Upload
ankenym7708
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
1/27
Writing the Analytical Essay
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
2/27
The run-down:1. Checking our assignment.
2. Brainstorming ideas.
3. Finding quotes.4. Creating a thesis.
5. Establishing a structure.
6. Starting with whats natural.
7. Filling in the details.
8. Compiling and Revising
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
3/27
Check the Assignment:Prompt:In a 3 page essay, address the following prompt: Apply
Hemingways Iceberg theory of writing to our reading ofThe Sun
Also Rises.Quote atleast3 examples of Hemingways Iceberg
style, explainingthe effectiveness ofhis style and the hiddenmeaningunderneath the minimalist expression. In other words,
describe 3 different areas where Hemingway uses
understatement, and express an opinion on whether or not it is
effective. Exemplary papers will explore the strength of
Hemingways style,yetwilloffer a critique ofthe limits oftheminimaliststyle.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
4/27
Check the rubric:A 10 has all the qualities of a 9, but is more mature instyle, strength of argument, and has no errors.
A 9 displays a strong grasp of Papas style and offers
relevant commentary on Hemingways use of
understatement. It also explores the limits of
understatement and what potentially is lost in the
brevity of verse. It has a clear thesis and the argument
is organized, makes sense, and cites the text. It has fewto no errors in punctuation, formatting (MLA), and is (at
least) 3 pages in length.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
5/27
So what we know so far: 3 pages
At least 3 quotes
Were talking about minimalism and
understatement.
We have to critique (show something
negative) about minimalism.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
6/27
Now, we brainstorm.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
7/27
Qualities of Minimalist Style:
Short, simple, declarative sentences.
Terse dialogue.
Lack of description.
Rapid-fire dialogue.
Eliminates extraneous details.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
8/27
Positives /N
egatives Engages reader by allowing
them to interpret the text.
Allows for different
meanings, which appeals todifferent readersexperiences.
Easy to read /straightforward.
Allows for clever
understatement / pithyremarks.
Reader as participator instory.
Can lead to
confusion because
of missinginformation.
Lack of description
can become boring.
Lack of creative
language can make
prose bland.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
9/27
Next, we add in quotes (only need 3).
Positive examples:
Youre not a moron.
Youre only a caseof arresteddevelopment.(Harvey Stone, 51)
Love you? I simplyturn all to jelly whenyou touch me. (LadyBrett Ashley, 34)
Negative example:
Im not joking you. I
never joke people. Jokepeople and you make
enemies. Thats what I
always say. (Count M.,
65)
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
10/27
Initial commentary: Youre not aClever, pithy statement creates engaging
dialogue. Engaging way to reveal Cohns true problem - using aminor character to articulate what the major character is always
thinking. Love you Shows, through indirect comment, Bretts truefeelings. By not overstating feelings, we are left to add in ourown experience in falling in love.
Im not joking Choppy, dry sentences. Dialogue sounds
forced, even a little clich (thats what I always say.). Also, veryambiguous what author is implying. Should we sympathize withthe Count, who we barely know, or Brett, who we know well andalready have some kind of connection with?
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
11/27
Slimming down those ideas into:
Clever, pithy statements are engaging.
Allows reader to add in true emotion.
Ambiguous comments can lead to
confusion.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
12/27
Now, we write our thesis:
Hemingways use of understatement
creates pithy, clever moments that engage
the reader by allowing space forinterpretation. But, he does this at the cost
of misunderstanding and confusion, which
can lead to unintentional tension in the
text.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
13/27
Before we begin our actual writing, a
forethought from Strunk and White
Write in a way that comes
easily and naturally to you,using words and phrases that
come readily to hand.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
14/27
And Anne LamottFor me and most of the other
writers I know, writing is not
rapturous. In fact, the only way I
can get anything written at all is to
write really, really bad first drafts.
The first draft is the child's draft,
where you let it all pour out and
then let it romp all over the place,
knowing that no one is going to
see it and that you can shape it
later.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
15/27
And next, we establish a structure.I. I
ntroductionA. Broad introduction tomytopic.
B. Relating tothe prompt.
C. Big-time thesis,making bold claim.
II. BodyParagraph
A. WhatamI going toteach you today? (Purpose)
B. Heres why whatI have to say is so good. (Concrete Detail)
C. To helpyou understand. (Commentary)
D. Toremindyou ofwhatI just said. OR Totransition nicely. (Summary)
III. BodyParagraph
A. Im going to elaborate on mypoint. OR Make a newpoint. (Purpose)
B. Heres a genius insight. (Commentary)
C. Heres some insurance, toprove Imright. (Concrete Detail)
D. Heres how thatties in. (Commentary)E. Toremindyou ofwhatI just said. OR Totransition nicely. (Summary)
IV. BodyParagraph
A. Now, Im going toofferthe otherside ofthe story. (Purpose)
B. Remember, this is whatIdalready established. (Commentary)
C. But, now I wantto explore this. (More Commentary)
D. Heres an example. (Concrete Detail)E. Letme explain whatImean. (Commentary)
F. Now, doyou see how that works, too? (Commentary)
V. Conclusion
A. Although I just showed something different, I like whatIfirst said.
B. Doyou remember? Oh, Ill tell you.C. And, justtomake you feel good, Im going to end with a nice, round, fulfilling sentence.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
16/27
Then, we fill in the details with
concise, efficient language.
Vigorous writing is concise. A
sentence should contain no
unnecessary words, a paragraph
no unnecessary sentences, for
the same reason that a drawing
should have no unnecessary
lines and a machine nounnecessary parts.
QuickTime and aTI
(Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
17/27
Introductory Paragraph:A. Broad introduction to my topic.
B. Relating to the prompt.
C.Thesis, making bold claim.
ErnestHemingways life mimickedthe adventures found
in his novels.He lived big although he wrote, in a sense, very
small.Henry James commentedon Hemingways life and writing
by saying, Giants ofhis sortare trulymodest;there is much
more behindHemingway's formthan people know.
Perhaps Hemingways size anddepth ofexperience gave him
the confidence to write in a sparse, understated style.
Hemingways use ofunderstatement createspithy, clevermoments that engage the readerbyallowing space for
interpretation.But, he does this atthe costofmisunderstanding
and confusion, which can leadto unintentional tension in the
text.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
18/27
Body 1:
A. What am I going to teach you today?
(Purpose)
B. Heres why what I have to say is so good.
(Concrete Detail)
C. To help you understand.
(Commentary)
D. To transition nicely.
(Summary)
Harvey, while talking/interrogating Cohn comments, Youre notamoron.
Youre onlya case ofarresteddevelopment.
(51)
Hemingways use ofthe catchy, pithy, understated comment
engages the readerin the text.His creativity is revealedthrough the brevity
ofverse, and when executedproperly, his remarks are catchyand
memorable sound-bites.
While this commentmay have been loston Cohn, the readerfully
understands Harveys biting remark. Andalthough this example is an
explicit insult, Hemingways iceberg style is revealedthrough his choice
in character.He chooses Harvey, not Jake, toarticulate an idea Jake
thinks throughoutthe novel. ForHemingway, Jake is tootimidtovoice
this opinion outright, butthrough an indirect commentfromHarvey,
Hemingwayvalidates the readers suspicion thatCohn is socially
underdeveloped.
This example ofindirect charactercommentary is alsomimicked in
Hemingways usage ofindirect comments, directlyfromthe character.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
19/27
Body 2A. Im going to elaborate on mypoint.(Purpose)
B. Heres a genius insight.
(Commentary)
C. Heres some insurance, toprove Imright.
(Concrete Detail)
D. Heres how thatties in.
(Commentary)
E. Toremindyou ofwhatI just said.
(Summary)
Instead, she brings the readerinto herfeelings, giving us a sense - afeeling - of
hertempestuous emotions.Hemingways rhetorical question, Love you?
speaks volumes more than a Yes,orOfcourse.
Hemingways iceberg is shown clearlythrough the understated,
reserved, tense conversations held between characters.
Whenpresenting Brettand Jakes relationship, Hemingwayoften skirts explicit
language, andallows the readerto grasp, through intonation, the characters true
feelings.
When Brett Ashley says, Love you?I simplyturn all to jelly when you touch me,
(34) she does not explicitlyanswerJakes straightforward question.
Ourimagination fills in the gaps and we are able toalign ourselves with Bretts
emotions by interpreting themfromourown experience. This is amasterful
example ofunderstatementspotency.Here, less is more.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
20/27
Body 3
A. Now, Im going toofferthe otherside ofthe story.(Purpose)
B. Remember, this is whatIdalready established.
(Commentary)
C. But, now I wantto explore this.
(More Commentary)D. Heres an example.
(Concrete Detail)
E. Letme explain whatImean.
(Commentary)
F. Now, doyou see how that works, too?
AlthoughH
emingways use ofunderstatement, indirect charactercommentary, and subtle commentary is mostly successful.But, there are
moments when his style is found wanting.
Hemingways scarcityofdetail can leadtodryprose andHemingways iceberg
ambiguity can leadto unintendedtension forthe reader.During Jake andBretts conversation with Count Mippopolous, the Count says,
Im not joking you.I neverjokepeople. Jokepeople andyou make enemies.
Thats whatIalways say. (65)
The clich, thats whatIalways say, ends the sentence withoutthe pompand
rigorofstrong prose. And with the Counts comment, the readerbecomes torn.Do we now side with the Count, whoobviouslypresents sage advice? Ordo we
stay loyal toBrett, a characterwe have known longerand sympathize with. This
unintentional tension creates an issue offidelityforthe reader.
While Hemingways minimalistprose often serves his purpose well, it is not without
its occasional weaknesses.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
21/27
ConclusionA. Although I just showed something different, I
like what I first said.
B. Do you remember? Oh, Ill tell you.
C. And, just to make you feel good, Im going to
end with a nice, round, fulfilling sentence.
Much like an iceberg, Hemingways infrequent surface breaches in
style are greatlyoutweighed by his frequent submerged, subtleprosaic
victories.
Perhaps Hemingways size lent him confidence, andperhaps his confidence
allowed himtotrustthe readerto graspthe underwaterpartofthe iceberg.Or,maybe Papa simply wanted us to imagine/write what he felt went better
unsaid.
Papasprose allows readers to interact with the text in an individual way, as
each readerbrings his orherown experiences, reading them intoHemingwaysliteraryframework.Papa gives us the skeleton, and we provide the blood,
muscle, andflesh tofill the gaps in his prose.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
22/27
Now, we compile.
And then, we revise.
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
23/27
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
24/27
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
25/27
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
26/27
The summary:
1. Checking our assignment.
2. Brainstorming ideas.
3. Finding quotes.4. Creating a thesis.
5. Establishing a structure.
6. Starting with whats natural.
7. Filling in the details.
8. Compiling and Revising
8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical
27/27
Fin.