3

WUT: Quality Assessment Fraud #2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

2/5 Quality Assessment documents published by the Thai government at http://www.cheqa.mua.go.th that allegedly contain assessment scores based on fraudulent research and faculty data. Members of the WUT Academic Committee allege that Rector Ratish Thakur and Academic Director Nisha Ray-Chaudhuri have purposefully submitted fraudulent research to the Thai Ministry of Education multiple years in a row in order to maintain their university-level QA ratings, despite refusing to fund actual research at WUT, while at the same time "borrowing" millions of Thai baht from student tuition fees for their own personal travel, living, and education expenses.

Citation preview

Page 1: WUT: Quality Assessment Fraud #2

ÖóäóÈØö¬ Ü.2 ÝæÂóäÜäñÿâõÚÖóâîÈÅ°ÜäñÂîÛÅùÔáóß

îÈÅ°ÜäñÂîÛØö¬ 9

îÈÅ°ÜäñÂîÛØö¬ 4

îÈÅ°ÜäñÂîÛØö¬ 6

îÈÅ°ÜäñÂîÛØö¬ 8îÈÅ°ÜäñÂîÛØö¬ 7

îÈÅ°ÜäñÂîÛØö¬ 1

îÈÅ°ÜäñÂîÛØö¬ 5

îÈÅ°ÜäñÂîÛØö¬ 3îÈÅ°ÜäñÂîÛØö¬ 2

ÿÊæö¬ãäèâØùÂÖòèÛ¬ÈËö­ÃîÈØùÂîÈÅ°ÜäñÂîÛÝæÂóäÜäñÿâõÚ

îÈÅ°ÜäñÂîÛÅùÔáóß

Page 2: WUT: Quality Assessment Fraud #2

ÖóäóÈØö¬ Ü.2 ÝæÂóäÜäñÿâõÚÖóâîÈÅ°ÜäñÂîÛÅùÔáóß

- 3.00 - 3.00 ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛßîĂË­

1.50 5.00 3.61 3.72 ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛÕö

- 5.00 5.00 5.00 ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛÕöâóÂ

- 5.00 - 5.00 ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛÕöâóÂ- 4.75 4.42 4.68 ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛÕöâóÂ

- 5.00 - 5.00 ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛÕöâóÂ

- 5.00 5.00 5.00 ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛÕöâóÂ

- 5.00 - 5.00 ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛÕöâóÂ3.89 4.75 4.25 4.33 ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛÕö

3.29 4.78 4.35 4.45 ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛÕö

ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛßîĂË­

ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛÕöâóÂ

ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛÕö

ÅñĀÚÚÂóäÜäñÿâõÚÿÊæö¬ã ÝæÂóäÜäñÿâõÚI P O äèâ 0.00<=1.50ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚÖ­îÈÜäòÛÜäùÈ

ÿä¬ÈÕ¬èÚ1.51·2.50 ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚÖ­îÈÜäòÛÜäùÈ2.51·3.50 ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛßîĂË­3.51-4.50 ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛÕö4.51-5.00 ÂóäÕôÿÚõÚÈóÚäñÕòÛÕöâóÂ

collegetimes
Sticky Note
Quality standards evaluation for WUT
Page 3: WUT: Quality Assessment Fraud #2

ÖóäóÈØö¬ Ü.2 ÝæÂóäÜäñÿâõÚÖóâîÈÅ°ÜäñÂîÛÅùÔáóßìâóãÿìÖù