40
Wine Market Council Presentation December 9, 2004

Wine Market Council Presentation December 9, 2004

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Wine Market Council PresentationDecember 9, 2004

Wine Market Council Internet Consumer Survey Conducted in June/July 2004

by Merrill Research

1328 respondents (558 core, 770 marginal)

Screener criteria same as previous surveys

Data weighted by gender and income

Key Consumer Attitudes and Behaviors – 2004

Core Marginal

Likes Taste 93% 85%

Wine makes occasion formal 46% 54%

Drinks wine only onspecial occasions 8% 41%

(Percentages by segment)

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

Positive Attitudes – 2004

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

Makes a good gift 95 92

Can buy good wine without spending a lot

96 88

Moderate use is good for you

94 90

Core Marginal

(Percentages by segment)

Consumption Barriers – 2004

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

Like having a bottle on hand

92 68

Open bottle stays fresh for 2 – 3 days

68 55

Don’t like to open a whole bottle for myself

34 61

Core Marginal

(Percentages by segment)

(Percentages)

Table Wine Drinking Frequency – 2004

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

Daily Wkly+ Once Wk 2-3X Mo Monthly 2-3 Mo

5%

22%

15%

24%

17% 17%

Drinking More v. Less Wine

Total Males Females

CoreMarginal

(Net gain by segment – 2004)

39%

3%

36%

1%

41%

4%

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

Total Males Females

Core

Marginal

Prefer wine to other alcohol beverages?(Percentages by segment – 2004)

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

74

32

48

67

80

42

Under$3

$3-$6 $6-$10 $10-$15$15-$20 Over$20

Core

Marg

Purchases by Price Category(750ml, Top 2 box by segment)

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

11

39

82

63

3228

6

78 75

55

33

72

Import & Domestic Wine Consumption - 2004

Core MarginalSource: Merrill Research & Associates

Domestic 70%

Import 30%

Domestic 77%

Import 23%

Millennial Gen X Boomer

Core

Marginal

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

Core v. Marginal Ratio by Generation – 2004

63

37 36

64

44

56

(Percentages by generation)

Core Marg NoWine

DK

Millennial

Gen X

Boomer

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

15

23

4642

38

30

Did your parents drink wine?(Percentages by generation)

2

19

3641

44

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

Currently on a low carbohydrate diet?(Percentages by segment)

Males Females

Core

Marg20 1826

16

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

Purchased screwcap wine in past 3 months?(Percentages by generation)

Millennial Gen X Boomer

25

20 20

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

How often buy brand never seen or heard of?(Top two box by segment)

Core

Marg

69%

53%

Most Recent Purchases(Percentages by region, Core and Marginal)

CA IT AU FR NY WA OR

Core

Marg

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

8774

46

29

43

22

36

20 2315

22

1116

11

Recent Purchases – California (Percentages by region, Core and Marginal)

Napa Sonoma

CoreMarg

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

71

54 52

36

Purchase Motivator Statements

The wine I purchased is unique to the region where it was produced

I prefer the flavor of the wine I purchased compared to similar wines from other regions

The wine I purchased is better quality than similar wines from other regions

The wine I purchased is a better value than similar wines from other regions

Unique Flavor Quality Value

CA

IT

FR

AU

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

42

5956

53 53

49

Purchase Factors/Beliefs(Percentages by world region)

59

41

61

47

38

33

54 5451

55

Unique Flavor Quality Value

CA

OR

WA

NY

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

42

56 56

52 53

43

Purchase Factors/Beliefs(Percentages by U.S. region) 59

54

4745 46 47

51

55

46

50

Unique Flavor Quality Value

Core

Marg

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

47

63

56

Purchase Factors/Beliefs – California Wines

62

38

51 50

57

(Percentages, Core and Marginal)

All CA Napa Sonoma

Core

Marg

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

47

5654

Ratings as “Unique” – California Wine Purchasers

38

48

38

(Percentages, Core and Marginal)

Unique Flavor Quality Value

Core

Marg

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

69

49

41

Purchase Factors/Beliefs – French Wines

31

5045

35 35

(Percentages, Core and Marginal)

Unique Flavor Quality Value

Core

Marg

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

66

5249

Purchase Factors/Beliefs – Italian Wines

45

5154

49

37

(Percentages, Core and Marginal)

Unique Flavor Quality Value

Core

Marg

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

5452

49

Purchase Factors/Beliefs – Australian Wines

5654 55 54 53

(Percentages, Core and Marginal)

Unique Flavor Quality Value

Core

Marg

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

56

51

44

Purchase Factors/Beliefs – New York Wines

4845

60

4751

(Percentages, Core and Marginal)

Unique Flavor Quality Value

Core

Marg

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

65

55

44

Purchase Factors/Beliefs – Oregon Wines

56

4750

41

52

(Percentages, Core and Marginal)

Unique Flavor Quality Value

Core

Marg

Source: Merrill Research & Associates

42 4341

Purchase Factors/Beliefs – Washington Wines

46

54

48

52

48

(Percentages, Core and Marginal)

A Campaign for the Wine Industry

Wine. Since 6000 B.C.

Focus on the authenticity of wine

A statement only the wine industry can make

Juxtaposes ancient and modern images to capture the imagination

Humorous copy lines deliver the message: “wine is a casual, everyday enjoyment”

“Kickin’ Back”

“Husband”

“Mutton”

Columbus Test Market

Columbus Test Market Campaign

October 20 to November 28

Print placements in Columbus Dispatch, USA Weekend, Columbus Monthly

PR and merchandising initiatives

Pre and post consumer survey, focus groups, IRI scan data matched market analysis

Wine Market Council PresentationDecember 9, 2004