Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
How to write a scientific paper
PattyKaneApril12,2017
Somehelpfulresources!1) http://www.nature.com/scitable/ebooks/english-communication-for-scientists-
14053993/118519636#bookContentViewAreaDivID--gooddescriptionofwhatdifferentsectionsofapaperneedtoaccomplish
2) https://www.elsevier.com/connect/11-steps-to-structuring-a-science-paper-editors-will-take-seriously
3) --partofaseriesfromanauthor/reviewer/editoronhowtogetstartedonyourpaper
3) http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3009394/pdf/pro0019-2261.pdf--”TheArtofWritingScience”byKevinPlaxco--excellentpaperonhowtodevelopyourscientificwriting
4)http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/pub/the-science-of-scientific-writing/1--excellentarticlediscussingspecificsofstructureinscientificwriting
• When am I ready to write my paper?• What do I write?• Where do I start?• How do I know when I’m done?• Where do I send my paper?• What happens after I’ve submitted my
manuscript?
WhenamIreadytowrite?YOUNEEDTOBEABLETOMAKEASTORY
--Youcan(should)thinkaboutyourstorybeforeyou’rereadytowritethepaper
--The“story”usuallystartswithaquestion
--Ultimately,youneedtoletyourdatadrivethestory—thinkaboutwhatfiguresyouhaveandwouldneed
--Yourstoryisunlikelytofollowthechronologyofhowyoudidyourexperiments
WhenamIreadytowrite?
• YOUNEEDTOBEABLETOMAKEASTORY
• Buttherearedifferenttypesofstories:--shortcommunication/letter--regularresearchpaper--comprehensivepaper
Shouldyouplanforaspecificjournal????
WhatdoIwrite?
Mostscientificarticleshavethesamecentralsections:
IntroductionMaterialsandMethods/ExperimentalProceduresResultsDiscussion
Butit’snotusuallyagoodideatostartatthebeginningwhenyouwrite.
WheredoIstart?
• Outlineyourstory(oneapproach)– Startwithabroadoutline,thinkingaboutthequestionyouarestartingwithandwhereyouwanttoend
– Graduallymakeyouroutlinemoredetailed—whatpointswillyouneedtomake(whatdatawillyouneedtopresent)tobuildyourargument
– Outlinewilleventuallycontainsectionsofyourpaper
WheredoIstart?• Figures—letthedatadriveyourstory
• Resultssection—writearoundyourfigures
• Discussion—putsyourpaperincontext
• Materialsandmethods—writeafteryouknowwhatisgoingtobeinyourfinalfigures
• Introduction—presentsthequestionyouareaddressingandplacingyourpaperinyourfield
• Abstract—writeafterothersectionsarecomplete
Resultssection
• Relatesexperimentstoyourlargerquestion• Shouldpresentexperimentaldesignforeachfigure,butwithouttremendousexperimentaldetail
• Objectivelydescriberesults• Canincludesomeinterpretation/conclusions,butmuchofthisgoesinDiscussion
Discussionsection• Discussesyourresultsasawholeinthecontextofyourquestion—moredetailedanalysisofresults
• Pointsoutwhatyourresultsarecontributingtothefield
• Canthinkofa“pyramid”—startingfromyourdetailedresultsandmovingoutinbreadthtoendwithhowyourworkfitsintoyourfield
• Sometimesgoodtoendwithremainingquestionsornextsteps
Materialsandmethods
• Shouldallowreadersofyourpapertoreproduceyourexperiments
• ShouldNOTberequiredforreaderstounderstandyourresultsanddiscussion(Manypeoplewon’treadthissection)
• Asageneralrule:referenceestablishedmethods,butdescribeneworsubstantiallyrevisedmethodsinmoredetail
Introduction
• Makesthequestionyouareaaddressingclear• Canconvincereadertocontinuereadingyourpaper
• Couldbethoughtofasinvertedpyramid:mostgeneralinformationtomorespecificinformationtoyourproject
• PurposeisNOTtoshoweverythingyouknowaboutyourfield(youcandothatinyourthesis!).Shouldbeunbiasedbutbedirectedtowardframingyourquestion/results.
References• Formatisdependentonjournal
• Useareferencemanager(Endnoteorothers)
• Knowwhatisactuallyinthepapersyoureference!Trytofindsourcereferences.Don’tciteapaperforareferencethatisinthatpaper.
• Whenindoubt,reference—IntroductionandDiscussionwillgenerallyhavelotsofreferences;MaterialsandMethodsmayhavequiteafew,too.
Abstract
Abstract
• Veryimportantpartofpaper—willbeonPubMed.NEEDSTOCAPTUREINTEREST.
• Avoidalotofbackground,butmakeyourquestionclear.
• Generalexperimentalapproachandmostimportantresults.
• Requiresclear,concisewriting—haveothersoutsideyourlabreaditforclarity.
Title
• Currenttrendistowardtitlesthatdescriberesults:“TheRAVEcomplexisanisoform-specificV-ATPase assemblyfactor”
• Olderpapershadmoregeneraltitles:“BiochemicalcharacterizationofyeastV-ATPase”,“Astudyof…”
• Shortaspossible,butinformative
HowdoIknowwhenI’mdone?
Expectmanyrevisionsasyouwriteyourpaper
Getfeedbackfromothersoutsideyourlab,evenafterallauthorsareinagreement.
Recheck“InstructionstoAuthors”forthejournalwhereyouwillsubmityourpaper.
Aclear,well-writtenpaperisworththeeffort!!!
• Themostimportantruleissimple:ignoreanyandallotherrulesifdoingsomakesthepapereasiertoread.Writingtheclearest,easiesttoreadpaperspossibleistheone-and-onlygoal
From“TheArtofWritingScience”
Scientificwritingisanart!• Makeyourreader’sjobaseasyaspossible• Trytoavoidpassivevoice• Becarefulaboutsentencestructure—ifyouuselongsentences,thenneedtobeveryclear
• Watchoutforlabjargon,unnecessaryabbreviations
• Trytonoticepapersthatyoufindexceptionallyclearwhenyouarereading—lookatwhatmakesthemclear
• Improvingyourwritingisalife-longeffort.
WheredoIsendmypaper?
• Complicatedissue—manyfactorstoconsider:--Impactfactor???--Wherewillpeopleinyourfieldbemostlikelytoreadyourpaper?--Isthepaper’stopicnarroworbroad(bothcanbeverysignificant)--Journalsgivesomeguidelinesaboutthetypeofpaperstheyarelookingfor--Thinkaboutjournalsyoureadandcitefrequently
WhathappensafterI’vesubmittedmymanuscript?
WhathappensafterI’vesubmittedmymanuscript?
• Editorialreviewfirstatmanyjournals
• Editorsendspaperouttoreviewers(cansuggestreviewersincoverletteratsubmission)
• Reviewersaregenerallyanonymous;communicatewitheditorwhocommunicateswithyou.
Outcomes• Acceptwithoutrevision—rarebutjoyous
• Acceptpendingrevisions—lookatreviewercommentstoseeifyoucananswerthem.Don’thavetodoeverything,butdohavetoaddressthemseriously.Cantalktoeditoraboutcomments.
• Reject—mournforalittlewhile,butthenlookatreviewercommentsandresubmitsomewhereelse.
• Questions????