, linear referencing)
• Seamless across political or other collection area boundaries• Reduces costly data duplication efforts• Facilitates data exchange (i.e., NHD to TIGER/Line)• Certified, consistent base layers for The National Map
Trends for Statewide Core Data SetsGeospatial Trends for Statewide Core Data Sets
1:24,000 Scale1990’s-present
1:100,000 Scale
1980’S
1:4800 ScaleFuture
Orthoimagery
• Present– 1996-1999 USGS Color-Infrared Digital Orthophoto Quads
• 1:12,000 scale (1” = 1000 ft.)
• 1 meter GSD
• 1822 USGS 3.75-Minute quarter quads
• Valued at 2 million
• Future– 2003 Statewide Addressing and Mapping Board (SAMB) Natural Color
Orthophotos• 1:4800 scale (1” = 400 ft.)
• 2 foot GSD
• 8,000 image files – 10,000’ x 10,000’ Tiles
• 4.72 million; USDA cost share $375,000
• Challenges– Large file size and quantity of SAMB imagery
– Update cycles for new imagery
Orthoimagery
CIR AERIAL PHOTOS
Scale: 1:12,000 1” = 1,000 ft.
Date: 1996-97
AERIAL PHOTOS
Scale: 1:4800 1” = 400 ft.
Date: Spring 2003
Present Future
Hydrography
• Present– 1:24,000-scale National Hydrography Dataset (NHD)
– 1:24,000-scale sub watershed boundaries (6th level, 12-digit HUCs)
• Future– Convert SAMB hydography to 1:4800-scale NHD
– SAMB data: minimum attribution
• Challenges– Funding, needs analysis, cost-effectiveness of conversion
Hydrography (1:24,000)
6th Level (12 Digit) Subwatersheds
Transportation• Present
– 1:24,000-scale Topographic Map-Based vectors (minimal attribution)
– 1:62,500-scale WV DOT (cartographic generalizations)
– 1:100,00-scale Census TIGER files (poor spatial resolution)
• Future– 1:4800-scale SAMB addressable road centerlines
– Census MAF/TIGER Modernization • Re-alignment of Census TIGER data to SAMB road centerlines
• SAMB data meets minimum requirement of 7.6 meters accuracy
• Challenges– Long-term maintenance of statewide, addressable road centerline data set
– Integration with SAMB long-term maintenance program
– Integrating statewide road centerline data set with locally produced edge of pavement (double line) roads
Transportation (1:24,000)
State DOT GIS Implementation
2004 AASHTO GIS-T Symposium
Elevation
• Present– 1:24,000-scale Digital Line Graphy (vector) Hypsography (77%) – 30-meter DEMs (100%)– 10-meter DEMs (36%)
• Future– High-Resolution Elevation Products (5 meter or better DEM grids)
• WVSAMB “enhanced” digital terrain model – WV DOT $850,000 cost share for Microstation files– USGS Pilot to convert SAMB to gridded raster
• IFSAR digital terrain model• LIDAR
• Challenges– Vertical accuracies not guaranteed in dense vegetation – Best product for the National Elevation Dataset (NED)
Elevation (1:24,000)
IFSAR (2003)
ElevationDATASET NAME OWNER(S) Horiz.
AccuracyVertical RMSE and
Contour IntervalMAPPING SYSTEM
UNIT
% WV
DATE
National Elevation Dataset (Level 1 & 2 DEMs)
USGS 30 meter
10 to 50 ft. RMSE20 or 40 ft. C.I.
Seamless Nation-wide
100 2000
Digital Line Graph (DLG) Contours and Spot Elevations
USGS 1:24,000-scale
10 to 20 ft. RMSE20 or 40 ft. C.I.
7.5 Min. Quad
77 1950-1997
10-meter DEMs (USGS)
USGS 10 m 10 to 20 ft. RMSE 7.5 Min. Quad
36 Varies
Enhanced DTM(mass points & break lines)
WVSAMB 5 ft. RMSE10 ft. C.I.
10,000 ft. x 10,000 ft.
tiles
100 2003
IFSAR DTM(5 meter postings)
Intermap 2.0 m 3 ft. (1st Surface) 10 ft. C.I.
40,000 square km
40 2003
LIDAR FEMA 0.5 m 0.5 ft. RMSE < 2 ft. C.I.
Study Area 2 Varies
1.25 m
Boundaries (Governmental Units)
• Present– Various types of political and administrative boundaries compiled at
various scales: County and Municipal Boundaries; Census Geographic Entity Boundaries; Public Land Boundaries; Tax District Boundaries; Emergency Service Zone Boundaries; Legislative Boundaries
• Future– Improved Coordination:
• WV Association of Land Surveyors for GIS-compatible surveys
• WV Legislative Redistricting Office for District Boundaries
• Census Submission of Digital Annexation & Boundary Surveys
– Improve Boundaries with SAMB data
• Challenges– Certified, consistent boundaries the same for all levels of government
– Shared geographic boundaries properly aligned (i.e., WMAs with NF)
Boundaries (1:24,000-scale)
Boundary Comparison (24k versus 500k)
Land Ownership (Cadastral)
• Present– 42 of 55 counties (76 %) are using, or transitioning to, GIS-based tax
mapping programs
• Future– Link SAMB addressable mapping files (i.e., structures) with cadastral
• Challenges– Local assessors establishing GIS-based mapping programs
– Linking geographic files to State’s Integrated Assessment System (IAS)
– Capitalize on Mineral Parcel Mapping Project
– Statewide repository of tax parcel files
WV Digital Tax Mapping Status
Mineral Parcel Mapping Project - WVDTR
Mineral Parcel Mapping Project• Can be a starting point for digital tax map conversions• Not all surface parcel related features collected• Not continually updated
Local Tax Map
WV DTR Collection
State Mapping Project
Geographic Names
• Present– Geographic Names Information System (GNIS)
– Updates by West Virginia through web data entry and edit forms
• Future (maintenance activities)– Target GNIS feature classes with high error rate for batch processing
• Wildlife Management Areas (WV DNR)
• Schools (WV Army National Guard)
– Update GNIS manmade features with SAMB addressable mapping layers• Schools, Churches, Hospitals, Bridge, Building, Airport)
– Incorporate subtypes (Schools – public, private, college, vocational)
• Challenges– Reconciling previous with more current name databases
Structures
• Present– Limited
• Future – SAMB addressable structures (approximately 800,000)
• building centroids
• footprint polygons of major structures (> 7500 square feet)
• Challenges– Maintenance of statewide structure database
– Integration of structure spatial database with other data models
SAMB Structures – Centroids and Footprints
Geodetic Control (Transparent Layer)
• Present – WV High Accuracy Reference Network (HARN) established in 2000
– New ground control established through SAMB
• Future – Additional CORS survey grade base stations
– Densify Federal Base Network
• Challenges– Establishing protocols for exchanging geographic information between
surveyors and GIS professionals
The National Map
21st Century Topographic MapA seamless, continuously maintained, and consistent set of online, public domain, core geographic data
• Cartographic Product– High quality, visually appealing printed product
• State Portal to National National – WVmap State Portal– Public access to data via USGS, state, or other portals– WVmap portal customized to West Virginia’s needs – Seamless download– Projection and GIS format translators– Search and map display functions
• Search by place name, address, coordinate)• Print-on-demand maps
• Challenges– Establishing protocols for exchanging geographic information between surveyors and GIS professionals
Printed Cartographic Product
Morgantown South, WV pilot map
National Map Viewer
State Map Viewer
Wvmap – Customized to WV’s Needs
Customized Javascript function for ArcIMS
Viewer Partnerships• FEDERAL
– National Elevation Dataset (USGS)
– National Hydrography Dataset (USGS)
– Geographic Names (USGS)
– Flood Hazard Areas (FEMA)
– SAMB Orthophotos (USDA)
– National Forest Lands (USFS)
– National Park Lands (NPS)
• STATE– State Forests / Wildlife Management Areas (WV DNR)
– Critical Infrastructure (WV OES)
– Water Intakes ( WV BPH)
– Mining Data (WV DEP)
– Geology (WV GES)
– Coal Impoundments (WV CS, CET)
– Land Cover (WVU NRAC)
• PRIVATE SECTOR– New Roads (Baker Engineering)
AGENCY ROLL CALL• Present and future mapping activities
• Final Report – August 1st
• 62 agencies submitted