WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    1/72

    Wireless Communication

    Lecture 1: Overview

    Sqn Ldr Sohail Ahmed

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    2/72

    Wireless Communication

    Transmitting voice and data using electromagneticwaves in open space

    Electromagnetic waves

    Travel at speed of light (c = 3x108

    m/s) Has a frequency f and wavelength P

    c = f P

    Higher frequency means higher energy photons

    The higher the energy photon the more penetrating is the

    radiation

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    3/72

    Wireless Communication: Advantages

    Ubiquity: Can travel long distances and acrossoceans

    Mobility

    Easy to esta

    blish a wireless link: no hardwarebased medium

    Can penetrate buildings

    Suitable both for indoor and outdoorcommunication

    Omni-directional: can travel in all directions Can be narrowly focused at high frequencies

    (greater than 100MHz) using parabolicantennas (like satellite dishes)

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    4/72

    Wireless Communication: Challenges

    Mobility leads to Doppler effect

    Multipath effect

    Wireless channel is time varying: difficult to estimate Interferences from other users and sources

    Limited bandwidth

    Limited power (especially in mobile communication)

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    5/72

    Wireless Communication: Applications

    Satellite Links

    LOS Microwave

    Cellular communication

    Wireless LAN

    Wireless Local Loop (WLL)

    Space Communication

    Remote controls

    Sensor networks

    Mobile computing

    Cordless phones

    Pagers

    Radars

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    6/72

    History

    1831: Faraday had first started experimenting withelectromagnetic waves.

    Electromagnetic wave:

    one of the waves that are propagated by simultaneous

    periodic variations of electric and magnetic field intensityand that include

    radio waves

    infrared

    visible light

    ultraviolet,

    X rays

    Gamma rays

    Started with Marconis invention of radio.

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    7/72

    First Wireless Telegraphy

    The first use of wireless telegraphy

    in military occurred during the

    Anglo-Boer War (1899-1902). The

    British Army experimented with

    Marconi's system and the BritishNavy successfully used it for

    communication among naval

    vessels in Delagoa Bay.

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    8/72

    Wireless History

    First Mobile Radio Telephone 1924

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    9/72

    History Early Achievements

    1901: Marconi successfully transmits radio signal across AtlanticOcean from Cornwall to Newfoundland

    1902: First bidirectional communication across Atlantic

    1909: Marconi awarded Nobel prize for physics

    1914: First voice over radio transmission

    1920s: Mobile receivers installed in police cars in Detroit

    1930s: Mobile transmitters developed; radio equipment occupied

    most of police car trunk

    by 1934: Amplitude Modulation (AM) systems used by police carsand stations

    1935: Edwin Armstrong demonstrated frequency modulation (FM)for the first time. Majority of police systems converted to FM

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    10/72

    History Mobile Telephony

    1946: First public mobile telephone service was introduced.First interconnection of mobile users to public switched

    telephone network (PSTN)

    1949: FCC (Federal Communications Commission) ofUS

    recognizes mobile radio as new class of service

    1950-1960: AT&T Bell Labs developed theory andtechniques for cellular telephony

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    11/72

    History Pagers, Cordless Phones and

    Cellular Telephony 1959: The term "pager" was first used, referring to a Motorola radio

    communications product

    1968: AT&T proposed cellular telephony to FCC ofUS.

    1974: The first pager was introduced byMotorola.

    1977: Public cell phone testing began. 1979:Worlds first cellular system was implementedby NTT Japan.

    1980: 3.2 million pagers used wordwide. They had limited range.

    1980: Cordless phones started to emerge.

    Early 1980s: Wireless modems emerged.

    1981:

    European Nordic

    Mo

    bile

    Telephone (N

    MT) System wasdeveloped

    1983: FCC allocated wireless spectrum for mobile telephony.

    1983: AMPS, first USA analog cellular telephony standard wasdeveloped

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    12/72

    History Wireless LANs, GSM

    1987: IEEE 802.11 Wireless LAN working group founded.

    1989: In Europe, GSM was defined.

    1990: In Europe, GSM deployed.

    by 1990: Wide-area paging had been invented and over 22

    million pagers were in use

    1990: FCC allocated spectrum in 900 Mhz for cordlessphones.

    1990: Announcement ofWireless LAN products

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    13/72

    Recent History

    1991: First US digital cellular hardware was installed. IS-54 and IS-136 emerged.

    1991: RAM mobile (mobitex) data service 1992: HyperLAN in Europe

    1992:World Radio Conference in Malaga (WRC-92) allocated

    frequencies for futureUMT

    S use. Frequencies 1885 - 2025 and 2110 - 2200 MHz were identified for IMT2000 use

    1993: First GSM 1800 system in commercial operation in UK

    1993: IS-95 code-division multiple-access (CDMA) spread-spectrum digital cellular system deployed in US

    1993: CDPD (Cellular Digital Packet Data) over AMPS was realized 1994: GSM system deployed in US

    1994: there were over 61 million pagers in use and pagers becamepopular for personal use.

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    14/72

    History Personal Area Networks

    1998: Bluetooth was born. SIG for Bluetooth has beenestablishedby the leadership of 5 companies: Ericsson, IBM,Intel, Toshiba, Nokia

    1998: HomeRFWorking Group was formed.

    1998: FCC gave 2.5 GHz spectrum for cordless phones

    1998 ETSI SMG meeting in Paris both W-CDMA and TD-CDMA proposals were combined to UMTS air interfacespecification.

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    15/72

    History 3G Trials and Progress

    1998: The first call using a Nokia W-CDMA terminal inDoCoMo's trial network was completed at Nokia's R&D unitnear Tokyo in Japan.

    Jun 1998: CDMA2000 submitted to ITU for IMT-2000

    Dec 1998: The first meetings of the 3GPP TechnicalSpecification Groups in France.

    1999: IEEE 802.11b approved (11 Mbps)

    1999: The first open Bluetooth specification 1.0 is released.

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    16/72

    History 3G Progress

    Jul 1999: Phase 1 CDMA2000 standard complete andapproved for publication

    Jul 1999: Korea Telecom Freetel launches world's first IS-95B network in Korea

    1999: Nokia claimed that it has completed the firstWCDMAcall through the public switched telephone network in theworld

    Nov 1999: ITU-RTask Group 8/1 endorses CDMA2000standards (three modes) for IMT-2000

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    17/72

    History 3G Progress

    1999: ETSI Standardization finished for UMTS Release 1999specificationsboth for FDD and TDD in Nice, France.

    Mar 1999: March 1999 ITU approves radio interfaces for thirdgeneration mobile systems

    1999:W

    orld Radio Conference (W

    RC-99) handled spectrum andregulatory issues for advanced mobile communicationsapplications in the context ofIMT-2000

    June 2000: Telstra and Nortel complete first 3G CDMA2000 1Xdata transmission

    2001 Ericsson and Vodafone UKclaim to have made the world's

    first WCDMA voice call over commercial network. Jun 2001: NTT DoCoMo launched a trial 3G service

    June 2001: CDMA2000 1xEV-DO recognized as part of the 3GIMT-2000 standard

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    18/72

    History 3G Commercial Services

    Aug 2001: 1 million commercial CDMA2000 1X subscribers

    Oct 2001 NTT DoCoMo launched the first commercial WCDMA 3G mobilenetwork

    Nov 2001: Nokia and AT&TWireless complete first live 3G EDGE call.

    Dec 2001: Telenor launched in Norway the first commercial UMTS network

    Jan 2002: Verizon Wireless (US) launches commercial CDMA2000 1Xservice

    Jan 2002: Verizon Wireless (US) launches commercial CDMA2000 1Xservice

    Feb 2002: Nokia and Omnitel Vodafone claims to have made the first richcall in an end-to-end All-IP mobile network at the 3GSMWorld Congress inCannes, France.

    May 2002: 10 million commercial CDMA2000 1X subscribers

    Jun 2003: Target date for UMTS Release 6

    2005: UMTS service will be world-wide

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    19/72

    History The Future

    4G:

    Must support data traffic much more cost-effectively than 3G

    Large peak data rates

    Over 2 billion voice users worldwide

    Preferably, global convergence to a single standard

    May not be based on CDMA; multi-carrier transmissionbeingconsidered.

    WiMAX Ultrawideband (UWB) systems

    Software defined radio

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    20/72

    What is Mobility?

    InitiallyInternet and Telephone Networks isdesigned assuming the user terminals are static

    No change of location during a call/connection

    A user terminals accesses the network always from a fixed

    location Mobility and portability Portability means changing point of attachment to the

    network offline

    Mobility means changing point of attachment to the networkonline

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    21/72

    Degrees of Mobility

    Walking Users Low speed

    Small roaming area

    Usually uses high-bandwith/low-latency access

    Vehicles High speeds

    Large roaming area

    Usually uses low-bandwidth/high-latency access

    Uses sophisticated terminal equipment (cell phones)

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    22/72

    Major Mobile Radio Standards

    USAStandard Type Year

    Intro

    MultipleAccess

    Frequency Band

    (MHz)

    Modulation Channel

    BW

    (KHz)

    AMPS Cellular 1983 FDMA 824-894 FM 30

    USDC Cellular 1991T

    DM

    A 824-894 DQPSK

    30

    CDPD Cellular 1993 FH/Packet 824-894 GMSK 30

    IS-95 Cellular/PCS 1993 CDMA 824-8941800-2000

    QPSK/BPSK 1250

    FLEX Paging 1993 Simplex Several 4-FSK 15

    DCS-1900(GSM)

    PCS 1994 TDMA 1850-1990 GMSK 200

    PACS Cordless/PCS 1994 TDMA/FDMA 1850-1990 DQPSK 300

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    23/72

    Major Mobile Radio Standards - Europe

    Standard Type Year

    Intro

    MultipleAccess

    Frequency Band

    (MHz)

    Modulation Channel

    BW

    (KHz)

    ETACS Cellular 1985 FDMA 900 FM 25

    NMT-900Cellular 1986 FDMA 890-960 FM 12.5

    GSM Cellular/PCS 1990 TDMA 890-960 GMSK 200KHz

    C-450 Cellular 1985 FDMA 450-465 FM 20-10

    ERMES Paging 1993 FDMA4 Several 4-FSK 25

    CT2 Cordless 1989 FDMA 864-868 GFSK 100

    DECT Cordless 1993 TDMA 1880-1900 GFSK 1728

    DCS-1800 Cordless/PCS 1993 TDMA 1710-1880 GMSK 200

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    24/72

    Wireless Communication

    Lecture 2: Wireless Channel

    Sqn Ldr Sohail Ahmed

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    25/72

    Basics - Propagation

    Radio waves are Easy to generate

    Can travel long distances

    Can penetrate buildings

    They are

    both used for indoor and outdoor communication

    They are omni-directional

    They can be narrowly focused at high frequencies (greater than100MHz) using parabolic antennas (like satellite dishes)

    Waves behave more like light at higher frequencies Difficulty in passing obstacles

    More direct paths

    Theybehave more like radio at lower frequencies Can pass obstacles

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    26/72

    Basics - Propagation

    AtVLF, LF, and MF b

    ands, radiowaves follow the ground. AM radio

    broadcasting uses MF band

    At HF bands, the ground

    waves tend to be absorbed by the

    earth. The waves that reach ionosphere

    (100-500km above earth surface),are refracted and sent back to

    earth.

    absorption

    reflection

    Ionosphere

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    27/72

    Basics - Propagation

    LOS path

    Reflected Wave

    -Directional antennas are used

    -Waves follow more direct paths

    - LOS: Line-of-Sight Communication- Reflected waves interfere with the

    original signal

    VHF Transmission

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    28/72

    Radio Propagation Mechanisms

    The physical mechanisms that govern radio propagation are complexand diverse, but generally attributed to the following three factors

    1. Reflection

    2. Diffraction

    3. Scattering Reflection

    Occurs when waves impinges upon an obstruction that is muchlarger in size compared to the wavelength of the signal

    Example: reflections from earth and buildings

    These reflections may interfere with the original signalconstructively or destructively

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    29/72

    Radio Propagation Mechanisms

    Diffraction Occurs when the radio path between sender and receiver is

    obstructed by an impenetrable body and by a surface with sharpirregularities (edges)

    Explains how radio signals can travel urban and ruralenvironments without a line-of-sight path

    Scattering Occurs when the radio channel contains objects whose sizes are

    on the order of the wavelength or less of the propagating waveand also when the number of obstacles are quite large.

    They are produced by small objects, rough surfaces and otherirregularities on the channel

    Follows same principles with diffraction Causes the transmitter energy to be radiated in many directions Lamp posts, trees and street signs may cause scattering

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    30/72

    Radio Propagation Mechanisms

    Building Blocks

    D

    R

    S

    R: ReflectionD: Diffraction

    S: Scattering

    transmitter

    receiver

    D

    Street

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    31/72

    Radio Propagation Mechanisms

    As a mobile moves through a coverage area, these 3mechanisms have an impact on the instantaneousreceived signal strength.

    If a mobile does have a clear line of sight path to the base-

    station, than diffraction and scattering will not dominate thepropagation.

    If a mobile is at a street level without LOS, then diffraction andscattering will probably dominate the propagation.

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    32/72

    Radio Propagation Models: small-scalefading

    As the mobile moves over small distances, theinstantaneous received signal will fluctuate rapidlygiving rise to small-scale fading

    The reason is that the signal is the sum of many contributors

    coming from different directions and since the phases ofthese signals are random, the sum behave like a noise (e.g.Rayleigh fading).

    In small scale fading, the received signal power may changeas much as 3 or 4 orders of magnitude (30dB or 40dB), whenthe receiver is only moved a fraction of the wavelength.

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    33/72

    Radio Propagation Models: Large-scalePath Loss

    As the mobile moves away from the transmitter over largerdistances, the local average received signal will graduallydecrease. This is called large-scale path loss.

    Typically the local average received power is computed by averagingsignal measurements over a measurement track of 5P to 40PFor PCS,

    this means 1m-10m track)

    The models that predict the mean signal strength for anarbitrary-receiver transmitter (T-R) separation distance arecalled large-scale propagation models

    Useful for estimating the coverage area of transmitters

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    34/72

    Small-Scale and Large-Scale Fading

    14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28

    T-R Separation (meters)

    -70

    -60

    -50

    -40

    -30

    Received Power (dBm)

    This figure is just an illustration

    to show the concept. It is not based on readdata.

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    35/72

    Large-Scale Fading: Free-Space

    Propagation Model Free space power receivedby a receiver antenna separated froma radiating transmitter antenna by a distance d is given by Friisfree space equation:

    Pr(d) = (PtGtGrP2) / ((4T)2d2L) [Equation 1]

    Pt is transmitted power Pr(d) is the received power Gt is the transmitter antenna gain (dimensionless quantity) Gr is the receiver antenna gain (dimensionless quantity) d is T-R separation distance in meters L is system loss factor not related to propagation (L >= 1) L = 1 indicates no loss in system hardware (for our purposes we

    will take L = 1, so we will ignore it in our calculations). P is wavelength in meters.

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    36/72

    Free-Space Propagation Model

    The gain of an antenna G is related to its affective apertureAeby:

    G = 4TAe / P2 [Equation 2]

    The effective aperture of Ae is related to the physical size of

    the antenna, P is related to the carrier frequencyby:

    P = c/f = 2Tc / [c [Equation 3]

    f is carrier frequency in Hertz

    [c is carrier frequency in radians per second.

    c is speed of light in meters/sec

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    37/72

    Free-Space Propagation Model: Path

    Loss Path loss, which represents signal attenuation as positive

    quantity measured in dB, is defined as the difference (indB) between the effective transmitted power and thereceived power.

    PL(dB) = 10 log (Pt/Pr) = -10log[(GtGrP2)/(4T)2d2] [Equation 4]

    If antennas have unity gains

    PL(dB) = 10 log (Pt/Pr) = -10log[P2/(4T)2d2] [Equation 5]

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    38/72

    Reference Distance d0

    Eq. 1 does not hold for d=0. So we define reference distance d0 Pr(d) = Pr(d0)(d0/d)

    2

    Reference distance d0 for practical systems:

    For frequncies in the range 1-2 GHz

    1 m in indoor environments

    100m-1km in outdoor environments

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    39/72

    Long distance Path loss model

    Extension of the free-spacemodel to other channels.

    The average large-scale pathloss for an arbitraryT-Rseparation is expressed as afunction of distanceby using apath loss exponent n.

    The value ofn depends on thepropagation environment: forfree space it is 2; when

    obstructions are present it hasa larger value.

    )log(10)()(

    )()(

    0

    0

    0

    d

    dndPLdBPL

    d

    ddPL

    n

    !

    w

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    40/72

    Path Loss Exponent for Different

    EnvironmentsEnvironment Path Loss Exponent, n

    Free space 2

    Urban area cellular radio 2.7 to 3.5

    Shadowed urban cellular radio 3 to 5

    In building line-of-sight 1.6 to 1.8

    Obstructed in building 4 to 6

    Obstructed in factories 2 to 3

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    41/72

    Log-normal Shadowing

    Path loss equation given above does not consider thefact the surrounding environment maybe vastlydifferent at two locations having the same T-Rseparation

    This leads to measurements that are different fromthe predicted values obtained using the aboveequation.

    Measurements show that for any value d, the pathloss PL(d) in dBm at a particular location is random

    and distributed normally.

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    42/72

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    43/72

    Log-normal Shadowing, n and W

    The log-normal shadowing model indicates thereceived power in dBs at a distance d is normallydistributed with a distance dependent mean and witha standard deviation ofW

    In practice the values of n and Ware computed frommeasured data using linear regression so that thedifference between the measured data and estimatedpath losses are minimized in a mean square errorsense.

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    44/72

    Small Scale Fading: Multipath

    Propagation

    Many echoes are received due to reflections

    As data rate goes up, number ofbits sent between echoesgoes up

    `E0 ` `E1 ` `E2 `

    (1 (2

    E0

    E1

    E2

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    45/72

    Signal Transmissions in MultipathEnvironments

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    46/72

    Mathematical Model of Multipath

    Channel Channel Impulse Response and Transfer

    Function

    ? Atfetstx 02)()( T!Transmitted Signal

    Received Signal after time-varying channel

    ? A !n

    nn ntxtty )()()( XE

    Attenuation Delay

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    47/72

    Channel Impulse Response

    -

    !

    tfj

    n

    n

    tj

    n ettsettyn 02

    EnvelopeComplexChanged

    )()]([)()(

    TU XE

    )(2)( 0 tft nn XTJ |Where

    g

    g

    !

    !

    XX

    XXHX

    XT

    J

    detctfH

    tettc

    fj

    n

    n

    tj

    nn

    2

    )(

    ),(),(

    FunctionTransfertheAnd

    )]([)(),(

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    48/72

    Time-Varying Impulse Response Model

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    49/72

    Multipath Channel: Received Signal

    Received signal consists of many multipath

    components

    Amplitudes change slowly

    Phases change rapidly Constructive and destructive addition of signal

    components

    Amplitude fading of received signal

    The channel has time-varying statistics

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    50/72

    Effect ofFading on QPSK Signal

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    51/72

    Fading Ruins Performance

    Unmitigated, flatfading kills thesystem

    About an extra30dB needed!(1000 times moresignal power )

    Clearly, wireless

    systems need away around thiscatastrophe

    30 dB

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    52/72

    Fading Channels: Doppler Effect

    cd

    idi

    f

    c

    vf

    ff

    !

    ! Ucos

    DirectionOf Movement

    Buildings

    iU

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    53/72

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    54/72

    Fading Channel: Doppler Spread

    The Average Received Power

    g

    g!

    !

    iiAb

    2

    0 2

    1

    2

    0

    1

    )(

    !

    d

    dfff

    bfS

    T

    Power Spectrum of c(t)

    df

    df

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    55/72

    Fading Channel: Coherence Time

    Doppler spread Bd is the range of frequencies over whichthe Doppler spectrum is non-zero.

    Bd fd Coherence time Tc is the statistical measure of the time

    during which the channel impulse response remains moreor less invariant

    Tc 1/ BdTwo pulses arriving with a time separation ofgreater than Tc will be affected differently by the

    channel.

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    56/72

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    57/72

    Multipath Spread and the MultipathIntensity Profile

    Multipath or delay spread Tm is the time between thefirst and last received component. Also referred to asmaximum excess delay.

    Multipath intensity profile (MIP) gives the average

    power output of the channel impulse response (CIR) as afunction of time delay.

    There is measurements-based evidence that the MIP can beapproximated by an exponentially decaying function

    where is the standard deviation of the delay , i.e.,

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    58/72

    Coherence Bandwidth

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    59/72

    Fading Channel: Coherence Bandwidth

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    60/72

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    61/72

    Frequency Selective Fading

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    62/72

    Frequency Selective Fading

    Large Differential Path Delays

    Signal BW> Coherence Bandwidth

    Phase and Amplitude Distortion

    Introduces ISI

    Urban/Sub-Urban Cellular Channel

    Wideband signal

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    63/72

    Flat and Frequency Selective Fading

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    64/72

    Various Fading Distributions

    Used to model the statistical nature ofthe envelope (amplitude) of thereceived signal when the transmittedsignal suffers from small-scale fading.

    Rayleigh

    Rician

    Nakagami-m

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    65/72

    FadingDistributions:Rayleigh fading

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    66/72

    Rayleigh fading: Received Signal

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    67/72

    FadingDistributions:Rician Fading

    I0 is the modified Bessel function of zeroth order

    K=s2/22, ratio of the power of the direct signal component to the

    diffuse signal power

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    68/72

    FadingDistributions: Nakagami-m

    distribution

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    69/72

    Outage Probability

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    70/72

    Level Crossing Rate (LCR) and AverageD

    uration ofF

    ades (ADF)

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    71/72

    LCRand ADF (Outdoor Channel)

  • 8/7/2019 WIRELESS OVERVIEW, CHANNEL

    72/72

    Multiuser Interference

    Wireless frequencyspectrum is limited

    All wireless users

    inherently interfere witheach other (Power fallsoff rapidly with distancethough, thankfully)

    How to divide the

    resources and be robustto interference?