30
William Joel Parker Human Development Learning Theory Motivation Learning Environment 2002 Maura Enscoe and Tom Larson

William Joel Parker

  • Upload
    lona

  • View
    26

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

William Joel Parker. Human Development. Motivation. Learning Theory. Learning Environment. 2002 Maura Enscoe and Tom Larson. William is an enactive learner, by Bandura’s definition. William has one positive role model and one negative role model. Learning Style and Role Models. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: William Joel Parker

William Joel Parker

Human Development

Learning Theory

Motivation

Learning Environment2002 Maura Enscoe and Tom Larson

Page 2: William Joel Parker

Learning Style and Role Models William is an

enactive learner, by Bandura’s definition.

William has one positive role model and one negative role model.

Page 3: William Joel Parker

Piaget’s Learning ModelMath Class Example

Lesson: Area

William falls into disequilibrium during lecture.

Accommodation 1

Accommodation 2

Page 4: William Joel Parker

Math Class Example

Accommodation 1

Mr. Seanz the Math teacher provides one on one education.

4 inch square area

Page 5: William Joel Parker

Math Class ExampleAccommodation 2

Class hands-on project

Planters and Flowers

Triangle Planter

L-Shaped Planter

Rectangular Planter

Page 6: William Joel Parker

Skinner Operant ConditioningABC Model

Antecedents – Hungry students

Behaviors – Pushing, bullying

Consequences – Hurts others feelings, and is sent back to the end of the lunch line.

Lunch Time!

Page 7: William Joel Parker

Skinner Operant Conditioning

Removal Punishment

Sending William to the end of the lunch line does not work.

Positive Reinforcement

Letting out class 2 minutes early for good behavior does work.

Page 8: William Joel Parker

AutismAutos – self

Inability to communicate effectively usually due to language fallback.

Impaired social interactions and restricted interests.

No cure, but early detection allows theory to help with fine motor skills.

Page 9: William Joel Parker

Human Development TheoryVygotsky

Zone of Proximal Development

William has a very narrow ZPD

Williams requires scaffolding often to achieve success in his school subjects.

Page 10: William Joel Parker

Scaffolding Required One on one

instruction. Hands-on

experiences.

Page 11: William Joel Parker

Motivation William is

extrinsically motivated at work.

William is intrinsically motivated at school.

Page 12: William Joel Parker

Learning Environment*Recommendation 1

William working one on one with teachers, with multiple learning aids.

(*Derived from: Vygotsky’s ZPD, Piaget’s learning theory, Bandura Enactive Learner)

Page 13: William Joel Parker

Learning Environment*Recommendation 2

Supervised social atmospheres.

(*Derived from: Piaget-Cognitive Development and Vygotsky’s Human Development)

Page 14: William Joel Parker

Learning Environment*Recommendation 3

Give William confidence and assurance.

(*Derived from: Erikson’s Psychosocial and Weiner’s Attribution)

Page 15: William Joel Parker

Learning Environment*Recommendation 4

Positive reinforcement rather than punishment.

(*Derived from: Skinner’s ABC Model)

Page 16: William Joel Parker

All About “Billy” 16 years old Interests include; video games,

birds, gardening. Has a best friend named Brian Has a girlfriend. Black Lab named Ebony Work in a greenhouse Discipline Problems

-Parental lack of discipline. Struggles in school. Autistic

Page 17: William Joel Parker

IndexHuman Development Theory- Cognitive Development

(Piaget, Vygotsky)- Psychosocial Development

(Erikson)- Moral Development

(Kohlberg)

Learning Theory- Cognitive (Piaget’s Learning

Model- Behaviorism (Skinner)- Social Learning Theory

(Bandura)- Processing Style- Constructivism

Motivation

- Goal Structure

- Attribution System

- Hierarchy of Needs (Maslow)

Page 18: William Joel Parker

Piaget Cognitive Development

William is in 4th state, Formal Operations

Has critical thinking limitations.

Has trouble analyzing school material.

Adolescent ego-centrism.

Page 19: William Joel Parker

Vygotsky Human Development Theory

William’s ZPD is extremely narrow.

Needs extensive scaffolding.

Page 20: William Joel Parker

Erickson’s Psychosocial Development

Primary stage: Initiative vs. Guilt

Secondary stage: Autonomy vs. Shame and Doubt

Working on: Industry vs. Inferiority

Page 21: William Joel Parker

Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Reasoning

Level 1 Preconventional/personal impact

Stage 2 Personal reward

William is trying to get to the social contract and universal ethic stage.

Page 22: William Joel Parker

Cognitive Learning TheoryPiaget’s Learning Model

When William falls into disequilibrium, he often requires multiple attempts at accommodation, before he can assimilate the situation.

This method works well in his educational settings.

Page 23: William Joel Parker

BehaviorismSkinner Operant Conditioning

William’s social behaviors can be altered, by Skinner’s Operant Conditioning.

Many of Williams social problems can be solved using Skinner’s ABC model.

Positive reinforcement produces better results than removal punishment.

Page 24: William Joel Parker

Bandura’s Social Learning Theory

According to Bandura, William would be classified as an enactive learner rather than a vicarious learner.

Page 25: William Joel Parker

Processing Style

William is primarily a bottom-up processor.

Page 26: William Joel Parker

ConstructivismWilliam is an exogenous learner.

Page 27: William Joel Parker

Motivation

William is extrinsically motivated at work.

William is intrinsically motivated at school.

Page 28: William Joel Parker

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs

William struggles with belongingness.

Page 29: William Joel Parker

Attribution SystemWilliam’s excuses are external.

His thoughts are unchangeable.

Placing blame on others is uncontrolled.

William is a classic learned helplessness case.

Page 30: William Joel Parker

Goal StructuresWilliam is work avoidant.

William is motivated by others.