Writing the Iceberg Analytical

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    1/27

    Writing the Analytical Essay

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    2/27

    The run-down:1. Checking our assignment.

    2. Brainstorming ideas.

    3. Finding quotes.4. Creating a thesis.

    5. Establishing a structure.

    6. Starting with whats natural.

    7. Filling in the details.

    8. Compiling and Revising

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    3/27

    Check the Assignment:Prompt:In a 3 page essay, address the following prompt: Apply

    Hemingways Iceberg theory of writing to our reading ofThe Sun

    Also Rises.Quote atleast3 examples of Hemingways Iceberg

    style, explainingthe effectiveness ofhis style and the hiddenmeaningunderneath the minimalist expression. In other words,

    describe 3 different areas where Hemingway uses

    understatement, and express an opinion on whether or not it is

    effective. Exemplary papers will explore the strength of

    Hemingways style,yetwilloffer a critique ofthe limits oftheminimaliststyle.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    4/27

    Check the rubric:A 10 has all the qualities of a 9, but is more mature instyle, strength of argument, and has no errors.

    A 9 displays a strong grasp of Papas style and offers

    relevant commentary on Hemingways use of

    understatement. It also explores the limits of

    understatement and what potentially is lost in the

    brevity of verse. It has a clear thesis and the argument

    is organized, makes sense, and cites the text. It has fewto no errors in punctuation, formatting (MLA), and is (at

    least) 3 pages in length.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    5/27

    So what we know so far: 3 pages

    At least 3 quotes

    Were talking about minimalism and

    understatement.

    We have to critique (show something

    negative) about minimalism.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    6/27

    Now, we brainstorm.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    7/27

    Qualities of Minimalist Style:

    Short, simple, declarative sentences.

    Terse dialogue.

    Lack of description.

    Rapid-fire dialogue.

    Eliminates extraneous details.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    8/27

    Positives /N

    egatives Engages reader by allowing

    them to interpret the text.

    Allows for different

    meanings, which appeals todifferent readersexperiences.

    Easy to read /straightforward.

    Allows for clever

    understatement / pithyremarks.

    Reader as participator instory.

    Can lead to

    confusion because

    of missinginformation.

    Lack of description

    can become boring.

    Lack of creative

    language can make

    prose bland.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    9/27

    Next, we add in quotes (only need 3).

    Positive examples:

    Youre not a moron.

    Youre only a caseof arresteddevelopment.(Harvey Stone, 51)

    Love you? I simplyturn all to jelly whenyou touch me. (LadyBrett Ashley, 34)

    Negative example:

    Im not joking you. I

    never joke people. Jokepeople and you make

    enemies. Thats what I

    always say. (Count M.,

    65)

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    10/27

    Initial commentary: Youre not aClever, pithy statement creates engaging

    dialogue. Engaging way to reveal Cohns true problem - using aminor character to articulate what the major character is always

    thinking. Love you Shows, through indirect comment, Bretts truefeelings. By not overstating feelings, we are left to add in ourown experience in falling in love.

    Im not joking Choppy, dry sentences. Dialogue sounds

    forced, even a little clich (thats what I always say.). Also, veryambiguous what author is implying. Should we sympathize withthe Count, who we barely know, or Brett, who we know well andalready have some kind of connection with?

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    11/27

    Slimming down those ideas into:

    Clever, pithy statements are engaging.

    Allows reader to add in true emotion.

    Ambiguous comments can lead to

    confusion.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    12/27

    Now, we write our thesis:

    Hemingways use of understatement

    creates pithy, clever moments that engage

    the reader by allowing space forinterpretation. But, he does this at the cost

    of misunderstanding and confusion, which

    can lead to unintentional tension in the

    text.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    13/27

    Before we begin our actual writing, a

    forethought from Strunk and White

    Write in a way that comes

    easily and naturally to you,using words and phrases that

    come readily to hand.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    14/27

    And Anne LamottFor me and most of the other

    writers I know, writing is not

    rapturous. In fact, the only way I

    can get anything written at all is to

    write really, really bad first drafts.

    The first draft is the child's draft,

    where you let it all pour out and

    then let it romp all over the place,

    knowing that no one is going to

    see it and that you can shape it

    later.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    15/27

    And next, we establish a structure.I. I

    ntroductionA. Broad introduction tomytopic.

    B. Relating tothe prompt.

    C. Big-time thesis,making bold claim.

    II. BodyParagraph

    A. WhatamI going toteach you today? (Purpose)

    B. Heres why whatI have to say is so good. (Concrete Detail)

    C. To helpyou understand. (Commentary)

    D. Toremindyou ofwhatI just said. OR Totransition nicely. (Summary)

    III. BodyParagraph

    A. Im going to elaborate on mypoint. OR Make a newpoint. (Purpose)

    B. Heres a genius insight. (Commentary)

    C. Heres some insurance, toprove Imright. (Concrete Detail)

    D. Heres how thatties in. (Commentary)E. Toremindyou ofwhatI just said. OR Totransition nicely. (Summary)

    IV. BodyParagraph

    A. Now, Im going toofferthe otherside ofthe story. (Purpose)

    B. Remember, this is whatIdalready established. (Commentary)

    C. But, now I wantto explore this. (More Commentary)

    D. Heres an example. (Concrete Detail)E. Letme explain whatImean. (Commentary)

    F. Now, doyou see how that works, too? (Commentary)

    V. Conclusion

    A. Although I just showed something different, I like whatIfirst said.

    B. Doyou remember? Oh, Ill tell you.C. And, justtomake you feel good, Im going to end with a nice, round, fulfilling sentence.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    16/27

    Then, we fill in the details with

    concise, efficient language.

    Vigorous writing is concise. A

    sentence should contain no

    unnecessary words, a paragraph

    no unnecessary sentences, for

    the same reason that a drawing

    should have no unnecessary

    lines and a machine nounnecessary parts.

    QuickTime and aTI

    (Uncompressed) decompressorare needed to see this picture.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    17/27

    Introductory Paragraph:A. Broad introduction to my topic.

    B. Relating to the prompt.

    C.Thesis, making bold claim.

    ErnestHemingways life mimickedthe adventures found

    in his novels.He lived big although he wrote, in a sense, very

    small.Henry James commentedon Hemingways life and writing

    by saying, Giants ofhis sortare trulymodest;there is much

    more behindHemingway's formthan people know.

    Perhaps Hemingways size anddepth ofexperience gave him

    the confidence to write in a sparse, understated style.

    Hemingways use ofunderstatement createspithy, clevermoments that engage the readerbyallowing space for

    interpretation.But, he does this atthe costofmisunderstanding

    and confusion, which can leadto unintentional tension in the

    text.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    18/27

    Body 1:

    A. What am I going to teach you today?

    (Purpose)

    B. Heres why what I have to say is so good.

    (Concrete Detail)

    C. To help you understand.

    (Commentary)

    D. To transition nicely.

    (Summary)

    Harvey, while talking/interrogating Cohn comments, Youre notamoron.

    Youre onlya case ofarresteddevelopment.

    (51)

    Hemingways use ofthe catchy, pithy, understated comment

    engages the readerin the text.His creativity is revealedthrough the brevity

    ofverse, and when executedproperly, his remarks are catchyand

    memorable sound-bites.

    While this commentmay have been loston Cohn, the readerfully

    understands Harveys biting remark. Andalthough this example is an

    explicit insult, Hemingways iceberg style is revealedthrough his choice

    in character.He chooses Harvey, not Jake, toarticulate an idea Jake

    thinks throughoutthe novel. ForHemingway, Jake is tootimidtovoice

    this opinion outright, butthrough an indirect commentfromHarvey,

    Hemingwayvalidates the readers suspicion thatCohn is socially

    underdeveloped.

    This example ofindirect charactercommentary is alsomimicked in

    Hemingways usage ofindirect comments, directlyfromthe character.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    19/27

    Body 2A. Im going to elaborate on mypoint.(Purpose)

    B. Heres a genius insight.

    (Commentary)

    C. Heres some insurance, toprove Imright.

    (Concrete Detail)

    D. Heres how thatties in.

    (Commentary)

    E. Toremindyou ofwhatI just said.

    (Summary)

    Instead, she brings the readerinto herfeelings, giving us a sense - afeeling - of

    hertempestuous emotions.Hemingways rhetorical question, Love you?

    speaks volumes more than a Yes,orOfcourse.

    Hemingways iceberg is shown clearlythrough the understated,

    reserved, tense conversations held between characters.

    Whenpresenting Brettand Jakes relationship, Hemingwayoften skirts explicit

    language, andallows the readerto grasp, through intonation, the characters true

    feelings.

    When Brett Ashley says, Love you?I simplyturn all to jelly when you touch me,

    (34) she does not explicitlyanswerJakes straightforward question.

    Ourimagination fills in the gaps and we are able toalign ourselves with Bretts

    emotions by interpreting themfromourown experience. This is amasterful

    example ofunderstatementspotency.Here, less is more.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    20/27

    Body 3

    A. Now, Im going toofferthe otherside ofthe story.(Purpose)

    B. Remember, this is whatIdalready established.

    (Commentary)

    C. But, now I wantto explore this.

    (More Commentary)D. Heres an example.

    (Concrete Detail)

    E. Letme explain whatImean.

    (Commentary)

    F. Now, doyou see how that works, too?

    AlthoughH

    emingways use ofunderstatement, indirect charactercommentary, and subtle commentary is mostly successful.But, there are

    moments when his style is found wanting.

    Hemingways scarcityofdetail can leadtodryprose andHemingways iceberg

    ambiguity can leadto unintendedtension forthe reader.During Jake andBretts conversation with Count Mippopolous, the Count says,

    Im not joking you.I neverjokepeople. Jokepeople andyou make enemies.

    Thats whatIalways say. (65)

    The clich, thats whatIalways say, ends the sentence withoutthe pompand

    rigorofstrong prose. And with the Counts comment, the readerbecomes torn.Do we now side with the Count, whoobviouslypresents sage advice? Ordo we

    stay loyal toBrett, a characterwe have known longerand sympathize with. This

    unintentional tension creates an issue offidelityforthe reader.

    While Hemingways minimalistprose often serves his purpose well, it is not without

    its occasional weaknesses.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    21/27

    ConclusionA. Although I just showed something different, I

    like what I first said.

    B. Do you remember? Oh, Ill tell you.

    C. And, just to make you feel good, Im going to

    end with a nice, round, fulfilling sentence.

    Much like an iceberg, Hemingways infrequent surface breaches in

    style are greatlyoutweighed by his frequent submerged, subtleprosaic

    victories.

    Perhaps Hemingways size lent him confidence, andperhaps his confidence

    allowed himtotrustthe readerto graspthe underwaterpartofthe iceberg.Or,maybe Papa simply wanted us to imagine/write what he felt went better

    unsaid.

    Papasprose allows readers to interact with the text in an individual way, as

    each readerbrings his orherown experiences, reading them intoHemingwaysliteraryframework.Papa gives us the skeleton, and we provide the blood,

    muscle, andflesh tofill the gaps in his prose.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    22/27

    Now, we compile.

    And then, we revise.

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    23/27

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    24/27

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    25/27

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    26/27

    The summary:

    1. Checking our assignment.

    2. Brainstorming ideas.

    3. Finding quotes.4. Creating a thesis.

    5. Establishing a structure.

    6. Starting with whats natural.

    7. Filling in the details.

    8. Compiling and Revising

  • 8/9/2019 Writing the Iceberg Analytical

    27/27

    Fin.