25
Window of Opportunity Peter Scharf University of Missouri

Window of Opportunity

  • Upload
    elle

  • View
    34

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Window of Opportunity. Peter Scharf University of Missouri. Window of Opportunity?. Sensors. Factors defining the window. Effect of N timing on yield How late can you go? Effect of sensor timing on diagnostic accuracy How early can you go?. Effect of N timing on yield. tassel. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Window of Opportunity

Window of Opportunity

Peter ScharfUniversity of Missouri

Page 2: Window of Opportunity

Window of Opportunity?Window of Opportunity?

Sensors

Page 3: Window of Opportunity

Factors defining the window

Effect of N timing on yieldHow late can you go?

Effect of sensor timing on diagnostic accuracyHow early can you go?

Page 4: Window of Opportunity

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 4 8 12 16 20

growth stage of single N applic.

yiel

d r

elat

ive

to p

rep

lan

t N

missouri

nebraska

oklahoma

MO line

Effect of N timing on yield

tassel

Page 5: Window of Opportunity

How late can you apply?

Planned single application: as late as V11?Northern data needed

Page 6: Window of Opportunity

35 to 90 kg N/ha applied preplant

00.20.40.60.8

11.21.4

0 4 8 12 16 20

growth stage when balance of N applied

yie

ld r

ela

tiv

e t

o p

rep

lan

t N

Effect of N timing on yield

tassel

Page 7: Window of Opportunity

How late can you apply?

Planned single application: as late as V11?Northern data needed

With modest preplant N: later yet

Page 8: Window of Opportunity

How late can you apply?

Planned single application: as late as V11?Northern data needed

With modest preplant N: later yet

As a rescue application: at least silking

Page 9: Window of Opportunity

Factors defining the window

Effect of N timing on yieldEffect of sensor timing on

diagnostic accuracy

Page 10: Window of Opportunity

Effect of sensor timing on accuracy

Can work as early as V6

Page 11: Window of Opportunity

Effect of sensor timing on accuracy

Chlorophyll meter prediction of N rate V5 to V9, R2 = 0.53 V10 to R1, R2 = 0.66

Chlorophyll meter: equation changes as season progresses

Page 12: Window of Opportunity

Prime window: V6 to V11?

Discussion?

Page 13: Window of Opportunity

Effect of N timing on yield

Russelle et al. 1983 Evanylo 1991 Jokela and Randall 1989 Sripada et al. 2005 Miller et al. 1975 Hoeft Bausch

Page 14: Window of Opportunity

Effect of N timing on yield depends on placement…

Broadcast

Between-row

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

0 30 60 90 120

Corn height (cm) when N was applied

Yie

ld (

kg h

a-1)

Page 15: Window of Opportunity

…and source (N burn)(average of 7 locations in Missouri, 2003-04)

TreatmentTreatment 1 foot1 foot 2 feet2 feet 3 feet3 feet 4 feet4 feet

Ammonium Ammonium nitratenitrate 11 88 2020 1818

28% N 28% N solutionsolution 99 1414 3333 6161

UreaUrea 00 00 XX 44

Yield loss (between-row minus broadcast) when 150 lb N applied broadcast at corn height:

Page 16: Window of Opportunity

Kansas producer 2006: 4000 Kansas producer 2006: 4000 acres of corn fertilized in six acres of corn fertilized in six days using sensorsdays using sensors

Page 17: Window of Opportunity

…and source (N burn)(average of 7 locations in Missouri, 2003-04)

TreatmentTreatment 1 foot1 foot 2 feet2 feet 3 feet3 feet 4 feet4 feet

Ammonium Ammonium nitratenitrate 11 88 2020 1818

28% N 28% N solutionsolution 99 1414 3333 6161

UreaUrea 00 00 XX 44

Yield loss (between-row minus broadcast) when 150 lb N applied broadcast at corn height:

Page 18: Window of Opportunity

Effect of N timing on yieldMissouri data, 28 expts. 1997-99

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0 4 8 12 16 20

growth stage of single N application

yie

ld r

ela

tiv

e t

o p

rep

lan

t N

tassel

Scharf et al., 2002, Agron. J. 94:435-441

Page 19: Window of Opportunity

Nebraska data, 2 expts. 1993-1994

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 4 8 12 16 20

growth stage of single N application

yie

ld r

ela

tiv

e t

o p

rep

lan

t N

Effect of N timing on yield

tassel

Binder et al., 2000, Agron. J. 92:1228-1236

Page 20: Window of Opportunity

Oklahoma data, 5 expts. 2005-06

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 4 8 12 16 20

growth stage of single N application

yie

ld r

ela

tiv

e t

o p

rep

lan

t N

Effect of N timing on yield

tassel

Walsh, 2006, MS Thesis

Page 21: Window of Opportunity

35 to 90 kg N/ha applied preplant

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

0 4 8 12 16 20

growth stage when balance of N applied

yie

ld r

ela

tiv

e t

o p

rep

lan

t N

nebraska

oklahoma

missouri

Effect of N timing on yield

tassel

Page 22: Window of Opportunity

Effect of N timing on yield

Producer N rate, Producer N rate, preplant vs preplant vs sidedress (on sidedress (on average V9)average V9)

Field-length stripsField-length strips

Page 23: Window of Opportunity

Effect of N timing on yield

YearYear # # expts.expts.

Yield effect of Yield effect of sidedresssidedress

20042004 77 -5-5

20052005 55 -16-16

20062006 55 +4+4

Yield effect is very weather-dependent!

Page 24: Window of Opportunity

Yield response to late N: Only when corn hasOnly when corn has visible N stress visible N stress

Greenness of corn

Yield response to N applied when corn was shoulder-high

100% 0 91% 10 77% 37

Steve Watkins farm, Hayti, 2000; research by Gene Stevens

Page 25: Window of Opportunity

Window of Opportunity: Later for unplanned (rescue) applications

Application until at least silking can give a large yield response when N stress is substantial

35 to 50 bu/ac in three MO tests