Upload
hortense-spencer
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Working in the family courts – a guardian’s perspective
Court Skills Training for Social Workers
Manchester Civil Justice Centre
20 November 2015
Presentation by David Delahunty, Children’s Guardian
Working in the family courts
Purpose of family courts is to achieve good outcomes for children
See process as an opportunity for scrutiny rather than criticism
Opportunity to demonstrate the quality of your practice
Judges recognise the challenges facing local authority social workers
Family Justice System
Public law cases – over 11,000 care applications between April 2014 and March 2015 (increase of 5% from previous year)
19,350 children subject of care proceedings National average duration of a care case is 29
weeks (Greater Manchester average is 36 weeks)
Private law cases – over 34,000 applications between April 2014 and March 2015 (decrease of 27% from previous year)
Family Justice Review (November 2011) – Findings Cases take too long Costs of the system are too high Organisational structures are complicated and
overlapping Children and adults are confused by the process No clear sense of leadership or accountability Individuals and organisations across the different
parts of the system too often do not trust each other No sense of shared objectives
Family Justice Review – Findings (2) Local authorities can wait too long before
commencing proceedings Not always sufficiently focused on children’s
timescales Impact of long-term neglect and emotional
abuse underestimated Variable quality of local authority evidence Over-use of experts
Family Justice Review - Recommendations Care proceedings should be completed within 26
weeks other than in exceptional circumstances Court should substantially reduce its scrutiny of
the detail of the care plan Court should focus on the core of the care plan Guardian’s primary focus should be at the start
of a case Independent Reviewing Officer is best placed to
oversee implementation of the care plan
Recent changes in Family Justice Single family court introduced in April 2014 Single point of entry for an application in each local area Each case allocated to the most appropriate level of
judge Simplified process Expert evidence only to be ordered where the judge
deems it necessary Legal aid reforms
Recent changes in public law cases Public Law Outline came into force in April 2014 Designed to improve case management Emphasis on work undertaken by local authorities
at pre-proceedings stage Timetable for the child Decisions should be made with specific reference
to child’s welfare When court considers a care plan it should focus
on those issues essential to the decision
Re B-S
2013 Court of Appeal case Concerns cases involving a care plan of
adoption Criticises quality of written evidence provided
by social workers and guardians Reminder of good practice not a change in
the law Does not mean that a court is unlikely to
approve a plan of adoption
Children’s guardian
Introduced following public inquiry into the death of Maria Colwell in January 1973
Independent scrutiny of local authority’s plans Appoints solicitor to represent child Considers outcome that would best promote
the child’s welfare Ascertains child’s wishes and feelings Considers child’s participation in the
proceedings
Guardians and social workers Importance of good communication Ensure guardian is made aware of any
significant developments Nothing wrong with professional
disagreement Try to resolve issues without the involvement
of solicitors or the court
Child’s solicitor
Appointed by the children’s guardian at the outset of the proceedings
Usually an experienced family solicitor and member of the Children’s panel
Advocates on behalf of the child during the proceedings
Direct involvement with child will depend on the circumstances of the case
Conflict between child’s solicitor and guardian
Presenting your case
Written evidence – remember it is your statement not the local authority solicitor’s
Submissions by your legal representative Oral evidence Questions from the court
Providing effective written evidence The better the written evidence the less likely
the court will require oral evidence Oral evidence may be required to clarify
issues or to address issues not covered in the written evidence
Preparation
Before the hearing
Read the case papers carefully What are the key issues in the case? What are the weakest parts of your case? What questions are you likely to be asked in
evidence? What support will you have at court?
Some practical issues
Location of court Identity of judge Dress appropriately Be early Parking Demeanour outside the courtroom Discussions outside court
In the witness box (1)
Swear or affirm? Stand or sit? Speak clearly but don’t shout Address the judge – know what to call the
judge Establish eye contact – the judge is the
person you are trying to convince not the advocates
In the witness box (2)
Listen carefully to the question Take your time Don’t talk too fast Stay calm Don’t worry about aggressive cross-
examination If you don’t understand the question say so You have to answer the question
A fair and credible witness
Give consistent answers – if you’re asked the same question more than once just give the same answer
Give a balanced picture Acknowledge the positives Be clear about your areas of responsibility Be ready to acknowledge any deficiencies in
the management of the case