Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
e*G '4Dt
. 1 T ot
- 4* SODI- W-1A Wuto ~ ~ ~ & V%47i w*vwse *0 t - im -t
aflteo al a 06~ am"A# of't' aON U,4f O
tawo 40m ARM MM0 *40ArOW V4W*WWi
00V qAMSA *4 beW 04 A* t "a %*AV*M3 Is A fl afnt beml 4
ý'rt 460""m flp *A%*Sqm USI Ofto e " .40404646 if
.9lfolPo 40 444010% ow l .9eefw~ lePOAW t004 0wa
aaeeneo AO aPqp bed's. MiS -U 1# *1 SOW '00*dtv Ti00O 04 0do
.40AsW to * 4. *9 A a* *565 U -I 0Z .. i400fWAk
fl*.P eAn*"swt3. Us. " r~ PWb riW .O - isftft 4ase ft
-f tooI *MMw.W eee#qo
* 04"Slm 09t1MNVO"~P* Sol 10 0. am. voe *wbe O%Now *
"tt 44a, *0 W*
UPOT WVS^*WTATIS PA4L
2~ýw -*Mae-* ewmf mo WcO'.*w 'set as e as. 4 3;..,#w"~ * vow I" * a - o"o akimst~ f
oft~~~~9 "" - gf:;4SIkAW 41 aum! mow U TA
Af~**Al~t VON Qin6
£ -
low~~~ ftoam" 0
aaeeauWO aK
*ipll a *I~pf -1 *am * V nl CRw io tKJSul Am vOs ~ ow wu, W
4004oofls0 *Sa0vqAtPW cphwioe ef fls0 om~"a * oe 900s .rm *mo swn~ 1~S' seeW~- ftl No'" Wiwert oPm *mowb* rnwin# ow0 fl
CMWoto Oe* *"moo. ,e0 *" *60W 4wR isWR fwlwowe~* *% wen lovb .me 00%0 op4e U1*o m ue m
- S W0 flUMlFw4f nOi
*Of. en *nm. cW *s.aa ~flmmgw* *atie .wowsmbANwOMS' nnailf 10t ae cn Stana -
O4U100%f~ oes e awwv#q* ciwse oseso 4Wm imp" a ouwr
z 0 fAflEM*1ESA Ot$OAdW~ft
44 .XWM2WV 0I Yb AfEMjAYOR2)tAnmPWP'rAd. i.AVXi
C AftmCtAOW 'L0WO
rts . tj -- lw o
V-4-
00
A'-"--I
FIGURAES
I Thooewo ooiflIV a~bio 3
3. ScvmmaC Of OIMe'.WW Wp"
4- SumaC Oft ofm' w~f Of
Ray A" Mgpv of lm eewiw oleo Saw -%W memt W PUT 10
0- it IW 12a
o eUm *ORO go% rel 7wWlw los1in ow aW~s w oIoa
1.0 INTROOUCTION
Conven~onal poknzm 45NWWW hae" been used sinc last te f 1920s. The__einmanwtc of fte two-mape pommetauMMenumor, where one polahim is fixed and the
othe one is roowed. is bvown as MW*is eW:
f(S) /Tr(o) - (coes)3
wet r(S) is Owe trawwIPR riwance of the tw ob ws and g is tMe ange enciosed bydoe pvvtc%* - w,ajnanc axs". Thi eme was unVelks df te source Was Panledypoftozed orth VO enselvy of the dWACOS wanied vM the angle of poleitabo(PAO. I). DOoW"o sviomed the ttW96-stuip OWM ftJ whN Overcame theofca in "h two-sow aownuo (Pet, 2). In Oowafs tstOd fth Git and lastPolenzers were stabonary SOM ttr opc Uses andm W VI 'Id~ PoAnzer was0oad The mree-usta poemnze anwwvio Vamwunt an 00enuty govened byaco** fOeiaOflbtv.
rs) / rto) - (coos) 1
To Owsn accuruw, Prrmee'Now"IM1. vwi OXIsnen sma of the Polw~tr OMd ebwev'gnceol 0"e idwf pownmae mum to kown wd aoio d Wo when the
aftraw s cuibv"e4 In vl o UWe swo ka fftVIODMIWPol.& am nu&s60#&Wig UI&" Ocagft ere **IV 6 10 000 1 towWufl q i*w- -Mv s (efW 1).
Sovweg MOWvs "Mpe of PVtflfI hFv bW usedin 00t~ e*#aP MtWMMSennatUee ~ v.~~smG colic gwas minmMPfswdoe lwned Ph"IWOfWvl Ivw1I to b~ea OWM 0 1 POIC (P4 3) helenz eandEcemevt cueeeed 9VyIW'ac OW'r OA*10 mVVeR&s in 9iee @1POWtM9. 90"nan4 agmeww $"a end .n 11 coos m e or" d ~am zo" n Theycia rcludO Via the W~ aofrc W1 ONAM ft" GOUW n4 d b o 100001
IT ~ ro -WM m lwpo becojee @1 ife IM*lnwf bmiwmpenw of the irudl
Ppe, svýa 0rew theyO e.la"pe vooqv a ted " a stelawW~weam rtw~ atNN wto vm 0 aceetv c vt tsvlfie COPW "NODOPOV: 4 1 Orview
Po~wv tr# 0v4em ~~ se" #Ngs W4 Owis brev s m W!en Ofd vciatoo
***ncMCvt f~l of rod Ufrks an*4 (Pat 1) vetww ts O A did fo4i gea ie Oftep-TwO ?tu~iP~la VWas Ole~d wo b"! by NO* VWl' I m~ of &C
and was a high schhleren quality calcite, because the intensity variation was notsymmetric in the four quadrants. He suggested that a prism-type polarizer withadequate performance would have the advantage of a wider, more useful spectralrange than was possible with sheet polarizers (Ref. 3).
The current work was based on the same concept and used specially selected highquality optical Glan-Thompson prisms, extremely precise automated stages, and acombination of optical density fitters with a lock-in amplifier, to obtain accuratemeasurements and to deterrymne the leasibility of using a three-stage polarizerattenuator with laser beams in and near the visible range. This device should beeffective for indep calbrkang expermental signals and transmittance ofneutral density filters over a wavelength range from 350 to 2500 nm and over anoptical density range of nine orders of magnitude.
2
2.0 EXPERIMENTAL ARRANGEMENT
2.1 ATTENUATOR DESIGN
The three-stage attenuator was comprised of specially selected high quality opticalGlan-Thompson prisms manufactured by Karl Lambrecht Corporation (MGT25EIO-90),Chicago, Illinois. The calcite prisms are glued at the interface. The optical glue limitedthe capability of the attenuator at the ultraviolet end of the spectral range, but it alsoprovided better maximum attenuation. The prisms were selected so that one crossedpair would have an attenuation equal to or greater than 106:1. The prisms had a wave-length range of approximately 350 to 2500 nm and a tolerance on maximum beamdeviation of approximately 6 arc sec.
The prisms were each mounted in precision stages. Two of the stages, manufacturedby Klinger Scientific, Garden City, New York, were electronically driven. The first stagewas required to accurately return to the O-deg position and to have a repeatable 90-degrotation. These criteria were easily met with one of the Kiinger stages. The require-merits for the second stage (middle polarizer) were the most stringent since this stagewas the only one which would rotate after the attenuator was aligned. This stage wasresponsible for determining the angle "B" with great accuracy. Consequently, thesecond stage consisted of a Klinger Scientific, Garden City, New York, stage and anencoder. The encoder on the middle stage was accurate to approximately 1 arc sec.The third stage was a manual stage which incorp both fine and coarse adjust-meits. Figures la, lb. and 1c show the assembled three-stage polarizer attenuatortaken from the top (Fig. Ia), from the front (Fig. lb), and from the side (Fig. Ic).
(a). Top view.
Figure 1. Three-stage polarizer attenuator.
3
(b). Side view.
I
(c). Front view.
Figure 1. Concluded.
4
2.2 ALIGNMENT OF THE ATTENUATOR
The alignment for the stages was accomplished mechanically by using an optical postwhich was the same diameter as the prisms. The post was inserted through themounts (where the prisms would be mounted) and then the mounts were adjusted andtightened down. The post was removed.
Each prism was then individually mounted in each stage position and tested. A targetwas placed 6 to 8 ft away from the attenuator and then the stage was rotated through360 deg to ensure that the laser spot remained in the same location on the target. Allthree prisms performed properly.
An alignment procedure was developed which ensured the first and third polarizershad their optic axes in parallel positions and the second polarizer reached a minimumtransmittance when it was crossed with the other two polarizers. The proceduresused are described below and depicted in Figure 2. (Note: Prism 1 is mountedclosest to the laser source, prism 2 is mounted in the center of the attenuator, andprism 3 is mounted closest to the detector.)
Step 1. Set all of the mounts to their 0-deg position and insert all the prisms inthe same approximate orientation.
Step 2. Set prism 3 near the 90-deg or null position.
Step 3. Set prism 2 so that prisms 1 and 2 are exactly 90 deg off (crosspolarized). This location should provide an exact null and prism 2 will be inapproximately the 90-deg position.
Step 4. Set prism 1 in the same position as prism 2.
Step 5. Return prism 3 to the 0-deg position and adjust it until an exact null isreached (prisms 2 and 3 are crossed polarizers). Lock prism 3 in place.
Step 6. Return prism 1 to its exact original position. At this point, prisms 1and 2 should be exactly 90 deg offset and prisms 2 and 3 should also be exactly 90deg offset.
Step 7. Return prism 2 to its 0-deg position. The attenuator should now beset for maximum transmission.
5
STEP1
2SEP 2
STEP 4-
SEP 5
STEP 6
SEP 7
21
Figure 2. Attenuation alignment procedures.
6
2.3 EXPERIMENTAL LAYOUT
The three-stage attenuator was then $ aW .,pwhEDet OR .range and accuracy. The expenmnwaw sc• ia *, Vh ,
The laser was a 5-mW helium-neon VOW , 43) *#expander. A quarter-wave pla was poaro oe SawA .0* ., ... **attenuator. Consequently, a u uO . , .aebeaI .ft,,W,-~source was normally incident upow te Af* aasw A .* , e -properly position the light for the Oslwo
A chopper with reflective blades we v AWo W ast tw 4• w t . w'integrating sphere which was cigoup, o a• aae, ..... -a*-input laser signal and was read on the w*p **#wow
The laser light then entered a uAtiky b -•s tt =1 - 4# .in its walls for both the incident &avd 'sebfua am. o* 1-,caused the laser light to scatte.,' an caro. ns• .-. -. in.. ......reflector (Labsphere, Inc.. North Su N-a , vitwn * V" 3W..4
center of the box. The laser beam oewn 0 t*.* .4, o% ,,..the sample's normal. A portion o0 nohawa,#," tanit w ,.w *. .the pnotometer. For alignment purpoe, * 1s,#4 ins vow .beam could exit when no samp4 vm se r _ #t•, , •,i.inner wall, were inserted throu~gh •i•e rail *o* o "s w .beam entered and exited the box A rrr e, am m e. i. sv.i,.,laser beam was adjusted until a s*i % to te. .0.t.m, en . ..the tubes. Figure 4 illustrates the Iboc o wk4 .. ,t swv
The photometer, filter wheel assent. ari #P.anwnmOi -, -'rseveral capabilities: (1) the a&bl•y o •in• cra•i. to. *" wk, othe ability to focus the beam. (3) the• e 1 • * - '. -f v... Veliminate most sources of stray ig. avd •i. S"o 4' o .*,neutral density filters in the opcav trm % rsi " o#g * vw.axis. Figure 5 provides a ray iagrra .me, owt ' 'Whousing (Products for Research. ft, %Camp%, ova ",-radiofrequency shielding. a dau•c s w•wi e * n
reduction of dark current.
The PMT was connected to a El'.to * retifuWo"t ,was used to obtain data over a s•ri ov•vV • •, ..n 4,orders of magnitude were otwaned br 9elr, a " n - a. •.*with a National Institute of Scienc arid *'rrhww 'e* a - .density filter. Consequently. e te tri 'r* -f ..limitation and within the linear rn" ' 0 o,
I I I I I I I~ I - Iu
44
4
I,C
- Laii
It
I Ik
uJ. 9S
-;uI I.,"
q *
I
ha| •
S..
t P
'l~t
!
S.¢.,S
! "
I
I• ,,' :\a,
tt
'"I 1 e1, 1 a
atom.
&~~~ a0 at000 *$*nr'*s *tWt L &&
Saim# ,1M f 4O OM4 AOA 00$ON%8
w 'AM.. S."an.s *abs* kab esi a44 - 'AN*ae . @w. . a40 mae e's.m o*vt . 40S "
0* e~aa~ s m. ~a I* *Uweea
qp ~aU a** me 44" solo Noa #M
.me emas a 0 nnUs o000 a0w rA w.ta *
a.~~40 #dew" a0% a ' n.Caweaenp 4400 *mo a . a U elm* 4
0*0 ah ago .f~ U'*001 o4W~ 1'lft * a. Us1 ow oww*sf
rQWP,1 * ,f -t .aaa m a .U~MM a. ft 0s .m. -r Vm a a * *e
mVW a AN .0 ift" int a dW4 ''0 aN NO!a.'0%4~ ows 00q* Of SPo fme foo f 6i #so
$ .law 111
.1
iJ oft N *no&
,a'
ILI
ng IF!
.' 1. t
~' ,A -,
-Am-
O dI
'3*ju ;L P• • •Onmu 0n~niuD••• p •an•
It-007 r' r T r VTr v 'r r r r T I I I TT
1.-es
1,-010
010 WN 0*IM Aro rAW9041
9 Oft w 1 O -nwwww VWA o p~n ftan qI
le-008
1e-009 .:
1,-olo
2 )-012
1*-O)3
le-014
10-016 Legend Cw w
1#-01 7
I,-018~ ~ o 0% 0 - N 4E t
at at CFO~ ~ 0 0 0 0o%o o 40 to Pso f % P% rl r-
Pr-smv Roltaton ANqIe. Degrees
(b) Ano new 270 dog.
Figm .9 Carckaded.
16
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.7
~1.6
c 1.4
V 1.3 ,,,0
0 1.2
1.1
1.0 v A ,- -
0.9
0.8 t I I0 90 180 270 360
Prism Rototion Angle, Degrees
Figum 10. RatIo of the experimental tmiasmnttance to the theoretical transmittanceversu the prism rotation angle.
17
3.2 EXPERIMENTAL ERROR
3.2.1 Measurement Error
There were several sources of measurement and random error present throughout theexperiment. These errors include nonlinearity in the phase lock amplifier, noise fromthe photomultiplier, stray light in the optical train, variation in the lock-in amplifierreading, and drift in laser power. No attempt was made to control the laser power.
3.2.2 Systematic Error
Data collected around the 0-, 90-, 180-, and 270-deg angles indicated significantsystematic errors. The major errors include drift in the laser signal from the beginningto the end of the data run and slight alignment errors in the prisms. The drift wasnoticed in the signal from the beginning to the end of the data runs. In addition, theequipment was left for several 30-min intervals without altering the equipment settingand experimental data did change slightly with time. Alignment errors are noticed inthe lack of perfect symmetry in data around the 0- and 360-deg points. In addition,there was a small double hump pattern around the 90- and 270-deg points. Additionalsystematic errors would include the temperature change in the room affecting the laserdetector or the electronics and small inaccuracies in the mechanized center stage.
18
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
The three-stage polarizer attenuator, with the advanced Glan-Thompson opticalprisms, the extremely precise automated stages, and an experimental setup whichallowed accurate measurements of high extinction ratios, was capable of providingattenuation of a laser beam for nine orders of magnitude with uncertainties of 1 to 2percent. This attenuator was useful in providing practical accuracies of a few percentover a wide dynamic range with a simple technique. The data were symmetricthroughout all four quadrants. The attenuator can be used to calibrate neutral densityfilters over a wavelength range from 350 to 2500 nm and over an optical density rangeof nine orders of magnitude. These results were obtained with laser sources only, andno corrections were made for drift in the laser power or signal processing.
19
REFERENCES
1. Mielenz, K. D. and Echerle, K. L., "Accuracy of Polarization Attenuators," A•DliedOptics, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 594-603, March 1972.
2. Dowell, J. H., J Sci Instrum, Vol. 8, p. 382, 1931.
3. Bennett, H.E., "Accurate Method for Determining Photometric Linearity," AUKiliedOptics. Vol. 5, No. 8, August 1966.
20
RAW OATA CO.S tt
I " I I • • i - , , . . . .
~1L VIAAd' .46 j4w
ts t 4W
IM
VV
4b 4* 4 *40AN a -d*
402*-4b
am
40 V low I O
# 9
-w in lo I w 0 wO
or Ir Pol o'
xv 0*404db*
0-4 o s4-a46 a*.
IN *.44 0 41k
0*4!16~a~d Aoooo
#*too
* *4.4 '~~~**o a-la~ .
* '0. -4 * w4op
4W 4$ 4&A.a0 O
sa aI
-V 1% 4 4 .d
46l 4tnd, a
Ala-* 40 & b0 d
ww
AW do
4w 4
40.4 t0. Am-
ft~~~~~~ a s% . - t ~ aa s4 4 -
0 do4 0A
VV V V . . .- . . . .. .... . .
t t
S• • al ol*•
.* t *zI & AlbA
* .. s a1•,, .. a l pm .
S. 1! - .. -.SI 115
3~...
*0 A* 40. 3
I low 1
*Aft
Vt P' 44
5*
*J
IV 1 0mA SN
AD-s I am $Jaw
tamt ----- -- owl t 4-
A t "*1 Somo
MI O
I... . ... •' vI 1,, 144--
*I
081~iI'•e I rs ea4ts
ow.
* '913,
rr
ri
m o•$ v
f too., . - - - a so _ ___
-4-- Is l bu
to4 w
am ca
FPLTVA LOCK-& F&TER S LOCK-Hw~EE (Ei C) WADING
?fl15 000 t O v 3 3040 2.78t_______0.006 V
74-00 1-41,m S 361.00 2.761_____ ________ ____0.006 V
3 Z7400 4" 2 066 3 MAO 2.75tov 0.006 V
3 moo00 4 1~0-5 V 3 36300 2.73±
3 3000 2 0t @00 3 364,00 1,711av 0405 V
3 000 UO:@s 06 ov 3 366-0 2.701
3~ 300001) 3 000 276±CISmv a00 mv
3 3)4000 04an 0000 3 too 276±v ~0 00y
3 we000 *IN I Ca 3 too 273±v a 00 v
MOO00 J15 3 100 271±* v Gm~v
334000 3),20 OM 3 .100 2771
0_ _ _ * an v
inn00 15u6Vw 3 2300 276±0 00 v
3 M60 17S v 3 Goo aft t
0 005v
Als a61 174 #@ M v0 om
mo0 Mt
1 4*7. *70± * S0 56*
FILTER 8 LOCK-IN FLTER B LOCK-INWHEEL (') READING WHEEL () READING
POIMCN POSmON
so-so 422 t 0.05 PV 1 90500 0.591± :0.0005 mV
1 10.0o 20310.06 pv
1 915 28.0±0.05uv
_ 0906 27.A 0.O5 pV
1 00.97 27.6 ±0.05 pIV
1 0008 27.7:10.06 pV
I 0l0 28.1 ±__________ ~~~0.05 PaV _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _90000 203 t 0.05 PV
1 19001 2.0o 0.06 _v
00.02 27.A0.05 PV
1 0.03 27A 0.06 _v
S90004 27 .7 ±O.OS 0v
¶ 90.06 27±0.05±O V _v
S0o010 2.7 t 0.0 YpV
1 90200 42.S ± 0.06 5
90.300 gas ±0.06 oV
1 90400 250) t O,_ _v
30
APPENDIX B
REDUCED DATA
31
8 TRANSMITTANCE EXPERIMENTAL NORMALIZEDCOS, 8 VALUE EXPERIMENTAL
VALUE
-5.00 0.98 2.62E00 ± 0.01 0.95E00
-4.00 0.99 2.61 EOO ± 0.01 0.94E00
-3.00 0.99 2.69E00 ± 0.09 0.97E00
-2.00 1.00 2.70E00 ± 0.09 0.97E00
-1.00 1.00 2.70E00 ± 0.08 0.97E00
0.00 1.00 2.70E00 ± 0.11 0.97E00
1.00 1.00 2.69E00 ± 0.07 0.97E00
2.00 1.00 2.68E00 ± 0.06 0.96E00
3.00 0.99 2.67E00 ± 0.04 0.96E00
4.00 0.99 2.63E00 ± 0.01 0.95E00
5.00 0.98 2.67E00 ± 0.01 0.96E00
10.00 0.94 2.51 EOO ± 0.07 0.90E00
20.00 0.78 2.08E00 ± 0.02 0.75E00
30.00 0.56 1.51 E00 ± 0.05 0.54E00
40.00 0.34 0.92E00 ± 0.02 0.33E00
50.00 0.17 0.47E00 ± 0.02 0.17E00
60.00 0.06 1.72E-01 ± 0.05E-01 0.62E-01
70.00 0.01 3.77E-02 ± 0.08E-02 1.36E-02
80.00 9.09E-04 2.48E-03 ± 0.07E-03 8.93E-04
85.00 5.77E-05 1.57E-04 ± 0.06E-04 5.65E-05
86.00 2.37E-05 6.44E-05 ± 0.2E-05 2.32E-05
86.50 1.39E-05 3.75E-05 ± 0.04E-05 1.35E-05
87.00 7.5E-06 2.02E-05 ± 0.03E-05 7.27E-06
87.50 3.62E-06 9.67E-06 ± 0.16E-06 3.48E-06
88.00 1.48E-06 3.93E-06 ± 0.03E-06 1.41E-06
88.25 8.70E-07 2.32E-06 ± 0.01 E-06 8.35E-07
86.50 4.70E-07 1.26E-06 ± 0.01 E-07 4.54E-07
32
a TRANSMITTANCE EXPERIMENTAL NORMALIZEDCOS' B VALUE EXPERIMENTAL
VALUE
88.75 2.26E-07 6.06E-07 ± 0.04E-07 2.18E-07
89.00 9.28E-08 2.50E-07 ± 0.03E-07 9.OOE-08
89.25 2.94E-08 7.98E-08 ± 0.14E-08 2.87E-08
89.50 5.80E-09 1.65E-08 ± 0.06E-08 5.94E-09
89.60 2.38E-09 7.04E-09 ± 0.02E-09 2.53E-09
89.70 7.52E-10 2.75E-09 ± 0.02E-09 9.90E-10
89.75 3.62E-10 1.70E-09 ± 0.03E-09 6.12E-10
89.80 1.48E-10 1.16E-09 ± 0.03E-09 4.18E-10
89.90 9.28E-12 8.06E-10 ± 0.03E-10 2.90E-10
89.95 5.80E-13 7.70E-10 ± 0.01E-10 2.77E-10
89.96 2.38E-13 7.65E-10 ± 0.01E-10 2.75E-10
89.97 7.52E-14 7.59E-10 ± 0.01 E-10 2.73E-10
89.98 1.48E-14 7.62E-10 ± 0.01E-10 2.74E-10
89.99 9.28E-16 7.73E-10 ± 0.01E-10 2.78E-10
90.00 0 7.60E-10 ± 0.45E-10 2.74E-10
90.01 9.28E-16 7.70E-10 ± 0.01E-10 2.77E-10
90.02 1.48E-14 7.65E-10 ± 0.01E-10 2.75E-10
90.03 7.52E-14 7.65E-10 ± 0.01E-10 2.75E-10
90.04 2.38E-13 7.62E-10 ± 0.01E-10 2.74E-10
90.05 5.80E-13 7.56E-10 ± 0.01E-10 2.72E-10
90.10 9.28E-12 7.89E-10 ± 0.01E-10 2.84E-10
90.20 1.48E-10 1.17E-09 ± 0.01E-09 4.21 E-10
90.25 3.62E-10 1.72E-09 ± 0.06E-09 6.19E-10
90.30 7.52E-10 2.74E-09 ± 0.01 E-09 9.86E-10
90.40 2.38E-09 7.12E-09 ± 0.01E-09 2.56E-09
90.50 5.80E-09 1.63E-08 ± 0.01E-08 5.87E-09
90.75 2.94E-08 7.84E-08 ± 0.05E-08 2.82E-08
33
a TRANSMITrANCE EXPERIMENTAL NORMALIZEDCOS4 a VALUE EXPERIMENTAL
VALUE
91.00 9.28E-08 2.49E-07 ± 0.02E-07 8.96E-08
91.25 2.26E-07 6.08E-07 ± 0.03E-07 2.19E-07
91.50 4.70E-07 1.27E-06 ± 0.01 E-07 4.57E-07
91.75 8.70E-07 2.36E-06 ± 0.04E-07 8.50E-07
92.00 1.48E-06 3.99E-06 ± 0.03E-06 1.44E-06
92.50 3.62E-06 9.75E-06 ± 0.07E-06 3.51E-06
93.00 7.50E-06 2.02E-05 ± 0.01 E-05 7.27E-06
93.50 1.39E-05 3.74E-05 ± 0.03E-05 1.35E-05
94.00 2.37E-05 6.41 E-05 ± 0.01 E-05 2.31E-05
95.00 5.77E-05 1.56E-04 ± 0.01 E-04 5.62E-05
100.00 9.09E-04 2.48E-03 ± 0.02E-03 8.93E-04
110.00 0.01 3.78E-02 ± 0.05E-02 1.36E-02
120.00 0.06 1.71E-01 ± 0.03E-01 6.16E-02
130.00 0.17 0.46E00 + 0.07E-01 1.66E-01
140.00 0.34 0.96E00 ± 0.02E00 3.46E-01
150.00 0.56 1.53E00 + 0.01E00 0.55E00
160.00 0.78 2.12E00 + 0.05E00 0.76E00
170.00 0.94 2.59E00 ± 0.06E00 0.93E00
175.00 0.98 2.68E00 ± 0.06E00 0.96E00
176.00 0.99 2.71 E00 ± 0.03E00 0.98E00
177.00 0.99 2.72E00 ± 0.01E0O 0.98E00
178.00 1.00 2.73E00 ± 0.05E-01 0.98E00
179.00 1.00 2.75E00 ± 0.01EOO 0.99E00
180.00 1.00 2.77E00 + 0.03E00 1.00E00
181.00 1.00 2.76E00 ± 0.01 E00 0.99E00
182.00 1.00 2.75E00 ± 0.01 E00 0.99E00
183.00 0.99 2.74E00 ± 0.03E00 0.99E00
34
B TRANSMITTANCE (~AtE
184.00 0.99 27rEaiz5til-
185.00 0.96 2 7"
187.00 0.97 2 ?*to
188.00 0.96 z r2mI~i'~ A4wt
189.00 0.95 2 Mu z~
190.00 0.94 ZtI U
200.00 0.78 aI 1460 it -41
210.00 0.56 ~ 1M lim s WIMI
220.00 0.34 0W m Ma i C11
230.00 0.17 _"m____qa
240.00 0.06 W'@~* 4
250.00 0.01 1* m I R 0
260.00 9.09E-04 I_____ a ýK
265.00 5.77E-05 )4at.W 4S1 am s
266.00 2.37E-0 tanS 40 4
266.50 1.39E-M oe 4stW. 4w.
267.00 7.50E-06 a194
267.50 3.62E-06 Iat~h44 do t1-*
268.00 1.48E-06 4
268.25 8.70E-07 ON4 tS.$ I UN
268.50 4.70E-07 t ~ a t_10 g
268.75 2.26E-O? i~t a4r, I x*14.)
269.00 9.2BE-WSI4a.u~
269.10 6.09E-0S V 1, 4? j . r
269.20 3.SOE-O & ? w
269.25 2.94E-06
-+ t .I ?• - a i i*i t- a.lIvA b tl . - a al4 to mJ ~ S•ti 46 4b i =il t ti
M, 74 "I ISt tltk 46 14 , irvokt 4 #lt 4
J, I • I A'tMi a . . t41 Is
V .. . . . . . . . . . V ... .
, W 4 -- -i t I-. I.- i II 4- --
so I- tv b
-t ..
I- * . - " - - - Vt
et. 40 '4S* i fil Ita i
li-ip
~~~~t .. . ... .,*I
astoO V $AU4
AMlow wt ' - I, a l-
f ..... - O w0
',* -!i ', iuwwIII •I.t Iivlil *t
S......... Itp p*I @tpl 5 511l ,.II l ,
a.... . . a1•* i WIS i ++I P- i lPt *
S. .. . . . .. .. .. ... .. ... -i i*
al'a
's 4%
V 41 VA V
* '54 l*~.an
-, r so'0~4415a~. 45.4 s sa
k4W a. Aw 0 sit s4*1
VRoll
asý 4,1 . l a
Ibs
atti a a 15 .~ A M.5*
V Iwo
.. *0k) WON * a , -
7-1 MWW