24
WP 3 Advanced Biomass Conversion Levulinic Acid production from lignocellulose biomass: comparison of the DIBANET proposed design with the Biofine process for the acid hydrolysis route to Levulinic Acid Donncha Haverty , Karla Dussan, Dr. Anna V. Piterina, Dr. Buana Girisuta, Dr. D. Hayes, Dr. J. Leahy, Prof. M. Hayes

WP 3 Advanced Biomass Conversion Levulinic Acid production from lignocellulose biomass

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    10

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

WP 3 Advanced Biomass

Conversion

Levulinic Acid production from lignocellulose biomass: comparison of the DIBANET proposed design with the Biofine process for the acid hydrolysis route to Levulinic AcidDonncha Haverty, Karla Dussan, Dr. Anna V. Piterina, Dr. Buana Girisuta, Dr. D. Hayes, Dr. J. Leahy, Prof. M. Hayes

Overview

• Capabilities developed at Carbolea during DIBANET• Context

– Limiting factors in LA production – Existing chemical processes for levulinic acid production

• DIBANET pretreatment as the basis of an improved acid hydrolysis process

• The design• Comparison with Biofine

Processing capacity

• Lab scale – 0.1 Lt – 8Lt – Atmosphere – 50 Bar– In line sampling

• Pilot scale – 100 Sq m – Continuous system – Up to 1Lt/min

throughput

Desirable series of reactions

•Lignin interference

•Recalcitrance

•Physical state (Mass transfer)

•Reactive intermediates

•Optimum kinetics/yields/process engineering

•Selectivity highly T dependent

•Practicalities: T, P [Acid]

)1.283(.2785.0 .0099.0

max6

max +=

= − ACWe

Y

YS T

HU

LA

Originally DIBANET based on Biofine

Areas for improvement

• Hydrolysis of Cellulose limiting (high energy input)• Multiple components • Acid effect on process equipment• Desirable products not stable under process conditions• Low through put (95% water) • Energy intensive • Post processing complicated by the sulphuric acid• Scalability (high pressure CSTR)

The Context

• Is there a process to :– Reduce Mechanical energy inputs (Grinding, Chopping)– Reduce Energy inputs (heat)– Increase LA Yields– Environmentally sustainable– Cost effective

• Capital, energy, rendering of output streams

– Encompasses the best attributes of different approaches: fractionation, reduced recalcitrance etc

Pretreatment

• Feasible means of fractionating the biomass• Renders the cellulose to a high surface area form.• From 5 to 7.5% peroxide and high mass loadings

– > 90% lignin removal in 5 min– > 85 % Hemicellulose converted to monomeric sugars in the

liquor in 5 min– > Homogeneous cellulosic feedstock for hydrolysis

• The system is auto-thermal: temperatures of 110oC without external heat

• Resultant cellulose is 10-12 times more digestible

5% Acid150 CPre-treated

1% Acid175 CRaw material

1% Acid150 CPre-treated

1% Acid150 CRaw material

5% Acid150 CPre-treated

1% Acid175 CRaw material

1% Acid150 CPre-treated

1% Acid150 CRaw material

Avicel

Raw (non-treated) biomass)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1.1

1.2

1.3

0 0.45 1.5 7 24 48 72

Glucose release

(DNS assay), 540 nm

Duration of the enzymatic hydrolysis (hrs)

Substrate type

Pre-treated biomass

FA/H2O2 -(5%)

Pre-treated biomass

FA/H2O2 -(7.5%)

Profile of glucose release during enzymatic digestion of Avicel (microcrystalline cellulose), raw and pretreated Miscanthus (5.0% and 7.5% H2O2) at 45 oC with a commercial cellulase enzyme mix.

Enzymatic Digestion of Pretreated Miscanthus

Design Proposal Basis

• Pre-treatment to yield two streams - > Cellulose rich sludge- > FA liquor with dissolved C5 sugars and Lignin

• Liquor is fed to CSTR for conversion of C5 to furfural- > [FA] affects conversion

• The mixture is cleaned of humins and silicates • Various evaporation and water addition steps are used to precipitate the lignin• A liquid stream containing FA, Furfural and Water is sent for product recovery and recycling (largely determines the feasibility)• Cellulose sent for conventional hydrolysis at 150 C in a series of CSTR’s

Pre-treatment and furfural production

Levulinic Acid Production

Furfural recovery and FA recycle

LA Production: BIOFINE

Comparison of DIBANET and BIOFINE Yields

DIBANET BIOFINE

In Kg/hr Yield In Kg/hr Yield Improvement

Biomass 100.00 100.00

H2O2 55.00 0.00

H2SO4 0.60 1.35

MTHF 0.20 0.40

CaO 0.50 1.00

Out Out

LA 19.45 70.00 16.45 57.00 22%

FURFURAL 15.10 69.20 8.95 41.02 69%

FA (80%) 6.45 45.00 7.42 52.20 -16%

Lignin 22.50 75.00 0.00 0.00 -

AHR 23.41 57.39

Comparison of DIBANET and BIOFINE: Energy

Dibanet Biofine

LA production + Recovery 171.1 543.6

Furfural +FA Recovery 284.5 258.6

Total 456 802

StageDuty (kW)

Comparison of DIBANET and BIOFINE: Product value

Dibanet Biofine

In In

Kg/hr or KWhr Unit cost/kg Sub cost/hr Kg/hr or KWhr cost/kg Sub cost'/hr

Biomass 100.00 0.10 10.00 100.00 0.10 10.00

H2O2 55.00 0.30 16.50 0.00 0.30 0.00

H2SO4 0.60 0.30 0.18 1.35 0.30 0.41

MTHF 0.20 1.00 0.20 0.40 1.00 0.40

CaO 0.50 0.30 0.15 1.00 0.30 0.30

Energy 662.00 0.01 6.62 805.00 0.01 8.05

Sub Total Cost/hr 33.65 19.16

Out Out

LA 19.45 2.00 38.90 16.45 2.00 32.90

FURFURAL 15.10 2.00 30.20 8.95 2.00 17.90

FA (80%) 6.45 0.30 1.94 7.42 0.30 2.23

Lignin 22.50 0.50 11.25 0.00 0.50 0.00

Subtotal Product per hr 82.29 53.03

Gross Margin/hr 48.64 33.87

Moving Biomass into the pre-treatment reactor at scale

• Solid dosing pumps – Several Manufacturers

• Pultzmeister • Weir

– High solids loading 65% sludge – Large particles (no requirement for milling) – Exit to DN200– Flow rates to 60 M 3/hr – Pressures to >150 bar– Range of feeders and augers

Pre-treatment reactor

Thank You

• Acknowledgements – K Dussan – Dr B Giristuta– Dr D Hayes – Dr A. Piterina– Prof M Hayes – Dr J. J Leahy

• Questions?

Biofine paper sludge (cellulose only)