14
World-Systems Theory and the Environment

World-Systems Theory and the Environment

  • Upload
    clancy

  • View
    45

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

World-Systems Theory and the Environment. The Unequal Ecological Exchange Thesis. Due to their economic, military, and political power, wealthy nations have the capacity to: Make environmental “withdrawals” from poor nations (in terms of natural resource extraction), and, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: World-Systems Theory and the Environment

World-Systems Theory and the Environment

Page 2: World-Systems Theory and the Environment

The Unequal Ecological ExchangeThesis

Due to their economic, military, and political power, wealthy nations have the capacity to:– Make environmental “withdrawals” from poor

nations (in terms of natural resource extraction), and,

– Make environmental “inputs” in poor nations in terms of pollution or waste.

Page 3: World-Systems Theory and the Environment

World-systems theory pays great attention to the historical development of capitalism…

Why are some countries wealthy (core) or others relatively poor (semi-periphery) or very poor (periphery)?

• The establishment of an international division of labor.

• The creation and maintenance of unequal terms of exchange.

• Processes of underdevelopment.

Page 4: World-Systems Theory and the Environment

Three Periods of Colonialism• Global Expansion 1492-1776: Spanish,

Portuguese, Dutch, French, and the English.• 1776-1870: British Dominance.• 1870-1914: The “New Imperialism.”

Page 5: World-Systems Theory and the Environment

European colonies in 1674

World colonies, 1900

World colonies, 1800

Page 6: World-Systems Theory and the Environment

Colonialism and the Slave Trade– Peaked in 18th C– Colonial

expansion and triangular trade – exchange between Europe, Africa, and the Americas – built from slave trade routes.

Page 7: World-Systems Theory and the Environment

Colonial Commercial Relationships• Shaped colonial economies.

– Orientation away from a subsistence to a cash economy.– Extractive / external-market focus.

• Established a new international division of labor.– Colonies produce and export raw materials (minerals, timber,

monoculture commodity agriculture).– Colonizers export manufactured goods.– Set up export dependence.

• Established unequal terms of exchange.• Underdeveloped colonies.

– Extracted tremendous wealth in terms of natural resources.– Created vast amounts of upheaval and social disruption.

Page 8: World-Systems Theory and the Environment

The Unequal Ecological ExchangeThesis

Due to their economic, military, and political power, wealthy nations have the capacity to:– Make environmental “withdrawals” from poor

nations (in terms of natural resource extraction), and,

– Make environmental “inputs” in poor nations in terms of pollution or waste.

Page 9: World-Systems Theory and the Environment

Potosi, as described by Galeano in The Open Veins of Latin America

Page 10: World-Systems Theory and the Environment

The Recent History of Colonialism.

Africa:• Ethiopia: 1944• Ghana: 1957• Seventeen African nations achieve independence

in 1960.• South Africa: 1994Asia:• Indonesia: 1949• Vietnam: 1954, 1973

Page 11: World-Systems Theory and the Environment

World-systems theorists argue that relationships of unequal ecological exchange continue to characterize relationships between nations today.Two examples and a counter-example:

• Oil in Nigeria.• Electronic waste in China.• Possible counter-example:

China and rare earth minerals. (Or is it simply an indication of a changing world.)

Page 12: World-Systems Theory and the Environment

World-systems theorists argue that unequal ecological exchange continues to characterize core-periphery relations.

• The international division of labor established during periods of colonialism still largely exists.

• Economic “development,” is often geared toward export production.– i.e. development in the form of railways or roads

between mines and ports rather than meeting community needs.

• Economic development in the periphery is often its continued “underdevelopment.”

Page 13: World-Systems Theory and the Environment

Modernization Theory: A Competing Perspective

• Natural resource extraction is a viable means of economic development, providing:– Influx of capital.– Local high-paying jobs.– Provision of services to communities.– Tax revenues for countries to invest in further development.

• Proposes the “environmental Kuznets curve” thesis:– As a poor nation’s economy grows in terms of GDP, its rates

of environmental degradation will also increase.– As a nation develops, and its GDP reaches a certain size,

rates of environmental degradation will decrease.

Page 14: World-Systems Theory and the Environment

Criticisms of World-Systems Theory?

• Core/periphery relations between nations might overlook similar kinds of relations within nations?

• Overlooks real success stories in development?

• Other criticisms…?