Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Flashing Education Course
Regional Installations / Codes & Standards Best Practices for Self-Adhered Flashing
Material Characteristics and Application Considerations
James D Katsaros, PhDDuPont Building Innovations
Flashing Systems and Energy Management Development Leader
2Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Learning Objectives
�The Role and Importance of Flashing
�Types of Flashing Used in Windows and Doors
�What does the Code say about Flashing?
�Guiding Principles for Installation
�Installation Standard Practices
�Regional Considerations / Wall System Variations
�Recognition of Common Installation Errors
3Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Flashing is a Key Part of the Weatherization System
“Configuration of materials that are arranged to direct water to the exterior.”
Fine Homebuilding
April/May 1998
Illustration from the EEBA Water Management Guide, 2002
2
4Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Improper Flashing & Installation is a Key Source of Building Damage/Litigation
“…most leakage problems are related to improper or insufficient flashing details or the absence of flashing…”
Durability by Design guideline published by the Partnership of Advancing Technology in Housing (PATH)
5Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
The Five Most Common Mistakes Leading to Water Intrusion
� Improperly flashed doors and windows
� No exterior drainage plane
� Reversed shingling of flashing or housewrap and other moisture barriers
� Improper grading to keep water away from foundation walls
� No kick-out flashing to keep rainwater from running behind the cladding and get trapped in the wall
Adapted from “Keeping Mold at Bay”, Rural Builder, March 2003
6Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
� Self-Adhering Flashing (flexible
and extendable)
� Mechanically Attached Flashing
� Sill Flashing for Drainage Systems (rigid or flexible)
� Liquid Applied Flashing (emerging)
Types of Flashing Used in Windows and Doors
3
7Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Self-Adhering Flashing (flexible and extendable):
SELF ADHERING FLASHINGS: Flexible facing materials coated completely or partially on at least one side with an adhesive material and which do not depend on mechanical fasteners for permanent attachment…
Per AAMA 711-07 Section 3
8Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
There are Many Advantages for Self-Adhered Flashings….
� Provide a broad moisture seal at the window-wall interface � Provide a more durable seal than sealant alone � Are easy to install (“peel-and-stick”)� Are versatile for many different installation methods and
openings (size, shape, etc) � Maintain their seal through joint
movement between dissimilar materials� Seal through fasteners & penetrations
9Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Key Installation Considerations for Self-Adhering Flashing
Ensure Compatible Systems are Utilized – sealants, primers, foams, etc
Appropriate Job Site Conditions
• Surface to be clean, dry, & consistent
• Use primer for loosely bonded surfaces (fiberglass, felt, fiberboard)
• Installation Temperature Range
• Weather Conditions
Material Durability for Expected Climate Exposure
Apply with Adequate Pressure or J-Roller
Installers Properly Trained
4
10Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Approved Corrosion-Resistant Flashing shall be applied shingle fashion.
• Flashing required on all openings
Drainage to WRB now allowed.
• Versus previous TWF kick-out requirement.
Eliminates provision for ‘self-flashing’ window
Window manufacturer needs to provide flashing
installation instructions
• Window mfg vs DuPont guidelines.
What does the Code Say About Flashing? (key IRC 2006 changes to R703.8)
11Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Approved Corrosion-Resistant Flashing shall be applied shingle fashion.
• Flashing required on all openings
Drainage to WRB now allowed.
• Versus previous TWF kick-out requirement.
Eliminates provision for ‘self-flashing’ window
Window manufacturer needs to provide flashing
installation instructions
• Window mfg vs DuPont guidelines.
What does the Code Say About Flashing? (key IRC 2006 changes to R703.8)
What defines “Approved corrosion resistant flashing ”?
12Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
AAMA 711-07: Material Property Standard for Self-Adhered Flashings
Physical Property Requirements: Tensile strength, peel adhesion to common substrates, cold temperature pliability
Performance Requirements: Nail sealability, adhesion after temperature cycling, minimum widths
Durability: Properties after UV aging, thermal exposure, water immersion
Self-Adhered flashing must beat least 4” wide and installed 2”beyond critical interface.
5
13Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Important 2009 IRC Code Change -- Flashing
1. R 703.8 Flashing. Approved corrosion-resistant flashing shall be applied shingle-fashion in such a manner to prevent entry of water into the wall cavity or penetration of water to the building structural framing components. Self-adheredmembranes used as flashing shall comply with AAMA 711. The flashing shall extend to the surface of the exterior wall finish. Approved corrosion-resistant flashings shall be installed at all of the following locations:
AAMA 711-07 to be referenced in IRC to define “Acce ptable”Self-Adhered Flashing Products.
- Does not address non-self adhered (metal flashing, nail-on, etc.)
14Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Mechanically Attached Flexible Flashing
15Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Use of Building Sealants with Mechanically Attached Flexible Flashing
Pictures taken from AAMA 711-07
6
16Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Flashing Lengths and Cut Formulas
InstallationMastersTM Manual Table 16-2
Flashing Length and Cut Formulas
Sill Flashing = ROW + (2 x Flashing Width)
Jamb Flashing = ROH + (2 x Flashing Width) – 1”
Head Flashing = ROW = (2 x Flashing Width) + 2”
Legend
RO = Rough Opening
ROH = Rough Opening Vertical Height
ROW = Rough Opening Horizontal Width
17Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Comparison of Flexible Flashings
Flashing Type Mechanically Applied
(Nail-On Flashing)
Self-Adhering Flashing (Peel-and-stick)
Applicable Standard
AC-148/ AAMA 712 under development
AAMA 711-07
Minimum Width
9” 2” past the critical interface/ 4”minimum
Water Holdout
Water deflection from interface/ water seal depends on sealant
(ASTM D779 / 24 hours)
Provides both deflection and seal/seals through
fasteners
(AAMA 711-07)
Key Challenges
Penetrations not sealed, reliance on gunnable sealant application
Reliable adhesion to various substrates and
conditions
18Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Sill Pan Flashing –
used in drainable installations
7
19Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Examples of Pan Flashing
Materials and Fabrication
Rigid Component
1-Piece or Multiple Pieces Type I
Multiple Pieces Type II
Flexible Membrane
1-Piece or Multiple Pieces Type III
Combination Systems
Multiple Pieces Type IV
From ASTM E2112, “Standard Practice for Installation of Exterior Windows, Doors and Skylights”, Table 5
20Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Sill Pan Flashing Installation Considerations
● Continuous integration with the window and the WRB
● Avoid fastener penetrations in the sill area
● Maintain drainage gaps in sealant under flange
● Use non-metallic material in cold climates to avoid thermal bridging
● Must have robust interior air/water seal
21Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Flashing Application Principles
8
22Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Guiding Principles for Installation of Windows and Doors
� Continuity of Window-Wall Interface
� Correct Shingling / Lapping of Materials
� Provide a Drainage Path for Leaks
� Test Window-Wall Installation as Complete System
� Installation Conditions (real life) that promotes adhesion (self-adhered flashings)
� Material Durability for Anticipated Exposure
� Risk Assessment
23Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Guiding Principles for Installation of Windows and Doors
� Continuity of Window-Wall Interface
� Correct Shingling / Lapping of Materials
� Provide a Drainage Path for Leaks
� Test Window-Wall Installation as Complete System
� Installation Conditions (real life) that promotes adhesion (self-adhered flashings)
� Material Durability for Anticipated Exposure
� Risk Assessment
24Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Continuity of the Window-Wall Interface: between the window, flashing & weather barrier – follow 2” gap rule for self-adhered flashing
Correct Not correct
9
25Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Guiding Principles for Installation of Windows and Doors
� Continuity of Window-Wall Interface
� Correct Shingling / Lapping of Materials
� Provide a Drainage Path for Leaks
� Test Window-Wall Installation as Complete System
� Installation Conditions (real life) that promotes adhesion (self-adhered flashings)
� Material Durability for Anticipated Exposure
� Risk Assessment
26Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Installation: Shingle Fashion
27Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Flashing Installation: Continuity and Shingle Fashion
10
28Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Guiding Principles for Installation of Windows and Doors
� Continuity of Window-Wall Interface
� Correct Shingling / Lapping of Materials
� Provide a Drainage Path for Leaks
� Test Window-Wall Installation as Complete System
� Installation Conditions (real life) that promotes adhesion (self-adhered flashings)
� Material Durability for Anticipated Exposure
� Risk Assessment
29Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Flashing Installation Method Comparison:
Barrier System Barrier System Drainage System Drainage System
Drawings taken from ASTM E2112, “Standard Practice forInstallation of Exterior Windows, Doors and Skylights”, Figures 11 & 15
30Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Original ASTM E2112-01Barrier System Barrier System
From ASTM E2112, “Standard Practice forInstallation of Exterior Windows, Doors and Skylights”, Figures 11 & 15
11
31Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Original ASTM E2112-01 – Method B
32Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
InOut
Original ASTM E2112-01 Methods (A, A1, B, B1)Barrier Method Flashing / Caulked Bottom Flange
33Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM E2112-07 Adds Drainage System
Drainage System Drainage System
Drawings taken from ASTM E2112, “Standard Practice forInstallation of Exterior Windows, Doors and Skylights”, Figures 11 & 15
Barrier System Barrier System
12
34Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
InOut
No Caulk onBottomFlange
ASTM E2112-07 Drainage Method:Sill Pan Flashing /
Bottom Flange Open to Drain
35Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Recommends sill pans!
36Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
13
37Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Inside Wall
38Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
DuP
ont Con
trac
tor T
ape
DuP
ont Con
trac
tor T
ape
DuPont
Contractor Tape
DuPont
Contractor Tape
3
”6
”
DuPon
t
Cont ra
ctor T
ape
DuPon
t
Cont ra
ctor T
ape
DuPon
t
Cont ra
ctor T
ape
DuPon
t
Cont ra
ctor T
ape
DuPon
t
Cont ra
ctor T
ape
DuPon
t
Cont ra
ctor T
ape
DuPon
t
Cont ra
ctor T
ape
DuPon
t
Cont ra
ctor T
ape
DuPontContractor Tape
DuPontContractor Tape
DuPontContractor Tape
Du P
on tC
ontr acto
r Tap
e
Du P
on tC
ontr acto
r Tap
e
Du P
on tC
ontr acto
r Tap
e
39Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Inside Wall
Back Dam and Air Seal
14
40Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Guiding Principles for Installation of Windows and Doors
� Continuity of Window-Wall Interface
� Correct Shingling / Lapping of Materials
� Provide a Drainage Path for Leaks
� Test Window-Wall Installation as Complete System
� Installation Conditions (real life) that promotes adhesion (self-adhered flashings)
� Material Durability for Anticipated Exposure
� Risk Assessment
41Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
It is essential that an installation method is tested at the window / wall interface as an installed system.
Window and wall are usually tested separately.
+ =
42Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
REF: Weston T. A., et al.,“Performance Testing of Window Installation and Flashing Details” 2002 Symposium on Improving Building Systems in Hot & Humid Climates, May
Installed Window –Wall Testing Protocol
Walls
Air leakage Test
Water leakage Test
Does Wall Pass?
Yes
No
Thermal Cycling
Wind Loading
Air leakage Test
Water leakage Test
Does Wall Pass?
Yes
No
Water leakage Test
Phase I
Phase II
Walls
Air leakage Test
Water leakage Test
Does Wall Pass?
Yes
No
Thermal Cycling
Wind Loading
Air leakage Test
Water leakage Test
Does Wall Pass?
Yes
No
Water leakage Test
Phase I
Phase II
15
43Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Guiding Principles for Installation of Windows and Doors
� Continuity of Window-Wall Interface
� Correct Shingling / Lapping of Materials
� Provide a Drainage Path for Leaks
� Test Window-Wall Installation as Complete System
� Installation Conditions (real life) that promotes adhesion (self-adhered flashings)
� Material Durability for Anticipated Exposure
� Risk Assessment
44Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Durability Considerations of Self-Adhered Flashings
Must withstand UV exposure until covered by siding (per manufacturer’s recommendation)
Must be able to maintain adequate adhesion and moisture seal through environmental cycles (temperature and moisture exposure)
Must maintain integrity (adhesive & topsheet) through thermal cycles and resulting joint movement / settling of building
45Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
What temperature exposures do SAFs experience after installation?
Measured on wood siding on 80o F day in Northern California
16
46Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Heat Durability of Self-Adhered Flashings
Initial Samples on Housewrap Initial Samples on OSB
Butyl samples Butyl samplesAsphalt samples Asphalt samples
Internal DuPont Testing
47Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Heat Durability of Self-Adhered Flashings
Butyl samples Butyl samplesAsphalt samples Asphalt samples
After heat aging at 70o C (160o F) for 14 days
Internal DuPont Testing
48Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Heat Durability of Self-Adhered Flashings
Close up of wrinkling of butyl sample with film topsheet
Close up of leaching / stainingof asphalt (bitumen) adhesives
Internal DuPont Testing
17
49Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Heat Durability of Self-Adhered Flashings (180o F)
Samples aged 6 hours at 180o F (82o C)
Butyl samples Butyl samplesAsphalt samples Asphalt samples
Internal DuPont Testing
50Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Guiding Principles for Installation of Windows and Doors
� Continuity of Window-Wall Interface
� Correct Shingling / Lapping of Materials
� Provide a Drainage Path for Leaks
� Test Window-Wall Installation as Complete System
� Installation Conditions (real life) that promotes adhesion (self-adhered flashings)
� Material Durability for Anticipated Exposure
� Risk Assessment
51Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Key Risk Factors for Installation Considerations
Exposure• Rainfall
• Temperature (hot, cold, cycles)
• Humidity / Drying Potential
• Window / Wall Design (overhangs, recessed, bump out?)
Moisture Tolerance• Wall Assembly (wood frame or masonry)
• Reliable Drainage Path to Exterior (new construction vs replacement)
• Window System (wood or vinyl)
Workmanship• Labor Skill Level
• Complexity of Detail
• HANDS ON TRAINING!
Risk Tolerance
18
52Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Installation Standards
53Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM E2112 Installation Practice
First Broadly Recognized Standard for Installation of Windows, Doors and Skylights
Details 4 Methods based on Flashing / WRB Sequencing
Not in format that can be used on job site
Really only covers integral flanged windows on wood frame walls
Can’t cover the world with one Standard
54Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Flashing Method Selection Chart(Based on windows with mounting flanges being installed in membrane/drainage-type
wall systems)
A B
Flashing will be
applied AFTER the
window or OVER
the face of the
mounting flange
Flashing will be
applied BEFORE the
window or BEHIND
the face of the
mounting flange
II WRB is applied AFTER
the window
installation
Use Method “A” Use Method “B”
I WRB is to be applied
FIRST or BEFORE the
window installation
Use Method “A1” Use Method “B1”
From ASTM E2112, “Standard Practice for Installation of Exterior Windows, Doors and Skylights”, Table 9
19
55Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Partial List of Variations in Window-Wall Interface Conditions….
• Fenestration product mounting system (integrally flanged, non-integrally / field applied flanged, brick mold, or box / non-flanged products)
• Fenestration product geometry / arrangement (rectangular, round top, circular / oval, mulled units, bow / bay units)
• Fenestration product wall configuration (recessed, bump out, store front),
• Wall type (wood framed, concrete block, metal framed),
• Wall façade system (drainage cavity / rain screen, surface barrier, concrete / mass wall),
• Water resistive barrier system (flexible membrane, fluid or spray applied, laminated board system, etc)
• Expected environmental exposure of the installation (wind, rain, heat, extreme, thermal cycles, ground water, etc.).
56Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM E2112 Future Direction
Restructure to be more User Friendly / Including Specialized Content
57Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Regional Installation Practice Development
Standard / Program
Guideline Scope Application / Region
ASTM E2112 Comprehensive guideline on general fenestration installation principles
All fenestration types, but not all methods / wall systems / regional specific details
AAMA 2400 Installation practice for mounting flanged windows in open stud construction
Low exposure regions, particularly southwest US
FMA/AAMA 100 Installation practice for mounting flanged windows in wood frame construction
Extreme wind/water exposure, particularly southeast US
FMA/AAMA 200 & FMA/WDMA 250 (draft)
Installation practice for mounting flanged windows in surface barrier masonry construction
Extreme wind/water exposure, particularly southeast US
FMA/AAMA/WDMA 300 and 400
Installation practice for doors in wood frame (300’s) and surface barrier masonry construction (400’s)
Extreme wind/water exposure, particularly southeast US
AAMA Installation Masters™
Training program to certify installers US – wide, based on the original E2112 guidelines, revised to included regionally specific methods
20
58Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Much Work to be Done to Cover All the Installation Variations….
Open StudConstruction
SurfaceBarrier CMU Walls
Recessed Windows
Windows Before WRB
Windows After WRB
Brickmold Windows
Aluminum Windows
Low E glazing / Insulated cavity
Vinyl Windows Wood Windows
Concrete Slab Floors
High Wind / Rain Exposure
Hurricane Exposure
Extreme Temp Swings
Foam Sheathing
Extreme Storms
FMA / AAMA
AAMA 2400
59Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Recognition of Common Installation Errors:Reversed shingling and detached flashing gaps between the window, flashing & weather barrier
60Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Round Top Windows
Reverse Shingling At Window Head
Correct
21
61Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
What’s Wrong????
Wrapped In At The Window Head
62Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
What’s Wrong????
Improper Penetrations Correct
63Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
What’s Wrong???
Heading Flashing Stops Short of Jamb Flashing
22
64Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
What’s Wrong???
Fastener in Corner/Exposed Wood
65Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
What’s Wrong???
Flashing Not Adhering
66Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Lack of Continuity at the sill…..
23
67Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Learning Objectives – How Did We Do?
�The Role and Importance of Flashing
�Types of Flashing Used in Windows and Doors
�What does the Code say about Flashing?
�Guiding Principles for Installation
�Installation Standard Practices
�Regional Considerations / Wall System Variations
�Recognition of Common Installation Errors
Application of Self-Adhered Flashing Products in Building Openings,J.D. Katsaros & N. S. Hudson, Handbook of Sealant Technology , CRC Press, Ed. Mittal & Pizzi, Chapter 14, p 393-424 (2009)
68Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
DRAFT 7
Training, Resources & Guide Documents For Engineers,
Architects, Specifiers and Installers
www.swrionline.org
• www.adhesives.org (Sealants portal with free educational content)• Caulks and Sealants Short Course, April 18-19, 2010 (Savannah, GA)
The Adhesive and Sealant Council (ASC)
Sealant Waterproofing & Restoration Institute• Sealant Validation Program : This product validation program provides data that manufacturers independently test submitted material to determine whether they perform as stated by the manufacturer and to industry standards.
ASTM International
Contact:Steve Duren
301 986-9700
Contact:Erin Nied
816.472.7974
Contact:Steve Mawn610-832-9726
Construction Specification Institute (CSI)
• ASTM E 2112-07: Standard “Standard Practice for Installation of Exterior Windows, Doors and Skylights “ document is available for purchase at www.astm.orgwww.ASTM.org
Contact:Susan Konohia703-706-4744
• Green Format: Evaluate the Green characteristics of your products and & choose the product that fits your specification with Green Format
www.ascouncil.org
68
Installation Masters™ Program Contact:Ben Myers orKaren Yetter717-764-7700
• Nationwide training & certification program for new construction and replacement window and door installation with 10,000 certified installers
• Visit the InstallationMasters™ website for upcoming class dates.installationmastersusa.com
www.greenformat.com
69
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Best Practice: Gunnable Foam Sealant
History, Product Characteristics, Application and Germane Standards
ASC/SWRI Webinar Nov 3, ASC/SWRI Webinar Nov 3, ASC/SWRI Webinar Nov 3, ASC/SWRI Webinar Nov 3, 2009200920092009
Robert G Braun BGBraun Building Enclosure [email protected]
69
24
70
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
IntroductionUntil early 2002 no US consensus standards for Aerosol
Foam Sealant existed. Since then the industry has
worked to develop test methods, practices, guides, and
specifications for this product class. ASTM has been the
primary forum for this activity through the C24.61
subcommittee. AAMA has recently been a second
standards’ group as well since fenestration installation is
a major use of these products. Underwriters Lab of
Canada (ULC) in cooperation with Canadian National
Research Center (CNRC) has been a third group
developing standards for foam sealant. 70
71
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Learning Objectives
Understanding foam sealant air barrier properties and industry performance criteria
Identify the various delivery systems of foam sealant
Differentiate between low pressure and low/high expanding foam sealant terminology
Understand how to specify foam sealant using ASTM C-1620
Be able to select an appropriate foam sealant for window installations conforming to ASTM E2112 71
72
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Primary Foam Delivery Systems
• “Gun Type” foam sealant…used by all pro and many semi-pro users
• “Straw Type” foam sealant…used mostly by occasional users
72
25
73
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Aerosol Polyurethane (PU) foam sealant was first developed around 1970 in Europe and the first US production occurred in 1974. The energy saving feature of foam sealant initially drove foam sealant use in many building construction areas. Secondary benefits, in addition to air-sealing, are still being developed today. AAMA originated the term “gunnable foam sealant”.
Some Aerosol Foam History
73
74
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Material Air Permeability
74
75
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Assembly Permeability
75
26
76
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Primary Role of the Foam Sealant
--Gap filling air tightness to reduce energy
Usage and help prevent water ingress
--Initial structural integrity adequate
to withstand building design pressures
--Durability to maintain this performance
throughout the building life
76
77
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
77
78
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Sealant & Foam Sealant?
Some Differences IdentifiedCharacteristic Sealant Foam sealant
Density 40-80 lb/FT3 1-2 lb/FT3
Tool Before/After Cure Before After
Flexibility Lower Higher
Movement Capability Well Defined In Progress
Gap Profile Required Hour Glass Not Specific
Gap Size Small to Med Med to Large
Dispensing Control Greater Lesser78
27
79
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Sealant & Foam Sealant?
Some Differences IdentifiedCharacteristic Sealant Foam sealant
UV Resistant Yes NO
Insulation Value Lower Higher
Vapor Barrier/Retarder Yes/No No/Yes
Air Barrier Yes Yes
Structural Strength Higher Lower
Expansion Virtually zero 1X to 3X
Pressure-Build @ Cure Virtually zero Low to High79
80
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM International…Under Committees C24, E06, E05, D14
American Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA)
Underwriters Lab of Canada (ULC) and…
ULI for US Surface Flame Spread Classification per UL723/ASTM E-84
Current Standards for Aerosol Foam
Sealant are Promulgated by…
80
81
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
In 2000 Subcommittee C24.61 began the task of developing germane foam sealant standards.
Now several test methods and one spec are published…
ASTM C1620 is the Spec for PU and latex foam sealants.
More tests are in ballot process now and a complete list will follow later in the presentation…
ASTM C24
81
28
82
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM E06 Activities
The foam sealant industry has participated in the ten year ASTM E2112 Standard development and has developed Annex A which is specific to foam sealant.
Now also standards for air leakage assemblies have been developed in C24.61.
Water intrusion tests can be evaluated as well. 82
83
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM E06 & E2112
ASTM E2112 Standard Practice for Installation
of Exterior Windows…was developed over a
ten year period and now represents the
industry’s best effort to bring consensus to
the practice of window installation.
Recommendations for foam sealant are
detailed in Annex A of this document…
83
84
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM E2112 in Summary• Sealant, aerosol foam, n, in
building construction, a foamed compound that is dispensed under pressure from a container.
• Consider the following factors prior to installation:
• “Low-Pressure” refers to foam sealant …and is the force exerted by the material on the fenestration frame during its curing time and or recovery time. Choose a low-pressure aerosol foam sealant…
• Select a material that provides an airtight seal of the gap.
• The foam applicator for aerosol foam sealant should be controllable in terms of foam volume and foaming rate (see Figs. A1.1 and A1.2).
• The gap should not be over filled.
84
29
85
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
FIG. A1.1 Application of Aerosol Foam Sealant (Type A
Material) In Cavity Between Window Frame and Rough
Opening
85
86
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
FIG. A1.2 Straw Applicator Type A Material
86
87
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM E2112 in Summary
• A suitable installed foam…fill should not distort the fenestration frame more than 1⁄16 in. (1.5 mm) along any side.
• Before any material is used to fill the rough opening gap, test the window for ease of operation and cut off the excess portions of the shims.
• The rough opening gap should be at least wide enough to permit insertion of the barrel of the foam sealant applicator.
• Gaps smaller than that recommended by the foam manufacturer should be sealed only at the interior face of the gap with a minimal size bead.
• Foam between the new frame and the old frame in a replacement window application (see Fig. A1.3)
87
30
88
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
FIG. A1.3 Locations for Type A Material with
Replacement Window
88
89
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM E2112 in Summary
• If the rough opening gap is overfilled, preventing the installation of trim members, the foam must be trimmed to remove the excess. The foam material must be manually removed using a sharp knife after it cures. On some fenestration products, one bead is applied from the outside and another from the inside.
• If the rough opening gap is over 2 in. (50 mm) deep, the installer may decide to inject a second optional bead of foam around the entire fenestration product perimeter creating an air sandwich. The first bead is allowed to become tack-free (at least 10 minutes) before the second bead is applied.
89
90
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM E2112 in Summary
• On some fenestration products, one bead is applied from the outside and another from the inside.
• If windows are flanged, both beads are applied from the inside leaving an air gap between them (see Fig. A1.4).
• DO NOT OVERFILL THE
CAVITY. With foam sealant
material, allow for foam
expansion during cure. Wait
until foam has cured when
using this material (consult
manufacturer’s
recommendation) before
cutting excess foam flush
with wall and installing trim
(see Fig.A1.5).
90
31
91
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
FIG. A1.4 Optional Second Bead Approach for
Type A Material
91
92
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
FIG. A1.5 Excess Type A Material Trimmed with
a Sharp Knife
92
93
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM E2112 in Summary
• Check operation of window or door one final time (Warning—Foam cleaners or solvents may not be compatible with all fenestration materials. Consult the fenestration manufacturers’recommendations before using cleaners on fenestration products.)
• At the head rough opening gap, the installer should apply a single bead of foam sealant just sufficient to air-seal this area. This technique reduces the downward force transmitted to the head jamb of the window should the structural header tend to sag over time.
93
32
94
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
94
95
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
The Architectural Manufacturers Association (AAMA) develops and publishes standards for fenestration products and their installation.AAMA 812-04 is now published which provides a test for measuring the Pressure-Build for an aerosol foam sealant.
AAMA Standard For Pressure-
Build
95
96
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Aerosol Polyurethane (PU) foam sealant has been used in Europe without window frame distortion concerns since 1974. However, in the US there have been reported cases that the pressure that occurs during the foam curing process (i.e. Pressure-Build) can bow the window frame inwards thus affecting the window operation. In general, this occurs with str aw foams and only when the rough opening cavity is completely filled with the foam sealant which is contrary to all manufacturers’ recommendations. The following is a report of the industries study o f this issue and a summary of their findings.
Some Aerosol Foam History
on Pressure-Build
96
33
97
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
97
98
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
98
99
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
AAMA 812-04 in Summary
99
34
100
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Measuring Pressure-Build
100
101
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
General Comparison of Pressure-Build for a High and Low Pressure-Build Foam
0
10
20
30
40
50
Time
For
ce, p
ound
s
101
102
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
What is the Value?
• AAMA 812-04 evaluated foam sealants can be used
with assurance using the Pressure-Build data from a
third party evaluation report.
• The window manufacturer must know the structural
strength of the window frame. Of course the highest
concern occurs for the weakest fenestration frames.
• Back calculation can then determine a specific foams
suitability for a particular window when the
Pressure-Build data is available.
102
35
103
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
• The following slides depict the
application of foam, the resulting
expansion of foam, the pressure
device location and set-up, the
operating force test as well as the
operating force results and measured
frame deflections for each of the
representative low-, medium- and
high- Pressure-Build foams.
Full-Scale Testing
103
104
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Foam Application in Window Gap – The
Rough Opening is Completely Filled
104
105
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Test Window Assemblies…Foam
Expands Out From the Perimeter
105
36
106
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Pressure-Build (P-B) Measurement
106
107
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Operating Force Test…Before and
After Foaming Change
107
108
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Average Operating Force(Bottom Sash)
17.5
12 13.5
18.75
13 14
02468
1012141618202224262830
Wood New Vinyl ReplacementVinyl
Ope
ratin
g F
orce
(po
unds
)
Pre-Test Post-Test
108
37
109
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
• The peak pressure was monitored on the
wood windows only and resulted in the
following values:
• Low - 0.24 psi
• Medium - 2.03 psi
• High - 0.69 psi
• Note that the Medium Pressure-Build foam
is the highest...
109
110
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
During testing, the Pressure-Build appears to
be partly related to how quickly the outermost
portions of the foam cure or “skin”. The
Medium Pressure-Build foam “skinned” quickly
and resulted in building up a higher pressure
than the High Pressure-Build foam. The High
Pressure-Build foam surface continually
“broke” or “split” and allowed the pressure to
be released as it cured. This may not occur
with all such foams so ask for P-B values.110
111
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
• Because no measurable changes in the frame
members occurred for the Low Pressure-
Build foam test sample, no graphical
representation can be provided here.
111
38
112
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Individual Jamb Deflection vs. Foam
0.1
0.05
0.07
0.05
0.020.03
0.060.06
0.00
0.05
0.10
Wood New Vinyl ReplacementVinyl
Def
lect
ion
(inch
es)
Top Jamb Meeting Rail Bottom Jamb
Medium Pressure-Build Foam
112
113
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Individual Jamb Deflection vs. Foam
0.02
0.040.04
0.01
0.06
0.00
0.05
0.10
Wood New Vinyl ReplacementVinyl
Def
lect
ion
(inch
es)
Top Jamb Meeting Rail Bottom Jamb
High Pressure-Build Foam
113
114
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Testing per ASTM E283/E331 for a
1-cm Wide Gap Assembly
114
39
115
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
A Published Result of ASTM E283 and
E331 for a Low Pressure-Build Foam
• Water Summary
• The water penetration test results are tabulated as follows:
• Test Method Title of Test Results
• ASTM E331 & E547 Water Penetration Tests Pass, no water entry
• @ 12.0 psf**115
116
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM C24 Activities
The Following Standards are
Published
• ASTM C1536-03 For Volumetric Yield/Can
• ASTM C1620-05 For Foam Specifications
• ASTM C1642-07 For Air Leakage Rate
• ASTM C1643-08 For Post Expansion
116
117
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Standard Test Method for Measuring the Yield for Aerosol Foam SealantsFirst published 2002 and now in active revision, this document created the first industry standard for this important user property. It measures the linear feet of 3/8 inch diameter bead that a user can expect from a single can of foam sealant.
ASTM C1536
117
40
118
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Provides a max leakage limit per ASTME283Provides maximum requirements per ASTM E84Provides a minimum requirement for R-valueMandates reporting for several additional foam sealant properties specified herein including foam sealant yield measured exclusively by ASTM C1536
ASTM C1620 Standard Spec for
Polyurethane and Latex Foam Sealant
118
119
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Specifying Foam Sealant Using ASTM C1620
• Look for the conformance statement on the product data sheet or the product itself: “Conforms to ASTM C1620”
• Select either a PU or a latex foam sealant based on the product’s specification and properties
• Choose a “High or Low Expansion” foam sealant per the application/void size*
• Insure the manufacturer has reported C1536 data and not made yield claims based on a non-standardized and un-published test
• Review other reported product specification values from the manufacture’s data sheet per your specific application needs
* Check AAMA 812-04 for Pressure-Build when appropriate119
120
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM C1642-07 For Air Leakage Rate
• Foam is tested per E283 Standard Test Method for Determining Rate of Air Leakage Through Exterior Windows…butin a standardized jig
• C1642 can also be used to test to ASTM E331Standard Test Method for Water Penetration of Exterior Windows…
120
41
121
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM C1643-08 Test Method For Post
Dispensing Foam Expansion
• Standardized method to
measure the foam sealant
expansion that typically occurs
immediately after dispensing
• For PU Foam Sealants this can
vary from 50 to 300%
• High foam sealant expansion
does not necessarily imply high
Pressure-Build!
121
122
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
ASTM C24 Activities
The Following Standards are in Development
• ASTM C1536 Revisions For Volumetric
Yield/Can
• ASTM CXXXX For Product Temperature Use
• ASTM CXXXX For Foam Movement Capability
• ASTM CXXXX For Foam Substrate Adhesion
• ASTM CXXXX For Product Dispensing Rate
122
123
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Some Foam Sealant Limitations
• Minimum product temperature during application is circa 20°F for most PU and 55ºF for latex (an ASTM C24.61 standard is in development now)
• Latex products are quite water absorptive
• Extremely large voids (see above photo) or any cavity where moisture cannot permeate into (PU) or escape from the (latex) foam are not suitable
• PU products will surface degrade in UV light
• Overfilling a window cavity with a high Pressure-Build foam sealant can cause window frame distortion. 123
42
124
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Some Additional Foam Sealant Benefits
• Manufacturers have found that many foam sealants applied
to the inboard edge of the rough opening gap can reduce
frame distortion during high wind events and help prevent
water ingress.
• Foam sealant has a high insulation value.
• Foam sealant is a vapor retarder.
• Foam sealant is an air barrier. 124
125
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Because foam sealant low density, ASTM E84 or UL723 has been this industry’s standard test for many years.
The C1620 spec now requires reporting at ¾” bead diameter and 25% test panel coverage.
Typically most products exhibit a very low < 25 Flame Spread Index and <25 Smoke Development at this coverage.
Fire Standards per ASTM E05
125
126
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
UL and ULC Standards
Two ULC Standards have been fairly recently developed
for PU foam sealant…
CAN/ULC-S710.1 for material properties
This includes a “Durability” test for the specific
application listed in the product report
CAN/ULC-S710.2 for product installation…this details
the use and application limits for the product
126
43
127
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Conclusions The previous absence of suitable standards for aerosol
foam sealant has created confusion in the building community. This includes both architects and the Model
Building Code…it has struggled with categorizing their status as a sealant in building construction or a foam insulation material. Through consensus groups like
ASTM, this is now beginning to change, and for those not fully familiar with these products, the new standards should help them and the entire building community understand the applications and capabilities for these products. Those charged with the responsibility for
specifying the right foam sealant for critical jobs such as fenestration applications are also now just beginning to
have the tools they need as well.127
128
Window Wall Interface“The forgotten detail in the drawing set”
Q&A
128
129
Training, Resources & Guide Documents For
Engineers, Architects, Specifiers and Installers
DRAFT 7
www.swrionline.org
• www.adhesives.org (Sealants portal with free educational content)• Caulks and Sealants Short Course, April 18-19, 2010 (Savannah, GA)
The Adhesive and Sealant Council (ASC)
Sealant Waterproofing & Restoration Institute• Sealant Validation Program : This product validation program provides data that manufacturers independently test submitted material to determine whether they perform as stated by the manufacturer and to industry standards.
ASTM International
Contact:Steve Duren
301 986-9700
Contact:Erin Nied
816.472.7974
Contact:Steve Mawn610-832-9726
Construction Specification Institute (CSI)
• ASTM E 2112-07: Standard “Standard Practice for Installation of Exterior Windows, Doors and Skylights “ document is available for purchase at www.astm.orgwww.ASTM.org
Contact:Susan Konohia703-706-4744
• Green Format: Evaluate the Green characteristics of your products and & choose the product that fits your specification with Green Format
www.ascouncil.org
129
Installation Masters™ Program Contact:Ben Myers orKaren Yetter717-764-7700
• Nationwide training & certification program for new construction and replacement window and door installation with 10,000 certified installers
• Visit the InstallationMasters™ website for upcoming class dates.installationmastersusa.com
www.greenformat.com129