17
Drilling a geothermal well into a deep sedimentary geothermal reservoir – case study on the Groß Schoenebeck wells Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

  • Upload
    ziarre

  • View
    54

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Drilling a geothermal well into a deep sedimentary geothermal reservoir – case study on the Groß Schoenebeck wells. Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck. Geothermal Technology Development. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Drilling a geothermal well into a deep sedimentary geothermal reservoir –

case study on the Groß Schoenebeck wells

Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Page 2: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Geothermal Technology Development

The Rotliegend of the North German Basin has been investigated for the generation of geothermal electricity from low-enthalpy reservoirs in the in situ laboratory Groß Schoenebeck

Page 3: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Successfull Stimulation of Well Groß Schoenebeck 3

The results of• Reopening of the

abandoned gas exploration well

• Production tests• Comprehensive

stimulation experiments

justified the drilling of a

second well.

Enhancing the flow conditions within the reservoir is the key issue for the geothermal utilization of the low permeable Rotliegend formation.

Primary testJan. 2001passive

sandstonefracFeb. 2002gel and proppant100m3

40 l/s

waterfracFeb. 2003water4000 m3

25 l/s

waterfracNov./Dez. 2003water10000 m3

40 l/s (80 l/s)

fracfluidvolumemax. rate

pro

du

cti

vit

y in

dex [

m/h

MP

a ]

315

10

5

Page 4: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Continued development of the in situ laboratory

Drilling the second well

Stimulation and test of the new well

Completion of the first well GrSk 3/90 as an injector

Testing the communication of the doublet

Demonstration of power generation

Page 5: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Borehole Design

The well design based on

• Deep dynamic water table

• The option for an additional protective casing string in the top hole region

• The required minimum distance between the two wells in the target horizon

• A drilling mud concept with a minimum damage potential

• The increase of the flow potential by the inclined well as well as by (possibly) multiple fracs

• The knowlegde about the geological conditions from the analysis of adjacent boreholes

Page 6: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Borehole Design of the Research Well GrSk 4

Page 7: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Drilling Rig

VDD 370.2 (Streicher AG)

Drilling contractor: Drilltec GUT GmbH, Deggendorf

Lifting capacity 370 t

Top drive up to 160 rpm

Super single joints (13,5 m)

Diesel-electro-hydraulically driven

5 mud pumps (max. 4000 l/min)

Automatic pipe handling system with storage on ground

Very low noise emission

Page 8: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Drilling Rig

Particularities:

Rigid guidance of the top drive requires a straight vertical starting hole (conductor pipe)

Difficult handling of large diameters (18 5/8“ casing) and of joints with more than 13,5 m.

Trip velocity is limited by the pipe handling system and requires a high level of the driller´s experience for high trip velocities (330 m/h have been reached)

Page 9: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Drilling Performance

Planned performance based on the results of the first well could not be reached – the significantly larger diameter affects ROP much more than expected.

Insufficient pumping capacity in the top hole region as well as improper bit selection reduced ROP in the mesozoic section (16“).

16“ PDC-bit after drilling of 7m unexpectedly abrasive sandstone

Page 10: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Drilling problems

Total fluid loss occurred during cementation of the combined casing 16“ x 13 3/8“ despite of a slurry density of 1450 kg/m³

To prevent casing damage due to thermally induced stress in the future of the production well, the annulus had to be cemented to the the surface. For this purpose, a squeeze cementation down from the well-head was designed and successfully performed.

Page 11: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Drilling problems

9 5/8“ liner collapsed during drilling into the target formation after reduction of the mud density from 2000 kg/m³ to 1060 kg/m³ (Heavy Deformation between 3880…3200 m)

Causes not yet clear:

•Design – according to the rules with an overburden pressure gradient of 2,3

•Casing material – certified quality

•Anisotropic stress due to well inclination of about 20° in connection with anhydrite content of the salt?

Ovality 8 mm

Page 12: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Remedy for the collapse

Replacement of the collapsed 9 5/8“ liner by a 7“x7 5/8“ liner

after sidetracking

Repeated attempts (4 times) to set the mechanical anchor of the whipstock required the modification of the anchor for a reliable operation in mud with 40% baryte content

Page 13: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Remedy for the collaps

The loss of one casing dimension required the adjustment of the borehole design – drilling of the Rotliegend section with 5 7/8“ and running and cementing of a combined 5“ liner with an uncemented section of preperforated pipes at the bottom.

Page 14: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Drilling problems

HC - gas with H2S - content was encountered just below the 7 5/8“ casing shoe within the fissured Zechsteinkalk with a pressure gradient exceeding 1,2. The appropriate safety measures had to be taken first.

Thus the concept for drilling into the reservoir with minimum damage potential had to be adjusted:

•The target of nearly balanced drilling with a reduced solid content could not be met

•With a formation pressure gradient of 1,06 in the Rotliegend there was a permanent threat of differential sticking with a mud density of 1200…1160 kg/m³ while drilling and running the 5“ liner

•Despite intensive treatment of the marble flour based mud (OptiBrigdeTM) we could not avoid small fluid losses while drilling the coarse sandstones of the Rotliegend formation.

Page 15: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Lessons learned

1st. Well:o Reopening of an abandoned well turned out to be a

cost saving optiono Due to formation damage this option could be used for

creating an injection well onlyo Various enhancing treatments were performed

resulting in a significant increase of injectivity

2nd. Well:o Reliable planning requires the input of all available

neighbouring wells with respect to- Drilling experience- Geological and reservoir information

Page 16: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Lessons learned

o Discussion about the necessity of large diameters seems to be necessary again taking into account all related problems during the lifetime of the well

o Directional drilling proved to be a standardo The unexpected casing collapse within the salt

formation requires further investigation for a better understanding – with the remedial liner we considered a safety factor against collapse of 1.8.

o The mud controlled the bore hole even under complicated conditions

- No sign of unstable borehole conditions occurred during the 20 days lasting rig repair without circulation

- The high mud density in the Zechstein-formation protected a stable borehole

- The drilling fluid succesfully formed the filter cake in the Rotliegend sandstones despite of the required overbalancing of the mud

Page 17: Wulf Brandt, Ali Saadat, Lothar Wohlgemuth, Ernst Huenges, Heinz-Gerd Holl, Inga Moeck

Lessons learned

o The problems arising from the gas indications could be solved successfully taking into consideration gas inflow prevention vs. danger of differential sticking

o Drilling such challenging geothermal wells requires the union of sufficient experience, the appropriate idea to remedy unexpected situations as well as sufficient financial resources.