WS 2011/2012 Evaluation Health Economics Part II · WS 2011/2012 Evaluation Health Economics ... 11 1 9 0 2 4 6 8 10 fully incorrect partly incorrect indifferent partly correct fully

WS 2011/2012

Evaluation Health Economics – Part II

Thursday 12th and Friday 13th

from 9:00 a.m. till 5:00 p.m. in S 16

(n=10)

Mohamad Alameddine, MPH, PhD

Prof. Dr. Alfonso Sousa-Poza

[email protected]

1. Lecturer´s characteristics

WS 2011/2012© Institut Health Care & Public Management,

Universität Hohenheim2

2

8

0

2

4

6

8

10

fully incorrect

partly incorrect

indifferent partly correct

fully correct

na.

The topics were explained sufficiently and further information was given




2

8

0

2

4

6

8

10

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

The examples used contributed to the comprehension of the teaching contents




1

7

2

012345678

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

The lecturer referred to other fields




1

4

5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

The lecturer illustrated the interrelation between the different topics




1

5

4

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

The lecturer´s presentation was structured well




3

7

0

2

4

6

8

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

The media used (e.g. PowerPoint, blackboard, overhead projector)

contributed to the comprehension of the teaching contents




2

8

0

2

4

6

8

10

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

The lecturer motivated me to prepare and review this course




1

9

0

2

4

6

8

10

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

I was encouraged to think about the topics discussed in this course




1

9

0

2

4

6

8

10

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

I was encouraged to participate actively in this course




1

9

0

2

4

6

8

10

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

I felt free to ask questions and make comments




3

7

012345678

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

The lecturer conveyed enthusiasm




1

9

0

2

4

6

8

10

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

The study and workung atmosphere in this course was pleasant




12

7

0

2

4

6

8

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

This course prepared me for ecames or other course assesments




12

7

0

2

4

6

8

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

The lecture clearly communicated the learining objectives of this course




1

3

6

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

In this course i have learned plenty




1

9

0

2

4

6

8

10

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

Attending this course was worth it




9

1

0

2

4

6

8

10

1 2 3 4 5

How woud you grade this course? (5=worst; 1=best)

Durchschnitt:

1,1

2. Complexity



9

1

0

2

4

6

8

10

too low low just right high very high na.

The pace of this course was …

2. Complexity



1

8

1

0

2

4

6

8

10


The level of difficulty was …

2. Complexity



1

6

1

2

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7


The effort necessary to prepare and review this course was …

2. Complexity



1

4

5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6


The amount of content taught was …

2. Complexity



1

8

1

0

2

4

6

8

10


The prerequisites for this course were …

3. Surrounding Conditions



For Thursday 12th and Friday 13th, from 9:00 a.m. till 5:00 p.m., in S 16

How would you assess the following surrounding conditions of this course?

(Range of grades: 1=best to 6=worst)

6

7

6

5

7

2

1

3

4

3

4

5

3

7

4

1

3

1

5

2

1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Tidiness of room

Ventilation Number of seats

Noise Acoustics Disburbance by fellow students

Lighting Quality of seats

1

2

3

4

5

6

na.

4. Concluding Assessment



21

6

1

0

2

4

6

8

fully incorrect

partly incorrect


fully correct

na.

I would approve funding this course by tuition fees in order to improve the

conditions of teaching.




What was particularly good in this course?

• a small group of people, very detailed discussion about the topic

• covering lot of different aspects of health care, films

• interessante Themen

• open environment etc (esp. Ice-breaking), very enjoyable work environment

• very comprehensive examples, very pleasent atmosphere




Do you have any suggestions what could be improved?

• more weight on presentations (not in time, but for the grade (not just 20%

together with paper)). Reason: very time intensive

• 2. Teil höher bewerten. Aufwand für 2. Teil (Hausarbeit + Präsentation) stand

nicht im Verhältnis zum Anteil an der Endnote, etwas weniger Gruppenarbeit

• Die Leistung aus Part II sollte stärker gewichtet werden, da der zu leistende

Aufwand (Paper erstellen, Präsentation erstellen) relativ hoch ist

• Some things are known by MSc-students. For example: efficiency vs.

Effectiveness, economies of scale => explaining these terms shouldn´t be

part of this course

• switch weekday to Fr./Sa. => missing a lot of other important courses

5. Basic Personal Data



9

1

0

5

10

0 1 2

How many sessions of this course did you NOT

attend?

10

0

10

20

1 2 3

Please select the number of semesters you have been enrolled for your

programme.

5. Basic Personal Data



9

1

0

2

4

6

8

10

MSc Management - Health Care

MSc Economics

Please select the programme you are enrolled for

Documents

WS 2011/2012 Evaluation Health Economics Part II · WS 2011/2012 Evaluation Health Economics ... 11 1 9 0 2 4 6 8 10 fully incorrect partly incorrect indifferent partly correct fully