Upload
duongkhanh
View
248
Download
13
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Worldwide Market Update on NiMH, Li Ion and Polymer Batteries for Portable Applications and HEVS
THE 24th INTERNATIONAL BATTERY SEMINAR & EXHIBIT10:30 -12:15 Pre-Seminar Tutorial II
March 19, 2007
Hideo TakeshitaVice President
Institute of Information Technology, Ltd.URL: http://www.iit.co.jp
1. WW Secondary battery market overview2. LIB market trend by supplier and application3. LIB material and technology4. Small Fuel Cell impact on portable applications5. HEV and HEV battery movement6. LIB future market forecast
1. WW Secondary battery market overview
• LIB market further expansion– Double digit volume growth continues, 07CY volume will be 2.6B cells– Demand for NBPC/Cellular is firmly growing– Power Tools, DSC, game, audio and BT devices require more LIB– Ready for LIB powered HEV in 08-10CY, UPS and energy storage systems will follow
• Accident and recall make LIB tougher– Painful payment for “Too much cost reduction” and “Uncompleted high capacity
technology”– However, no replacement solution of LIB for portable devices– Before the full scale introduction of the 2nd gen. technology and LIB powered HEV, the
recent issues are meaningful warnings– Importance of the new safety technologies such as MBI’s HRL
• NiMH/NiCd future is unclear– Only one promising is AA/AAA NiMH for alkaline-primary cell compatible– Shocked by Nickel metal price unbelievable rise (LIB also suffered, but the damage is
smaller)
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 2
1-1 Almost 10B US$ market with HEV and packs
1535182318832060217116951692139413991204
810 935 905 1006 873 781 779
39100 281
7461038
863 910848 10711245
767 667 600767 692 739 750
110
57
152
4221292
17151900
24582805
218924583427
4019387841694273
00
0
0
00
0 2
39187
180299
358
487549
754 872
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,00091
CY
92C
Y
93C
Y
94C
Y
95C
Y
96C
Y
97C
Y
98C
Y
99C
Y
00C
Y
01C
Y
02C
Y
03C
Y
04C
Y
05C
Y
06C
Y
07C
Y
Sum
of t
he s
ales
of p
orta
ble
seco
ndat
y ba
ttery
(M U
S$ )
LIB Lami.LIB Cy/PrNiMHNiCd
• Fig.1 Worldwide rechargeable battery market (value base)
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 3
1-2 LIB penetration in PT is faster than expected
• Competition among Sony/Sanyo/SDI and E-One LiMn2O4/A123 LiFePO4 technologies accelerate the shift to LIB at PT
• Fig.2 Cell demand and pack base composition by chemistry (07CY)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
NBPC
Cellular
Movie
Power Tools
Cordless phone
DSC
Audio
Game
Consumer
HEV
Others
Worldwide cell demand(Million cells/CY)
NiCd
NiMH
Cy LIB
Pr LIB
Lami LIB
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
NBPC
Cellular
Movie
Power Tools
Cordless phone
DSC
Audio
Game
Consumer
HEV
Pack volume share
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 4
1-3 Always Material/Cell/User collaborate
• Good triangle realizes the technology and cost improvement of LIB (It seems that FC does not have…)
• Fig.3 Historical review of LIB technology/player/user91-95 96-00 01-05 06-10 Future
Key tech. New Cathode LiCoO2 LiMn2O4 NMC and/or High V chargeNCALiFePO4
New Anode Amorphous carbon…Graphite Graphite capacity enahancementSn type anode Si type anode and/or Low V cut
New supporting material Functional electrolyte HRL/Functional separator or new layer Non flammeble electrolyte?Gel polymer and laminate package
New structure Cylindrical Prismatic Laminate and/or stack Thin and large electrode for HEV Bi-polar system for HEV?
Sony and ATB Sanyo and MBI BYD for manual operation A123… Toyota and NissanGSMT, NEC and Maxell LGC and SDI
Sanyo for high speed manufacturing
Sony CAM, Dell, Toshiba for LIB adoption MOT for low cost Nokia for low cost Dewalt for LiFePO4 JP big 3 for HEVIBM ThinkPad for safety SEMC/Apple for polymerNTT Docomo for safety Bosch/Makita for PT
Chinese manual operationJP high speed manufacturingKorea challenge by financial support
Material price down (by the volume increase) and/or Takeshita? Material again (by inexpensive process and raw material)
Key player
Key user
Cost reduction
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 5
2. LIB market trend by supplier and application
• Every supplier has a double-edged sword– Sanyo: Strong in low cost segment and business success, annoyed by the high voltage and high
capacity cell problems– SDI: Strong in delivery and communication to be No.2, but not ready for further price war and high
safety technology– Sony: PT and polymer business really good, however deeply damaged by the recall– MBI: Advanced with high capacity and safety technology, the task is having the second vendor
and business success– LGC: Cylindrical and polymer coming back with the good chemical/technology background,
although prismatic is struggling to get the big customers– Unique is that LIB business succession and whole company/group situation are opposite
• MOT and Nokia moves are to be watched– Nokia’s low cost procurement strategy directs the final competition of Sanyo/BYD (and SDI)– MOT’s seeking reliable and high technology is possible to cut Chinese, also gives big impact on
JP mid-3 (SGS/Maxell/NEC)• 18650 business is really good, but the high capacity must be supported by the
new safety technology– 2.6Ah shift is slower than that of 2.0-2.4Ah due to the Sony’s recall and Sanyo’s incomplete
product– Limited mobile Notebook starts to employ 2.8Ah (High V, Sanyo/SDI/LGC) from mid-07 and
demands more of 2.9Ah (Low V cut, MBI)…adjusts the power management for both solutions– Growing demand for NBPC and PT will drive the shortage of supply again, even though Sanyo,
SDI and MBI make new line installations
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 6
2-1 Equipment market is really active
• Fig.4 Portable device market trends
0100200300400500600700800900
10001100
02C
Y
03C
Y
04C
Y
05C
Y
06C
Y
07C
Y
Cel
lula
r pho
ne u
nit s
hipm
ent (
Milli
on u
nits
/CY
OthersLGESEMCSECMOTNokia
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
02C
Y
03C
Y
04C
Y
05C
Y
06C
Y
07C
Y
Not
eboo
k P
C u
nit s
hipm
ent (
Milli
on u
nits
/CY
OthersLenovoAcerToshibaHPDell
0
5
10
15
20
02C
Y
03C
Y
04C
Y
05C
Y
06C
Y
07C
YCam
cord
er u
nit s
hipm
ent (
Milli
on u
nits
/CY
OthersHitachiSamsungCanonJVCPanaSony
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 7
0102030405060708090
100110
02C
Y
03C
Y
04C
Y
05C
Y
06C
Y
07C
Y
Dig
ital C
amer
a un
it sh
ipm
ent (
Milli
on u
nits
/CY
OthersCasioPanasonicSamsungFujifilmNikonOlympusKodakSonyCanon
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
02C
Y
03C
Y
04C
Y
05C
Y
06C
Y
07C
Y
Por
tabl
e G
ame
unit
ship
men
t (M
illion
uni
ts/C
Y
Sony PS3controllerSony PSP
Nintendo GB/DS
0102030405060708090
100
02C
Y
03C
Y
04C
Y
05C
Y
06C
Y
07C
Y
Por
tabl
e H
DD
/flas
h m
usic
pla
yer u
nit s
hipm
en(M
illion
uni
ts/C
Y)
OthersSonyDigitalway/mpioAigoSamsungReigncom/iriverCreativeApple
2-2 Demand situation remains good
• By the gradual stabilization of demand parameter of NBPC/Cellular, LIB demand increase for 2 big applications is almost proportional toequipment unit growth
– NBPC 6.5cells/pack, 1.15packs/unit– Cellular 1.2packs/unit
• Growth of PT-LIB is much more than expected• Fig.5 LIB shipment volume by application
229 339 429 440 557 602513
769970 1041
1203 13161
420
73117
0200400600800
100012001400160018002000220024002600
02CY 03CY 04CY 05CY 06CY 07CY
LIB
dem
and
(Mill
ion
cells
/CY Others
PTGameDSCPDAAudioCamcorderPHSCellularNBPC
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 8
2-3 Biz success depends on the big users
• Nokia/MOT share 27% of total LIB demand• Avoiding Sony for NBPC 18650??• Fig.6 LIB supplier-big user matrix (07CY prediction)
Total Pr/Laminate Nokia MOT SEC SEMC LGE BenQ Cellular 6 total OthersSanyo 588.0 358.0 140.3 78.0 24.0 - 18.0 1.0 261.3 96.7Sony 358.5 183.5 50.5 6.0 - 50.0 8.0 6.5 121.0 62.5BYD 120.0 118.0 72.0 20.0 10.0 - - - 102.0 16.0MBI 237.3 87.3 46.5 - - - - - 46.5 40.8SDI 385.8 252.8 96.7 22.5 65.0 13.0 - 4.0 201.2 51.6LGC 215.4 125.4 - - - 35.0 50.0 3.0 88.0 37.4
Lishen 121.5 109.5 - 60.0 10.0 - - 3.5 73.5 36.0E-One 22.5 2.5 - - - - - - 0.0 2.5Maxell 101.7 101.7 - 45.0 30.0 - - 4.0 79.0 22.7NEC 84.9 84.9 - 10.0 1.0 - - 0.5 11.5 73.4SGS 64.2 64.2 - 36.0 - 4.0 - - 40.0 24.2
2,299.8 1,487.8 406.0 277.5 140.0 102.0 76.0 22.5 1,024.0 463.8Units 375.0 267.0 130.5 93.6 71.1 22.2 69%
Blue: Decrease Pack/Unit 1.08 1.04 1.07 1.09 1.07 1.01Yellow: Increase Sanyo Sanyo SDI Sony LGC SonyRed: New M/S 35% 28% 46% 49% 66% 29%
Cy Dell HP Toshiba Acer Lenovo ASUS PC 6 total OthersSanyo 230.0 30.0 12.0 24.0 20.0 28.0 - 114.0 116.0Sony 175.0 10.0 24.0 12.0 8.0 20.0 1.6 75.6 99.4BYD 2.0 - - - - - - 0.0 2.0MBI 150.0 15.0 8.0 37.0 36.0 0.3 - 96.3 53.7SDI 133.0 34.0 41.0 - 6.0 - 22.0 103.0 30.0LGC 90.0 24.0 39.0 - - - - 63.0 27.0
Lishen 12.0 - - - - - - 0.0 12.0E-One 20.0 - 0.2 - - - - 0.2 19.8
812.0 113.0 124.2 73.0 70.0 48.3 23.6 452.1 359.9Units 15.80 16.00 10.50 10.00 8.30 3.30 56%
LIB ratio 98% 100% 100% 100% 95% 100%Cell/Pack 6.40 6.70 6.40 6.20 6.00 6.50
07CY Million cells/CY
07CY Million cells/CY
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 9
2-4 What is the goal of Nokia/MOT?
• Fig.7 Nokia/MOT’s cell vendor share trend
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
1Q 0
3
2Q 0
3
3Q 0
3
4Q 0
3
1Q 0
4
2Q 0
4
3Q 0
4
4Q 0
4
1Q 0
5
2Q 0
5
3Q 0
5
4Q 0
5
1Q 0
6
2Q 0
6
3Q 0
6
4Q 0
6
Cel
l ven
dor s
hare
in M
OT LGC
SDIATLSonyNECMaxellSanyoSGSLishenBYD
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
1Q 0
3
2Q 0
3
3Q 0
3
4Q 0
3
1Q 0
4
2Q 0
4
3Q 0
4
4Q 0
4
1Q 0
5
2Q 0
5
3Q 0
5
4Q 0
5
1Q 0
6
2Q 0
6
3Q 0
6
4Q 0
6
Cel
l ven
dor s
hare
in N
okia
Sony
SDI
BYD
MBI
Sanyo
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 10
2-5 Is 18650 biz promising?
• 2.0Ah still demanded for NBPC-LE: Sanyo Y, Sony G5…price competition is hard
• 2.6Ah shift is not so fast…but the launch of 2.8Ah soon (of course price is good=high)
• Fig.8 LIB 18650 cell demand/supply
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1Q 0
6
2Q 0
6
3Q 0
6
4Q 0
6
1Q 0
7
2Q 0
7
3Q 0
7
4Q 0
7
1865
0 ce
ll(M
illion
cel
ls/m
onth
)
2.8Ah2.6Ah2.4Ah2.2Ah2.0Ah1.8Ah1.6AhMax outputD indicator
18650 Design capacity(M cells/M) 1Q 06 2Q 06 3Q 06 4Q 06 1Q 07 2Q 07 3Q 07 4Q 07Sanyo 16.0 16.0 20.5 20.8 20.8 20.8 25.3 29.8SDI 9.0 9.0 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 14.5 14.5Sony 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5MBI 10.5 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 14.5 14.5LGC 9.0 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 10.5 10.5Design capacity total 61.0 63.0 70.0 70.3 70.3 70.3 81.3 85.8
Plus 15.5M18650 Max output
(M cells/M) 1Q 06 2Q 06 3Q 06 4Q 06 1Q 07 2Q 07 3Q 07 4Q 07Sanyo 15.2 15.2 17.9 19.8 19.8 19.8 22.5 26.7SDI 8.6 8.6 9.8 10.9 10.9 10.9 12.4 13.8Sony 15.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 15.7MBI 10.0 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 12.2 12.9LGC 8.6 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 10.0 10.0Max output total 58.0 59.9 63.8 66.8 66.8 66.8 72.7 79.1
Plus 12.3M18650 shipment result
(M cells/M) 1Q 06 2Q 06 3Q 06 4Q 06 1Q 07 2Q 07 3Q 07 4Q 07Sanyo 13.75 13.30 15.23 17.05SDI 7.84 7.90 8.67 8.67Sony 13.24 11.60 13.50 13.20MBI 8.25 7.25 9.15 9.90LGC 4.45 5.60 7.31 8.27Shipment total 47.53 45.65 53.86 57.09NBPC Cy 41.98 39.15 46.94 48.21 42.29 42.76 50.23 56.39PT Cy 4.13 5.17 6.64 8.16 8.35 9.00 10.00 11.50Demand indicator 46.11 44.32 53.58 56.37 50.64 51.76 60.23 67.89D/S 18650 80% 74% 84% 84% 76% 77% 83% 86%
Plus 11.5M
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 11
2-6 Who is the key player for the total NiCd replacement?
• 3S-5S (10.8-18V) light-weight product for existing HE segment• 7-10S (28-36V) high-voltage product to create new segment replacing
AC or Air powered tools• Dewalt successfully launched LiFePO4 based LIB with A123, the
competitors are ready to follow• Fig.9 LIB shipment volume by supplier/user for PT (06Q4)
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 12
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Bosch 18650VT
B&D 18650VT
Dewalt 26650M1
Dewalt 26650V
Dewalt 18650V/W
Makita 18650V
Hitachi 26650V
Hitachi 18650W
Panasonic 18650W
Panasonic 26650
Ryobi 18650VT
MAX Japan 4Ah Pr
Metabo 18650S
Chervon 18650S
Hilti 18650V/S
Hilti 26650
Regitar 18650
Ferm 18650
Others 18650
Milwaukee 26650
Milwaukee 26700
LIB shipment(K cells/month)
SonyMBISanyoLGCSDIE-OneA123GSY
2-7 Is MBI going to challenge again?
• 3S (Sanyo, SDI and Sony) volume is big enough• Challengers to be watched are MBI, LGC and Maxell• Question mark is the future of Chinese…(except for ATL and BAK?)• Fig.10 LIB shipment volume by supplier
173 221 243 243 343 35993 146 161 187 203 237200309 374 444
504 58857
97132 200
275386
0200400600800
1000120014001600180020002200240026002800
02CY 03CY 04CY 05CY 06CY 07CY
LIB
cel
l shi
pmen
t (M
illion
cel
ls/C
Y)
Lami. othersLIB othersLishenE-OneSDILGCBYDMaxellNECSGSSanyoMBIToshibaSony
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 13
2-8 Capacity enhancement continues
• 07CY total capacity increase will be 27.6M/M, and the majority is for cylindrical
– Cy 16.1M mainly by the new line of Sanyo, SDI, MBI– Pr 2.0M only by Maxell (no increase at Sanyo or SDI)– Polymer 9.5M mainly by Sony Wuxi expansion (only 1M at LGC)
• Fig.11 LIB cell production capacity (designed=yield & utilization 100%)
020406080
100120140160180200220240260280300
1Q 06 2Q 06 3Q 06 4Q 06 1Q 07 2Q 07 3Q 07 4Q 07
LIB
cel
l pro
duct
ion
capa
city
(Milli
once
lls/m
onth
)
BYDLishenMaxellNECSGSLGCMBISonySDISanyoLamiPrCy
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 14
2-9 Problem is the low profitability
• Price competition and Ni/Co metal price situation are tough– Only Sanyo keeps the high level of profit (in spite of the rapid ASP drop)– Even after being No.2, SDI challenge continues for the sake of high margin– Big risks are the accident and recall always
• Fig.12 Profitability and ASP trend of LIB suppliers
-15%-10%
-5%
0%5%
10%15%
20%25%30%
CY
02
CY
03
CY
04
CY
05
CY
06
CY
07
Ope
ratin
g pr
ofit/
Rev
enue
SanyoMBIBYDSGSSonyNECMaxellLGCSDIAverage
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
CY
02
CY
03
CY
04
CY
05
CY
06
CY
07
AS
P(U
S$/
cell)
SanyoMBIBYDSonyLGCSDIAverage
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 15
2-10 Key is the material again
• Material cost shares 60+ % of LIB business• Fig.13 Cost composition of LIB (for entire business) and Co/Ni price
trend
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
3Q 0
5
4Q 0
5
1Q 0
6
2Q 0
6
3Q 0
6
Cos
t com
posi
tion
for L
IB e
ntire
bus
ines
s @
ace
rtain
pla
yer
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
US
$/po
und
Material cost Fixed costSGA Operating profitCobalt US$
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 16
3. LIB material and technology
• Three candidates for higher capacity– NCA: MBI, Sony…not bad and improving– High V with NMC and/or Co: Sanyo…in trouble…bad choice?– Si or Sn: MBI with Si, Sony with Sn…not bad and improving
• Heat resistance Layer for safer design– Ceramic coat on Graphite or PE: MBI, LGC (but just for cylindrical?)– Heat resistance polymer on PE: Sanyo
• More safety technologies to come
• PT cell technology for power and low cost– Fine particle size and good conductor: Sony’s NCA/LiMn2O4 , A123’s LiFePO4
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 17
3-1 xxx Million US$ loss is possible
• Lithium increase in a cell…difficult to kill LIB by IC/PTC/CID/Separator SD and avoid thermal run away
• Too much cost saving…sometimes neglecting minimum quality level• Fig.14 Number of reports of LIB accident
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
95C
Y
96C
Y
97C
Y
98C
Y
99C
Y
00C
Y
01C
Y
02C
Y
03C
Y
04C
Y
05C
Y
06C
Y
Num
ber of report
C: At end user-recallB: At OEMA: At cell manufacturersNBPC related
Significance of trouble is more
notable
Note) 1 example includesMitsubishi Electric Cellular D902i D06 battery pack recall announced on 2006/12/7(Objective pack 1.3million, 18 abnormal heating reported including 1 explosion), so Sony’s recall at Dell is also only 1 example count
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 18
3-2 Who will be the next to have issues on 2.8Ah?
• Sony got troubles with 2.4/2.55Ah, Sanyo is struggling with 2.6Ah and NMC/Co 4.33-4.38V T series (prismatic)
• High V or Low V cut…it does not matter for the equipment• Does MBI choose and improve the right technologies? NCA, Si and HRL• Fig.15 Roadmap of 18650 cells
Current CY07 CY08 CY09 CY10Sanyo 2.6Ah 2.8Ah 3.0Ah
4.2-3.0V 4.35-3.0V 4.35-2.5VCo NMC/Co NMC/CoG G Si
Sony 2.6Ah 2.8Ah 3.0Ah4.2-3.0V 4.2-3.0V 4.2-2.5V
NCA/NCM NCA/NCM NCA/NCMG G SnCoC?
MBI 2.9Ah 3.2Ah 3.6Ah4.2-2.5V 4.2-2.5V 4.2-2.0V
NCA NCA NCAG G SiO2-Si
SDI 2.6Ah 2.8Ah 3.0Ah 3.2Ah4.2-3.0V 4.35-3.0V 4.35-3.0V 4.35-2.5V
Co Co NMC NMCG G G Si type
LGC 2.6Ah 2.8Ah 3.0Ah 3.2Ah4.2-3.0V 4.35-3.0V 4.35-3.0V 4.35-2.5V
Co NMC NMC NMCG G G Si type
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 19
3-3 MBI is appealing and appealing
• Latest NCA 2.9Ah-18650– Stable NCA with over 10 years development– HRL by good Al2O3/binder/coating technology– New Separator with Al2O3/Aramid combination on PE
• 3.6Ah in 09CY is possible– By good Si type electrode combined with special substrate and binder
• Fig.16 MBI’s HRL and cross-section of electrodes
0%20%40%60%80%
100%
2Q07
3Q07
4Q07
1Q08P
ortio
n in
MB
I Cy
LIB HRL type Normal
23µAl2O3-Aramid layer
Sumitomo Chemical separator
PE layerAl2O3 layer
Al2O3-Aramid layerSumitomo Chemical separator
PE layer
Outside of rollDirect coating of Al2O3 4µ
Anode MPG, approx. 150µ (9µ Cu foil, coated both sides)
Direct coating of Al2O3 4µ
Cathode NCA, approx. 130µ (18µ Al foil, coated both sides)
Al2O3 layer
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 20
3-4 Hot material 1: Cathode
• New suppliers play important roles
– NMC: Tanaka and Nichia– NCA: Toda and Sumitomo– LiMn2O4: Nikki, Nichia and
TORONOX– LiFePO4: A123, Phostech/Sud-
Chemie and Sony• KFS as active material supplier
– Holding precursors– Hedging metal price change– Lowering process cost
• KFS of material itself– Combined with good binder and
conductor (even with additive)– Good coating technology
• Fig.17 Cathode active material supply for LIB (07CY forecast, total 26062ton) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
Nichia Corp.
Umicore Korea
Nippon Chemical Industrial
Seimi Chemical
Seido Chemical
Toda Kogyo
Sumitomo Metal Mining
FMC Lithium
Chinese Local
Cell Maker In-house
Tanaka Chemical
Toda Kogyo
Nichia Corp.
Seimi Chemical
Mitsubishi Chemical
Umicore Korea
Cell Maker In-house
Toda Kogyo
Sumitomo Metal Mining
Seimi Chemical
JFE Mineral
Nikki Chemical
Nichia Corp.
Mitsui Mining
Nippon Denko
TORONOX
Mitsui Zosen
Nippon Chemical Industrial
Phostech/Sud-Chemie
A123Systems
Cathode active material (Ton/CY)
Sanyo SonyMBI SDILGC BYDLishen SGSNEC MaxellE-One Others
LiCoO2
NMC
NCA/NCM
LiMn2O4
LiFePO4
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 21
3-5 Hot material 2: Separator
• Unique industry: No competition for the last 15 years
– Tonen mechanical strength: Sony, SDI, LGC, SGS
– Asahi high permeability: Sanyo, Maxell– Dry type low heat shrinkage and cost: MBI,
NEC, Chinese and HEV• Required new feature 1: High heat
resistance by ceramic or polymer– MBI’s HRL– LGC’s ceramic coating on common
membrane– Sanyo’s xx coating and Asahi’s new
membrane• Required new feature 2: Stabilization
layer for NCA– Sumitomo’s new membrane for MBI
• Chance has come for the new comers– but the experience and know-how of big 3 are
strong, and High V and Si type are OK by the modification of existing separator
• Fig.18 Separator supply for LIB (07CY forecast, total 214M square meters)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Asahi KaseiChemicals
Celgard
Tonen ChemicalNasu
Ube Industries
SumitomoChemical
Mitsui Chemical
Entek
SK
Separator(Million m2CY)
SanyoSonyMBISDILGCBYDLishenSGSNECMaxellE-OneBAKOthers
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 22
4. Small Fuel Cell impact on portable applications
• For micro FC, LIB is still expensive and energy density is low – The latest 2.9Ah-18650 from MBI has 600+Wh/l and 3.6Ah-18650 will be available in
09CY with 700Wh/l (cell level)– But the most available product for NBPC now is 2.4Ah-2.6Ah and 6-cell pack energy
density is only 289-313Wh/l• Typical NBPC 18650-6cell pack W 20.5cm x D 4.5cm x H 2.0cm (185cc)
– 0.5-0.6US$/Wh for the major application now, LIB 10 years target is achieving 0.20-0.25US$/Wh
• Chance has come if FC provides “safety concern free” or “metal free”• Fig.19 LIB used in major applications (Price and cost US$ as of 07Q1)
PackUS$/Wh
Pack OEMPrice Cell cost FG/PCM
costAssy and
others Pack Wh Cell specification Pack retailprice
Notebook PC Dell 0.56 30.00 14.40 6.00 9.60 53.28 2.4Ah-18650 3S2P 119.00Cellular Nokia 0.60 2.15 1.20 0.50 0.45 3.59 0.97Ah-553350 1S 49.95Cellular Nokia 0.66 1.70 0.95 0.40 0.35 2.59 0.70Ah-553450 1S N/ADSC Canon 1.13 3.17 2.00 0.60 0.57 2.81 0.76Ah-553436 1S 37.50Game Nintendo 0.76 2.80 1.54 0.60 0.66 3.70 1.00Ah-653046 1S N/ABT Motorola 3.24 1.80 1.00 0.50 0.30 0.56 0.15Ah-501230 1S N/APT Hitachi 0.52 23.00 15.67 3.33 4.00 44.40 1.50Ah-18650 4S2P 133.33
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 23
5-1 LIB-HEV is almost ready
• LIB shift is confirmed, and the speed of NiMH replacement will be faster due to the current rise of Ni metal price
• Fig.20 Short term forecast of LIB-HEV
0200400600800
100012001400160018002000
CY0
8
CY0
9
CY1
0
CY1
1
LIB-
HEV
uni
t (K
units
/CY) DCX
SubaruHyundaiNissanHondaToyotaHEV total
CY08 CY09 CY10 CY11 Model kWh Cells Ah Likely Delivery style Cell Pack Cell cost Pack price NoteLikely winners Toyota 30 300 300 400 Prius III or new HEV 0.77 56 3.8 PEVE Pr Pack 70 130 54 100 A bit delaying
Honda 50 100 200 New HEV 0.69 48 4.0 GSY Pr Sanyo Pr Module 80 150 55 104 Alternative choice NiMHNissan 120 240 New HEV 2 models 1.04 80 3.6 NEL Lami LGC Lami Cell 60 100 62 104 Infiniti FR models
Dark horses Hyundai 30 40 100 New HEV 0.76 42 5.0 LGC Lami GSY Pr Pack or module NiMH MBI/GSY module in consideration
Subaru 5 20 50 Legacy 0.62 48 3.6 NEL Lami Pack 70 150 44 93 Possible to be postponedFollowers DCX 5 20 30 Mercedes S-class 1.27 88 4.0 JCS Cy Pack 120 200 152 253 JCS for EU makers from 2012
GM xx AHS2 HVE Cy LGC Lami PackGM Plug-in series HEV Cobasys/A124 Cy JCS Cy Pack Only the concept modelFord yy ? SDI Cy Sanyo Cy Pack Sanyo LIB with VW from 2012
30 390 600 1020Reference Toyota 524 422 509 550 Other NiMH models 1.40 180 6.5 PEVE Pr 50 90 70 126 kWh and JPY/Wh are average
Cell+AFE IC-->Module+ECS-->Pack
CY10 K JPY
LIB models total
LIB-HEV 1000 units CY10 Target JPY/WhLIB suppliersAutomotive makers Next choice
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 24
5-2 Ni price rise kills NiMH??
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 25
• Prius II replacement battery retail price: JPY 128K• 06Q3 estimated pack cost: over JPY 130K (Ni price JPY 3400/kg)
– 6-cell module (46.6Wh) manufacturing cost JPY61/Wh– 28-module pack (1.31kWh w ECU w/o cooling fan) manufacturing cost JPY101/Wh
• Fig.21 Cost estimation of Prius II NiMH (as of 06Q3)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Cel
lel
emen
ts
Mod
ule
mfgN
iMH
6-c
ell m
odul
e m
anuf
actu
ring
cost
(JP
Y
M DepM LaborTerminalsPackageCell elementsOthersKOH aqPP wovenCelmetMHNi(OH)2
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
Pack
mat
eria
ls
Pack
mfgN
iMH
28-
mod
ule
pack
man
ufac
turin
g co
st (J
PY
OHP DepP LaborPack materialsService plugSMRsRestraint rodsLower caseUpper coverEnd platesBattery ECU28 modules
5-3 1st gen. HEV-LIB is in the 3rd phase
• To achieve JPY60/Wh for cell– Phase 1: X2 power/energy of NiMH– Phase 1.5: Confirm safety and
reliability– Phase 2: Low cost cell design
• Thick and small electrodes• Fast assembly (less number of tab,
stack..)– Phase 3: Material price reduction– Phase 3.5: Low cost module design
including AFE-ECU
• Fig.22 Estimated cost of HEV-LIB cell (100K batteries a year)
Cell size for 3.6Ah 144 x 251 x 3mm
LiMn2O4 cathode energy density mAh/g 75Cathode coating thickness (1 side) micron 30Cathode active material per area (1 side) g/cm2 0.011LiMn2O4 cathode active material amount g 48 18 US$/kgCathode active material area (total) cm2 4,364Number of cathode 2 side layer 10Cathode active material area per 1 stack (2 side layer) cm2 218Example of cathode size 12cm x 20cm (cm2) 240Al cathode current collectror area 12cm x 21cm x 10 (cm2) 2,520 0.3 US$/m2Cathode current collector thickness micron 15Separator thickness micron 25Total thickness of cathode with separator micron 1,250PVDF binder amount (3 wt% of cathode paste) g 1.7Carbon black conductor amount (10wt% of cathode paste) g 5.5 5 US$/kgNMP solution (12wt% PVDF/NMP) g 13.8 10 US$/kg
Carbon anode energy density mAh/g 180Anode coating thickness (1 side) micron 35Anode active material per area (1 side) g/cm2 0.004Carbon anode active material amount g 20 15 US$/kgAnode active material area (total) cm2 5000Number of Anode 2 side layer 11Cathode active material area per 1 stack (2 side layer) cm2 227Example of anode size 12.5cm x 20.5cm (cm2) 256Cu anode current collectror area 12.5cm x 21.5cm x 11 (cm2) 3,146 1.2 US$/m2Anode current collector thickness micron 10Total thickness of anode micron 880PVDF binder amount (3 wt% of anode paste) g 0.6NMP solution (12wt% PVDF/NMP) g 5.2 10 US$/kg
Separator area 13cm x 20.5cm x 20 layer (cm2) 5,330 1.3 US$/m2Formulated electrolyte amount g 40 13 US$/kgLead tab inside (Al for cathode) piece 1 0.01 US$/pieceLead tab inside (Cu for anode) piece 1 0.02 US$/pieceAl/PP package 15cm x 25.5cm x 2 x 1.5 (cm2) 1,186 5 US$/m2Al/PP package thickness micron 150Lead tab outside with tab film set 1 0.85 US$/setLead tab outside (Al for positive) with tab film piece 1 0.4 US$/pieceLead tab outside (Cu for negative) with tab film piece 1 0.45 US$/pieceTotal thickness of cell mm 2.43
Cell manufacturing yield (material utilizaiton & pass rate) Electrode manufacturing process 93.0%Stacking process 98.0%Cell assembly process 98.0%Formation process 96.0%
Material priceMaterial specification and amount 100K batteries
3.6Ah cell material and production cost CostLiMn2O4 cathode 1.01 US$/cellAl foil 0.09 US$/cellCarbon black 0.03 US$/cellCarbon anode 0.35 US$/cellCu foil 0.44 US$/cellPVDF-NMP solution 0.22 US$/cellSeparator 0.75 US$/cellFormulated electrolyte 0.55 US$/cellAl/PP laminate foil 0.63 US$/cellLead tab/tab film 0.94 US$/cell1 cell material cost total (including others unlisted) 5.01 US$/cell1 cell production cost total (Depreciation/factory labor) 2.00 US$/cell1 cell material + production cost 7.01 US$/cellUS$/Wh 0.54JPY/Wh (JPY120/US$) 64.93
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 26
6. LIB future market forecast
Copyright ©2007 /IIT Page 27
• IIT’s forecast is always minimum (pessimistic…)– Only visible and confirmed application are included– 16CY: Cellular 1524M unit & NBPC 216M unit– Wh base: 06CY 10659Mega Wh 16CY 31299Mega Wh
• Fig.23 Long-term demand forecast of LIB (Portable and HEV)
Note) Latest forecast revised in February, 2007
0500
100015002000250030003500400045005000
03C
Y
04C
Y
05C
Y
06C
Y
07C
Y
08C
Y
09C
Y
10C
Y
11C
Y
12C
Y
13C
Y
14C
Y
15C
Y
16C
Y
LIB
cel
l dem
and
(Milli
on c
ells
/CY) HEV
OthersBTGameMP3CAMDSCPTNBPCCellular