Upload
zia
View
32
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
WP5 – Flagship Deployment. Period 1 Review Phil Evans – Logica/CGI. WP5 Objectives. Porting of the flagships to the cloud infrastructure provisioned by WP4. Evaluate and iteratively refine the deployment environment based on the need to improve the capabilities of each flagship. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
WP5 – Flagship Deployment
Period 1 ReviewPhil Evans – Logica/CGI
1
WP5 ObjectivesPorting of the flagships to the cloud infrastructure provisioned by WP4. Evaluate and iteratively refine the deployment environment based on the need to improve the capabilities of each flagship.
Specific goalsTo initially deploy the three flagship applications on the cloud infrastructure, at a limited scale, in such a way that the flagships can be used by their intended user communities;To assess the success of the deployments in terms of key evaluation criteria to be defined by each flagship;To move to a full scale deployment based on the results of the initial deployments and any necessary refinements of the application or deployment environments.
2
Effort ContributionLead Beneficiary: Logica Germany
WP523%
Person-Months per Participant
Participant Person-months
CERN 15.00
EMBL 15.00
Logica Germany
10.00
CNR 5.00
CSA EMEA 1.00
TOTAL 46.00
PM24PM7
WP5
3
Deliverables and MilestonesPeriod 1
Type Del. no
Name Nature Dissemination level
Date Delivered
Deliverable 5.1 Evaluation of initial flagship Deployments Report PU 19/06/20123
Milestone 11 Documented Criteria and Metrics against which the deployment will be evaluated
Report PU 02/04/2013
4
Scientific/technical achievementsand their impact
Completed:Initial Proof of Concept Deployments (H1, 2012) successfully completed and documented in D5.1Agreed Success Criteria & Metrics (MS11)
On-Going:Pilot Phase deployments on preliminary Blue Box environments (WP4)Task 5.5: Deployment Security Management
5
MS11: Success Criteria & Metrics
Agreed with both demand/supply-sideCriteria:
Time to First InstanceTime to port image, gain network connectivity, first instance of flagship application running
ScalingAbility to scale to desired levels, time taken to scale first instance/full-scale, number of failed node deployments
PerformancePerformance of application on suppliers’ infrastructure, network performance.
CostActual cost against projected cost, cost per “job”
SupportSuitability of support provision within the federated environment
Flagship Organisation SpecificSLA/T&Cs analysis against the set of points outlined by the QMUL Cloud Legal Project in their recent paper "Negotiating Cloud Contracts: Looking at Clouds from Both Sides Now".
6
Initial Deployments Evaluation
Completed H1, 2012Documented in D5.11-1 Deployments; No federationIdentified key areas to address before future deploymentsShaped the environments currently being used for the Pilot phase deployments.
7
Pilot Phase Deployments
Evolved Environments, 1 Commercial Blue Box, 1 Open-Source Blue BoxEvolved Supplier Infrastructure
Began late MarchDeployment planning many months before deployments beganWeekly, and in some cases, daily progress and coordination callsDelays due to factors external to the FP7 project.
8
Evolving deployment schedulefor second round of deployments
9
Overall modifications, corrective actions, re-tuning of objectives
Task 5.5: Deployment Security Management extended to cover the CSA’s Cloud Security Alliance Security, Trust and Assurance Registry (STAR) Increased effort for flagship deployment coordination due to increased complexities
Two Blue-Box DeploymentsDelays due to technical issues
10
Security Assessment & Challenge
Logica + Cloud Security AllianceFocuses on the Federated/Blue Box aspects of the pilotKey Areas:
Federated Cloud ManagementKey ManagementAvailabilityInteroperabilityAsset ManagementIncident ManagementLightweight Penetration Test
Currently underway & results GA3 - Heidelberg Decision to publish on STAR subject to agreement with all suppliers.
11
Exploitation and use of foreground
D5.1: Initial Flagship Evaluation (H1, 2012) MS11: Success
Criteria & Metrics
D4.3 Cloud Provisioning Report
Pilot Deployment Environments
(2013)
Deployment Evaluation
Task 5.5: Operational Policy
Definitions
Task 5.6: Technical Requirements for
Future Procurement
MS11: Success Criteria & Metrics
12
Collaboration with other beneficiaries
Demand-Side & Supply-Side Input to D5.1 & MS11
EMBL, CERN (+ ESA)Weekly Deployment Call
CERN, EMBL, T-Systems, Atos, CloudSigma and other Helix Nebula initiative membersESA
Daily calls to mitigate problems with specific flagships
13
Interaction with other FP7 projectsand stakeholders outside the consortium
SixSq (SME): SlipStream : CELAR/StratusLabSlipStream open-sourced under CELAR, key point in adoption for some suppliers.
Interoute : Cloud Service ProviderESA – Flagship Application providerThe Server Labs (SME): Service/Deployment Support
14
Summary
Proof of Concept deployments successfully completed, evaluated against MS11 criteria and documented in D5.1Pilot phase deployments underway via the two Blue Box deploymentsPilot deployments to be evaluated & presented at GA3 Security challenge to complete with results at GA3.Future Flagships…
15