7
Resource Ultilisation and Cost Analysis of Memantine in Patients with Moderate to Severe Alzheimer‘s Disease Wimo A., Winblad B., Stöffler A., Wirth Y., and Möbius H. J. Pharmacoeconomics 2003, 21 (5): 327-340

Wimo A., Winblad B., Stöffler A., Wirth Y., and Möbius H. J

  • Upload
    tivona

  • View
    24

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Resource Ultilisation and Cost Analysis of Memantine in Patients with Moderate to Severe Alzheimer‘s Disease. Wimo A., Winblad B., Stöffler A., Wirth Y., and Möbius H. J. Pharmacoeconomics 2003, 21 (5): 327-340. Study Design. No. of patients N = 252 (outpatients) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Wimo A., Winblad B., Stöffler A., Wirth Y., and Möbius H. J

Resource Ultilisation and Cost Analysis of

Memantine in Patients with Moderate to

Severe Alzheimer‘s Disease

Wimo A., Winblad B., Stöffler A., Wirth Y., and Möbius H. J.

Pharmacoeconomics 2003, 21 (5): 327-340

Page 2: Wimo A., Winblad B., Stöffler A., Wirth Y., and Möbius H. J

No. of patients N = 252 (outpatients)

Diagnosis Probable Alzheimer’s disease

Design Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study

Age 50 years (mean 76)

Severity MMSE 3 – 14 (mean 7.9)GDS 5 – 6FAST 6a

Dose; duration 20 mg Memantine/day; 28 weeks

Pharmaco- Resource Utilisation in Dementia (RUD) economic analysis

Study Design

Wimo et al., Pharmacoeconomics 2003

Page 3: Wimo A., Winblad B., Stöffler A., Wirth Y., and Möbius H. J

Baseline Characteristics

No significant differences in demographics and

the severity of the disease between treatment

groups

Very high degree of mean caregiving time in this

moderate to severe AD population

Wimo et al., Pharmacoeconomics 2003

Page 4: Wimo A., Winblad B., Stöffler A., Wirth Y., and Möbius H. J

Memantine Treatment Reduces Rate of Institutionalizations

p-value analyzed by 2 test

TPP, N = 166 Patient residential status at week 28

Wimo et al., Pharmacoeconomics 2003

Memantine Placebo

Residential status N (%) N (%) p-value

Community 83 (92.2 %) 62 (81.6 %)

0.04

Institutional 7 (7.8 %) 14 (18.4%)

Page 5: Wimo A., Winblad B., Stöffler A., Wirth Y., and Möbius H. J

Memantine Treatment Reduces Monthly Caregiver Resource Utilization

* corrected for baseline characteristics (ANCOVA model)

TPP, N = 166 Mean time over 28-week study period

Wimo et al., Pharmacoeconomics 2003

Memantine Placebo Difference

(N = 90) (N = 76)

Caregiver time 413.46 455.64 52*(hours) [SD] [234.27] [232.70]

Work loss 9.81 14.05 4.24(hours) [SD] [29.60] [38.72]

Page 6: Wimo A., Winblad B., Stöffler A., Wirth Y., and Möbius H. J

Significant Reduction of Costs through Memantine Treatment

US

Do

llars

/ m

on

th

* p < 0.03, ** p < 0.01 versus placebo

Total caregiver costs Total societal costs

8400

8000

7600

7200

6800

6400

6000Memantine Memantine

*

**

Placebo Placebo

TPP, N = 166 Adjusted mean monthly costs

Wimo et al., Pharmacoeconomics 2003

Page 7: Wimo A., Winblad B., Stöffler A., Wirth Y., and Möbius H. J

Summary

* corrected for confounding effects

Caregiver time and institutionalization were the main

cost drivers

Average monthly caregiver costs were $ 824 lower in the

memantine group*

Average monthly societal costs were $ 1090 lower in the

memantine group*

Conclusion:

Memantine treatment may lead to significant cost

savings by reduction of resource utilization

Wimo et al., Pharmacoeconomics 2003