2
Can Respir J Vol 10 No 3 April 2003 157 Written self-management plans improve asthma control RL Cowie MD Health Sciences Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta Correspondence and reprints: Dr RL Cowie, Health Sciences Centre, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4N1. Telephone 403-220-8981, fax 403-270-8928, e-mail [email protected] P atient participation is necessary for the treatment of any chronic disease but particularly for diseases that run a vari- able course. The day-to-day variability of asthma demands careful participation by the individual with the disease and his or her caregivers if they are to achieve optimal control and enjoy a normal lifestyle (1). Most, if not all, asthma guidelines emphasize that patient education is as important as the prescription of appropriate medication (1). Indeed, the prescription and the education are inseparable. Without instruction in the use of inhaler devices, without the knowledge of what constitutes disease control, and without the understanding of the role of medical and nonmed- ical interventions, it is not likely that asthma control will be achieved, even when all of the relevant medications have been prescribed. Patient education in a variable disease must also include some component of disease monitoring linked with a self-management plan. Probably the most important aspect of patient education toward self-management is preventing the development of severe and potentially life-threatening exacer- bations (2). Unfortunately, it has been shown that even those patients who have a good knowledge of their disease may not apply this knowledge to the management of an exacerbation of their asthma (3). The appropriate use of self-management plans in asthma thus requires careful education with the emphasis on changing behaviour (rather than the acquisition of knowledge). Action plans are not suitable for all patients with asthma (4) and are most effective in those with more severe disease (5). It is often difficult to provide an evidence base for an inter- vention, such as asthma self-management, that requires people to change their behaviour. This difficulty is demonstrated by the conflicting conclusions of two recent Cochrane reviews of this topic (6,7). The former review concluded that the inclu- sion of a written action plan in an education program for asth- ma improved health outcomes (6). The latter review of an almost identical selection of studies concluded that only six published studies were valid and that there was insufficient evidence to support the value of action plans (7). In fact, only one of the cited studies examined the impact of an action plan versus no action plan (8); the other five studies compared dif- ferent types of plans, or an education program and an action plan with no education or plan (7). Even one of the most recent studies failed to examine self-management plans on an even playing field, although it did suggest, as may be expected, that a plan without appropriate education is unlikely to result in a change in behaviour (9). The lack of evidence to support the role of action plans in patient management of asthma should not be seen as evi- dence of lack of efficacy. We know that it is very difficult to change behaviour, but that difficulty should not stop us from instructing our patients to manage their asthma any more than it should stop us from offering advice on smoking cessa- tion or other difficult interventions that require behavioural change. Notwithstanding the admittedly incomplete evidence, it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that written action plans should be part of the management of asthma in patients, espe- cially in those who suffer from severe exacerbations (5,8) and who are ready to make behavioural changes (10,11). ©2003 Pulsus Group Inc. All rights reserved SUMMARIES OF PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE 2002 CTS MEETING REFERENCES 1. Boulet LP, Becker A, Berube D, Beveridge R, Ernst P. Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, 1999. Canadian Asthma Consensus Group. CMAJ 1999;161(Suppl 11):S1-61. 2. Kolbe J, Fergusson W, Vamos M, et al. Case-control study of severe life threatening asthma (SLTA) in adults: demographics, health care, and management of the acute attack. Thorax 1997;55:1007-15. 3. Kolbe J, Vamos M, James F, et al. Assessment of practical knowledge of self-management of acute asthma. Chest 1996;109:86-90. 4. Adams RJ, Smith BJ, Ruffin RE. Patient preferences for autonomy in decision making in asthma management. Thorax 2001;56:126-32. 5. Lopez-Vina A, del Castillo-Arevalo E. Influence of peak expiratory flow monitoring on an asthma self-management education programme. Respir Med 2000;94:760-6. 6. Gibson PG, Coughlan J, Wilson AJ, et al. Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD001117. 7. Toelle BG, Ram FSF. Written individualised management plans for asthma in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;3:CD002171. 8. Cowie RL, Revitt RG, Underwood MF, et al. The effect of a peak flow-based action plan in the prevention of exacerbations of asthma. Chest 1997;112:1534-8. 9. Cote J, Bowie D, Robichaud P, Parent JG, Battisti L, Boulet LP. Evaluation of two different educational interventions for adult patients consulting with an acute asthma exacerbation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;163:1415-9. 10. Green LW, Frankish CJ. Theories and principles of health education applied to asthma. Chest 1994;106(Suppl):219S-30S. 11. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Velicer WF, et al. Predicting change in smoking status for self-changers. Addict Behav 1985;10:395-406.

Written self-management plans improve asthma controldownloads.hindawi.com/journals/crj/2003/653513.pdfCote J, Bowie D, Robichaud P, Parent JG, Battisti L, Boulet LP. Evaluation of

  • Upload
    hacong

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Written self-management plans improve asthma controldownloads.hindawi.com/journals/crj/2003/653513.pdfCote J, Bowie D, Robichaud P, Parent JG, Battisti L, Boulet LP. Evaluation of

Can Respir J Vol 10 No 3 April 2003 157

Written self-management plans improve asthma control

RL Cowie MD

Health Sciences Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AlbertaCorrespondence and reprints: Dr RL Cowie, Health Sciences Centre, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta

T2N 4N1. Telephone 403-220-8981, fax 403-270-8928, e-mail [email protected]

Patient participation is necessary for the treatment of anychronic disease but particularly for diseases that run a vari-

able course. The day-to-day variability of asthma demandscareful participation by the individual with the disease and hisor her caregivers if they are to achieve optimal control andenjoy a normal lifestyle (1).

Most, if not all, asthma guidelines emphasize that patienteducation is as important as the prescription of appropriatemedication (1). Indeed, the prescription and the education areinseparable. Without instruction in the use of inhaler devices,without the knowledge of what constitutes disease control, andwithout the understanding of the role of medical and nonmed-ical interventions, it is not likely that asthma control will beachieved, even when all of the relevant medications have beenprescribed. Patient education in a variable disease must alsoinclude some component of disease monitoring linked with aself-management plan. Probably the most important aspect ofpatient education toward self-management is preventing thedevelopment of severe and potentially life-threatening exacer-bations (2). Unfortunately, it has been shown that even thosepatients who have a good knowledge of their disease may notapply this knowledge to the management of an exacerbation oftheir asthma (3). The appropriate use of self-managementplans in asthma thus requires careful education with theemphasis on changing behaviour (rather than the acquisitionof knowledge). Action plans are not suitable for all patientswith asthma (4) and are most effective in those with moresevere disease (5).

It is often difficult to provide an evidence base for an inter-vention, such as asthma self-management, that requires peopleto change their behaviour. This difficulty is demonstrated bythe conflicting conclusions of two recent Cochrane reviews ofthis topic (6,7). The former review concluded that the inclu-sion of a written action plan in an education program for asth-ma improved health outcomes (6). The latter review of analmost identical selection of studies concluded that only sixpublished studies were valid and that there was insufficientevidence to support the value of action plans (7). In fact, onlyone of the cited studies examined the impact of an action planversus no action plan (8); the other five studies compared dif-ferent types of plans, or an education program and an actionplan with no education or plan (7). Even one of the mostrecent studies failed to examine self-management plans on an

even playing field, although it did suggest, as may be expected,that a plan without appropriate education is unlikely to resultin a change in behaviour (9).

The lack of evidence to support the role of action plans inpatient management of asthma should not be seen as evi-dence of lack of efficacy. We know that it is very difficult tochange behaviour, but that difficulty should not stop us frominstructing our patients to manage their asthma any morethan it should stop us from offering advice on smoking cessa-tion or other difficult interventions that require behaviouralchange.

Notwithstanding the admittedly incomplete evidence, it isdifficult to avoid the conclusion that written action plansshould be part of the management of asthma in patients, espe-cially in those who suffer from severe exacerbations (5,8) andwho are ready to make behavioural changes (10,11).

©2003 Pulsus Group Inc. All rights reserved

SUMMARIES OF PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE 2002 CTS MEETING

REFERENCES1. Boulet LP, Becker A, Berube D, Beveridge R, Ernst P. Canadian

Asthma Consensus Report, 1999. Canadian Asthma ConsensusGroup. CMAJ 1999;161(Suppl 11):S1-61.

2. Kolbe J, Fergusson W, Vamos M, et al. Case-control study of severelife threatening asthma (SLTA) in adults: demographics, health care,and management of the acute attack. Thorax 1997;55:1007-15.

3. Kolbe J, Vamos M, James F, et al. Assessment of practical knowledgeof self-management of acute asthma. Chest 1996;109:86-90.

4. Adams RJ, Smith BJ, Ruffin RE. Patient preferences for autonomy indecision making in asthma management. Thorax 2001;56:126-32.

5. Lopez-Vina A, del Castillo-Arevalo E. Influence of peak expiratoryflow monitoring on an asthma self-management educationprogramme. Respir Med 2000;94:760-6.

6. Gibson PG, Coughlan J, Wilson AJ, et al. Self-managementeducation and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD001117.

7. Toelle BG, Ram FSF. Written individualised management plans forasthma in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2002;3:CD002171.

8. Cowie RL, Revitt RG, Underwood MF, et al. The effect of a peakflow-based action plan in the prevention of exacerbations of asthma.Chest 1997;112:1534-8.

9. Cote J, Bowie D, Robichaud P, Parent JG, Battisti L, Boulet LP.Evaluation of two different educational interventions for adultpatients consulting with an acute asthma exacerbation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;163:1415-9.

10. Green LW, Frankish CJ. Theories and principles of health educationapplied to asthma. Chest 1994;106(Suppl):219S-30S.

11. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Velicer WF, et al. Predicting change in smoking status for self-changers. Addict Behav1985;10:395-406.

Cowie.qxd 3/28/03 12:48 PM Page 157

Page 2: Written self-management plans improve asthma controldownloads.hindawi.com/journals/crj/2003/653513.pdfCote J, Bowie D, Robichaud P, Parent JG, Battisti L, Boulet LP. Evaluation of

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Stem CellsInternational

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Behavioural Neurology

EndocrinologyInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Disease Markers

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

BioMed Research International

OncologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

PPAR Research

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

ObesityJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

OphthalmologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Diabetes ResearchJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Research and TreatmentAIDS

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Parkinson’s Disease

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com