Upload
carly-walls
View
28
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
WP6 - Telomeres Methodology project on comparing telomere measurements across labs. Standing issues since October 2009. Frequency. MeanN Newcastle 85+ (87y)3725bp588 Newcastle 85+ (85y)3914bp754 Lothian 1921 (79y)4089bp497 Lothian 1936 (60y)4201bp1071 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
WP6 - Telomeres
Methodology project on comparing telomere measurements across
labs
Standing issues since October 2009
50
100
150
250
200
2000
300
60004000 8000 10000 12000
NSHDNewcastle 85+ (1)
Newcastle 85+ (2)
Lothian 1936
Lothian 1921
Tel. Length (bp)
Frequency Mean NNewcastle 85+ (87y) 3725bp 588Newcastle 85+ (85y) 3914bp 754Lothian 1921 (79y) 4089bp 497Lothian 1936 (60y) 4201bp 1071NSHD (53y) 5646bp 2660
Are we handling the same source of DNA:
NSHD 53y Whole blood
Lothian 1936 – 60y Whole blood
Lothian 1921 – 79y Whole blood
Newcastle 85+ - 85y Whole blood
Newcastle 85+ - 87y PBMC
Standing issues since October 2009
Update April 2010
Whole Blood Cells (WBC) vs Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC)Granulocytes -------T –cells T-cellsB- cells B-cellsMonocytes Monocytes
WBPBMC
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
Telomere Length (bp)
Whole Blood vs PBMC on the Newcastle 85+ Study (85y)
Update April 2010
Update April 2010
122501050087507000525035001750
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Telomere Length (bp)
Freq
uen c
y
3851 708.8 7083914 837.2 754
Mean StDev NPBMCWhole Blood
Whole Blood vs PBMC on the Newcastle 85+ Study (85y)
Why through all the cohorts, men have consistently longer telomere than women
when the general view is that women have longer telomere than men?
David Bann (UCL), Mike Gardner (Bristol) and Laura Wiley (Newcastle)
Telomere search strategy for Medline
10149 studies based on the title and abstract
1221 studies for more detailed evaluation (full paper)
Standing issues since October 2009
Update April 2010
Standing issues since October 2009
Is the Lothian Cohort healthier than the Newcastle 85+?
122501050087507000525035001750
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Telomere length (bp)
Freq
uenc
y
4089 412.6 4973914 837.2 754
Mean StDev NLothian 1921 at 79yNewcastle 1921 at 85y
4209 564.1 1463725 399.9 588
Mean StDev N
5600490042003500280021001400
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Telomere Length (bp)
Freq
uenc
y
Lothian 1921-87yNewcastle 1921-87y
Update April 2010
Standing issues since October 2009
Validation of telomere measurements by real time PCR between labs
Paul Shields (Glasgow) and Carmen Martin (Newcastle)
150 DNA samples tested in both labs (Plates 17 and 18 of NSHD Cohort)
100007500500025000
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Newcastle Normalized Telomere length (bp)
Glasgow Normalized RatiosR= 0.463, p=0.060
Update April 2010
International Inter-lab Comparison of Telomere Measurements
- Same DNA samples (10 cell lines)
- Three different techniques applied: Southern blot, Real Time PCR and STELA
- Blind measured by 9 labs (coding by Andrew Wong, London, MRC)
Dr Sophie BekaertGhent , Belgium (Southern blot)
Prof Dr Petra BoukampHeidelberg, Germany (Southern blot)
Dr Pim van der HarstGroningen, Netherlands (Real time)
Dr. Duncan BairdCardiff , UK(STELA)
Prof Nilesh SamaniLeicester, UK (Real time)
Dr Paul G ShielsGlasgow, UK (Real time)
Dr Richard CawthonSalt Lake City, USA(Real time)
Prof. Göran RoosUmeå, Sweden(Real time)
Dr Carmen Martin-RuizNewcastle, UK(Real time)
Update April 2010
Standing issues since October 2009
-Technician recruited last year went on maternity leave in October 2009 and she has just been replaced.
- Hertfordshire DNA samples (700 + 300)
- Caerphilly DNA samples (1000+1000)