Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
4900 EARHART ROAD • LOVELAND, CO 80538
WIFI: COLGuest Password: accesswifi
REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING THURSDAY, APRIL 20, 2017
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMENT & IDEA SHARING CONSENT AGENDA
1. MINUTES FROM THE MARCH 23, 2017 MEETING 2. AIRPORT DIRECTOR’S REPORT 3. MONTHLY FINANCIAL STATEMENT
PULLED CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS CONSENT AGENDA FOLLOWUP REGULAR AGENDA
4. AIRPORT GOVERNANCE – 30 MIN • Airport Authority Discussion
5. AIRPORT PLANNING – 20 MIN • Terminal Building Discussion
6. AIRPORT DIRECTOR GOALS AND OBJECTIVES – 20 MIN 7. BUSINESS FROM MEMBERS
ADJOURN
The Cities Title VI policies can be found at the following websites www.fcgov.com/legal/?cmd=non-discrimination www.cityofloveland.org/departments/human-resources/risk-management/ada-policy-notice
Future Meeting Planning CalendarMay 18• Regular meeting
schedule update• Airport Authority
Presentation• 2016 Airport Audit
Presentation
June 15• 2018 Budget• Infrastructure
Planning
July 20• Rebranding and
Communications Subcommittee Workshop
Aug 20• Final Report Target
Market Analysis
Northern Colorado Regional Airport Commission Minutes March 23, 2017 Call to Order: Commission Chair Wade Troxell, called the meeting to order at 3:45 p.m. Roll Call: Chair Troxell, Vice-Chair Fleming, and Commissioners Adams, Atteberry,
Burgener, Gutierrez, and Stooksbury were present. Consent Agenda Public Comments: None Vice-Chair Fleming moved to approve the Consent Agenda. The motion, seconded by Commissioner Atteberry carried with all Commissioners present voting in favor thereof. Regular Agenda 4. Regulatory Compliance
• Hangar Use Policy
Public Comments: Steve Wolf: Recommends Commission accept the Hangar Policy and asked that once the Rules and Regulations are updated to enforce the leases in full. Requested the Commission adopt a Rules and Regulation Subcommittee and volunteered to participate. Reported two tenants in hangar across from his are living in it. Howard Abraham: In favor of this policy and would like to see it implemented. Rules and Regulations will be updated at a future meeting and the legal framework for accessing hangars is in place in the lease agreements. Jan Rossi: Recommends the Airport adopt a “Doors up day.” Vice-Chair Fleming made a motion to approve the Hangar Use Policy as presented. The motion, seconded by Commissioner Gutierrez carried with all Commissioners present voting in favor thereof. 5. Promotion & Events
• Airshow Subcommittee Briefing
Public Comments: Steve Wolf: Acting as proxy for Mike Fossi who could not attend, Mr. Fossi would like to join the Airshow Subcommittee. Bob Hau: Other events may coincide with the Air show that could bolster it into a more robust event weekend. Jim Eddy: Legal will research whether an RFP is necessary for the Airshow provider. Howard Abraham: September 2019. 6. Subcommittee Report
• Rebranding and Communications Subcommittee Update
Public Comments: None
7. Business From Members
This is an opportunity for Commissioners to report on recent activities or introduce new business for discussion at this time or on a future Commission agenda.
Adams: The Airport Director will present an initial run on what the Regulatory
Subcommittee might be and suggest possible members to the Commission at a future meeting.
Burgener: Cheyenne Regional Airport recently received funds for a new terminal
from multiple sources, including the Laramie County of Transportation, FAA, Wyoming Business Council, TSA, Cheyenne airport funds, and Laramie County residents who approved a $0.06 sales tax increase.
Direction: A plan to explore rebuilding the new terminal and infrastructure
as well as information on Airport Authorities in the State of Colorado will be discussed at the next meeting in April 20.
Adams: Discussion for extension of Rocky Mountain Blvd has been placed on the
calendar. Commission related goals and professional development for the Airport Director is still underway with HR and will discussed at the April 20 meeting.
Atteberry: Will be absent for April 20 meeting. Fleming: Will be absent for April 20 meeting. Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at 5:20 p.m. Respectfully Submitted,
_________________________________________ Vice-Chair, Tom Fleming
To: Northern Colorado Regional Airport Commission From: Jason Licon, Airport Director Re: Airport Report for March Date: 3/31/2017 Capital Projects & Awarded Grants
The Airport applied for three grants this year for preserving, rehabilitating, and extending sections of the Runways and Taxiways. Two grants from the State of Colorado Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics were approved in March totaling $65,000. The state grants will serve as the 5% match toward an expected $1,000,000 federal grant from the FAA, with the remaining $10,000 to be applied toward the purchase of pavement crack repair materials. The Airport’s grant matching fund obligation is approximately 5% or $65,000 required to leverage the $1,065,000 in federal and state resources.
The pavement preservation projects will extend the life of the Airport’s runways and taxiways and will update associated pavement markings for airport operational safety and FAA standards. A new pavement section will be added to the new snow removal equipment building and to a taxiway, which will be extended to accommodate a new hangar development project. The $1,000,000 FAA grant was made possible through congressional legislation that was part of the “FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016”. Without the language in the bill, the Airport would have only received $150,000 that to be used for a similar purpose.
Requests for Proposals
Airport staff is advertising two professional service requests for proposals (RFP) this month. The first RFP is for an engineering project associated with the planned federal and state supported pavement projects referenced above. The second RFP is for a target market analysis that will help the Cities gain a clear understanding of the potential for development both on and adjacent to the Airport. Information on these projects can be found on the Airport’s website:
http://www.flynoco.com/construction-development/bids-and-rfps/
Development and Leasing
The Green Ride Company announced this month that they acquired routes that the Super Shuttle Company previously served for Northern Colorado. Super Shuttle’s decision to discontinue its Northern Colorado services provided Green Ride with the opportunity to add to their routes and utilize leased space
2017 Project Area
004
that Super Shuttle occupied at the Harmony Park and Ride in Fort Collins. As a result, Green Ride will be moving their corporate offices to the Harmony location, and out of the Airport terminal building that they have leased partially for two years. Green Ride will continue to have an Airport presence, leasing a portion of the Airport’s parking lot for their park and ride.
A new development company, FNL Hangars LLC, has announced the building of two new hangar buildings with a combined total of approximatly 10,000 square feet. The new hangar buildings will be used for the storage of active aircraft, and for the development of an innovative project from Bye Aerospace. Bye has agreed to lease one of the new hangars partialy for their Stratoairnet solar electric prototype. A copy of the published article about the hangar development project and Bye Aerospace announcement is attached.
Police Training Campus
A joint City Council meeting was held on Thursday, March 23rd. The Councils discussed the previously proposed joint police training campus on the Airport property site. The proposed Airport site consists of approximately 40 acres directly adjacent to Boyd Lake Road and the Union Pacific Railroad on the western boundary of Airport property. The City Councils gave direction to staff involved in the project to proceed with the design of the facility this year. Airport staff will be working with the two police agencies and Loveland Public Works to ensure continuity.
Hangar Development Site
005
Solarpowered plane firm joins Northern Colo. airportPat Ferrier , [email protected] Published 3:19 p.m. MT April 3, 2017 | Updated 9:30 a.m. MT April 5, 2017
An Englewood company developing a longrange, solarpowered aircraft is expected to lease one of ahandful of new hangars planned at Northern Colorado Regional Airport in Loveland.
Bye Aerospace is developing the unmanned aircraft called StratoAirNet that it plans to house and test at theairport, formerly called Fort CollinsLoveland Municipal Airport.
The company already works with Lovelandbased Scion Aviation, which provides advanced composite parts,prototype aircraft and tooling. Housing its StratoAirNet at the airport creates a synergy among facilities,people and testing, Bye founder George Bye said in a telephone interview.
"The airport there is wonderful for so many reasons," he said. "It's a great facility with a great runway; it has access to both technology and employeesfor hightech and the airspace is not as restricted as it is around Denver.
"We love it up there for the StratoAirNet because of the special research and development effort that will be needed."
More: Woodward pledges $2M to preserve historic Coy barn (/story/money/business/2017/03/31/woodwardpledges2mpreservehistoriccoybarn/99783046/)
Bye said the aircraft is at Scion's facility at the airport. "We just need to get it in a larger facility that is better suited," he said.
Bye wants to begin work in Northern Colorado as soon as possible.
Kevin Pass, chief financial officer of KFNL LLC, which is building the four hangars, said Bye's should be ready no later than Sept. 1, but he hopes itwill be available by early July.
Initially, Bye will staff its local operations with Scion contractors and employees who live in North Denver or Northern Colorado. Eventually, Bye said thecompany will have between 12 and 25 workers in its first year to 18 months, "as we build our next four to five prototypes."
Airport General Manager Jason Licon said having Bye at the airport "will be a benefit not only to them but to area companies that provide advancedmaterials, software components and other things."
More: Platte River Power considers new HQ in Fort Collins (/story/money/business/2017/03/31/platteriverpowerconsidersnewhqfortcollins/99869280/)
The StratoAirNet has a 50foot wing span that will have a pilot during testing but will eventually fly without a pilot, Bye said.
A June story in Plane & Pilot magazine said Bye is targeting the defense market with the StratoAirNet. The story reported the company haddemonstrated a prototype in a virtual wargame simulation at an event hosted by the Air Force Research Lab out of Kirtland Air Force Base in NewMexico.
Other uses could include search and rescue operations, firefighting command and control, antipoaching monitoring, damage assessment, severeweather tracking, agriculture monitoring, mineral source surveying, spill detection and infrastructure quality assessment, according to the magazine.
Bye announced last month it was also working with XTI Aircraft Co., a Denverarea company, to develop a hybrid/electric prototype of XTI's TriFanvertical takeoff airplane that can takeoff and land like a helicopter.
More hangars to come
The planned hangar addition breaks a logjam of sorts at the airport, which hasn't seen new hangars for seven years.
The 186 hangars on airport grounds are at capacity and there's a three to fouryear waiting list for space in the 40 hangars owned by the airport,Licon said.
(Photo: Bye Aerospace)
006
KFNL Hangars LLC has a 45year lease on ground at the airport where it will build the hangars, said Pass, who is developing the project with RoySpace, both aviation enthusiasts who share a hangar. "That's how we came up with this project ... there is such a shortage of hangars."
Pass spent seven years building his own plane, an RV7, a twoseat, singleengine aircraft sold as a kit by Van's Aircraft.
Pass, a semiretired dentist, said the $1 million project should be completed by the end of the year.
Read or Share this story: http://noconow.co/2n5g4VP
007
Y-T-D 2017 Actual
Y-T-D 2016 Actual
Y-T-D 2017 Budget
2017 Total Budget
% of Y-T-D 2017 Budget
OPERATING REVENUES
Hangar Rental 35,581 24,441 27,000 108,000 33%FBO Rent 19,554 19,554 20,400 81,530 24%Gas and Oil Commissions 28,505 13,704 35,010 140,000 20%State Aircraft Fuel Tax 26,454 16,035 17,490 70,000 38%Land Lease 53,849 61,380 46,260 185,000 29%Terminal Lease and Landing Fees 2,562 1,507 2,520 10,000 26%Parking 3,220 1,060 2,010 8,000 40%Miscellaneous 4,807 4,459 5,850 23,200 21%
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 174,615 142,140 159,060 635,730
OPERATING EXPENSES
Personal Services 142,663 117,306 155,370 577,165 25%Supplies 6,148 3,895 13,530 54,115 11%Purchased Services 73,737 80,997 116,910 467,750 16%
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 222,548 202,198 285,810 1,099,030
OPERATING GAIN (LOSS) (47,933) (60,058) (126,750) (463,300)
NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)City Conributions 520,000 177,500 130,020 520,000 100%Passenger Facility Charge 0 0 5,490 22,000 0%Interest Income 4,776 3,777 3,750 15,000 32%Capital Expenditures 0 (76,204) (373,327) (1,493,302) 0%
TOTAL NONOPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES) 524,776 105,073 (234,067) (936,302)
NET INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS 476,843 45,015 (360,817) (1,399,602)
Capital Contributions 0 240,925 263,880 1,055,556 0%
CHANGE IN NET POSITION 476,843 285,940 (96,937) (344,046)
NET POSITION, Beginning 21,266,617 20,980,677 0 0
NET POSITION, Ending 21,743,460 21,266,617 (96,937) (344,046)Investment in Capital Assets 18,300,367 18,615,303 0 0 Net Position Available for use 3,443,093 2,651,314 (96,937) (344,046)
Airport Statement of Revenues and ExpensesFrom 01/01/2017 to 03/31/2017
Northern Colorado Regional Airport Commission
ITEM NUMBER: 4 MEETING DATE: April 20, 2017
PREPARED BY: Jason Licon, Airport Director
TITLE Airport Governance
RECOMMENDED AIRPORT COMMISSION ACTION Provide direction to Staff on next steps
BUDGET IMPACT Neutral or Not Applicable
SUMMARY The Airport Commission directed Staff at the February 23 regularly scheduled meeting to conduct an analysis and provide a white paper that illustrates the benefits and drawbacks of restructuring the Airport into an Airport Authority governance model. Staff created the attached white paper based on multiple specialized sources including associated Colorado Revised Statutes.
Staff found that Colorado Law prohibits an Airport Authority from the ability to levy taxes, as they are able to in other states. This includes property and sales tax assessments and/ or the creation of special districts. Colorado law does allow an Airport Authority to issue revenue bonds, which could be advantageous assuming that revenues are adequate to cover repayment.
ATTACHMENTS Airport Authority Governance Model White Paper
009
Airport Authority A case study of the Northern Colorado Regional Airport’s governance structure Sean Keithly Jason Licon April 14, 2017
Strategic Plan Action Item 4: Revise the Airport governance structure and authority
for the governing board
010
Purpose
This memorandum summarizes the purpose, function, legal considerations, and the advantages and
disadvantages of the airport authority form of governance, as defined in CRS 41-3-103 (2016).
Airport Governance Structure Overview
An airport authority is an independent entity that is the legal sponsor of an Airport, created through
enabling legislation and empowered to make decisions regarding the direction and overall management
of an airport. As a form of governance, airport authorities represent the governing structure of
approximately 1/3 of the airports in the United States. Airport authorities in Colorado constitute a
political subdivision of the state and are represented by a board of appointed commissioners.
Typical reasons for creation of an airport authority include:
- Airport market or service areas have outgrown their political boundaries, such as a city or
county, and have economic impacts that affect a wider region
- To fulfill a desire for greater autonomy and more expeditious decision-making
- As a response to a perception that airport authorities are subject to less direct political influence
- To facilitate new avenues for financing
011
- To create a governance structure that is more broadly representative of the region in which the
airport is located
Legal Considerations
- Airport authorities in Colorado are governed by state and federal law, which dictate their
powers and limitations. Authorities have broad powers under Colorado law, including the
following (summarized):
- To have perpetual existence;
- To sue and be sued;
- To enter into contracts and agreements with other public entities;
- To borrow money and issue bonds – however, Airport authorities cannot levy taxes for
payment of bonds;
- To exact fees;
- To provide rules and regulations governing the use of the airport;
- To buy, sell, and otherwise dispose of and encumber real estate;
- To exercise the power of eminent domain; and
- To construct and maintain works and facilities.1
- The statutory powers granted to airport authorities do not explicitly include the power to levy
taxes
- Under Colorado statute, airport authorities shall be governed by a board of commissioners
consisting of at least five but no more than nine members representing the “Combination” (i.e.,
the Cities of Fort Collins and Loveland). Commissioners shall be appointed for a term of four
years each (except for the first year, where one half of the members’ terms expire in two
years).2
- Authorities may be terminated by the municipality (-ies) composing the authority.3
- Authorities are exempt from general ad valorem taxes upon the airport; bonds and income
derived from them are exempt from state taxation.4
1 CRS 41-3-106 (1) 2 CRS 41-3-105 (2) 3 CRS 41-3-104 (6) 4 CRS 41-3-107
012
- Authorities are permitted under Federal law to exercise “proprietary powers and rights”, which
includes an allowance for the regulation of the aeronautical use of the airport.5
- As the airport sponsor, the authority must have requisite and sufficient powers to carry out
federal obligations and requirements.
Potential Advantages and Disadvantages of an Airport Authority
This analysis is based on research from the following sources:
- National Academies of Science, Airport Cooperative Research Program: Airport Governance and
Ownership (2009)
- Bureau of Government Research: New Orleans International Airport – Governance, Regional
Cooperation and Airport Expansion (1999)
- City of Fort Collins: Memorandum – Fort Collins-Loveland Airport Governance Issues (2007)
- American Association of Airport Executives: Body of Knowledge Module One – Finance and
Administration (2017)
Potential Benefits of an Airport Authority Governance Structure
- More diverse representation (e.g., potentially more of a balance between government and
private sector representatives, potentially more specialized knowledge of aviation-specific
issues)
- Authority members may be able to fully commit the necessary time and expertise to the
organization; City Council members and/or staff are often time-constrained by other
commitments that limit their ability to provide adequate time and attention to Airport matters.
- Allows for the cities to maintain ownership of the Airport, appoint members to the board, and
have the ability to dissolve if required
- Greater autonomy – not bound by constraints of local government
- Provide multiple jurisdictions with representation in an airport’s operation and development
and create a broader base of support for legislative action
5 49 U.S.C. § 41713(b)(3).
013
- Potential ability to develop more creative financing approaches for improvements, such as
horizontal and vertical infrastructure through the ability to pledge income to the repayment of
bonds
Potential Downsides of an Airport Authority Governance Structure
- Potential for reduced or eliminated direct funding resources from Cities
- Potential cost increase related to the separation of support from municipal departments, such
as legal, planning, finance, information technology, human resources, insurance coverages, and
economic development – higher direct cost to obtain these services separately through
contractual arrangements
- Airport Authorities cannot levy taxes for payment of bonds per Colorado statute
o C.R.S 41-3-106(1)(e): “Nothing in this article shall be construed as authorizing the
authority or any county to assess and levy taxes for the payment of said bonds, nor shall
said bonds be construed to be an indebtedness of the municipalities or counties
constituting members of the authority or of the county independently creating such
authority within the meaning of any constitutional, charter, or statutory limitation.”
- Efficiency advantages are largely unproven by research
- Uncertain advantages of a new leadership group – current leadership is stable and supportive
Neutral Considerations
- A community should critically examine its objectives for a change in airport governance to
ensure that such a change would substantially benefit the airport and its ability to provide
increased value to the region.
- Authority ownership / operation will not necessarily result in better management or less
political interference.
- The success of a given authority depends to a large extent on who the members are, what their
interests are, and the history / culture of the community with respect to the airport.6
- Airport authorities can be eliminated by the same entities that create them by statute.
- Relatively few airports change governance and typically only do so in extreme cases of
management or government distress.7
6 Reimer, Daniel S. and Putnam, John E. Airport Governance and Ownership. National Academies Press. 2009. (26) 7 Ibid (29)
014
Conclusion / Implications for FNL
Airport authorities can be an effective and advantageous approach to airport governance in certain
situations. A review of available literature on the subject does not provide conclusive evidence of one
form of governance being universally more appropriate than another.8 Therefore, any consideration of
a change in the form of governance should be considered in light of a number of factors including the
Airport’s Strategic Plan, Mission and Vision, the Airport’s current financial position, and the positive and
negative impacts of a change in governance on the community at-large.
A particularly relevant aspect of Colorado law relating to airport authorities resides in CRS 41-3-
106(1)(e), which prohibits the assessment and levy of taxes to repay bonds issued by the authority. This
significantly limits the ability of an airport authority to function as a sustainable public entity and its
ability to sufficiently serve the community in which it resides unless the airport is financially self-
sustaining. The current system of airport sponsorship and governance allows for limited, ongoing
funding from the two airport sponsors (the Cities of Fort Collins and Loveland) in recognition of the
airport’s function as a community economic asset. Without this funding under an authority model, the
Airport would need to independently pursue funding sources to make up for the resultant lack of
funding and departmental support from the two cities.
8 Ibid
015
Northern Colorado Regional Airport Commission
ITEM NUMBER: 5 MEETING DATE: April 20, 2017
PREPARED BY: Jason Licon, Airport Director
TITLE Airport Planning RECOMMENDED AIRPORT COMMISSION ACTION Provide direction to Staff on next steps BUDGET IMPACT Negative SUMMARY The Airport Commission directed Staff at the March 23 regularly scheduled meeting to research the funding methods the Cheyenne Regional Airport is using to build their new Airport Terminal. Staff was also directed to provide an analysis on what potential paths forward would exist to replace our current Airport Terminal. Staff created the attached presentation outlining the feasibility and possible timelines on when this goal could be achieved. The attached presentation is designed as a framework to initiate the discussion for prioritization and future planning purposes. ATTACHMENT Airport Terminal Presentation
016
4/14/2017
1
Airport Terminal Discussion
Cheyenne Airport Terminal Funding
• Funding Sources $19,150,000• FAA ‐ $6,000,000• WYDOT ‐ $2,800,000
• 6th Penny Tax ‐ $4,800,000• Airport Revenue/ Bonding ‐ $4,050,000• Previous Sales Tax Funding ‐ $1,500,000
017
4/14/2017
2
Cheyenne Airport Terminal Costs
• Anticipated Total Cost: $19,150,000• 35,000 sq. ft. Terminal ‐ $10,500,000 or $300 per sq. ft.
• Aircraft Parking Apron ‐ $3,200,000 for 4 mid sized aircraft
• Vehicle Parking Lot ‐ $3,800,000 for 400 vehicle spaces• Feasibility, Design, & Engineering ‐ $1,650,000
Cheyenne Airport Terminal Timeline• August 2007 ‐ $150,000 Feasibility study
• May 2008 ‐ voters approved $1.5 million for design
• February 2011 ‐ 20% design completed
• May 2014 ‐ environmental assessment completed
• April 2017 – construction start
018
4/14/2017
3
Cheyenne Airport Terminal Design
• Is to be used for airline support and airport administration• Airport administrative offices
• 3 airline ticket counters• TSA security screening checkpoint• Baggage claim• 4 rental car counters• Concession spaces including one restaurant area• 2,700 ft2 of post TSA screening gate area
Cheyenne Airport Terminal Layout
019
4/14/2017
4
Airline Service Benefits
• Community value increased through lowering the barrier to access & creating greater economic impacts
• Critical component for financial sustainability & FAA grants• Provides 25 times the revenue per square foot
• $0.20 sf annually for hangars vs $4.83 sf annually for airline space (275,000 sf @ $1.33 million in 2012)
• It can attract new enterprises that build upon Airport resources
• Market data shows that there is growing regional airline demand • 5.1 million in 2011 ‐ 5.9 million in 2015
Current Airport Terminal
• The main terminal building was constructed in 1992 – 3600 ft2
• Was designed for 19 passenger aircraft and pre TSA security
• Modular buildings added in 2003 & 2011• First 2400 ft2 & second 2700 ft2
• Aircraft parking apron for 2 mid‐sized jets• Awkward for accommodating more than one aircraft at a time• In good condition
• Auto parking for 375 cars • Overflow for up to 700• In poor condition
020
4/14/2017
5
Existing Terminal Area
What could a new terminal achieve?
• Creates a more attractive facility for all users and visitors
• Temporary facilities are at the end of their lifespan and have served the Airport well
• Remote tower has the potential of restarting regularly scheduled airline service and we need to be prepared
• Aligns with many aspects of the adopted Airport Strategic Plan and Vision Statement
021
4/14/2017
6
Proposed Airport Funded Terminal
• Design and build new 25,000 SF building in 2022• $6,250,000 Preliminary design & construction
• $3,585,000 FAA Entitlement Funds 2021 ‐ 2024
• $750,000 State
• $1,415,000 Local
• Will be more basic as compared to the CYS plan and is modeled at 50% scale of the Branson Missouri Airport terminal
• Will accommodate up to 250,000 people annually
• Would be designed with the future in mind• Convertible to general aviation use in future if economic trends change
Proposed Terminal Timeline
• Budget airport funds in FY 2018 to design
• Obtain funding from various sources
• Plan for construction in 2021 ‐ 2022
022
4/14/2017
7
Branson Airport Terminal Exterior
Branson Airport Interior
Gate Waiting Area
Airline Check In
023
4/14/2017
8
Additional Funding Options
• Could add additional space/ capacity through a variety of methods:• Private sector loans/ bonds• State Infrastructure Bank (SIB)
• 10 years @ 2.25%
• CDOT Aeronautics Grant Funding• Private donations• Airline partnership agreements
• Mesa Airport Terminal
024
Northern Colorado Regional Airport Commission
ITEM NUMBER: 6 MEETING DATE: April 20, 2017
PREPARED BY: Jason Licon, Airport Director
TITLE Airport Director Goals and Objectives RECOMMENDED AIRPORT COMMISSION ACTION Provide direction and feedback on the information presented BUDGET IMPACT Neutral or Not Applicable SUMMARY The intergovernmental agreement between the Cities for the joint operation of the Airport gives the Airport Commission the ability to provide goals and objectives for the Airport Director to be used as part of the Loveland City Manager’s annual evaluation process. A list of the goals and objectives will be provided to the Airport Commission via electronic mail on Tuesday April 18th. ATTACHMENTS None
025
