17
Wideband PowerLine Positioning for Indoor Localization Ubicomp 2008 Presenter: Vincent

Wideband PowerLine Positioning for Indoor Localization

  • Upload
    gigi

  • View
    43

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Wideband PowerLine Positioning for Indoor Localization. Ubicomp 2008 Presenter: Vincent. Outline. Overview PLP background Proposed Solution Test environment Wideband PLP Results Conclusion. Overview. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

Wideband PowerLine Positioning for Indoor Localization

Ubicomp 2008Presenter: Vincent

Page 2: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

Outline

• Overview• PLP background• Proposed Solution• Test environment• Wideband PLP Results• Conclusion

Page 3: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

Overview• Patel et al. (UbiComp 2006) introduced PowerLine

Positioning (PLP), a fingerprinting-based indoor localization system.

• PLP Limitations– Suboptimal frequency-pair selection.– Sensitivity to noise.– Temporal stability.

• Solution– replace the frequency-pair approach with a wideband signal.

Page 4: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

PLP Background

Page 5: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

PLP Background

• Amplitudes create a unique signature at every physical location.

• Initial site survey required.

• K-Nearest-Neighbors used for post-site-survey mapping.

Page 6: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

Classification Results• KNN classification of 66

grid-points using a K value of 1.

• Frequency pairs chosen independently for each of the three granularities for worst and best cases.

• Test and training data captured several hours apart.

8.5

MHz

, 9.0

M

Hz

8.5

MHz

, 11.

0 M

Hz

447

kHz,

11.

5 M

Hz

Page 7: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

Noise Sensitivity• How sensitive is

two-frequency amplitude data to noise?

• Added zero-mean Gaussian noise.

• Trained on the original uncorrupted data and tested on the corrupted data.

Page 8: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

How much noise exists?

Page 9: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

How much noise exists?

Page 10: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

Proposed Solution

• Frequency pair approach suffers from poor performance and noise sensitivity.

• Proposed solution: wideband signaling– Use all 44 tested frequency amplitudes for

classification - 44 dimensional classifier space. (447kHz, 448kHz, 600kHz, 601kHz, 500kHz ~ 20MHz in 500kHz steps)

Page 11: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

Test Environments• 66 surveyed grid-points

on a best-effort 0.9m x 0.9m grid.

• 3 Levels of classification– Room– Sub-room– Grid

Page 12: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

Measurement Apparatus• Software radio used to record raw over-the-air waveforms

with a 64 MHz ADC.• Broadband loop-antenna used for prototyping speed and

flexibility.• Necessary hardware has been reduced to portable size for

deployments in the future.

Locator “tag”

Page 13: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

Wideband Results

Page 14: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

Do you need 44 frequencies?

Page 15: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

Wideband Noise Resistance

Narrowband, 2 Frequency Wideband, 44 Frequency

Page 16: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

Wideband Temporal Stability

Page 17: Wideband  PowerLine  Positioning for Indoor Localization

Conclusion

• PLP Limitations– Suboptimal frequency-pair selection.– Sensitivity to noise.– Temporal stability.

• Solution– replace the frequency-pair approach with a

wideband signal.