Upload
ongkeet
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
1/25
Writing science fornfluencing policy: insights
from Nepals forest sectorHemant R OjhaNaya Sharma Paudel
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
2/25
Outline1. Context
- Forest policy field in Nepal?- Role of research and science writing?
2. Concepts
-policy?
- research?
- research-policy link?
3. Reflections
- what we did?
- how we did?
- Insights / dilemmas?
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
3/25
Contex
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
4/25
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
5/25
Communities
Forest
Communities
Forest
Gover
nment
Communities
Forest
Govern
ment
Donors
Forest
Communities
Governme
nt
Donor
NGOsCommunities
Forest
NGOs
Donor
Markets
INGOs
CFUG
networks
Go
ent
Before 1957
nationalization
of forest
Between 1957 -
1978 until early
forms of CF
initiated through
Panchayat Forestry
Regulations
Between 1957 - 1978
until early forms of CF
initiated through
Panchayat Forestry
Regulations
Between 1978 - 1995
when the new Forest
Act was enforced
After 1995 till
diverse actors,
complex field,
issues
More policy actors in forest governance than in the past, with
diverse knowledge and power forms
Increasing
space forpolicy
writing?
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
6/25
Diverse policy actors in forest governance
Donors
Ministry,
Dept
Research
institutions
Privatesector
Citizen
networks
NGOs
Communicating
researchWho
benefits fromthe research
we write?
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
7/25
Who makes policy decisions? Parliament
Sole decisions by the minister
Public Pressure
Bureaucratic wisdom
International influence/donor conditionality
Instructions by prime minister
National Planning Commission
Too diverse policy
Processes
Does science/Evidence
have a role?
It is th
who sh
polic
unders
people
gove
talking
here in
(A retired
a poli
organis
Nepal a
A
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
8/25
What drives forest policy change in Nepal?
Expertpolicy analysis with little community voice (e.g Master Plan for theForestry Sector, Agriculture Perspective Plan )
Administrativeimperative (Forest Policy 2000, Forest Inventory Directives
2000) Community movement(e.g withdrawal of recent amendment proposal of
Forest Act 1993)
Collaborative worksbetween civil society and the government: e.g CFGuidelines 2008, Forest Inventory Directives 2005
Community resistanceto top-down policy processese.g AgricultureDevelopment Strategy2013
Policies pushed by political leadersparties, ministers, parliamentarycommittees
Policies made by Judiciary and Constitutional Bodies(CIAA)
Policies pushed by aid agenciesand international processes - LAPA?
Informed by a rich pool ofknowledge, experience, and deliberatione.gForest Act 1993, Rules 1995
If r
limion
wh
ta
role
cha
Knowledge
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
9/25
In the current state of political transitionthe role of research in policy is even lesssignificant.
Muscles and violent resistance
Political negotiations
Politicized identity ofresearchersloss of epistemicauthority
Political leaders areinterested to do any
So as an expert what
do?
(ex NPC vice-chair pe
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
10/25
So how can we become effective science writers to influencWe need to better understand why research / writing is not
as expected.
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
11/25
Policy dilemma: burden or means of empowerment?
M
born
a
every
he
cha
-Rou
L t f k h h d h ld t ib t t li
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
12/25
Lots of works on how research can and should contribute to polic
Ojha and Shrestha 2013
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
13/25
E
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
14/25
Should sciencewriting be done
more at a
particular stage
of policy cyclethan others?
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
15/25
The political field of forest policy process
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
16/25
Social
science
ScienceNatural
science
Citizens
Cultural
groups
Economic
groups
Elected
leaders
Ideological
groups
Institutionalforms
Policymaking
as
deliberative
process and
social
learning
Local Contexts
Global Discourse and Policies
Bureaucracy
The political field of forest policy process
H d f ilit t li h ?
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
17/25
How do we facilitate policy change?(Start and Hovland 2004)
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
18/25
Reflectionfrom practice
13 years of research at Forest Action Nepal
3 years of research South Asia Institute of Advanced S
(SIAS)
3 years of research networking at Nepal Policy Resear
Network (NPRN)
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
19/25
Leaflet
Peer reviewed
articles
Discussi
Pappe
Policy Briefs
Journal of Fores
and LIvelihoos
Media
blogs/editorials
Varieties of
writing
Posters
Letters
Which form of writing for which
Policy making?
Publications typespolicy relevance
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
20/25
Which policy actors value which
form of science writing?
- Language?
- Style?
- Length of writing?
- Presentations?
- Evidence versus argument?
ub cat o s types po cy e e a ce
Research and science writing does influence policy
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
21/25
Research and science writing does influence policyprocesses and outcomes
Policy issues Level Our contribution Outco
Special forest policy (for
Terai) 2000
Policy Action researches
Dissertations
Book
Journal articlesSpecial issue of Journal on Terai forest
Carte
gover
Community Forestry
Guidelines
Guidelines Actively participated in taskforce
Analysis and papers focusing pro-poor and
inclusive provisions
Pro-p
Forest Act amendment
Attempts
Act Field study
Discussion paperPolicy roundtable
Gove
amen
New Conservation Area
(2010-2011)
Regulations Field study
Policy roundtable
Ensur
rights
inventory guidelines
(2000)
Guidelines Field study and report
Review article in JFL
Simp
guide
change? Timely critical strategic rapid
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
22/25
change? Timely, critical, strategic, rapidanalysis can help
Media reportsFECOFUN protes
Policy round table Discussion paper
Government proposal
Field rese
Amendment bill
withdrawn
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
23/25
r t ng or n uenc ng po cy: severa
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
24/25
r t ng or n uenc ng po cy: severachallenges
Single case?
Generalization
Critical?
Appreciative?
Qualitative
Quantitative
Attention to
details?
Too familiar
contexts?
Evidence
driven?
Theory
driven?
Diagnosis?
Specific
recommendations?
Identity?
Limits of NGO-
based researchEngagement?
Neutrality?
Summary
8/13/2019 Writing for Policy Change
25/25
Summary
Writing can make a lot of difference to policy, but only when don
- time
- relevance- quality
- presentation / form
- identity
Policy writing is an engaged, political actnot just a disengagedpractice
Writers need to manage their identitybeyond NGOs, as wider engaged public intellectuals