Upload
horace-cross
View
220
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
WORLD BANK
TCP Design(THIN CONCRETE PAVEMENTS)
Juan Pablo Covarrubias
Washington
2008
Type of Pavement we are Talking About
PERFORMANCE OF CONCRETE PAVEMENTS
The basic performance principles of Concrete Pavements
In Chile, the slabs are always curled with the edges lifted up, day and night.
DEFORMATION OF A SLAB15 cm thick, 4 m. long
EFFECT OF SUBGRADE STIFFNESS
5,5 5,5 / 11 11 / 16,6 16,6 /22,1
22,1
K (kg/cm3)
% cracked slabs
Armaghani 1993
EFFECT OF SUBGRADE STIFFNESS
cantilever
Granular CBR 40
cantilever
CTB
Not bonded (polyethylene)
EFFECT OF SLAB LENGTH
cantilever
1/3 L
cantilever
1/3 L
cantilever
1/4 L
cantilever
1/4 L
Length 4,5 m. cantilever = 1,13 m
Length 1,8 m. Cantilever = 0,45 m
EFFECT OF SLAB LENGTH ON SHRINKAGE AND CURLING
a > 1
450 cm x350 cmThickness= 18 cmDelta T°=-14 C° LinearCurling = 2.41 mm
140 cm x175 cmThickness= 18 cmDelta T°=-14 C° LinearCurling = 0.49 mm
EFFECT OF SLAB LENGTH ON CURLING
SLAB LENGTH AND CURLING
Holland 2002
3,8 m 4,5 m
Hiller and Springenschmid, 2004Hiller and Springenschmid, 2004
CrackingCracking
EFFECT OF TIE BARS ON CRACKING OF SLABS
Development of the Designby TCPavements
• Research at the University of Illinois
• Generate Design Method.
• Coordinate tests at international level
Loads of Trucks on Slabs
Dx
L
Dx
L
Minimum Requirement for TCP design:Minimum Requirement for TCP design:
• Maximum slab length less than L Maximum slab length less than L
• Maximum slab width less than Dx (1/2 lane)Maximum slab width less than Dx (1/2 lane)
LOADING OF LONG AND SHORT SLABS
Efect of Loads and Slab Geometry on Stresses
Top 2.47 MpaBottom 0.20 MPa
Top 0.52 MpaBottom 0.24 MPa
One Axel at the Edge
X
LOADS AND STRESSES ON A SLAB WHITH ROCKING
RELATION: length - thickness - tensile stress
Length (m) Thickness (cm) σ (MPa)
4,5 15 4,04,5 12 5,04,5 10 6,04,5 8 7,5
1,75 15 0,61,75 12 0,81,75 10 0,91,75 8 1,1
450 cm x350 cmThickness= 18 cmDelta T°=-14 C° LinearTop Tensile stress= 1.40 MPa
140 cm x175 cmThickness= 18 cmDelta T°=-14 C° LinearTop Tensile stress= 0.18 MPa
EFFECT OF SLAB LENGTH ON CURLING AND OWN WEIGHT STRESSES
Project in GuatemalaSlabs 4,5 m x 3,5 m x 24 cm
THICKNESS (cm) 24
SIZE 450x360
Thermal Gradient °C -14
Elastic Modulus (kg/cm2) 290000
K (kg/cm3) 3
Dowels YES
Load Position I II III IV
Tensions (kg/cm2) 21,9 22,5 19,9 10,6
Position III
Position IV
Position I
Position II
Project in Guatemala Slabs 1,8 m x 2,1 m x 15 cm
Posición III
Posición I
Posición II
THICKNESS (cm) 15
SIZE 210x180
Thermal Gradient °C -14
Modulus of Elasticity (kg/cm2) 290000
K (kg/cm3) 3
Load Transfer LTE 50%
Load Position I II III
Tensions (kg/cm2) 14,5 20,0 22,1
Summary Guatemala Project
Slab Length
m.
Thickness
cm
Tension
Kg/cm2
Traffic
mESALS
4,5 24 22,5 50
1,8 15 22,1 50
Thin slabs with 30 cm widening
FINITE ELEMENTS ANALISIS
Equitensional Curves
0255075
100125150175200225250275300325350375400425450
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Thickness (cm)
Len
gth
of
slab
(cm
)
20 Kg/cm2
25 Kg/cm2
30 Kg/cm2
35 Kg/cm2
40 Kg/cm2
Thicknesses for Same Stresses and Slab Length
Slab length change from 4,5 to 1,75 m
y = 0,5431x + 2,0129
R2 = 0,9954
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Slabs 4,5 m
Sla
bs
1,75
m
cm
cm
LOAD POSITION AND SLAB SIZE
Top and Bottom Stresses for Length and Thickness
CHARACTERISTICS of TCP Design• Small slabs (1,8 by 2.4 meters)
• Granular base (fines < 6%) 15 cm thick
• Impermeable layer between the sub grade and sub base, if needed
• Thin joint cut (2 mm thick)
• No joints sealing
• No dowel bars or tie bars
• Lateral confinement with curb, shoulder or vertical steel pins
• Widened outer lane (30 cm)
DesignDesign method being used:
– Design with AASHTO with normal slab size (4.5 m long)
– Determine by finite elements the stresses within the concrete of the slab for the AASHTO design
– Calculate slab thickness by iteration with ISLAB2000 with the new configuration of slab size and wheel positions (one set of wheels on each slab) to obtain the same stresses than the AASHTO design.
The result, by using this new design approach, is a thinner concrete pavement with the same stresses as
AASHTO design
Construccion Cost
TCP H° Tradicional Asfalto
EE Diseño EspesorCosto Km-
Pista Espesor Costo Km-Pista H°-TCP % Ahorro EspesorCosto Km-
Pista Asf-TCP%
Ahorro
50,000 8cm $ 69,041 - - - - 5cm $ 71,808 $ 2,767 4%
100,000 8cm $ 75,000 - - - - 7cm $ 86,000 $ 11,000 13%
1,250,000 10cm $ 81,715 15cm $ 113,400 $ 31,685 28% 9cm $ 101,803 $ 20,089 20%
3,000,000 12cm $ 94,389 18cm $ 132,411 $ 38,022 29% 10cm $ 116,165 $ 21,776 19%
15,000,000 15cm $ 113,400 22cm $ 160,000 $ 46,600 29% 13cm $ 137,389 $ 23,989 17%
68,000,000 18cm $ 132,411 28 cm $ 195,782 $ 63,371 32% 18cm $ 186,889 $ 54,478 29%
160,000,000 22 cm $ 157,759 30 cm $ 208,456 $ 50,696 24% 22cm $ 216,885 $ 59,126 27%
*Prices from Chile
Long Term Costs:NPV (%)
Time (years)15 20
Asphalt
Traditional
Concrete
TCP
Research at U. de Illinois
Sub Grade CBR 3%
Geotextile and Granular Base
Granular Base less 6% Fines
Concrete Slabs finished
ATLAS Machine
ATLAS Machine
Experiences
Constructed Projects
Guatemala
• BM3 Acceso CA9 Sur (Puente Villalobos)
• Description– Start Year: end 2005
– Length: 1.68km
– 120.000.000 Esals
– 15 years design
– Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala
– Highway
• Pavement structure– 21 cm thick
– Granular base and asphalt base
– 14.40m to 21.60m Witdh
Guatemala• Ruta CA-01 Occidente Ciudad San Cristobal - San
Lucas (Road to Antigua)
• Description– Year 2006
– Length: 11.07km
– 80.000.000 Esals
– Ciudad de Guatemala – Sacatepéquez, Guatemala
– Highway
• Pavement Structure– 17cm thick
– Granular base and asphalt base
– 14.40m Witdh
Configuration of Sugar Cane Vehícle (VCMEM)
TOTAL
Nú
me
ro d
e
Eje
s
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7
Nú
me
ro d
e
Ne
um
áti
co
s
2 8 8 8 8 8 8 50
Pe
so
Má
xim
o
(To
n)
6 29 25 25 25 25 25 160
Eje
s
Eq
uiv
ale
nte
s a
18
,00
0
lbs
0,26 31 15,9 15,9 15,9 15,9 15,9 111
Lo
ng
itu
d (
m)
18 10 10 38
Tensions with Sugar Cane Vehicle (VCMEM)
THICKNESS (cm) 22
Slab size 180x210
Thermal gradient °C -21 -14 0
Position of load I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV
Tensions (kg/cm2) - K = 3 kg/cm3 16,9 17,1 14,8 14,7 16,5 16,7 14,5 14,3 15,8 16,0 13,8 13,7
Tensions (kg/cm2) - K = 9 kg/cm3 17,9 18,2 15,7 15,5 16,9 17,2 14,8 14,6 14,5 15,1 13,0 12,7
THICKNESS (cm) 18
Slab size 180x210
Thermal Gradient °C -21 -14 0
Position of Load I II III IV I II III IV I II III IV
Tensions (kg/cm2) - K = 3 kg/cm3 25,1 25,4 21,9 21,7 24,4 24,7 21,3 21 23,1 23,4 20,1 19,8
Tensions (kg/cm2) - K = 9 kg/cm3 25,7 26,2 22,6 22,2 24,1 24,5 21,1 20,8 20,6 21,3 17,9 17,5
Conclution
TCP design allows for:
– Reduction in thickness, reducing construction costs and keeping the normal performance as traditional design
– Increase of axel loads, reducing transportation costs, congestion and contamination.
THANK YOU
www.tcpavements.com