Upload
ali-raza-sahni
View
57
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
Introduction: Econometrics is the application of mathematics and especially of statistical methods to
economics. It is especially concerned both with observational studies and with systems of equations. Econometrics has become strongly identified with Regression analysis. Regression analysis is used to check the impact of independent variable on the dependent variable. It tells the percentage change in independent variable due to change in independent variable. we take the data of 19 companies which are as follows:
Suraj Cotton Mills Ltd
Survays Textile Mills Ltd
Sapphire Fibres Ltd
Sana Industries Ltd
Salfi Textile Mills Ltd
Nishat (Chunian Ltd)
Nagina Cotton Mills Ltd
N.P Spinning Mills Ltd
Masood Textile Mills Ltd
Shakarganj Mills Ltd
Shahtaj sugar Mills Ltd
Shahmurad sugar Mills Ltd
Noon sugar Mills Ltd
Mirpurkhas sugar Mills Ltd
JDW sugar Mills Ltd
Husain sugar Mills Ltd
Habib sugar Mills Ltd
Adam sugar Mills Ltd First of all, we take two variables, profitability (independent variable) and dividend
payout (dependent variable) and check the impact of profitability on dividend payout. This can be stated in linear form as:
Y= b0 + b1X1 Where b0 = intercept b1= slope of regression line After including the error term in our regression model, the equation can be stated as
Y= + + u Secondly, we take firm size as independent variable and dividend payout as dependent variable and test the impact of firm size on dividend payout. This can be stated in linear form as:
Y= b0 + b2X2 Where b0 = intercept b2= slope of regression line After including the error term in our regression model, the equation can be stated as
2
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
Y= + + u Thirdly the impact of sales growth independent variable on dividend payout dependent variable is tested. This can be stated in linear form as:
Y= b0 + b3X3 Where b0 = intercept b3= slope of regression line After including the error term in our regression model, the equation can be stated as
Y= + + u Then we use the multiple regression analysis to test the impact of all three independent variables (profitability, firm size, sales growth) on the dependent variable dividend payout. This can be stated in multiple regression equation as:
= + + +
After including the error term in our multiple regression models, the equation can be stated as:
= + + + + u
The Methodology of Econometrics
Econometric research, in general, involves the following three stages:
1. Specification of the model or maintained hypothesis in explicit stochastic equation form,
together with the prior theoretical expectations about the sign and size of the parameters
of the function.
2. Collection of data on the variables of the model and estimation of the coefficients of the
function with appropriate econometrics techniques.
3. Evaluation of the estimated coefficients of the function on the basis of economic,
statistical and econometric criteria.
Simple Regression Analysis
The Two-variable linear model
The Two- variable linear model or simple linear regression models are used to check the impact
of an independent variable X on the dependent variable Y. It tells us the percentage change in
dependent variable due to the change in independent variable. Simple linear regression analysis usually
3
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
begins by plotting the set of XY values on a Scatter diagram and determining if there exists an
approximate linear relationship.
= +
The difference between estimated data points on the regression line and actual points is known as
disturbance or error term. So we include error term in our linear regression model.
= + +
It is the assumption of regression model that
1. The error term has Zero expected value or mean
2. Error term is normally distributed
3. Error term has constant variance
4. Error terms are uncorrelated
5. The explanatory variable has fixed values in repeated sampling
The Ordinary Least- Squares Method
It is a method in which we fir the best straight line into the sample of XY observations. It
minimizes the sum of squares deviations of point from the regression line
Min∑( )
Where
Actual observations
= corresponding fitted values
= = the residual
Table 1: The values of Y represent the percentage distribution of Dividend payout of 19 companies and
the values of X1 represent the percentage distribution of profitability of these companies from the
period of 2004-2009.
Y X1
0.12 1.960095
0.131455 1.308333
0 1.987874
0 3.414443
0 2.397895
0.032384 3.437208
0.232425 2.151762
0.41169 2.272126
0.11215 2.186051
0.275862 1.987874
0.212465 2.4681
4
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
0.350146 2.302585
0.23 1.667707
0.234242 2.370244
0 0.530628
0 1.856298
0.362676 1.547563
0 2.066863
0.157372 2.541602
0.146314 2.74084
0.301777 2.292535
0.3244 0.641854
0.208177 2.821379
0.253798 2.76001
0.2145 1.252763
0.146067 2.014903
0.439628 1.223775
0 2.557227
0 2.251292
0.234 -0.91629
0.134 1.667707
0 2.721295
0.070658 3.462606
0.32 2.186051
0.106136 2.24071
0.078701 3.459466
0 3.005683
0.226399 2.312535
0 1.902108
0 1.589235
0 1.163151
0.265487 1.335001
0.32 -1.60944
0 0.993252
0 -1.60944
0 -0.10536
0.148487 1.902108
0.315737 1.568616
0.525657 1.902108
0.447813 2.821379
0.615472 1.987874
0.563542 2.079442
0.50803 2.292535
0.398871 3.222868
0.224165 1.609438
5
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
0 1.360977
0 1.704748
0.066805 2.70805
0.234 2.66026
0 3.086487
0 1.029619
0.211665 1.252763
1.109285 1.410987
0.851852 1.458615
0.37309 2.406945
0.081803 2.906901
0.590018 2.028148
2.08326 2.04122
0 1.335001
0.544944 1.808289
1.047009 1.163151
0 -0.69315
1.577371 1.163151
0.303123 1.94591
0.698432 1.481605
0 0.916291
0 -1.60944
0.254 -1.20397
0.090111 2.631889
0.07937 2.322388
0.449761 1.193922
1.107843 -2.30259
0.786096 -1.60944
0 0.182322
0 1.280934
0.909091 0
1.178571 -0.22314
1.1 2.292535
0.23 1.481605
0.12 4.264087
0.588235 1.458615
1.020408 0.693147
0.65445 1.335001
0 2.332144
1.1 -0.10536
0.536111 1.871802
0.129812 2.451005
0.107085 2.639057
0.1638 2.727853
0.11 3.299534
6
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.240273
R Square 0.057731
Adjusted R Square 0.049318
Standard Error 0.353596
Observations 114
After doing the Data analysis in Excel, these results are obtained.
Coefficients
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 7
13
19
25
31
37
43
49
55
61
67
73
79
85
91
97
10
3
10
9
Dividend Puyout
Profitability
0.067011 4.245634
0.1 3.049273
0.150588 1.960095
0.089147 2.415914
0.25 1.098612
0 0.832909
0 0.405465
0.118151 2.140066
0.277992 1.974081
0.223187 2.197225
0.254237 2.066863
0 2.985682
0.199557 2.014903
0.437601 1.223775
7
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
Intercept 0.412764
b1 -0.07165
Here
bo = 0.412764
b1 = - 0.07165
We put these values of b0 and b1 in linear regression equation and estimated regression line is
= 0.412764 – 0.07165X1
At different values of independent variable X1 , the following result is obtained:
Observation Predicted Y Residuals Standard Residuals
1 0.272322 -0.15232 -0.4327
2 0.319021 -0.18757 -0.53282
3 0.270332 -0.27033 -0.76793
4 0.168118 -0.16812 -0.47757
5 0.240954 -0.24095 -0.68447
6 0.166487 -0.1341 -0.38094
7 0.258589 -0.02616 -0.07433
8 0.249965 0.161725 0.459408
9 0.256133 -0.14398 -0.40901
10 0.270332 0.00553 0.015709
11 0.235924 -0.02346 -0.06664
12 0.247783 0.102363 0.290781
13 0.293272 -0.06327 -0.17974
14 0.242935 -0.00869 -0.02469
15 0.374744 -0.37474 -1.06453
16 0.27976 -0.27976 -0.79471
17 0.301881 0.060796 0.172701
18 0.264672 -0.26467 -0.75185
19 0.230657 -0.07329 -0.20818
20 0.216382 -0.07007 -0.19904
21 0.248503 0.053274 0.151336
22 0.366775 -0.04237 -0.12037
23 0.210611 -0.00243 -0.00691
24 0.215008 0.038789 0.110188
25 0.323003 -0.1085 -0.30822
26 0.268395 -0.12233 -0.34749
27 0.32508 0.114548 0.325396
28 0.229538 -0.22954 -0.65204
29 0.251458 -0.25146 -0.71431
30 0.478416 -0.24442 -0.69431
8
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
31 0.293272 -0.15927 -0.45244
32 0.217782 -0.21778 -0.61865
33 0.164667 -0.09401 -0.26705
34 0.256133 0.063867 0.181427
35 0.252216 -0.14608 -0.41497
36 0.164892 -0.08619 -0.24484
37 0.197406 -0.19741 -0.56077
38 0.24707 -0.02067 -0.05872
39 0.276477 -0.27648 -0.78538
40 0.298895 -0.29889 -0.84906
41 0.329424 -0.32942 -0.93579
42 0.317111 -0.05162 -0.14665
43 0.528081 -0.20808 -0.59109
44 0.341597 -0.3416 -0.97037
45 0.528081 -0.52808 -1.50011
46 0.420313 -0.42031 -1.19398
47 0.276477 -0.12799 -0.36358
48 0.300372 0.015365 0.043647
49 0.276477 0.24918 0.70784
50 0.210611 0.237202 0.673815
51 0.270332 0.34514 0.980433
52 0.263771 0.29977 0.851552
53 0.248503 0.259527 0.737235
54 0.181844 0.217026 0.616503
55 0.297447 -0.07328 -0.20817
56 0.315249 -0.31525 -0.89552
57 0.290618 -0.29062 -0.82555
58 0.218731 -0.15193 -0.43157
59 0.222155 0.011845 0.033647
60 0.191616 -0.19162 -0.54432
61 0.338991 -0.33899 -0.96297
62 0.323003 -0.11134 -0.31628
63 0.311666 0.797619 2.265781
64 0.308254 0.543598 1.544189
65 0.240305 0.132784 0.377197
66 0.204483 -0.12268 -0.3485
67 0.267446 0.322571 0.916323
68 0.26651 1.81675 5.160807
69 0.317111 -0.31711 -0.90081
70 0.283199 0.261744 0.743532
71 0.329424 0.717585 2.03843
72 0.462428 -0.46243 -1.31361
73 0.329424 1.247947 3.545021
74 0.273339 0.029784 0.084606
75 0.306606 0.391825 1.113051
9
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
76 0.347111 -0.34711 -0.98603
77 0.528081 -0.52808 -1.50011
78 0.499029 -0.24503 -0.69605
79 0.224188 -0.13408 -0.38087
80 0.246364 -0.16699 -0.47438
81 0.327219 0.122542 0.348102
82 0.577745 0.530098 1.50584
83 0.528081 0.258016 0.73294
84 0.399701 -0.3997 -1.13542
85 0.320985 -0.32098 -0.91181
86 0.412764 0.496327 1.409907
87 0.428752 0.749819 2.129997
88 0.248503 0.851497 2.418832
89 0.306606 -0.07661 -0.21761
90 0.107241 0.012759 0.036245
91 0.308254 0.279982 0.795339
92 0.3631 0.657308 1.867204
93 0.317111 0.33734 0.958274
94 0.245665 -0.24567 -0.69786
95 0.420313 0.679687 1.930774
96 0.278649 0.257462 0.731369
97 0.237149 -0.10734 -0.30491
98 0.223675 -0.11659 -0.33119
99 0.217312 -0.05351 -0.15201
100 0.176351 -0.06635 -0.18848
101 0.108563 -0.04155 -0.11804
102 0.194282 -0.09428 -0.26783
103 0.272322 -0.12173 -0.34581
104 0.239663 -0.15052 -0.42757
105 0.334048 -0.08405 -0.23875
106 0.353086 -0.35309 -1.003
107 0.383712 -0.38371 -1.09
108 0.259427 -0.14128 -0.40132
109 0.27132 0.006672 0.018953
110 0.255332 -0.03215 -0.09131
111 0.264672 -0.01044 -0.02964
112 0.198839 -0.19884 -0.56484
113 0.268395 -0.06884 -0.19555
114 0.32508 0.112521 0.319637
Tests of Significance of Parameter Estimates
10
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
We have to test whether the parameter estimates of the regression are statistically significant
or not. So we calculate the variance of b0 and b1.
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance
F
Regression 1 0.857965 0.857965 6.862052 0.010025
Residual 112 14.0034 0.12503 Total 113 14.86136
Coefficients Standard
Error t Stat P-value
Intercept 0.412764 0.057397 7.191367 7.69E-11
Profitability -0.07165 0.027352 -2.61955 0.010025
t Stat P-value
7.191367 7.69E-11
-2.61955 0.010025
Test of Goodness of Fit and Correlation
If the observations fall closer to the regression line, the residual will be smaller and variations in Y
"explained" by the estimated regression equation will be greater. Total variation in Y is comprised of two
types of variations.
1. Explained variation
2. Residual or unexplained variation
Total variation in Y is the sum of these two variations.
∑( ) = ∑( ) + ∑( )
Total variation Explained variation Residual variation
In Y in Y in Y
TSS RSS ESS
Dividing both sides by TSS gives
1 =
+
11
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
Where ranges in values from 0 (when the estimated regression equation explain none of the
variation in Y) to 1 (when all points lie on the regression line)
In our case the value of R2 = 0.057731
So explained variation in Y = 5.7731% of the total variation and 94.2269% variation is unexplained
variation and it is attributed to factors include in error terms.
The correlation coefficient is given by
r= √ = ( )
Correlation tells us the direction and strength of relation between two variables.
In our case the value of r = 0.240273 or 24.0273%, and is positive it means that profitability and dividend
payout are positively correlated.
Table 2: The values of Y represent the percentage distribution of Dividend payout of 19 companies and
the values of X2 represent the percentage distribution of firm size of these companies from the period
of 2004-2009.
Y X2
0.12 1.860655
0.131455 1.864227
0 1.953989
0 1.95146
0 1.97187
0.032384 1.966969
0.232425 2.015018
0.41169 2.02953
0.11215 2.05174
0.275862 2.077685
0.212465 2.094087
0.350146 2.109542
0.23 1.82292
0.234242 1.866844
0 1.902876
0 1.88877
0.362676 1.854008
0 1.87207
12
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
0.157372 2.057309
0.146314 2.103931
0.301777 2.146206
0.3244 2.184685
0.208177 2.196051
0.253798 2.224686
0.2145 1.917796
0.146067 1.920389
0.439628 2.006376
0 2.018638
0 2.037263
0.234 2.027607
0.134 1.931115
0 1.923709
0.070658 1.94211
0.32 1.933266
0.106136 1.964706
0.078701 1.97132
0 1.909498
0.226399 1.971881
0 2.019881
0 2.038558
0 2.02387
0.265487 1.998368
0.32 2.042492
0 2.06628
0 2.068337
0 2.074307
0.148487 2.089616
0.315737 2.082732
0.525657 1.859645
0.447813 1.89819
0.615472 1.892738
0.563542 1.894873
0.50803 1.921958
0.398871 1.962788
13
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
0.224165 2.166794
0 2.221738
0 2.237401
0.066805 2.22973
0.234 2.243455
0 2.230756
0 2.125235
0.211665 2.160534
1.109285 2.172764
0.851852 2.185963
0.37309 2.199011
0.081803 2.216132
0.590018 1.904076
2.08326 1.881771
0 1.866988
0.544944 1.834327
1.047009 1.867443
0 1.862328
1.577371 1.95012
0.303123 2.05734
0.698432 2.06488
0 1.959924
0 1.957278
0.254 1.968639
0.090111 2.125837
0.07937 2.199188
0.449761 2.21434
1.107843 2.217633
0.786096 2.229027
0 2.240069
0 1.922476
0.909091 1.980372
1.178571 2.044184
1.1 2.031344
0.23 2.09155
0.12 2.085545
14
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
0.588235 1.730411
1.020408 1.744023
0.65445 1.761213
0 1.770359
1.1 1.772405
0.536111 1.780045
0.129812 2.125486
0.107085 2.157698
0.1638 2.195926
0.11 2.230613
0.067011 2.235783
0.1 2.222126
0.150588 1.911512
0.089147 1.972544
0.25 1.977089
0 1.995032
0 2.034472
0.118151 2.014988
0.277992 2.058149
0.223187 2.063973
0.254237 2.097137
0 2.102073
0.199557 2.10637
0.437601 2.093944
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.173703
R Square 0.030173
Adjusted R Square 0.021513
Standard Error 0.35873
Observations 114
After doing the Data analysis in Excel, these results are obtained.
Coefficients
Intercept 1.25743
15
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
x2 -0.47833
1.25743
-0.47833
We put these values of b0 and b2 in linear regression equation and estimated regression line is at
different values of independent variable X2, the following result is obtained:
=
At different values of independent variable X2 , the following result is obtained:
Observation Predicted Y Residuals Standard Residuals
1 0.367426 -0.24743 -0.6928
2 0.365718 -0.23426 -0.65594
3 0.322782 -0.32278 -0.9038
4 0.323992 -0.32399 -0.90719
5 0.314229 -0.31423 -0.87985
6 0.316573 -0.28419 -0.79574
7 0.29359 -0.06117 -0.17127
8 0.286649 0.125041 0.350119
9 0.276025 -0.16388 -0.45886
10 0.263615 0.012247 0.034293
11 0.255769 -0.0433 -0.12125
12 0.248377 0.101769 0.284957
13 0.385476 -0.15548 -0.43534
14 0.364466 -0.13022 -0.36463
15 0.347231 -0.34723 -0.97226
16 0.353978 -0.35398 -0.99115
17 0.370606 -0.00793 -0.0222
18 0.361966 -0.36197 -1.01352
19 0.273361 -0.11599 -0.32477
20 0.25106 -0.10475 -0.29329
21 0.230839 0.070938 0.198629
22 0.212434 0.111966 0.313509
23 0.206997 0.00118 0.003305
24 0.1933 0.060498 0.169395
25 0.340094 -0.12559 -0.35167
26 0.338854 -0.19279 -0.53981
27 0.297724 0.141905 0.397338
28 0.291859 -0.29186 -0.81721
29 0.28295 -0.28295 -0.79227
30 0.287568 -0.05357 -0.14999
31 0.333723 -0.19972 -0.55923
16
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
32 0.337266 -0.33727 -0.94435
33 0.328464 -0.25781 -0.72187
34 0.332695 -0.01269 -0.03555
35 0.317656 -0.21152 -0.59226
36 0.314492 -0.23579 -0.66022
37 0.344064 -0.34406 -0.96339
38 0.314224 -0.08783 -0.24591
39 0.291264 -0.29126 -0.81555
40 0.28233 -0.28233 -0.79053
41 0.289356 -0.28936 -0.81021
42 0.301554 -0.03607 -0.10099
43 0.280448 0.039552 0.110746
44 0.26907 -0.26907 -0.7534
45 0.268086 -0.26809 -0.75065
46 0.26523 -0.26523 -0.74265
47 0.257908 -0.10942 -0.30638
48 0.261201 0.054536 0.152703
49 0.367909 0.157748 0.441699
50 0.349472 0.098341 0.275357
51 0.35208 0.263392 0.737506
52 0.351059 0.212483 0.594958
53 0.338104 0.169927 0.4758
54 0.318573 0.080298 0.224836
55 0.220991 0.003173 0.008885
56 0.19471 -0.19471 -0.54519
57 0.187218 -0.18722 -0.52422
58 0.190888 -0.12408 -0.34743
59 0.184323 0.049677 0.139098
60 0.190397 -0.1904 -0.53312
61 0.24087 -0.24087 -0.67444
62 0.223986 -0.01232 -0.0345
63 0.218136 0.891149 2.495244
64 0.211823 0.640029 1.792101
65 0.205581 0.167508 0.469028
66 0.197392 -0.11559 -0.32365
67 0.346657 0.243361 0.681418
68 0.357326 1.725934 4.832667
69 0.364397 -0.3644 -1.02032
70 0.38002 0.164924 0.461792
71 0.364179 0.682829 1.911942
72 0.366626 -0.36663 -1.02656
73 0.324633 1.252738 3.507705
74 0.273347 0.029776 0.083374
75 0.26974 0.428692 1.20035
76 0.319943 -0.31994 -0.89585
17
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
77 0.321209 -0.32121 -0.89939
78 0.315775 -0.06177 -0.17297
79 0.240582 -0.15047 -0.42133
80 0.205496 -0.12613 -0.35316
81 0.198249 0.251512 0.704241
82 0.196674 0.91117 2.551302
83 0.191224 0.594873 1.665661
84 0.185942 -0.18594 -0.52064
85 0.337856 -0.33786 -0.94601
86 0.310162 0.598929 1.677019
87 0.279639 0.898932 2.517037
88 0.285781 0.814219 2.279838
89 0.256983 -0.02698 -0.07555
90 0.259855 -0.13985 -0.3916
91 0.429726 0.158509 0.443831
92 0.423215 0.597194 1.67216
93 0.414992 0.239458 0.670489
94 0.410617 -0.41062 -1.14974
95 0.409639 0.690361 1.933033
96 0.405985 0.130127 0.364358
97 0.24075 -0.11094 -0.31063
98 0.225342 -0.11826 -0.33113
99 0.207057 -0.04326 -0.12112
100 0.190465 -0.08047 -0.2253
101 0.187992 -0.12098 -0.33875
102 0.194525 -0.09452 -0.26467
103 0.3431 -0.19251 -0.53904
104 0.313907 -0.22476 -0.62933
105 0.311733 -0.06173 -0.17285
106 0.30315 -0.30315 -0.84883
107 0.284285 -0.28428 -0.79601
108 0.293604 -0.17545 -0.49128
109 0.27296 0.005033 0.014092
110 0.270173 -0.04699 -0.13156
111 0.254311 -7.3E-05 -0.00021
112 0.251949 -0.25195 -0.70547
113 0.249894 -0.05034 -0.14095
114 0.255838 0.181764 0.508944
18
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
Tests of Significance of Parameter Estimates:
We have to test whether the parameter estimates of the regression are statistically significant
or not. So we calculate the variance of b0 and b2.
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance
F
Regression 1 0.448407 0.448407 3.484472 0.064562
Residual 112 14.41295 0.128687 Total 113 14.86136
Coefficients Standard
Error t Stat P-value
Intercept 1.25743 0.519373 2.421055 0.017082
Firm Size -0.47833 0.256246 -1.86667 0.064562
Test of Goodness of Fit and Correlation:
If the observations fall closer to the regression line, the residual will be smaller and variations in Y
"explained" by the estimated regression equation will be greater. Total variation in Y is comprised of two
types of variations.
1. Explained variation
2. Residual or unexplained variation
Total variation in Y is the sum of these two variations.
∑( ) = ∑( ) + ∑( )
Total variation Explained variation Residual variation
In Y in Y in Y
TSS RSS ESS
Dividing both sides by TSS gives
1 =
+
Where ranges in values from 0 (when the estimated regression equation explain none of the
variation in Y) to 1 (when all points lie on the regression line)
In our case the value of R2 = 0.030173 or 3.0173%
19
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
So explained variation in Y equal to 3.0173% of the total variation and 96.9827% variation is unexplained
variation and it is attributed to factors included in error terms.
The correlation coefficient is given by
r= √ = ( )
Correlation tells us the direction and strength of relation between two variables.
In our case the value of r = 0.173703 or 17.3703%, and is positive it means that profitability and firm size
are positively correlated.
Table 3:
The values of Y represent the percentage distribution of Dividend payout of 19 companies and the
values of X3 represent the percentage distribution of profitability of these companies from the period of
2004-2009
Y X3
0.12 3.109061
0.131455 1.252763
0 3.841601
0 3.493473
0 4.282206
0.032384 2.397895
0.232425 4.858261
0.41169 3.427515
0.11215 3.427515
0.275862 3.380995
0.212465 4.063885
0.350146 0.741937
0.23 4.317488
0.234242 1.974081
0 2.557227
0 3.499533
0.362676 3.165475
0 3.11795
0.157372 1.916923
0.146314 4.012773
20
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
0.301777 4.636669
0.3244 1.667707
0.208177 3.735286
0.253798 2.572612
0.2145 1.458615
0.146067 1.029619
0.439628 1.871802
0 3.328627
0 3.817712
0.234 3.280911
0.134 2.312535
0 4.028917
0.070658 4.366913
0.32 2.928524
0.106136 2.549445
0.078701 4.089332
0 2.451005
0.226399 0.09531
0 2.850707
0 3.08191
0 4.172848
0.265487 2.694627
0.32 2.833213
0 3.173878
0 4.329417
0 2.895912
0.148487 3.817712
0.315737 2.867899
0.525657 2.687847
0.447813 2.230014
0.615472 2.564949
0.563542 3.484312
0.50803 3.010621
0.398871 3.735286
0.224165 4.174387
0 3.723281
21
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
0 1.916923
0.066805 2.80336
0.234 3.246491
0 3.634951
0 2.509599
0.211665 1.667707
1.109285 3.994524
0.851852 2.923162
0.37309 3.490429
0.081803 3.65842
0.590018 3.511545
2.08326 3.600048
0 3.214868
0.544944 2.091864
1.047009 2.890372
0 0.262364
1.577371 0.262364
0.303123 4.11578
0.698432 3.261935
0 3.811097
0 2.844909
0.254 2.906901
0.090111 4.023564
0.07937 2.879198
0.449761 2.95491
1.107843 2.827314
0.786096 2.960105
0 2.197225
0 3.526361
0.909091 3.269569
1.178571 -0.91629
1.1 4.628887
0.23 2.797281
0.12 0.741937
0.588235 2.74084
1.020408 3.453157
22
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
0.65445 3.7612
0 3.020425
1.1 -0.22314
0.536111 3.440418
0.129812 3.157
0.107085 3.113515
0.1638 3.756538
0.11 2.533697
0.067011 3.005683
0.1 2.667228
0.150588 3.877432
0.089147 2.912351
0.25 4.136765
0 1.568616
0 2.451005
0.118151 2.74084
0.277992 4.062166
0.223187 3.139833
0.254237 3.754199
0 2.388763
0.199557 -2.30259
0.437601 2.772589
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.129653
R Square 0.01681
Adjusted R Square 0.008031
Standard Error 0.361193
Observations 114
After doing the Data analysis in Excel, these results are obtained
Coefficients
Intercept 0.408098
X3 -0.04059
23
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
0.408098
-0.04059
We put these values of b0 and b3 in linear regression equation and estimated regression line is at
different values of independent variable X3, the following result is obtained:
=
At different values of independent variable X3 , the following result is obtained:
Observation Predicted Y Residuals Standard Residuals
1 0.281913 -0.16191 -0.45027
2 0.357253 -0.2258 -0.62793
3 0.252182 -0.25218 -0.7013
4 0.266311 -0.26631 -0.74059
5 0.234299 -0.2343 -0.65157
6 0.310777 -0.27839 -0.77419
7 0.210919 0.021506 0.059806
8 0.268988 0.142702 0.396845
9 0.268988 -0.15684 -0.43616
10 0.270876 0.004986 0.013866
11 0.24316 -0.0307 -0.08536
12 0.377986 -0.02784 -0.07742
13 0.232867 -0.00287 -0.00797
14 0.327978 -0.09374 -0.26067
15 0.30431 -0.30431 -0.84627
16 0.266065 -0.26606 -0.73991
17 0.279623 0.083053 0.230965
18 0.281552 -0.28155 -0.78298
19 0.330297 -0.17293 -0.48089
20 0.245234 -0.09892 -0.27509
21 0.219913 0.081865 0.227661
22 0.340412 -0.01601 -0.04453
23 0.256497 -0.04832 -0.13437
24 0.303685 -0.04989 -0.13873
25 0.348899 -0.1344 -0.37375
26 0.36631 -0.22024 -0.61248
27 0.332129 0.1075 0.29895
28 0.273001 -0.273 -0.7592
29 0.253151 -0.25315 -0.704
30 0.274938 -0.04094 -0.11385
31 0.314241 -0.18024 -0.50124
32 0.244579 -0.24458 -0.68016
24
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
33 0.230861 -0.1602 -0.44552
34 0.28924 0.03076 0.085541
35 0.304626 -0.19849 -0.55199
36 0.242127 -0.16343 -0.45448
37 0.308621 -0.30862 -0.85826
38 0.40423 -0.17783 -0.49454
39 0.292399 -0.2924 -0.81314
40 0.283015 -0.28301 -0.78705
41 0.238738 -0.23874 -0.66391
42 0.298733 -0.03325 -0.09246
43 0.293109 0.026891 0.074784
44 0.279282 -0.27928 -0.77667
45 0.232383 -0.23238 -0.64624
46 0.290564 -0.29056 -0.80804
47 0.253151 -0.10466 -0.29106
48 0.291701 0.024036 0.066843
49 0.299008 0.226649 0.630296
50 0.31759 0.130223 0.362142
51 0.303996 0.311476 0.866194
52 0.266683 0.296859 0.825546
53 0.285908 0.222122 0.617708
54 0.256497 0.142374 0.395934
55 0.238675 -0.01451 -0.04035
56 0.256984 -0.25698 -0.71466
57 0.330297 -0.3303 -0.91854
58 0.29432 -0.22752 -0.6327
59 0.276335 -0.04234 -0.11773
60 0.260569 -0.26057 -0.72463
61 0.306243 -0.30624 -0.85164
62 0.340412 -0.12875 -0.35804
63 0.245975 0.86331 2.400811
64 0.289458 0.562394 1.563982
65 0.266434 0.106655 0.296601
66 0.259616 -0.17781 -0.49449
67 0.265577 0.32444 0.902248
68 0.261985 1.821274 5.064849
69 0.277619 -0.27762 -0.77204
70 0.323197 0.221747 0.616663
71 0.290789 0.75622 2.103
72 0.39745 -0.39745 -1.10528
73 0.39745 1.179921 3.281286
74 0.241054 0.062069 0.17261
75 0.275708 0.422724 1.175568
76 0.25342 -0.25342 -0.70474
77 0.292634 -0.29263 -0.8138
25
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
78 0.290118 -0.03612 -0.10044
79 0.244796 -0.15469 -0.43017
80 0.291242 -0.21187 -0.5892
81 0.288169 0.161592 0.449376
82 0.293348 0.814495 2.26506
83 0.287958 0.498138 1.38529
84 0.318921 -0.31892 -0.8869
85 0.264976 -0.26498 -0.73688
86 0.275398 0.633693 1.762259
87 0.445287 0.733284 2.039217
88 0.220229 0.879771 2.446589
89 0.294567 -0.06457 -0.17956
90 0.377986 -0.25799 -0.71744
91 0.296858 0.291378 0.810303
92 0.267947 0.752461 2.092547
93 0.255445 0.399005 1.109609
94 0.28551 -0.28551 -0.79399
95 0.417155 0.682845 1.898949
96 0.268464 0.267647 0.744309
97 0.279967 -0.15015 -0.41757
98 0.281732 -0.17465 -0.48568
99 0.255634 -0.09183 -0.25539
100 0.305265 -0.19526 -0.54302
101 0.286109 -0.2191 -0.6093
102 0.299845 -0.19985 -0.55576
103 0.250727 -0.10014 -0.27848
104 0.289897 -0.20075 -0.55827
105 0.240202 0.009798 0.027248
106 0.344434 -0.34443 -0.95785
107 0.308621 -0.30862 -0.85826
108 0.296858 -0.17871 -0.49697
109 0.24323 0.034763 0.096672
110 0.280664 -0.05748 -0.15984
111 0.255729 -0.00149 -0.00415
112 0.311147 -0.31115 -0.86528
113 0.501552 -0.302 -0.83983
114 0.295569 0.142032 0.394983
Tests of Significance of Parameter Estimates:
We have to test whether the parameter estimates of the regression are statistically significant
or not. So we calculate the variance of b0 and b3.
26
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance
F
Regression 1 0.249817 0.249817 1.914889 0.169173
Residual 112 14.61154 0.13046 Total 113 14.86136
Coefficients Standard
Error t Stat P-value
Intercept 0.408098 0.09183 4.444056 2.09E-05
Sales Growth -0.04059 0.02933 -1.38379 0.169173
t Stat P-value
4.444056 2.09E-05
-1.38379 0.169173
Test of Goodness of Fit and Correlation:
If the observations fall closer to the regression line, the residual will be smaller and variations in Y
"explained" by the estimated regression equation will be greater. Total variation in Y is comprised of two
types of variations.
1. Explained variation
2. Residual or unexplained variation
Total variation in Y is the sum of these two variations.
∑( ) = ∑( ) + ∑( )
Total variation Explained variation Residual variation
In Y in Y in Y
TSS RSS ESS
Dividing both sides by TSS gives
1 =
+
Where ranges in values from 0 (when the estimated regression equation explain none of the
variation in Y) to 1 (when all points lie on the regression line)
27
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
In our case the value of R2 = 0.01681 or 1.681%
So explained variation in Y = 1.681% of the total variation and 98.319% variation is unexplained variation
and it is attributed to factors include in error terms.
The correlation coefficient is given by
r= √ = ( )
Correlation tells us the direction and strength of relation between two variables.
In our case the value of r = 0.129653or 12.9563%, and is positive it means that profitability and sales
growth are positively correlated.
Classical Normal Linear Regression Model (CNLRM)
Using the method of OLS we were able to estimate the parameters b1, b2and . Under the
assumption of classical linear regression model, we were able to show that the estimators of
these parameters satisfy several desirable statistical properties. , such that unbiasness, minimum
variance, etc. Estimation is half the battle. Hypothesis testing is other half. In regression analysis
our objective is not only to estimate the sample regression function (SRF), but also to use it to
draw inferences about the population regression function.
The Probability Distribution of Disturbance
To find out the probability distribution of the OLS estimators, we proceed as follows.
Specifically, consider
= ∑
The Normality assumption for
The classical normal linear regression model assume that is distributed normally with
Mean: E ( ) = 0
Variance: E [ - E( ) ^2 = E( ) =
Cov ( , ): E[ - E( ) - E( ) ] = E( , ) = 0 i ≠j
Properties of OLS Estimators under the Normal Assumption
With the assumption that follows the normal distribution, the OLS estimators have the
following properties;
1. They are unbiased.
28
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
2. They have minimum variance. Combined with 1, this means that they are minimum-
variance unbiased or efficient estimators.
3. They have consistency; that is as sample size increases indefinitely, the estimators
converge to their true population values.
4. is normally distributed with Mean : E( ) and var( ):
or more
completely ≈ N( ,
), then by the property of normal distribution the variable Z,
which is defined as Z=
5. is normally distributed withMean : E( ) and var( ):
or more completely
≈ N( ,
), then by the property of normal distribution the variable Z, which is
defined as Z=
6. ( )( ) is distributed as ( chi square) distribution with degree of freedom (n-
2). This knowledge will help us to draw inferences about the true .
7. ( ) are distributed independently of .
8. Have minimum variance in the entire class of unbiased estimators, whether
linear or not.
Multiple Regression Analysis
Multiple regression analysis is used to test the impact of two or more independent
variables on the dependent. The four-variable linear regression model can be written as:
= + +
The additional assumption (to those of the simple regression model) is that there is no exact
linear relationship between the X values.
Ordinary least-squares (OLS) parameters estimates for the equation above can be obtained by
minimizing the sum of the squared residual:
∑ = ∑( )
We take all three independent variables (X1 = profitability, X2 = firm size, X3 = sales growth) and
dependent variable (Y = dividend payout) to perform multiple regression analysis and test the impact of
all three independent variables on dependent variable.
Y X1 X2 X3
Predicted
Y Residuals
0.12 1.960095 1.860655 3.109061 0.335925 -0.21593
0.131455 1.308333 1.864227 1.252763 0.425981 -0.29453
0 1.987874 1.953989 3.841601 0.275821 -0.27582
29
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
0 3.414443 1.95146 3.493473 0.195257 -0.19526
0 2.397895 1.97187 4.282206 0.230414 -0.23041
0.032384 3.437208 1.966969 2.397895 0.21688 -0.1845
0.232425 2.151762 2.015018 4.858261 0.212754 0.01967
0.41169 2.272126 2.02953 3.427515 0.237586 0.174104
0.11215 2.186051 2.05174 3.427515 0.233887 -0.12174
0.275862 1.987874 2.077685 3.380995 0.237044 0.038818
0.212465 2.4681 2.094087 4.063885 0.18125 0.031215
0.350146 2.302585 2.109542 0.741937 0.27483 0.075316
0.23 1.667707 1.82292 4.317488 0.337656 -0.10766
0.234242 2.370244 1.866844 1.974081 0.337758 -0.10352
0 0.530628 1.902876 2.557227 0.424477 -0.42448
0 1.856298 1.88877 3.499533 0.320403 -0.3204
0.362676 1.547563 1.854008 3.165475 0.363466 -0.00079
0 2.066863 1.87207 3.11795 0.324154 -0.32415
0.157372 2.541602 2.057309 1.916923 0.249569 -0.0922
0.146314 2.74084 2.103931 4.012773 0.161159 -0.01484
0.301777 2.292535 2.146206 4.636669 0.155466 0.146311
0.3244 0.641854 2.184685 1.667707 0.324738 -0.00034
0.208177 2.821379 2.196051 3.735286 0.12538 0.082798
0.253798 2.76001 2.224686 2.572612 0.148743 0.105055
0.2145 1.252763 1.917796 1.458615 0.401821 -0.18732
0.146067 2.014903 1.920389 1.029619 0.36369 -0.21762
0.439628 1.223775 2.006376 1.871802 0.355901 0.083728
0 2.557227 2.018638 3.328627 0.226572 -0.22657
0 2.251292 2.037263 3.817712 0.225213 -0.22521
0.234 -0.91629 2.027607 3.280911 0.445672 -0.21167
0.134 1.667707 1.931115 2.312535 0.346862 -0.21286
0 2.721295 1.923709 4.028917 0.236532 -0.23653
0.070658 3.462606 1.94211 4.366913 0.172543 -0.10189
0.32 2.186051 1.933266 2.928524 0.296334 0.023666
0.106136 2.24071 1.964706 2.549445 0.290044 -0.18391
0.078701 3.459466 1.97132 4.089332 0.168131 -0.08943
0 3.005683 1.909498 2.451005 0.266748 -0.26675
0.226399 2.312535 1.971881 0.09531 0.348555 -0.12216
0 1.902108 2.019881 2.850707 0.280703 -0.2807
30
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
0 1.589235 2.038558 3.08191 0.286706 -0.28671
0 1.163151 2.02387 4.172848 0.290592 -0.29059
0.265487 1.335001 1.998368 2.694627 0.329972 -0.06449
0.32 -1.60944 2.042492 2.833213 0.495771 -0.17577
0 0.993252 2.06628 3.173878 0.310771 -0.31077
0 -1.60944 2.068337 4.329417 0.444805 -0.4448
0 -0.10536 2.074307 2.895912 0.384997 -0.385
0.148487 1.902108 2.089616 3.817712 0.225822 -0.07734
0.315737 1.568616 2.082732 2.867899 0.275506 0.040231
0.525657 1.902108 1.859645 2.687847 0.351379 0.174278
0.447813 2.821379 1.89819 2.230014 0.289129 0.158684
0.615472 1.987874 1.892738 2.564949 0.335526 0.279946
0.563542 2.079442 1.894873 3.484312 0.304056 0.259485
0.50803 2.292535 1.921958 3.010621 0.292011 0.216019
0.398871 3.222868 1.962788 3.735286 0.19628 0.202591
0.224165 1.609438 2.166794 4.174387 0.202957 0.021208
0 1.360977 2.221738 3.723281 0.208214 -0.20821
0 1.704748 2.237401 1.916923 0.228433 -0.22843
0.066805 2.70805 2.22973 2.80336 0.143759 -0.07695
0.234 2.66026 2.243455 3.246491 0.129201 0.104799
0 3.086487 2.230756 3.634951 0.096815 -0.09682
0 1.029619 2.125235 2.509599 0.301941 -0.30194
0.211665 1.252763 2.160534 1.667707 0.295768 -0.0841
1.109285 1.410987 2.172764 3.994524 0.217985 0.8913
0.851852 1.458615 2.185963 2.923162 0.238325 0.613526
0.37309 2.406945 2.199011 3.490429 0.157177 0.215912
0.081803 2.906901 2.216132 3.65842 0.113687 -0.03188
0.590018 2.028148 1.904076 3.511545 0.302787 0.287231
2.08326 2.04122 1.881771 3.600048 0.308799 1.774461
0 1.335001 1.866988 3.214868 0.370323 -0.37032
0.544944 1.808289 1.834327 2.091864 0.38388 0.161064
1.047009 1.163151 1.867443 2.890372 0.389829 0.657179
0 -0.69315 1.862328 0.262364 0.581072 -0.58107
1.577371 1.163151 1.95012 0.262364 0.426364 1.151007
0.303123 1.94591 2.05734 4.11578 0.228359 0.074763
0.698432 1.481605 2.06488 3.261935 0.277835 0.420597
31
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
0 0.916291 1.959924 3.811097 0.342528 -0.34253
0 -1.60944 1.957278 2.844909 0.530711 -0.53071
0.254 -1.20397 1.968639 2.906901 0.498483 -0.24448
0.090111 2.631889 2.125837 4.023564 0.158754 -0.06864
0.07937 2.322388 2.199188 2.879198 0.178949 -0.09958
0.449761 1.193922 2.21434 2.95491 0.242612 0.207149
1.107843 -2.30259 2.217633 2.827314 0.467677 0.640166
0.786096 -1.60944 2.229027 2.960105 0.415182 0.370914
0 0.182322 2.240069 2.197225 0.316878 -0.31688
0 1.280934 1.922476 3.526361 0.34243 -0.34243
0.909091 0 1.980372 3.269569 0.407082 0.502009
1.178571 -0.22314 2.044184 -0.91629 0.507586 0.670985
1.1 2.292535 2.031344 4.628887 0.203196 0.896804
0.23 1.481605 2.09155 2.797281 0.279308 -0.04931
0.12 4.264087 2.085545 0.741937 0.159662 -0.03966
0.588235 1.458615 1.730411 2.74084 0.431704 0.156531
1.020408 0.693147 1.744023 3.453157 0.455717 0.564692
0.65445 1.335001 1.761213 3.7612 0.399378 0.255072
0 2.332144 1.770359 3.020425 0.35194 -0.35194
1.1 -0.10536 1.772405 -0.22314 0.593857 0.506143
0.536111 1.871802 1.780045 3.440418 0.365987 0.170124
0.129812 2.451005 2.125486 3.157 0.193761 -0.06395
0.107085 2.639057 2.157698 3.113515 0.169611 -0.06253
0.1638 2.727853 2.195926 3.756538 0.130824 0.032975
0.11 3.299534 2.230613 2.533697 0.11293 -0.00293
0.067011 4.245634 2.235783 3.005683 0.037748 0.029263
0.1 3.049273 2.222126 2.667228 0.128808 -0.02881
0.150588 1.960095 1.911512 3.877432 0.294202 -0.14361
0.089147 2.415914 1.972544 2.912351 0.265859 -0.17671
0.25 1.098612 1.977089 4.136765 0.315033 -0.06503
0 0.832909 1.995032 1.568616 0.393683 -0.39368
0 0.405465 2.034472 2.451005 0.380875 -0.38087
0.118151 2.140066 2.014988 2.74084 0.270508 -0.15236
0.277992 1.974081 2.058149 4.062166 0.227671 0.050321
0.223187 2.197225 2.063973 3.139833 0.235857 -0.01267
0.254237 2.066863 2.097137 3.754199 0.213914 0.040324
32
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
0 2.985682 2.102073 2.388763 0.190027 -0.19003
0.199557 2.014903 2.10637 -2.30259 0.376441 -0.17688
0.437601 1.223775 2.093944 2.772589 0.295426 0.142176
Resulting from the various use of profitability X1 and firm size X2 and sales growth X3 in
percentage from the year 2004-2009.Using the excel calculation we found the estimators as
1.314409
= -0.06378
-0.413172
-0.02692
The regression equation
= 1.314409 - 0.06378
Test of Significance of Parameter Estimates
In order to test for the statistical significance of the parameter estimates of the multiple
regressions, the variance of the estimate is required.
Coefficients Standard
Error t Stat P-value
Intercept 1.314409 0.510604 2.574223 0.011376
Profitability -0.06378 0.027575 -2.31282 0.022593
Firm Size -0.41372 0.251868 -1.6426 0.103321
Sales Growth -0.02692 0.028902 -0.93135 0.353711
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance
F
Regression 3 1.317196 0.439065 3.565903 0.01652
Residual 110 13.54417 0.123129 Total 113 14.86136
Interpretation of Results
Group Statistics:
33
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
Here the groups are identified, their sample sizes (N), their means, their standard deviations,
and their S.E.M.s is given. We should check that the right variables have been selected and the right
number of cases has been analyzed.
The Coefficient of Multiple Determinations ( )
The coefficient of multiple determinations is defined as the proportion of the total variation in
Y “explained” by the multiple regression of Y on X1, X2 and X3 it can be calculated as
∑
∑
= 1- ∑
∑
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.297712
R Square 0.088632
Adjusted R Square 0.063777
Standard Error 0.350897
Observations 114
The value = 0.088632 or 8.8632% it means that the dependent variable is 8.8632% explained
by the independent variable and 91.1368% by other factors.
The Test of Overall Significance of the Regression
The overall significance of the regression can be tested with the ratio of the explained to
the unexplained variance. This follows an F distribution with k – 1 and n-k degrees of freedom,
where n is number of observations and k is number of parameters estimated.
=
⁄
⁄
34
Prepared by Mutee-Ur-Rahman
If the calculated F ratio exceeds the tabular value of F at the specified level of significance and
degrees of freedom, the hypothesis is accepted that the regression parameters are not all equal to
zero and that is significantly different from zero.
In addition, the F ratio can be used to test any linear restriction of regression parameters by using
the form
=
∑ ∑
∑
Where p is the number of restriction being tested, ∑ indicates the sum of squared
residuals for the restricted regression where the restriction are assumed to be true, and
indicates the sum of squared residuals for the unrestricted regression ( i.e. the usual residuals).
The null hypothesis is that the p restriction are true, in which case the residuals from the
restricted and unrestricted models should be identical, and F would take the value of zero. If the
restrictions are not true, the unrestricted model will have lower errors, increasing the value of F.
If F exceeds the tabular value, the null hypothesis is rejected.
So by using the excel the calculated value of = 3.565903 exceed the table value of F 3.97
at 5% level of significance , the hypothesis is accepted that b1 and b2 are not both zero and that is
significantly different from zero.
Conclusion:
When we check the impact of profitability on dividend payout through linear regression
analysis, the value of = 0.057731. It means that 5.7731% change in dividend payout is due to
firm profitability.
When we check the impact of firm size on dividend payout through linear regression analysis,
the value of = 0.030173. It means that 3.0173% change in dividend payout is due to firm
size.
When we check the impact of sales growth on dividend payout through linear regression
analysis, the value of =0.01681. It means that 1.681% change in dividend payout is due to
sales growth.
When we check the impact of all three independent variables (profitability, firm size, sales
growth) on dependent variable (dividend payout) through multiple regression analysis, the
value of =0.088632. It means that these three independent variables bring 8.8632% change
in dividend payout and 91.1368% change is due to other factors not included in our study.