26
Winona Area Public Schools (WAPS) Staff Health Program Samantha Adams, Andrew Weiers, Nicole Wilhelm

Winona Area Public Schools (WAPS) Staff Health Program

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Winona Area Public Schools (WAPS) Staff Health Program. Samantha Adams, Andrew Weiers, Nicole Wilhelm. Outline. Background Information Statement of Problems/ Statistics Goals and Objectives Resources Constraints Intervention/Activities Evaluation Timeline Budget Conclusion. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Winona Area Public Schools (WAPS) Staff Health

Program

Samantha Adams, Andrew Weiers, Nicole Wilhelm

Outline

• Background Information• Statement of Problems/ Statistics• Goals and Objectives• Resources• Constraints• Intervention/Activities• Evaluation• Timeline• Budget• Conclusion

Background Information

• Staff members of WAPS

• Number Employed- 640

• Majority of faculty are

between the ages of 41-

70

• Majority of WAPS faculty

are female

Methodology

• Survey Questionnaire

• Multiple Choice

• Survey delivered through

Qualtrix

• Link sent out through staff e-

mail

• Reminder posters placed in

busy areas

Statement of Problems

• Stress Levels

– 85% of participants reported their stress level

medium to high.

– 74% of participants’ stress was work-related

Statement of Problems

• Weight Management/Nutrition– 89% of participants were interested in losing

weight- 1% increase from 2008

Statement of Problems

• Physical Activity– 54% of participants rated their physical fitness

level between good and excellent.

Goals

• To decrease the stress among Winona Area Public Schools faculty.

• To increase knowledge of weight management strategies among Winona Area Public Schools faculty.

• To increase physical activity among Winona Area Public School faculty.

Impact Objectives

• When asked, the percentage of faculty that say their stress is medium to high will have decreased from 85% to 75% by Fall 2010.

• When asked, the percentage of faculty that say their knowledge of stress management is good to excellent will increase from 84% to 90% by Fall 2010.

Impact Objectives

• When asked, the percentage of faculty that say their physical fitness level is good to excellent will have increased from 54% to 70% by Fall 2010.

• By Fall 2010, 25% will be exercising 3 to 5 days a week for 30 to 60 minutes a time.

Outcome Objectives

• 70% of faculty will report using exercise as a way to reduce stress by Fall 2010.

• 90% of faculty will report having good to excellent weight management knowledge.

• By Fall 2010, the percentage of Winona Area Public School faculty that are attending nutritional and dietary activities will increase from 21% to 35%.

Resources

• Middle School Weight Room

• WSU students to facilitate circuit training

• District printing of flyers

• Tech school massage therapy students

• Winona area paths

Constraints: Internal Weaknesses

• Very set in ways • Busy Schedule

Constraints: External Threats

• Other Commitments that take up time– Family– Coaching/Clubs– Teaching Extra Classes

• Fast Food

Intervention/Activities

• Massage Therapy– Flyers

• Circuit Training Program– Demonstrate– Guidance

• Walking Program– Flyers– Grouped by school

Massage Therapy

• Target group: High stress staff

• When: Before the holidays

• Where: Available at several times and locations

• Facilitator: Put on by Southeast Tech Students

• Marketing: Flyers and Emails

Circuit Training

• Target Group: All staff

• When: Wednesdays- 3:30-5:30 (flexible)

• Where: At Winona Middle School Fitness Center

• Facilitator: WSU Exercise Science Student

• Marketing: Flyers and Emails

Walking Program

• Target group: All staff

• When: Flexibility in times

• Where: Paths located all around schools and town

• Facilitator: Self-facilitated- walking Teams

• Marketing: Pamphlets, flyers and posters

Process Evaluation

• Questions:– Number of participants?– Satisfaction with programs?

• Methods:– Small questionnaire for participants following

activities– Questionnaire will vary slightly for different

programs

Process Evaluation

• Responsibility:– Questionnaire distributed by facilitator– Results analyzed by WAPS Wellness Committee

• Time:– Given during the intervention, after each program

Outcome Evaluation

• Questions:– Were the program objectives met by this intervention?

• Methods:– Baseline self wellness assessment- Adding questions on

program involvement– Assessment will be given to participants of program– Control group made up of teacher’s who did not

participate in programs- Cohort Study– Outcome assessment given to same participants after

intervention completed and to control group

Outcome Evaluation

• Responsibility:– Questionnaire distributed by Wellness Staff– Results analyzed by WAPS Wellness Committee

• Time:– Baseline given one week prior to start date- Jan.

13th– Outcome Evaluation Final Survey given the last

week of program – June 2nd

Time Table

Activity Start Date End Date• Massages Dec. 7th Dec. 18th

• Circuit Training Jan. 13th June 2nd

• Walking Program Jan. 13th June 2nd

Conclusion

• Survey showed problem areas were: Stress, Weight and Physical Activity

• 3 main programs expected to start 2010 to target these 3 problems

• Evaluation to be conducted after interventions are complete

• Budget is minimal due to volunteers and resources

Qu

estio

ns