Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Win2k3 EoS andEnterprise Modernization
Matt StarkieBusiness ArchitectWW DC and Cloud Infrastructure CoEMicrosoft
Michael LoftusChief Strategist & Consulting PartnerHyper Technologies
Objectives for Win2k3 EoS / Enterprise Modernisation
1. Identify Existing Risks in Applications2. Reduce Risk Exposure 3. Reduce Financial Exposure 4. Leverage Newer Capabilities5. Reduce Time to Value of Services6. Simplify the Environment
Why?• Organisations have an Application
Transformation Challenge, still• The Traditional Destination has evolved• Organisations are going BiModal• Risk vs Cost – what’s your preference?• What’s your exposure?• What are we hearing that is relevant to
you• General Themes• Specific Role Viewpoints
Goal
Value
Approach
Governance
Sourcing
Talent
Culture
Cycle Times
Reliability
Price for Performance
Waterfall, V-Model
Plan Driven, Approval Based
Enterprise Suppliers, long-term deals
Good at conventional process/ projects
IT Centric, customer removed
Long – (months / years)
Agility
Revenue, Brand, Customer Experience
Agile, Kanban
Empirical, continuous, fail faster
Startups, small, short term deals
Good at new and ambiguous projects
Business-centric, customer focused
Short – (days, weeks)
Fast Twitch Slow Twitch
Going Bi-ModalAND
Win2k3 EoS / Enterprise Modernisation – Common Themes
1. Again, we’ve just done this on the desktop!!
2. Our solution works as is, why change it?
3. We don’t need any help, we’re all covered
4. This is an IT problem5. This is a Business Problem6. What are you trying to sell us this
time?7. Yes we have a problem, we don’t know
how big or where to start8. Another vendor trying to scare us into
buying from them9. We haven’t budgeted to address this10.You’re no different than the other
vendors11.Yes we’re an ITIL shop………12.Show me the value13.We want this to be the last time we do
this
Win2k3 EoS / Enterprise Modernisation – Role Based Viewpoints
• Viewpoint Perspectives• CIO Strategy• Lines of Business• Business Relationship Managers• Enterprise Architecture• Senior IT Roles• Innovation Teams• Finance and Procurement• Legal
How to Start • Understand your problem• Communication – Early, Often, Relevant
• Service RACI• Service Cost is Key
• How Much today• How Much in future
• Avoid Analysis Paralysis• Lower the time to Value
• Offload Risk• Outcome based solutions
How to Start
Target DestinationDesign / Build / Operate
Week 15 onwards
Accelerated Application Modernization ApproachDiscovery
&Rationalisation
Complexity Project – Assessment & Planning & Migration
CSA Start
Week 5-12 July 2015Week 1-4
5-10 Application Migration Pilot
Low Complexity Migration Planning (3rd
Party & MS)
Service Catalogue Findings and Reports
Environment Data Collection
Custom Application Review and Validation
Impact Project – Assessment & Planning
Week 7-15Initial Business
Case Analysis
(CSA & Risk Impacts) Business Impact, Risk,
Schedule and Approach
Medium Complexity Migration Planning
Sprint Project - Migration
Weeks 13-26
Microsoft Velocity Migrations
Testing and Remediation
Quarterly CSA Server Count Defined Objectives
Impact Project - Migration
Week 15 – TBD (ASAP)Microsoft Velocity
Migrations
Governance and Risk Mitigation
Partner Migration
Management
Business Testing and Remediation
CSA Accountability Roles and Responsibilities
End User Communication and
Training
Sprint Project – Assessment & Planning
Target Destination Decisions
Infrastructure Modernisation Michael Loftus
Hyper-T
Hyper Technologies (HyperT) A Perspective on Modernization and Win 2003
• Microsoft Partner
• Deep expertise in Hyper-V, System Center, and core MS Platforms
• Focused primarily on Consulting and On Premises Managed
Service, with a “Boutique” Hosting Capability
• Azure activity restricted to DR feasibility discussions thus far.
Dev/Test on the horizon.
• Active in Several Windows 2003 Upgrade Projects• Focused on Infrastructure – so not confronting Application Server
challenges yet
Our Core Services
• Core MS Platforms
• Virtualization (server, desktop, user)
• Automation and Self Service
Infrastructure Matters
• Availability• Agility• Time to Value• Service Quality
Our Approach
HyperT and Infrastructure Modernization –Beliefs and Approach
• Modernize• Optimize• Automate• PrivateCloud• Hybrid Cloud
The HyperT Migration Roadmap Hybrid Cloud
VMM/WAP mastery
DR focus
Dev/Test pilots
Network optimization
Private Cloud
Broad virtualization
Standard builds
Orchestration
Advanced self service
Automate
Advanced scripting
Task automation
Basic self service
Optimize
Consolidate
Cluster/HA & basic DRPoint Virtualization
Manage
s/w currency
h/w currency
supporting “glue” (DNS, AD, backup, etc)
Modernize
Windows 2003 Initiatives- HyperT
All focused more on “point” modernization than EOL/CSA risk. Windows 2003 Remediation seen as larger challenge and not necessarily being addressed as single project by our clients.
Two separate Financial Services Engagement examples First is moving Windows 2003 File Servers to Virtualized Windows
2012 clusters. Build out new environment, migrate data, retire old servers.
Second engagement is also a File Server/DFS-R upgrade to Windows 2012.
As you would expect, very few significant technology challenges with these migrations
In “Proposal Stage” for multiple clients starting to look at Application Servers. Initial trend is they are not interested in diagnostic tools like ChangeBase/App DNA. They seek ISV validation of support for Win 2012
HyperT Summary
We are absolutely committed to (and optimistic about) the prospects for private and hybrid cloud based on MS Cloud OS.
There is a need to improve understanding of networking and WAN optimization in the context of Azure and O365
We are in dialogue with a few smaller clients about moving their entire IT infrastructure Azure and O365
Client interest/demand for these migrations is driven by modernization imperatives.
Although the Windows 2003 EOL “event” is acknowledged, it does not appear to represent the major “inflection point” that we believe it is.
Not clear that patch availability as critical a concern as it should be.
Why Microsoft and Partners?
• We’ve Done This Before, countless times• We know Your:
• Organisation• Industry• Geography
• Experienced Resources & Partners• Onshore• Offshore
• Tailored and Proven Approaches• Choice of Destinations
• Microsoft• Non-Microsoft
• Shared Interests and Goals• The clock is ticking!!!!
Questions?Matt StarkieBusiness Solutions ArchitectWW Datacenter and Cloud Infrastructure [email protected]
Michael LoftusRole?Hyper [email protected]
© 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries.The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing marketconditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation.MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.
Target Workstream
Destination Build
Internal Resource
External Resources
Mixed?
PrinciplesPrivate Cloud Unless……
Public Cloud Unless….
Hybrid Cloud Unless…
Set the Target Destinations to work towards
Pre-requisitesIdentity Strategy
Comms Plan
CAPEX / OPEX Goals
Justification for change
Discovery & Rationalisation Workstream
System integrators
Microsoft Services
Microsoft partners
Non-Microsoft Partners
Self-Service toolsMicrosoft Assessment and Planning (MAP) Toolkit
Dell ChangeBASE
Lakeside Software SysTrack
Catalog Software, Workloads, Owners, Stakeholders
Internal Resources
Dev Teams
Business Units
Long Serving Employees
Service Desk
Assess & Planning Workstream
Complexity / Risk
High
High to Medium
Medium to Low
Low
Business Criticality
Mission Critical
Important
Marginal
Duplicate
Asses Service Components
Gartner 5 R’s
Retire
Rehost
Refactor / Revise
Rebuild
Replace
Migrate Workstream
Who?
Internal Resources
External Resources
COTS Upgrades
Remember Service Owners
How Much?Internal cost vs External
Remember licensing
Remember OPEX
Budgetary Year
Who, When, What, How Much?
When / What?
Simplify first
Mix of Risk / Complexity
Leverage Cloud
Plan for Vacations
