9
BIVARIAT 1. Hubungan Motivasi dengan Disiplin Kerja Perawat Motivasi kerja * Disiplin kerja perawat Crosstabulation Disiplin kerja perawat Total Kurang disiplin Disiplin Motivasi kerja Rendah Count 16 21 37 Expected Count 11.5 25.5 37.0 % within Motivasi kerja 43.2% 56.8% 100.0% Tinggi Count 2 19 21 Expected Count 6.5 14.5 21.0 % within Motivasi kerja 9.5% 90.5% 100.0% Total Count 18 40 58 Expected Count 18.0 40.0 58.0 % within Motivasi kerja 31.0% 69.0% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square 7.117 a 1 .008 Continuity Correction b 5.628 1 .018 Likelihood Ratio 8.024 1 .005 Fisher's Exact Test .009 .007 Linear-by-Linear Association 6.994 1 .008 N of Valid Cases b 58 a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.52. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

WORD SPSS

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

bahan

Citation preview

Page 1: WORD SPSS

BIVARIAT

1. Hubungan Motivasi dengan Disiplin Kerja Perawat

Motivasi kerja * Disiplin kerja perawat Crosstabulation

Disiplin kerja perawat

TotalKurang disiplin Disiplin

Motivasi kerja Rendah Count 16 21 37

Expected Count 11.5 25.5 37.0

% within Motivasi kerja 43.2% 56.8% 100.0%

Tinggi Count 2 19 21

Expected Count 6.5 14.5 21.0

% within Motivasi kerja 9.5% 90.5% 100.0%

Total Count 18 40 58

Expected Count 18.0 40.0 58.0

% within Motivasi kerja 31.0% 69.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value dfAsymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.117a 1 .008

Continuity Correctionb5.628 1 .018

Likelihood Ratio 8.024 1 .005

Fisher's Exact Test .009 .007

Linear-by-Linear Association 6.994 1 .008

N of Valid Casesb58

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.52.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Motivasi kerja (Rendah / Tinggi)

7.238 1.468 35.693

For cohort Disiplin kerja perawat = Kurang disiplin

4.541 1.155 17.850

For cohort Disiplin kerja perawat = Disiplin

.627 .458 .858

N of Valid Cases 58

Page 2: WORD SPSS

2. Hubungan Ketegasan Pimpinan dengan Disiplin Kerja Perawat

Ketegasan pimpinan * Disiplin kerja perawat Crosstabulation

Disiplin kerja perawat

TotalKurang disiplin Disiplin

Ketegasan pimpinan

Kurang baik Count 9 5 14

Expected Count 4.3 9.7 14.0

% within Ketegasan pimpinan

64.3% 35.7% 100.0%

Baik Count 9 35 44

Expected Count 13.7 30.3 44.0

% within Ketegasan pimpinan

20.5% 79.5% 100.0%

Total Count 18 40 58

Expected Count 18.0 40.0 58.0

% within Ketegasan pimpinan

31.0% 69.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value dfAsymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 9.533a 1 .002

Continuity Correctionb7.595 1 .006

Likelihood Ratio 9.014 1 .003

Fisher's Exact Test .006 .004

Linear-by-Linear Association 9.369 1 .002

N of Valid Casesb58

a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.34.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Ketegasan pimpinan (Kurang baik / Baik)

7.000 1.878 26.098

For cohort Disiplin kerja perawat = Kurang disiplin

3.143 1.559 6.338

For cohort Disiplin kerja perawat = Disiplin

.449 .219 .921

N of Valid Cases 58

Page 3: WORD SPSS

3. Hubungan Sanksi hukuman dengan Disiplin Kerja Perawat

Sanksi hukuman * Disiplin kerja perawat Crosstabulation

Disiplin kerja perawat

TotalKurang disiplin Disiplin

Sanksi hukuman

Kurang baik Count 13 11 24

Expected Count 7.4 16.6 24.0

% within Sanksi hukuman 54.2% 45.8% 100.0%

Baik Count 5 29 34

Expected Count 10.6 23.4 34.0

% within Sanksi hukuman 14.7% 85.3% 100.0%

Total Count 18 40 58

Expected Count 18.0 40.0 58.0

% within Sanksi hukuman 31.0% 69.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value dfAsymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 10.236a 1 .001

Continuity Correctionb8.475 1 .004

Likelihood Ratio 10.348 1 .001

Fisher's Exact Test .003 .002

Linear-by-Linear Association 10.059 1 .002

N of Valid Casesb58

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.45.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Sanksi hukuman (Kurang baik / Baik)

6.855 1.977 23.762

For cohort Disiplin kerja perawat = Kurang disiplin

3.683 1.514 8.963

For cohort Disiplin kerja perawat = Disiplin

.537 .340 .848

N of Valid Cases 58

Page 4: WORD SPSS

4. Hubungan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Dengan Disiplin Kerja Perawat

Pendidikan dan pelatihan * Disiplin kerja perawat Crosstabulation

Disiplin kerja perawat

TotalKurang disiplin Disiplin

Pendidikan dan pelatihan

Tidak pernah mengikuti DIKLAT

Count 15 20 35

Expected Count 10.9 24.1 35.0

% within Pendidikan dan pelatihan

42.9% 57.1% 100.0%

Pernah mengikuti DIKLAT Count 3 20 23

Expected Count 7.1 15.9 23.0

% within Pendidikan dan pelatihan

13.0% 87.0% 100.0%

Total Count 18 40 58

Expected Count 18.0 40.0 58.0

% within Pendidikan dan pelatihan

31.0% 69.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value dfAsymp. Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (2-

sided)Exact Sig. (1-

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 5.764a 1 .016

Continuity Correctionb4.455 1 .035

Likelihood Ratio 6.232 1 .013

Fisher's Exact Test .021 .015

Linear-by-Linear Association 5.665 1 .017

N of Valid Casesb58

a. 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7.14.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Pendidikan dan pelatihan (Tidak pernah mengikuti DIKLAT / Pernah mengikuti DIKLAT)

5.000 1.250 19.992

For cohort Disiplin kerja perawat = Kurang disiplin

3.286 1.069 10.095

For cohort Disiplin kerja perawat = Disiplin

.657 .474 .912

N of Valid Cases 58

Page 5: WORD SPSS

MULTIVARIAT

Regresi I

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a Ketegasan 2.078 .934 4.953 1 .026 7.991

Pendidik 2.433 .987 6.077 1 .014 11.391

Motiv .629 1.041 .365 1 .546 1.875

Sanksi 2.167 .860 6.341 1 .012 8.730

Constant -2.583 .949 7.411 1 .006 .076

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Ketegasan, Pendidik, Motiv, Sanksi.

Regresi II

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Step 0 Variables Ketegasan 9.533 1 .002

Pendidik 5.764 1 .016

Sanksi 10.236 1 .001

Overall Statistics 21.522 3 .000

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a Ketegasan 2.334 .859 7.386 1 .007 10.316

Pendidik 2.490 1.002 6.169 1 .013 12.056

Sanksi 2.352 .817 8.292 1 .004 10.510

Constant -2.703 .946 8.167 1 .004 .067

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Ketegasan, Pendidik, Sanksi.

Page 6: WORD SPSS

UJI INTERAKSI

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a Ketegasan 2.286 1.319 3.001 1 .083 9.832

Pendidik 2.540 1.126 5.091 1 .024 12.680

Motiv .687 1.062 .418 1 .518 1.988

Sanksi 2.452 1.518 2.607 1 .106 11.607

Ketegasan by Sanksi -.418 1.805 .054 1 .817 .659

Constant -2.776 1.294 4.601 1 .032 .062

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Ketegasan * Sanksi .

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a Ketegasan 2.082 .954 4.759 1 .029 8.022

Pendidik 2.437 1.006 5.867 1 .015 11.434

Motiv .649 1.463 .197 1 .657 1.914

Sanksi 2.177 .995 4.790 1 .029 8.817

Motiv by Sanksi -.039 1.957 .000 1 .984 .961

Constant -2.590 1.007 6.613 1 .010 .075

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Motiv * Sanksi .

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a Ketegasan 2.581 1.118 5.329 1 .021 13.208

Pendidik 3.608 1.304 7.652 1 .006 36.877

Motiv 1.467 1.296 1.280 1 .258 4.336

Sanksi 2.585 .966 7.157 1 .007 13.268

Motiv by Pendidik -4.258 2.161 3.883 1 .549 .014

Constant -3.317 1.147 8.358 1 .004 .036

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Motiv * Pendidik .