Upload
wesley-shaw
View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Women’s Voices Women’s Lives: Low Income, Aging, Black Women Living with
HIV InfectionRosanna DeMarco, PhD, RN, PHCNS-BC, APHN-BC, ACRN, FAAN
Chair & Professor, CNHS, Department of Nursing
University of Massachusetts Boston
•
A Program of Research: Outcomes of Interest
Healthcare Adherence Relational Self-Advocacy
Stigma
LOCAL AND GLOBAL PARTNERSHIPS
HIV AIDS Bureau, MDPHDorchesterCambridgeSpringfield
NicaraguaVietnamJamaicaBurkina FasoSouth AfricaMilawi
Sandra Harding
Is there a scientific method that eliminates social bias?
Knowledge based on experience but women’s experience is different
Is feminist research biased? (perhaps excluding others….Black women, men……)
Who’s Science, Who’s Knowledge
Critical Social Theory
Jurgen Habermas (Frankfurt School; Social Research)
Types of Inquiry Empirical-analytic: technical (control, objectify) Historical-hermeneutic: practical (meaning) Critical: self-reflection and emancipation
WHAT DO SCHOLARS SAY:
Gilligan, In a Different Voice
Miller, The Self-In-Relation
Puka, Conscious Silencing
Keen, Oppression
Roberts, Oppressed Group Behaviors
Jack!!! (Relational Theory of Silencing the Self)
Silencing the Self
Inhibiting One’s Own Self Expression and Action to Avoid Conflict and Possible Loss of Relationship
The Divided Self
Presenting an Outer Compliant Self to Live Up to the Role Imperatives While the Inner Self Grows Angry and Hostile
CBPR: Community-Based Participatory Research CBPR is a methodology (a perspective or
belief in the way to carry out research) that counters oppression in the research process as well as in the lived experience of the participants
Participants have a key role in: Setting up the agenda Data Gathering Analysis Controlling use of the Outcomes
CBPR
Strategies of creating knowledge that is relevant to community needs and interests (Gibson et. al., 2001)
Design for research questions do not come from the academic setting but from reflection
Roles in the research are collaborative
Take Action
Collect analyze
Reflect
Study and Plan
Prevalence and Relevance
Of the 126,964 women living with HIV/AIDS in US, 64% are black (CDC, 2012)
HIV infection is the 3rd and 4th leading cause of death for black women aged 35–44 years and 45-54 years of age respectively (CDC, 2012).
MASSACHUSETTS: 52% of ALL LIVING WITH HIV INFECTION ARE OVER 50 YEARS OLD.
“Black”
individuals who identify as African American (considered person born in the US who are descended from members of the black community living in the US since the era of black slavery) and
other black individuals including persons born in African, the Caribbean basin and parts of Central and South American (MDPH, AIDS Bureau, 2013).
Building Community Partnerships and Trust: Sistah Powah 1998-2007: Healing Our Community Collaborative (HOCC):
Testing validity of STSS items
Women of Color AIDS Council/Women Connecting and Affecting Change (WCAC)
2004- Women’s Voices Women’s Lives©
Women, Teen, Provider versions and curricula
Vietnamese 2007
Spanish 2009
2007- present: Sistah Powah Intervention (SPI) and Community Group
Film
Winner of American Academy of Nursing Media Award
Distributed in schools of public health, nursing, and ASO’s across USA
Berkina Faso, 2006
South Africa, 2007
Jamaica, 2010
Milawi, 2011
Vietnam, 2012
Nicaragua,2012
Purpose and Intervention
Evaluate the effect of peer-led structured writing prevention intervention on Black women living with HIV infection
Amherst Writers as Artists Method (Schneider)1. Preparation…….meditation2. Prompt…….4 film clips,
Women’s Voices Women’s Lives©Testing PositiveStigmaGender and Safe Sex NegotiationSurvivorship
3. Write
Research Question
Does structured writing using the AWA method effect change in relational self-silencing, health care adherence (condom and safe sex practice behaviors), and stigma over time in comparison with usual care support group
Gaps Addressed by the Study
Past Publications Participants came
from the same clinical setting
? External validity
? Mixed efficacy with peer-led approaches
Retention/Attrition Issues
This Study Participants from a
variety of treatment centers (external validity)
Peer-Led
Directed exclusively to aging low income Black women
Mixed Methods Approach
Participants/Groups
Total Sample = 110
Intervention (I): n = 56
Usual Care (UC): n 54
9 sets of groupsT1, T2
4-6 women randomized to each group
I and UC met at same period of time on different evenings Sample retention = 85.5%
Method
Measures (paper/pencil, self-report)DemographicsSilencing the Self (Jack, 1991; Jack & Dill, 1992)Health Adherence (Medical Outcomes Survey;
DiMatteo, Hays, Sherbourne, 1992 )Stigma Scale (Berger, Ferrans, & Lashley, 2001)
Mixed Methods AnalysisDescriptive, Dependent sample T-tests, GLM
Repeated Measures ModelContent Analysis (Miles and Huberman, 1994).
Sample
Demographics (n=110)
Age: M=44.6; R= 32-65; SD=8.05
Education: 66% (n=73) HS; 27% (n=30) some HS
Marital Status: 40% (n=44) not married/partnered; 25% (n=27) married/partnered
Sexually Active: 60% (n=71)
STI History: Chlamydia 27%; GC 30%; Syphilis13%; Herpes 30%
Pregnancies: M=4, SD=3.00
Sex for Money: (62%); Food (12%); Drugs (40%); Alcohol (23%)
Silencing the Self Scale Items (STSS) (Jack, 1991; Jack & Dill, 1992)
1. I find it is harder to be myself when I am in relationships then when I am
on my own.
2. I feel I have to act in a certain way to please my partner.
3. When my partner’s needs or opinions conflict with mine, rather than
asserting my own point of view I usually end up agreeing with him
4. When I am in a close relationship, I lose my sense of who I am
5. I feel that my partner does not know my real self
6. I think it’s better to keep my feelings to myself when in conflict with those
of my partner
7. In a close relationship, I don’t usually care what we do as long as the other
person is happy
8. I try to bury my feelings when I think they will cause trouble in my close
relationships
*Delphi Study of 10 women over three rounds (2006)
**FA: two factor structure [pleasing others; hiding/burying feelings]; Cronbach Alpha=.90 (current study)
T-tests (n=110) T1-T2
Mean difference = 2.767, p = 0.013 in the intervention group
No differences in the comparison group (mean difference = 0.373, p = 0.723
HIV (MOS) Derived from recommendations from the United States Public Health
Service Guidelines for the Prevention of Opportunistic Infections in Persons with HIV (Kaplan, Masur, Holmes, et al., 1995).
Components Able to do what healthcare provider suggests? Keep Routine appts/Prevention appts /specialists Behaviors
Smoke cigarettes/Try to cut down Drink Alcohol/Try to cut down Use condoms when having sex Use safer sex practices as a substitute for unprotected sex IVDU (only one person in Usual Care/Control Group
Medications HIV, opportunistic infections, others How often taken (1-10)*
*mean higher than 8.8/SD 2.42 over time
T-tests (n=109) T1-T2
Frequency response to the question, "how often do you use condoms when having sex" was higher for the intervention group (mean difference = 1.02, p = .04).
For the comparison group, the frequency in condom use from the two time points was not statistically significant
(mean difference = -0.97, p = 0.12).
Stigma
Negative Self Image Disclosure Concerns Personal Stigma Concern for Public Attitudes
40 items, Likert 1-4, strongly disagree to strongly agree
Qualitative Data
Data (themes) from writing and end of program evaluation indicates other influences affecting outcomes through content analysis (Miles & Huberman)
Addiction Recovery Trauma (CSA; IPV) Mental Health (Depression; Bipolar; Personality Disorders) Sustained issues of lack of money & job skills
Women asking for longer program (peer support) and skill building component
Very positive about writing “helped me focus”
Would do this without research reimbursement
DEBI: Dissemination of Evidence-Based Interventions
Prevention Research Synthesis (PRS) Efficacy Criteria, Community Level Interventions (Rigor)
Prospective
Comparison Arm (50 each arm at least)
Minimize Selection Bias: Systematic Selection for community characteristics
Randomize to groups
Follow-up Assessment > 3 months
70% Retention Rate
Analysis based on alpha of .05 or more stringent
Positive Intervention Effect
No Harm
Continuing Program of Research
RCT comparing writing with spoken word
Continuing peer-led approach (Dissemination)
Exploration related to brain function (qEEG) hippocampus, amygdala and memory processing with cognitive restructuring during structured writing
Sistah Powah Experience
Thanks
CDC HIV/AIDS Prevention (HAP) & MA Dept of Health, Bureau of Infectious Diseases
Norbert Hardner Foundation
Women of Color AIDS Council, Inc/Multicultural AIDS Coalition (MAC)
Sistah Powah
Publications
DeMarco, R.F. & Chan, K. (In press, 2012). Structured writing: An effective intervention for aging low income HIV positive Black women. American Journal of Health Promotion.
DeMarco, R.F. & Lanier, L.R. (In press,2012). The Concept of "Silencing the Self" in Low Income, Aging, HIV-Infected African American Women: A Ten-Year Community-Based Participatory Program of Research with Results. Journal of Association of Nurses in AIDS Care.
DeMarco, R.F., Bradley Springer, L., Gallagher, D., Jones, S.G., & Visk, J. (2012). Recommendations and reality: Perceived patient, provider, and policy barriers to implementing routine HIV-screening and proposed solutions. Nursing Outlook, 60(2), 72-80.
DeMarco, R. (2010). Supporting voice in women living with HIV/AIDS. In D. Jack & A. Ali (Eds.), Cultural Silencing the self across cultures: Depression and gender in the social world (pp. 343-362). New York: Oxford University Press.
Publications
DeMarco, R. F. & Stokes, C. (2010). Midlife Black Women Living with HIV/AIDS in the United States: A Treatment Strategy Using Peer-Led, Structured Writing in a Group with Global Possibilities Treatment Strategies-AIDS. http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/d4b7caf8#/d4b7caf8/1.
DeMarco, R. & Minnich, C.A. (2007). Men’s experiences viewing an HIV/AIDS prevention education film by and for women. American Journal of Men’s Health, 1 (3), 183-189.
Norris, A.E. & DeMarco, R. (2005). The experience of African American women living with HIV creating a prevention film for teens. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 16(2), 32-39.
Norris, A.E. & DeMarco, R. (2004). The mechanics of conducting culturally relevant HIV prevention research with Haitian American adolescents: Lessons learned. Journal of Multicultural Nursing and Health,11(1), 69-76 .
Publications
DeMarco, R., & Norris, A.E. (2004). Women’s voices women’s lives: A Web-Based HIV prevention film project. J. V.M. Welie & J. Lee (Eds.). Jesuit health sciences and the promotion of justice: An invitation to a discussion. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
DeMarco, R. & Norris, A. (2004). Culturally Relevant HIV Interventions: Transcending Ethnicity. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 11(2), 65-68.
DeMarco, R., & Johnsen, C. (2003). Taking action in communities: Women living with HIV lead the way. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 20 (1), 51-62.
DeMarco, R. & Johnsen, C. (2002).Vulnerable populations: Women living with HIV/AIDS. In E.A. Mahoney & J.K. Shaw (Eds.) HIV/AIDS Nursing Secrets. Philadelphia, PA: Hanely & Belfus, Inc.
Publications
DeMarco, R., Lynch, M.M., & Board, R. (2002). Mothers who silence themselves: Clinical implications for women living with HIV/AIDS and their children. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 17 (2), 89-95.
*DeMarco, R., Johnsen, C., Fukuda, D., & Deffenbaugh, O. (2001). Content validity of a scale to measure silencing and affectivity among women living with HIV/AIDs. Journal of Association of Nurses in AIDS Care (JANAC), 12 (4), 49-60.
*DeMarco, R.F., Miller, K., Patsdaughter, C., Grindel, C. & Chisholm, M. (1998). From silencing the self to action: Experiences of Women Living with HIV/AIDS. Women’s Health Care International, 19 (6), 539-552.