Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SAMPLE
31
C H A P T E R 2
Iconology—Outline of a Working Methodology
ARCHITECTUR E A S A VISUAL MEDIUM
Architecture as a visual medium envelops and influences emotional inter-
action differently than do the other visual arts. That is because human ac-
tions include a spatial characteristic. In consequence, architecture has both
a public and personal existentialist character. More than simply inviting the
viewer into an imaginative scene, as in painting, or focusing on a particular
object, as in sculpture, architecture envelops, creating literal environments
and representational space, not simply representations of space. It includes
nonrepresentational compositions but also, potentially, coded meanings of
theological significance.
Therefore, in a study such as this we are compelled to use build-
ings themselves as texts in order to assess their meaning. As J. H. Elliott
argues in his book History in the Making, artifacts like the churches we
examine played a cultural role of defining the faith of their communities.1
Their architects’ use of existing styles did not necessarily conflict with the
new meanings intended by their designers, but expressed possibilities of
expressing their ideas about a new creation, the right ordering of life, of
rationality and the purposes of God. As we will argue, in utilizing these
1. Elliott, History in the Making.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
T h e V i s u a l T h e o l o g y o f t h e H u g u e n o t s
32
styles, they edited the ideas of Vitruvius and helped recover a classical style
and its visual language.
A methodology is needed to address the questions raised, a criteria
to assess the meanings suggested by cultural artifacts in their own context,
and in particular to ascertain what churches have meant for the communi-
ties who build them or appropriate and adapt them. Richard Kieckhefer
provides a starting place for articulating a methodology that will approach
the questions of interpreting liturgical space.2 Using Kieckhefer as a point
of departure, informed by insights from Jacobsen, Torgerson, Mugerauer,
Whyte, and Dyrness, we will look at a sort of “architectural iconology” of
French Protestantism, by which is meant an historical analysis and aesthet-
ic investigation of architectural forms and images in their context. More
specifically, this will help us to read French Protestant worship spaces, to
determine what forms meant theologically to those that designed or used
them.
WOR D - OR IEN TED AND FOR M- OR IEN TED CHURCH SPACE
All churches demonstrate characteristics that can be described as sacra-
mental and evangelical. All Christian communities celebrate the sacra-
ments, even if their major point of contact with the divine is in the hearing
of the Word of God; all are evangelical in the sense of reading Scripture and
recalling the gospel tradition, even if this is sublimated to the celebration
of the Mass. However, churches tend to exhibit one of these factors as a
“fundamental determinant of church design.”3 Some follow a long Eucha-
ristic ecclesial and architectural tradition dating from the early period of
Christian worship, seeing the approach to sacraments as this fundamental
determinant of church design. Others follow the kerygmatic tradition that
sprung up in the later Middle Ages and in the sixteenth-century Reforma-
tion, a tradition that understands the encounter with the Word of God to be
the primary manner in which one accesses the holy. These influences can
be seen to a greater or lesser degree in all churches, then, but one of these
tendencies shapes the essential form.
Various contexts contribute to the experience of responding to
a church, including cultural interaction, expectations, the ethos of its
2. Kieckhefer, Theology in Stone.
3. Krautheimer, Early Christian, 13.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
I c o n o l o g y — O u t l i n e o f a Wo r k i n g M e t h o d o l o g y
33
community, and how it is being used liturgically.4 One person, for example,
might experience a liturgy as a meaningless show, and another not as a
show but a sacred enactment. The meaning of architectural space is negoti-
ated, then, between the intention of the architect and the experience of the
building’s users. Response to a church is learned and requires informed
reflection, for “the meanings of a church are seldom obvious.”5
Kieckhefer proposes four ways of looking at a church, undergirded by
two foundational questions: How is it used? And, what sort of reaction is it
meant to elicit? Both questions may be separated into two distinct refine-
ments: when we ask how a church is used, we are enquiring first about the
overall configuration of space: “how is it shaped, and how does its design
relate to the flow, the dynamics of worship?” Another way of putting the
question would be, Where is “the central focus of attention, if any . . . and
how does it make clear what is most important in worship?”6 The ques-
tions address the immediate impact and first impressions of walking into
the church, of what the disparate elements communicate, and of the mood
evoked. The center of attention communicates what is most important in
the experience of worship, and pays attention to the “accumulation of im-
pressions” that comes to the forefront through longer exposure. Marks of
holiness, of the set apart nature of the worship space, lead to an intensifica-
tion of experience and to deeper understanding.
To further elaborate Kieckhefer’s methodology, he proposes four dis-
tinct questions to pose when looking at a church. They are:
1. How is the space shaped, and how does its design relate to the flow of
worship?
2. Where is the focus of attention? (On the Lord’s Table, an altar, or a
pulpit? Is the focus on the worshiping community itself?)
3. What is the aesthetic impact? (Entering a church parallels our experi-
ence of coming into God’s presence. A church’s design—its aesthetic
impact—reminds us of leaving behind the world for a time to enjoy
community with God in prayer as well as with fellow believers.)
4. What is its symbolic resonance? (Does the church communicate rich
associations that invite further exploration? Such connotations can
take place both visually and verbally, but if little is communicated
4. Kieckhefer, Theology in Stone, 5–7.
5. Ibid., 9.
6. Ibid., 10.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
T h e V i s u a l T h e o l o g y o f t h e H u g u e n o t s
34
that draws us into deeper meanings, then there is little to hold one’s
interest.)
Following Jacobsen, we might also ask of a church, Is it beautiful?
Does it elicit our affection? How does the building provide for “the expe-
rience of approach, for hospitality, and for enhancing relationships?” As
Lindsay Jones reminded us, buildings also have meaning because of how
they are used as containers of religious activity. To grasp multiple mean-
ings, we will look at transpositions between a building’s designer, its users,
and those who observe it. Dyrness’s analysis of Protestant use of narrative
applies as well.
First, however, a historical sketch of the development of the sacramen-
tal and the evangelical traditions will establish some context, and further
define the two foundational orientations to church space that undergird
discussion of churches. If Gadamer is correct that a structure’s local history
as an “event” and its social context help define meaning, then this survey is
indispensible.
THE CL A SSIC SACR A MEN TAL TR ADITION: OR IGINS OF SPATI AL AR R ANGE MEN TS IN CATHOLIC
CHURCHES
The classic sacramental tradition emerged from the first decades of church
building in the fourth century. Its most representative form is known as the
basilican plan, a long hall-like structure with side aisles, completed by an
apse form at the eastern end. The name basilica derives from the Greek
stoa, a long covered walkway, and basilea, royal, a designation for a king’s
tribunal chamber in fifth-century BC Athens. In the second century BC,
basilicas functioned as public halls for conducting business and deciding
legal affairs.7 Colonnaded aisles ran parallel along the sides, and a raised
dais on the apse provided space for magistrates to sit. The central hall, being
higher than the side aisles, permitted light to penetrate the building through
clerestory windows. Christianity developed within the cultural framework
of the Roman-Hellenistic world, and its organization as well as its architec-
ture reflected this context (see figure 6). Familiarity with the historical de-
velopment of the basilican form of church building, prevalent in the classic
sacramental church, helps us understand the forms of medieval churches
7. Gietmann, “Basilica,” line 3ff.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
I c o n o l o g y — O u t l i n e o f a Wo r k i n g M e t h o d o l o g y
35
that sixteenth-century Protestants inherited in territories where the Refor-
mation was adopted.
Figure 6: A front section of old St. Peter’s church in Rome
shows the Roman basilican form.
Worship in the Late Roman Empire was a public obligation for its sub-
jects, who were required to pray to the gods who assured the well-being of
the state. In the private realm, citizens were free to worship or not without
interference. As long as cults of personal salvation did not interfere with
the cult of the emperor, explains Richard Krautheimer, no conflict need
arise.8 Indeed, in the first century of the development of Christianity, the
faith grew with little notice. In officialdom or when under scrutiny, how-
ever, worship of the gods became a litmus test for loyalty to the emperor.
As Krautheimer points out, “worship was a civic duty performed accord-
ing to a state ritual.”9 Due to the work of St Paul, however, the Christian
movement broke with Judaism, and could no longer be seen as simply an
offshoot or as a heresy within its ranks.
Within the first century, Christianity spread to the Hellenized cities of
Greece, Asia Minor, to towns and villages, and eventually to Rome. Orga-
nization of new congregations fell to lay administrators, overseers or bish-
ops (episkopoi), and stewards or deacons (diakonoi), with preaching and
guidance supplied by the itinerant disciples and by apostles and prophets.
8. Krautheimer, Early Christian, 23.
9. Ibid., 23.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
T h e V i s u a l T h e o l o g y o f t h e H u g u e n o t s
36
By the mid to late second century, tasks included teaching and the lead-
ing of worship, works of charity, the teaching of catechumens, the care of
cemeteries, the cure of souls, and the administration of property. Bishops
and deacons, along with elders or presbyters (presbuteroi) formed a hier-
archical class of clergy. Bishops eventually came to oversee the churches of
each city, following the pattern of Bishop Dionysius in Rome (259–268).
As Christians grew in power and influence, they came to be seen as chal-
lenges to state authority. Early persecutions had been local and sporadic,
but after 250, Christian self-separation and refusal to participate in the cult
of emperor worship caused ill feeling to issue in fierce persecution.10 In the
mid third century, authorities
in Alexandria, Carthage, and Rome confiscated property, executed
church leaders, and prohibited Christians from meeting together. The
church proved resilient, however, and Emperor Gallienus restored prop-
erty, cemeteries, and the right to assemble. The larger churches owned
property, either legally or overlooked by authorities. Smaller congregations
continued to meet in homes, and large congregations would revert to this
practice in times of persecution.
Built structures served spiritual needs as well as the exigencies of social
welfare, for worship administration, and distribution of charity. Cemeteries
allowed for memorials for the dead and particularly for the martyrs. The
liturgy had been standardized by the early third century, and the common
meal was no longer celebrated weekly, but on special occasions only, such
as memorial banquets and meals for the poor.
A service consisted of two parts: the Mass of the Catechumens, for the
catechumens as well as for regular believers, which consisted of prayers,
Scripture, and sermon. The second part, the Mass of the Faithful, was for
regular, confirmed members, and consisted of a procession for bringing
offerings and contributions for the poor and for the maintenance of the
church, and of the Eucharist.
The assembly hall had to be large enough to accommodate worship-
pers, and was divided into spaces for clergy and laity. The bishop’s seat oc-
cupied a space on a raised platform to one end of the chamber, adjoined
by chairs for the other assisting clergy. Men and women sat on opposite
sides of the assembly. Furniture included chairs for the clergy, a table for
communion, and a second table for the offerings. A confirmation room
and a baptistery were also needed, according to the needs of the cult. Other
10. Ibid., 25.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
I c o n o l o g y — O u t l i n e o f a Wo r k i n g M e t h o d o l o g y
37
requirements included rooms for clergy offices and quarters for clergy and
their families; rooms for storing and distributing food and clothing for the
poor; classrooms for the instruction of converts, and community gathering
space. The scale and diversity of these usages determined that congrega-
tions needed more space than a private home could afford.
Krautheimer tells us such structures, occasionally purpose-built
and often purchased and adapted, were dubbed domus ecclesiae or oikos
ecclesias, or in Rome, a titulus.11 Such houses that are known follow the
general plan of local utilitarian domestic architecture of the third century.
Christians shied away from religious forms of architecture such as temples
and sanctuaries because of their association with pagan religious practices
and Roman cultic customs. Christian meeting places were usually typical
peristyle dwellings, following the manner of domestic middle class archi-
tecture, as was certainly the case at Dura-Europos in the eastern part of the
Empire. This style comprised a courtyard faced on three sides by rooms,
and by a columned portico on the fourth. In Rome, tenements seem to
have been converted into Christian community houses in the third and
fourth century to accommodate the needs of larger congregations.12 Chris-
tians integrated classical forms into funerary architecture—mausolea, mar-
tyria, and banqueting halls—more readily than into worship spaces, since
pagan funeral buildings did not carry the religious associations of public
monumental buildings. Structures devoted to regular Christian worship
and church administration resisted classical pagan architectural influences
longer, preferring the purely utilitarian design of the domus ecclesiae into
the late fourth century.
Gradually, however, churches began to emulate the more exalted ar-
chitectural surroundings and ceremonial practices of a Roman magistrate.
As Christianity gained official favor and eventually became the dominant
religious power, the basilica was the principal form used for ecclesiasti-
cal building. From the time of Constantine, “Christian concepts [are] ex-
pressed in the language of the official architecture of Late Antiquity.”13
Constantine’s Edict of Milan in 313 insured official toleration for
Christianity, and throughout his twenty-four year reign the church became
increasingly enmeshed with the power of the state. The hierarchy of leader-
ship that had developed in the years of peace for the church from 260 to 305
11. Ibid.
12. Ibid., 29.
13. Ibid., 37.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
T h e V i s u a l T h e o l o g y o f t h e H u g u e n o t s
38
further solidified; the Mass was standardized across the Empire; and the
bishops accustomed themselves to the privilege, rank, and insignia of high
government officials.14 In consequence, the church demanded an archi-
tecture commensurate with its social standing, and sanctuaries that stood
on a par with the grandest of palaces and public buildings.15 Sanctuaries
contained “a lofty throne atop a dais, an audience chamber,” and worship
was accompanied by “the performance of acclamations upon entering the
meeting room for services.”
Today, variants of the basilican plan are seen in Catholic, Orthodox,
Lutheran, Episcopalian, and other traditions. An extended nave contains
seats for the congregants, and a chancel allows for the seating of clergy.
Kieckhefer underscores that terminology and arrangements vary, but stan-
dard features include choir stalls and an altar, a symbolic place of sacrifice.
This, in the classic sacramental church, is the point of focus. He writes,
If a church of this type is based on a coherent aesthetic vision,
it is usually one meant to evoke the immanence of God and the
possibility among worshipers for transcendence of ordinary con-
sciousness. Such churches often abound with symbolic forms and
decorations, making them rich in symbolic resonance.16
That is, if the church was constructed with intentionality, the grandeur
and immediacy of God will likely resonate in that space. Such spaces are
usually replete with artistic pieces, but even without them, the structure
itself communicates. It may be obvious that the scale of a classical sacra-
mental church edifice communicates God’s transcendence more than it
does immanence due to the height and the expansiveness of Romanesque
or Gothic styles. This dynamic is counterbalanced, however, with sym-
bols and iconology, which convey a tangibility and imaginative locus for
worshippers.
Even with the change in religious loyalty to Calvinist or Lutheran
teachings, old perceptions of sacred space were not quickly or easily
overcome. In addition, practical considerations insured that Protestants,
where possible, appropriated classical sacramental churches, changing the
utilization of space where that proved necessary for their purposes. Ex-
amples of this trend are numerous in the Rhineland-Palatinate, in Scotland,
in the Netherlands, in the Alsace, in southwest France, and in the cities
14. Ibid., 39.
15. Ibid.
16. Ibid., 11.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
I c o n o l o g y — O u t l i n e o f a Wo r k i n g M e t h o d o l o g y
39
of Protestant Switzerland such as Neuchâtel, Basel, Lausanne, Bern, and
Geneva.
The basilican form, then, conveyed dignity, solidity, spaciousness, and
grandeur, attributes suited to its original usage as a place of business or
governance. As well, it was suited to express, in its adaptation for Christian
worship, a theology of transcendence, power, and authority, as Krautheimer
suggests. Churches were divided into spaces of increasing degrees of holi-
ness, conjuring memories of the ancient Jewish temple in Jerusalem. The
physical movement from the church yard, over the west porch and through
the main doors, most often passing under carvings of Christ at the Last
Judgment, would have relayed an impression of moving from the world
into the heavenly realm. This form will be relevant to our later discussion
of the Protestant adaptation of St. Pierre in Geneva, several centuries old
by Calvin’s time. Although in use as a Christian place of worship for over
one thousand years, conceptualized through this long period as domus dei,
perceptions of its nature would undergo a significant shift in the Reforma-
tion period, a return to the pre-Constantinian understanding of the church
as domus ecclesiae, or oikos ecclesias.
THE CL A SSIC EVANGELICAL TR ADITION
The Protestant reformers of the sixteenth century rediscovered and re-
turned to the ancient idea of a temple as the domus ecclesiae rather than as
the domus dei. Harold Turner, who relies on his own observation of pat-
terns in historic worship spaces, explains in From Temple to Meeting House
that the reformers’ new understanding of church space sprang from their
changing view of the church itself and their recovery of the “primitive com-
munal nature of worship.”17
Kieckhefer describes the classic evangelical tradition as essentially an
auditorium designed for the purpose of hearing the exposition of Scripture.
All other visual elements are sublimated to this purpose, for as Calvin in-
sisted, “Unless we listen attentively to [God], his majesty will not dwell
among us.”18 Indeed, in this scheme in a place designated for Protestant
worship there can be no place for symbols or images. In this space the pul-
pit, the focal point of the proclaimed Word, dominates the space. Rather
17. Turner, From Temple, 205.
18. Calvin, Institutes, 2.1.4.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
T h e V i s u a l T h e o l o g y o f t h e H u g u e n o t s
40
than cruciform or rectilinear, the space is often broader, even square or
octagonal. This enables all the individuals to clearly hear the preaching and
be edified by it, even encouraging spontaneous interaction with the preach-
er. The building is stripped of ornaments, plain in style, most often lacking
in chapels, images, frescoes, altars, and stained glass windows—all the ele-
ments charged with theological meaning in the classic sacramental church.
Kieckhefer reminds us that the style would be appropriated by nineteenth-
century urban revival preachers, following the pattern of exposition of
Scripture and call to faith above all else, and once again by twentieth-cen-
tury evangelicals “with the latest technology at their command.”19
Figure 7: “Purging the Temple” (upper portion), receiving the Scripture (lower left)
and the typical features of Protestant worship, with the two biblical sacraments and
the congregation gathered around a pulpit to hear the preaching. (From Foxe’s Book of
Martyrs, 1563 edition.)
19. Krautheimer, Early Christian, 11–12.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
I c o n o l o g y — O u t l i n e o f a Wo r k i n g M e t h o d o l o g y
41
DEVELOPMEN TS IN THE CL A SSIC EVANGELICAL TR ADITION
The classic evangelical tradition in church design developed in response
to needs of new Protestant worshiping communities. For Luther, churches’
physical significance paled in comparison with the believing community
itself, and churches were not consecrated as holy spaces but approached
from a perspective of practical concern. In purpose-built Protestant wor-
ship spaces, there was no altar and the Lord’s Table became predominant.
Turner points out that the first Lutheran architectural treatise appeared
only in 1649 at the end of the Thirty Years War in response to the need
for guidance in matters of design. The city architect of Ulm, Joseph Furt-
tenbach, penned Kirchenbau as a guide to construction of sanctuaries in
rural territories devastated by war. “He recommended plain domestic rect-
angular buildings, with pulpit, table and font together where all could see
and hear.”20
This arrangement was a shared characteristic with Reformed spaces,
although in contrast with Huguenot churches, the exterior as well as inte-
rior space in Furttenbach’s church designs was adorned with crosses, and
in contrast with Reformed churches in general, his church designs included
ornate altars. Along with Jacques Perret, he was one of two architects of the
period writing about the arrangement of Protestant churches per se; it was
not until the eighteenth century that a theoretician of Protestant temples
properly speaking would appear with Leonhard Christoph Sturm, “a Lu-
theran converted to Calvinism and author of works on architecture and
theology.”21
There was much deliberation over the nature of the church, whose
distinguishing characteristics Calvin held to be “the Word of God purely
preached and heard, and the sacraments administered according to Christ’s
institution.”22 One implication of this conviction was that appropriate wor-
ship space included a visible and centralized pulpit for proclamation, a bap-
tismal font visible to the congregation, and a Lord’s Table accessible for the
Eucharistic meal. Calvin recognized that buildings themselves are neutral:
even pagan temples can serve as spaces where God encounters his people.23
20. Turner, Theories of Culture, 206.
21. Germann, “Les Temples Protestants,” 346.
22. Calvin, Institutes, 4.1.9
23. Turner, Theories of Culture, 207. Turner cites Calvin’s reflections on the nature of
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
T h e V i s u a l T h e o l o g y o f t h e H u g u e n o t s
42
In his sovereign freedom, God deigns to meet his people in the place where
they gather; Julie Canlis, in her work Calvin’s Ladder, reminds us that “Cal-
vin will emphasize time and again that we are to be drawn up to God rather
than dragging him down to us—whether it be in the Lord’s Supper, idolatry,
or carnal ways of conceiving of God. . . . ‘For our affections must ascend to
heaven, or otherwise we would not be at all united to Jesus Christ.’”24
Nonetheless, it is possible to construe some preferences of Calvin,
which accentuate the Protestant predilection for simplicity, practicality,
and accessibility. Church space is consecrated by the Word and yet is not
sacred more than any other place; it can be put either to godly, edifying use,
or used to erect idols in the minds of believers. He writes, “As God in his
Word enjoins common prayer, so public temples are the places destined
for the performance of them.”25 Calvin recognizes the practical need for
gathering space dedicated to prayer, arguing for the gathered worshiping
community and against what he sees as the inadequacy of merely indi-
vidualistic devotion. His language speaks of the church’s public prayers, but
seems at times to refer as much to the worship space itself. God invites the
prayers of the faithful, and therefore buildings set aside for those prayers,
which are contrasted with the Christian’s private “chamber,” have their nec-
essary place. In the prayers (and the buildings themselves?) “there [should]
be no ostentation, or catching at human applause.” Calvin betrays some
the pagan temples. To quote the pertinent section from Calvin, “All the temples which the
Gentiles built to God with a different intention were a mere profanation of his worship,
—a profanation into which the Jews also fell, though not with equal grossness. With this
Stephen upbraids [Israel] in the words of Isaiah when he says, ‘Howbeit the Most High
dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the Prophet, Heaven is my throne,’
. . . For God only consecrates temples to their legitimate use by his word. And when we
rashly attempt anything without his order, immediately setting out from a bad principle,
we introduce adventitious fictions, by which evil is propagated without measure. [Yet] it
was inconsiderate in Xerxes when . . . he burnt or pulled down all the temples of Greece,
because he thought it absurd that God, to whom all things ought to be free and open,
should be enclosed by walls and roofs, as if it were not in the power of God in a manner
to descend to us [emphasis added], that he may be near to us, and yet neither change his
place nor affect us by earthly means, but rather, by a kind of vehicle, raise us aloft to his
own heavenly glory, which, with its immensity, fills all things, and in height is above the
heavens.” (Institutes, 4.1.5)
Here Calvin lifts up the principle that space is only sanctified by God’s Word—an
implicit denial of the validity of Catholic space, since in Calvin’s view the Romanists did
not handle Scripture properly—yet he leaves open the possibility that any space can in
theory be so consecrated as to be fit for worship.
24. Canlis, Calvin’s Ladder, 119.
25. Calvin, Institutes, 3.20.30.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
I c o n o l o g y — O u t l i n e o f a Wo r k i n g M e t h o d o l o g y
43
ambivalence at this point: he consistently emphasized human participation
in Christ, but is nearly mute on the effectiveness of the material sphere
for such a connection. He only tentatively ruminates on the relationship of
the Holy Spirit to the created order, contributing to “a historical reticence
toward the arts and images.”26 Calvin’s reluctance here seems to be in part
a reaction to the ostentatious display of medieval imagery. He does confer
a certain dignity on the actual place of common worship when he says,
“lest the public prayers of the Church should be held in contempt, the Lord
anciently bestowed upon them the most honorable appellation, especially
when he called the temple the “house of prayer.” Calvin continues,
If this is the legitimate use of churches (and it certainly is), we
must, on the other hand, beware . . . of imagining that churches
are the proper dwellings of God, where he is more ready to listen
to us, or of attaching to them some kind of secret sanctity, which
makes prayer there more holy. For seeing we are the true temples
of God, we must pray in ourselves if we would invoke God in his
holy temple. Let us leave such gross ideas . . . knowing that we
have a command without distinction of place, [emphasis added]
“in spirit and in truth.”27
The former temple of Israel was indeed consecrated by prayer and sac-
rifice, but above all it prefigured God’s dwelling within the people of God,
the true church. The Old Testament prophets insisted that God could not
be contained in a temple made of human hands. Turner rightly observes
that the temples or churches possess only a kind of derived or secondary
sanctity that depended entirely on the kind of worship offered there (see
figure 7). God has honored humanity by making people (i.e., the Christian
community) to be his literal temple, his sanctuaries, and we should not
debase the dignity of our calling by venerating walls and ceilings. However,
Calvin left room for churches to work out an appropriate physical setting
for worship. Andrew Spicer explains,
Although the Reformed attitudes towards places of worship and
their appearance were largely shaped by the theology and writings
of Jean Calvin and the second generation of Reformers—ideas
which were enshrined in the Second Helvetic Confession—there
26. Canlis, Calvin’s Ladder, 244.
27. Ibid.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
T h e V i s u a l T h e o l o g y o f t h e H u g u e n o t s
44
was no architectural model or blueprint of an ideal Reformed tem-
ple. Such matters were regarded as adiaphora by the Reformers.28
Calvin’s reflections thus provide a theological foundation for Re-
formed approaches to church architecture, not as specific designs but as
biblical guidance on appropriate attitudes, particularly toward the church
buildings that Reformed Christians inherited. The majesty and glory of
God were best perceived not through decorative adornments, but rather
were heard in the Word of God read and expounded upon. The lack of
specific and extensive architectural and design directives may not be so
much a lacuna in Reformed ecclesiology as an expression of the freedom to
develop forms appropriate to the settings of various diverse communities.
Calvin is more concerned with what takes place within a church than with
its specific shape.
The first spaces designed expressly for Reformed worship appeared in
Huguenot strongholds of France, and later in Holland, Scotland, the Palati-
nate, Transylvania, and eventually in the plain meeting houses of colonial
New England. These spaces were created for dignity rather than magnifi-
cence, with symbolic reticence and focus on the preacher. In the course of
time and with the rise of the modern liturgical movement in the twentieth
century, buildings displaying the characteristics of the classic evangelical
model borrowed stylistic elements from the classic sacramental tradition as
well, though reinterpreting these elements for their own purposes.
In the era of Renaissance architectural treatises, we find little ex-
plicit conceptual basis for Protestant space, in spite of the fact that many
architects in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century France were themselves
Protestants or at least crypto-Calvinists. Turner writes that “there were
no major [written] treatments of the church building, and nothing at all
comparable to the great treatises that provided a theory for the Catholic
symbolism of the Renaissance churches.”29 This is doubtless attributable to
the conflictual religious context in which they labored, where architects in
the employ of Catholic royal power would naturally attempt to avoid costly
ideological debate. In the context of Protestant territories, it seems that
builders’ attention centered on practical concerns. “Reformation activity
was focused more on the development of liturgies, and explicit statements
28. Spicer, Calvinist Churches, 2.
29. Turner, Theories of Culture, 206.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
I c o n o l o g y — O u t l i n e o f a Wo r k i n g M e t h o d o l o g y
45
about the buildings tend to be rather incidental or limited to their internal
arrangements.”30
Reformed Christians saw themselves, rather than an architectural
edifice, as the church of God built from “living stones” on the foundation
of Christ. The primary consideration in most built spaces was functional
rather than aesthetic. Specific modifications in the practice of Protestant
churches included a diminishing of the distinction between clergy and
the laity, the reception of communion in both kinds, the reunification of
preaching and sacrament, the extinguishing of the cult of the saints, and
a new distaste for luxury and ostentation. These changes necessitated a
rethinking of the space of worship, resulting in bringing the pulpit into
new prominence, eliminating the high altar, restoring the table as a locus
for communion, doing away with divisions of interior space, and gener-
ally cultivating space that reflected the people themselves as the temple of
God. The priority was making possible a gathering of the people in physical
proximity to hear the gospel proclaimed and to join in common prayer
rather than establishing, as in Catholic churches, a physical separation that
echoed spiritual progression from the entryway to the pulpit and beyond
it to the altar.
OTHER CON TR IBU TOR S TO THE CL A SSIC EVANGELICAL TR ADITION
Zwingli must be noted as well for his contribution to Reformed habits in
use of worship space. His is a voice for simplicity and what may be termed
visual concentration in the locus of common worship. One of the dramatic
acts of the Reformation would be when he prepared communion in Gross-
münster at Zurich in the Reformed manner on Maundy Thursday in April
1525. Having removed the church altar, he served at an ordinary domestic
table, dressed in secular garb, facing the congregation rather than with back
turned and facing the altar as per custom of the Catholic Mass. Instead
of costly accoutrements, simple wooden cup and plates were used. Rather
than the consecrated host, ordinary bread was used. In so doing, powerful
new visual symbols were implemented, ones insisting that a life of holiness
was not reserved for the cloister, but penetrating secular and family life in
the place where one fed physically and spiritually.
30. Ibid.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
T h e V i s u a l T h e o l o g y o f t h e H u g u e n o t s
46
Martin Bucer in Strasbourg is another voice in formulating a Re-
formed sense of space fit for worship. His conclusions are consistent with
Calvin’s theological approach to worship, yet he provides a few more spe-
cifics, and he embarks on a program to rearrange interior space to better
facilitate intelligible worship. Reflecting on his approach, Turner writes:
After recognizing the need for churches, which was not true of
all sections of the Reformation, [Bucer] declared “that the choir
should be so distantly separated from the rest the temple, and
the service (which pertains to the whole people and the clergy)
be set forth in it alone, is anti-Christian.” This arrangement sug-
gests that the ministers are “nearer to God than lay people,” and
also “confirms the pernicious superstition by which reading . . .
the Scripture and prayers without intelligence and without under-
standing of faith is thought worship pleasing to God.” For these
reasons, and from a misapprehension as to the frequency of round
churches in antiquity, Bucer favored a building of this shape as the
ideal form.31
Bucer explicitly directed, then, that the worship space must be in
proximity to the choir, enhancing the connection between the clergy and
the laity. That he would give this rule is evidence that the reformer un-
derstands the power of visual elements to symbolize and instruct—in this
case, that worship is for the whole people of God; that all have equal sta-
tus in worship; and that fitting worship entails understanding. Few others
were as clear on the matter as Bucer was, but other Protestant communities
practiced a similar manner of translating theological convictions into the
arrangement of worship space.
Margarite de Navarre, who was attracted to the teachings of Luther
and sympathetic to reform, is another illustrative voice in forming a view
of Reformed worship space. In her creative piece Heptameron she reflected
on what she considered appropriate design and appointment of spaces for
worship:
Truly, I have often wondered . . . how [Catholics] think to make
their peace with God by means of things, means of things which
he himself reprobated when he was on earth, such as great build-
ings, gildings, painting, and decorations, But if they rightly under-
stood what God has said, that the only offering he requires of us
is a humble and contrite heart, and another text in which St. Paul
says that we are the temple of God in which he desires to dwell,
31. Ibid., 208.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
I c o n o l o g y — O u t l i n e o f a Wo r k i n g M e t h o d o l o g y
47
they would have taken pains to adorn their consciences while they
were alive, and not have waited for the time when a man can no
longer do either good or ill.32
Margarite is expressing, in the artistic form of a novella, her convic-
tions on what pleases God in the sanctuary. This is, no less, a form in which
she frequently reflects on the meaning of material objects and works of art,
as Catharine Randall has shown.33 The place of worship is to be marked by
simplicity, as the appropriate focus in preparing for worship is repentance
and return to God in humble faith, a beauty not “from outward adornment,
such as braided hair and the wearing of gold jewelry and fine clothes.”
Heinrich Bullinger, too, in a section of the Second Helvetic Confession
titled “Decent Meeting Places,” includes instructions for the arrangement
of worship space:
Moreover, the places where the faithful meet are to be decent, and
in all respects fit for God’s Church. Therefore, spacious buildings
or temples are to be chosen, but they are to be purged of every-
thing that is not fitting for a church. And everything is to be ar-
ranged for decorum, necessity, and godly decency, lest anything
be lacking that is required for worship and the necessary works of
the church.34
Bullinger insists that places of worship which honor God are to be
modest, governed by the principle of humility. There is to be a sense of
fittingness in houses of worship. Beauty in such places will be seen in sensi-
tive arrangement; aesthetic concern is appropriate, suggested by his terms
“fair,” and “comeliness,” but these terms are held in balance by the words
“necessity,” “seemliness,” “decency,” and what is needful for the rites and
orders that comprise the liturgy of the church. There is here a dynamic in
which the faith of the church, not external elements like architecture, is
the essential component of the community ordered by the Word of God;
nonetheless Bullinger suggests a kind of set-apart quality of the buildings
themselves that were dedicated to worship. Built structures are to enable
and enhance the worship offered within them, and yet it is appropriate to
conduct oneself with reverence, a kind of anticipation that God will be
32. Marguerite, L’Heptameron, 313.
33. Randall, Earthly Treasures.
34. Bullinger, Second Helvetic Confession, XXII.4.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
T h e V i s u a l T h e o l o g y o f t h e H u g u e n o t s
48
pleased to meet his people gathered for worship in this place in a way dis-
tinct from other places.
And as we believe that God does not dwell in temples made with
hands, so we know that on account of God’s Word and sacred use
places dedicated to God and his worship are not profane but holy;
and that those that are present in them are to conduct themselves
reverently and modestly, seeing that they are in a sacred place, in
the presence of God and his holy angels.35
Here, Bullinger goes so far as to suggest that the places used for wor-
ship are made sacred by the activities that take place within them. He
shared the sentiments of nearly all reformers, that the places where God’s
people meet were not intrinsically holy by any magic they possessed, how-
ever, these were places to be treated with due reverence. Their special func-
tion demanded a fittingness or appropriateness of response, a humility that
recognized the nature of the true ornaments of the church. Whether on the
continent, in Scotland or elsewhere, all Reformed parties were attempting to
return to an ancient Christian understanding of the church building as the
domus ecclesiae. So the place itself is not holy, until inhabited by God’s holy
people, sanctified by prayer and by God’s Word, among whom he dwells. In
“The True Ornamentation of Sanctuaries,” Bullinger continues, seemingly
blurring the line between human and architectural ornamentation:
Therefore, all luxurious attire, all pride, and everything unbe-
coming to Christian humility, discipline, and modesty, are to be
banished from the sanctuaries and places of prayer of Christians.
For the true ornamentation of churches does not consist in ivory,
gold, and precious stones, but in the frugality, piety, and virtues
of those who are in the Church. Let all things be done decently
and in order in the Church, and finally, let all things be done for
edification.36
Externals, such as apparel, reflected internal reality, and therefore the
putting aside of pride and the adopting of “humility, discipline, and modes-
ty” were to be reflected in simplicity of manner, just as in sobriety of decora-
tion in the meeting place itself. Simplicity of design reflects godliness just as
does appropriate clothing or virtuous comportment. Michel de Montaigne,
a Catholic whose mother was a Protestant and who was sympathetic to the
35. Ibid., XXII.5
36. Ibid., XXII.6
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
I c o n o l o g y — O u t l i n e o f a Wo r k i n g M e t h o d o l o g y
49
cause of reform, reflected on pretentiousness of manner and the obsession
to impress among the nobility and aspiring nobility. This pretentiousness
made everyone look ambitious and foolish. Clothing might ostentatiously
show “superficial errors,” but was also enough “to inform us that the whole
fabric is crazy and tottering.”37 Just as the recognized importance of laying
aside excess in clothing highlighted the value of unadorned simplicity, so
the simplicity of design reflects godliness and deference.
Théodore de Bèze, the successor pastor/reformer in Geneva follow-
ing Calvin’s death in 1564, is another voice in our brief survey of influ-
ences in shaping a Reformed practical theology of worship space. Using
the language of the church as the “house of God,” he employs a series of
“opposites” to illustrate the quality of ordinary/extraordinary in the church.
In his Sermons on the Song of Songs he refers to the “extraordinary voca-
tions” as the “architects” of the church, and the “ordinary vocations” as the
“custodians.” The function of the architects was to build the church on the
foundation of Christ as mediated by the apostolic witness, and the function
of the latter to maintain what was given for the ages. In the case of corrup-
tion in the church, the custodians’ function became to restore the church to
the purity of the apostolic foundation. In using “architect,” “building,” and
“foundation” metaphorically, perhaps De Bèze suggests that the real built
space of the church is not for the purpose of grandeur or innovation, but for
clarity and fidelity to the biblical faith.
PROTESTAN T CHURCH BUILDING IN FR ANCE AND THE CL A SSIC EVANGELICAL TR ADITION
The churches of France drew from these multiple influences. Principally,
they drew from the theological inspiration of Calvin and of Martin Bucer.
Calvin’s influence was profound, as seen in his work behind the Gallican
Confession of 1559, in his sending de Bèze to represent the Reformed party
at the Colloquy of Poissy, and in his commissioning scores of Geneva-
trained missionary pastors to serve in France.
Nevertheless, the traditions and discipline of the French Reformed
churches drew from wider sources than Strasbourg and Geneva. Glenn
Sunshine underscores the influence of the Pays de Vaud through the work
of Pierre Viret on the system of the classe of the French polity.38 In addition,
37. Montaigne, “Of Sumptuary Laws,” 65.
38. Sunshine, Reforming French Protestantism, 4, 41.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
T h e V i s u a l T h e o l o g y o f t h e H u g u e n o t s
50
the French church may have drawn on the organization of the diaconate
from the Catholic Church, though perhaps by way of Strasbourg or Zurich.
Most importantly, perhaps, the Huguenots made a number of structural
innovations in response to their particular contexts. The French developed
a presbyterial or synodical representational government to deal with mat-
ters of discipline and doctrine. In the Swiss cantons of Bern and Zurich
Reformed theologians envisioned a system where church and state cooper-
ated for the management of the church, in which the state insured outward
conformity in behavior and the church established theological and orga-
nizational norms. There the system of called synods envisioned by Calvin
devolved into a structure led by a single pastor or church rather than a full
representational organization. In France, however, where the government
never considered the Reformed Church as anything but seditious, a threat
to the state to be eliminated, such a symbiotic relationship between church
and state was impossible.
The implications for the built space of churches in France were di-
verse. Reacting against practices that smacked of popery, the congregations
tended to extreme simplicity. In places where Protestant congregations
were forced to meet in secret, the faithful gathered in homes or even in
barns, usually outside the major cities. When Protestants were free to build
temples, they demonstrated a preference for large basilican (longitudinal)
or centralized forms such as the octagon or circle, providing maximum
sight lines for all worshipers.39 As the drawings or engravings of Huguenot
churches in Charenton, Lyons, La Rochelle, Rouen, Dieppe, and Chermont
reveal, Reformed Christians in many cases eschewed crosses on (and in)
their buildings. In the cases where Catholic churches could be requisitioned
and adapted for Protestant usage, such as in Languedoc, the church of St.
Fiary at Agen, and St. Étienne de Capduel at Nîmes, chapels and niches
would be “cleansed” of images, pulpits moved to more central positions,
Lord’s tables repositioned or introduced into the worship space. Kieckhefer
describes the essential options when adapting a Catholic worship space:
The early Reformers adapted existing churches more often than
they built new ones, and their greatest ingenuity was often devoted
to the reconception of medieval longitudinal space. They often set
pulpits midway down one side of the nave, turning long spaces
into wide ones. In a church with a distinct chancel, three main
possibilities presented themselves. First, the nave could serve as
39. Guicharnaud, “Introduction,” 136.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
I c o n o l o g y — O u t l i n e o f a Wo r k i n g M e t h o d o l o g y
51
the main worship space, and the chancel could be reserved for
other occasions (for smaller services such as weddings). Second,
the first part of the service (the liturgy of the Word) could be held
in the nave, after which the entire congregation could be invited
into the chancel for the remainder (the Eucharist), with the al-
tar placed either “altar-wise” against the east wall or “table-wise”
down the center of the chancel. Third, the chancel could become
the space in which privileged individuals or families sat while the
service was held in the nave. Along with any of these uses, the
chancel could serve also as a space for burials.40
It seems there were variations on adaptations for Protestant worship.
Some would gather toward the choir, others in the nave but turned toward
the short side. At times there would be movement during the service as
when the lay worshipers gathered on the chancel to receive the Lord’s
Supper.
The meanings conveyed by a seventeenth-century Protestant build-
ing differed from earlier churches in part because of the distinctively
Word-centered worship which takes place within it. This is not because
the form of the building is itself indifferent, but because the meaning of
other forms is always amplified and explicated by the spoken Word. In a
service stripped of extraneous elements and lifting up the gospel, aspects
of Roman Catholic heritage are excised. When Reformed churches do bor-
row from the classic sacramental churches, they reinterpret these features.
Classical liturgical churches, on the other hand, tend to serve a multiplicity
of purposes, with varying aspects based on different principles. Speaking a
language that much contemporary culture no longer understands, they can
be more difficult to interpret. Either tradition can be coherent, and enhance
the functioning that takes place within. Both the adaptations of the classical
liturgical church-building and the innovations of the classical evangelical
church-building expressed in their own manner a sense of sacrality. For
Krautheimer, this is achieved not so much by separation from the profane,
but rather in a church’s “symbolic associations,” or connections to profound
human narratives.41
Theological meanings arise, then, from the intersection of design
with actual uses of buildings, in particular with liturgical usage. In addi-
tion, buildings’ inhabitants adapted them in light of physical deterioration,
changing uses, evolving surroundings, and the vagaries of fashion, and
40. Kieckhefer, Theology in Stone, 46.
41. Krautheimer, Early Christian, 18.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press
SAMPLE
T h e V i s u a l T h e o l o g y o f t h e H u g u e n o t s
52
especially in response to their quest for renewal and reformation. In this
sense, buildings are perpetually metamorphic, “growing” in a kind of evo-
lutionary fashion, artifacts whose use adapts to changing needs over time.
In summary, the classic evangelical tradition sees the church building
as a frame for worship, not one that is holy in and of itself, but as a space
which enables and enhances an encounter with God through the hear-
ing of his Word in the gathered community. In France and Switzerland as
elsewhere, decorative elements in such a scheme tended to be few; visual
components intended for didactic purpose were missing; everything con-
tributed to the experience of approaching, hearing, reflecting upon, and
responding to the words of the Bible. In time, decorative elements such as
tombs, tablets of the Ten Commandments, or coats of arms of civic leaders
were introduced (which also made their way into the classic sacramental
churches adapted for Protestant worship), and later expressions of the
evangelical tradition would reflect some stylistic elements of the other basic
church types. For the Protestant reformers of the sixteenth and seventeenth
centuries, design preferences reflected a return to the pure and unadul-
terated worship of the early church. The context for these developments
in both architectural theory and design was the early modern climate of
reflection and discovery that drew on the theories of an ancient architect
and engineer. First, however, we present a case study of a Catholic concep-
tion of space to make clearer what the sixteenth-century Protestants were
reacting against.
© 2016 The Lutterworth Press