Why Sears Holding Corp. Will Go Bankrupt · 2017-12-05 · Why Sears Holding Corp. Will Go Bankrupt 4 closed 300 stores as part of a larger strategic refurbishment in order to free

Why Sears Holding Corp. Will

Go Bankrupt

Wagner College

Bryan Maley

Edward Wolf

Frank Abt

Why Sears Holding Corp. Will Go Bankrupt

1 Why Sears Holding Corp. Will Go Bankrupt

Which company will file for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy by 2020? We feel that it will be

Sears Holding (Sears).

Sears is a company with an ever increasing amount of debt and an ever decreasing amount of

equity. Unfortunately Sears has an organizational structure that is not geared for the competitive

retail environment. Sears equity price reflects these problems. Edward Lampert the CEO of

Sears, a seasoned financier, will be looking towards an exit strategy in order to avoid the type of

litigation revolving around an inevitable bankruptcy. It is our opinion Sears will eventually

devolve into an equity “death spiral”. A visit to any of their stores confirms this, they have more

retail clerks than customers, and the aisles are depressingly empty. Sears’ fate seems unavoidable

and Lampert must strategize a plan to file for a Prepackaged Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in order to

escape even worse consequences.

The situation at Sears is clearly presented in their financial statements. Revenues have

fallen from $41.6 billion in 2012 to $39.8 billion in 2013, and now stand at $36.1 billion as of

year-end 20141. The sale of Lands’ End, a thriving brand, confirms to us that management is

jettisoning good cargo in order to save the sinking ship. The company’s balance sheet is a

complete disaster. Sear’s burned through $714 million dollars last year2. Sears' asset base has

declined by $1.27 billion dollars in Q4 of 20143. In November Sears raised $2.2 billion in part

from a loan from ESL Investments, and the partial sale of the company’s stake in Sears Canada.4

Sears Canada, like Lands End, represented robust assets. This partial liquidation is another

1 http://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/financials/financials.asp?ticker=SHLD

2 http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/shld/financials/balance-sheet/quarter

3 http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/shld/financials/balance-sheet/quarter

4 http://www.wsj.com/articles/sears-considering-forming-reit-to-boost-liquidity-1415362718


2 ominous sign. Additionally Sears’ debt is weighing heavily on management as they have $1.3

billion in due in 12 months as well as their increasing unfunded pension obligations to retired

workers.5 All told, Sears has $4.9 billion dollars in debt which leaves them with a debt to equity

ratio of approximately 40 to 1.6 We feel these figures confirm an inevitable insolvency. Sears

equity has been extremely volatile. At one point Sears looked like a solid revenue producing

company. Lampert, who was chairman of Kmart engineered the purchase of Sears in 2004.

Given the tailwinds prior to 2008, Lampert’s strategy of leveraging real estate assets proved

brilliant. However like many of the other failed financial firms during this period, over

leveraging proved fatal as the real estate market crashed.

Sears dismal performance is reflected in its share price which currently trades in the high

30’s. It once sported a price handle in the 170’s less than ten years ago when there was more

confidence in Lampert and his team7. Lampert was well known for squeezing money out of

poorly managed businesses. In the first year the combined company produced revenue in 2005 of

$48.9 billion. The balance sheet was strong with liabilities to equity ratio of 1.6 to 18. While

Kmart and Sears employees were productively operating the retail stores during a challenging

environment, top level management implemented a “hedge fund like strategy”. They, in effect,

strip mined its balance sheet. This approach proved ruinous and weakened the company.

Combined with equity buybacks its debt to equity ratio was severely diminished. As ugly 3Q

results were announced in December 2014 Lampert still spoke to the public in a positive tone. A

share buyback program which was supposed to enhance shareholder value has done the opposite.

5http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/shld/financials/balance-sheet

6 http://ycharts.com/companies/SHLD/debt_equity_ratio

7http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=SHLD+Interactive#%7B%22range%22%3A%22max%22%2C%22scale%22%3A

%22linear%22%7D 8 http://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/02/eric-englund/the-sears-death-spiral/


3 Management failed to foresee the economic decline of the traditional retail industry which is

constantly confronted by ever increasing online sales. Ironically it was Sears Roebuck’s use of

mail order catalogs that revolutionized the retail industry in the United States. Internet based

shopping which can be viewed as a progeny of that technique is fiercely working against Sears.

In many ways Sears Roebuck and Company was the grandfather to Amazon. Now it is being

undone by the same sales strategy it once championed.

The company has seen 4 different CEO’s since the merger, yet many have said that

Lampert has been running the show. Critics have commented for years that Lampert’s style of

operating a retail organization like a hedge fund portfolio is wrong headed. One cannot run a

company like Sears in the same manner one would run a hedge fund portfolio. With multiple

business segments competing with one another for Lamperts attention he now has an

organizational structure which is decentralized. Instead of cooperating with each other, which is

crucial in retail given inventory and sales complexities, they are competing with one another

over a scarce resource base. One particular detractor, Shaunak Dave, who left Sears in 2012, said

that Lampert created “warring tribes” and “cooperation and collaboration aren’t there”. Yet

Lampert still refutes this by stating that decentralized systems can appear messier than

centralized systems, but they still tend to work better and produce better information over time.

Lampert is no doubt a talented business person with a proven track record. However, as

many management experts will agree, the strengths of the entrepreneur do not easily translate to

the operational structure. One must ask, could anyone have saved Sears? Brick-and-mortar

retailers have been struggling from declining economic activity for years, while losing market

share from online retailers. These companies cannot afford the real estate overhead. The latest

proof of this is Radio Shack’s decision in 2014 to close more than 1000 stores. Sears Holding


4 closed 300 stores as part of a larger strategic refurbishment in order to free up more capital and

reduce risk9. As the equity value lurches its way to zero, we feel that a Prepackaged Bankruptcy

may be the best alternative. The challenges facing this company are too great. It is for this reason

that we are confident that Sears is the answer to your question.

Bankruptcy Prepackage; A Primer

Any conversation revolving around a Prepackaged Bankruptcy for Sears must include a

review of the prepackaged process. The following paragraphs explain the procedures used in a

“prepack”. As one reads through this progression it more clearly demonstrates that this is the best

course of action for Sears. As long as Lampert is willing to live with an inevitable diminished

equity value, he can help his lien and debt holders realize a partial return of their investment and

quite possibly emerge as a relevant retail presence once again. In many ways the restructuring of

General Motors, who embraced a similar strategy, serves as a template to companies like Sears.

Chapter 11 bankruptcy, also called reorganization or rehabilitation bankruptcy, allows a

firm the opportunity to reorganize its debt and to try to re-emerge as a healthy organization. It is

strategically, a company’s way of retaining control of their bankruptcy. A Chapter 11 case begins

with the filing of a petition with the bankruptcy court serving the area where the debtor has a

domicile or residence. A petition may be a voluntary petition, which is filed by the debtor, or it

may be an involuntary petition, which is filed by creditors that meet certain requirements. Unless

the court orders otherwise, the debtor also must file with the court: (1) schedules of assets and

9 http://www.dailyfinance.com/2014/04/14/sears-just-doesnt-look-like-it-wants-our-business-anymore/


5 liabilities; (2) a schedule of current income and expenditures; (3) a schedule of executory

contracts and unexpired leases; and (4) a statement of financial affairs.

Essentially, the main goal of the indebted firm by contacting its creditors is to attempt to

change the terms of its debt but must continue to pay it back through future earnings. Upon filing

a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11, or in an involuntary case, with the entry for an

order of relief, the debtor automatically assumes an additional identity as the “debtor in

possession”. The term means that the debtor keeps possession and control of its assets while

undergoing the reorganization strategies of Chapter 11, without the appointment of a case

trustee. A debtor will remain a debtor in possession until the debtor's plan of reorganization is

confirmed, dismissed, converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation bankruptcy, or a Chapter 11 trustee is

appointed.

Generally a written disclosure statement and a plan of reorganization must be filed with

the court. The disclosure statement is a document that must contain information concerning the

assets, liabilities, and business affairs of the debtor sufficient to enable a creditor to make an

informed judgment about the debtor's plan of reorganization. The information required is

governed by judicial discretion and the circumstances of the case. The contents of the plan must

include a classification of claims and must specify how each class of claims will be treated under

the plan. Creditors whose claims are "impaired," (i.e., those whose contractual rights are to be

modified or who will be paid less than the full value of their claims under the plan) vote on the

plan by ballot. After the court approves the disclosure statement and the ballots are collected and

tallied, the court will conduct a confirmation hearing to determine whether to confirm the plan.

In regards to the above aforementioned appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee, Section

1107 of the Bankruptcy Code places the debtor in possession in the position of a fiduciary, with


6 the rights and powers of a Chapter 11 trustee, and it requires the debtor to perform of all but the

investigative functions and duties of a trustee

To give the debtor some breathing room, the automatic stay provides a period of time in

which all judgments, collection activities, foreclosures, and repossessions of property are

suspended and may not be pursued by the creditors on any debt or claim that arose before the

filing of the bankruptcy petition. As with cases under other chapters of the Bankruptcy Code, a

stay of creditor actions against the Chapter 11 debtor automatically go into effect when the

bankruptcy petition is filed. The filing of a petition, however, does not operate as a stay for

certain types of actions listed under 11 U.S.C. § 362(b). The stay provides a breathing spell for

the debtor, during which negotiations can take place to try to resolve the difficulties in the

debtor's financial situation.

However, in a Chapter 11 case, a liquidating plan is also an option. Such a plan often

allows the debtor in possession to liquidate the business under more economically advantageous

circumstances than Chapter 7 liquidation. It also permits the creditors to take a more active role

in fashioning the liquidation of the assets and the distribution of the proceeds than in a Chapter 7

case. Moreover, in accordance with Chapter 11 Bankruptcy rules and regulations, once a plan is

confirmed, the debtor is required to make plan payments and is bound by the provisions of the

plan of reorganization. The confirmed plan creates new contractual rights, replacing or

superseding pre-bankruptcy contracts.

An outstanding question that many companies have before filing a Chapter 11 bankruptcy

is what will happen to their securities. According to the SEC, a company's securities may

continue to trade even after the company has filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. In most

instances, companies that file under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code are generally unable to


7 meet the listing standards to continue to trade on the NASDAQ or the NYSE. However, even

when a company is delisted from one of these major stock exchanges, their shares may continue

to trade on either the OTCBB or the Pink Sheets. There is no federal law that prohibits trading of

securities of companies in bankruptcy.

Finally, when trying to give a valuation of a company’s debt, there are many components

one must take into consideration. These components are ones such as but not limited to, Capital

Structure, Debt & Coverage Ratio’s and Outstanding Bonds. Provided below are charts, graphs

and tables of these different components.


8

BONDS OUTSTANDING

10

11

10

Bond Prices are not reflective of current prices (morningstar.com) 11

Bond Prices are not reflective of current prices (morningstar.com)


9

As a result, Sears Holding Corporation should file for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy based on a

general rule of thumb that they have much more debt than income. Typically, companies who are

overextended but have steady income streams are good candidates for Chapter 11. Employing

this strategy, given the precipitous drop in Sears’s equity value is clearly its best alternative. A

person with Lampert’s vast financial experience can undoubtedly see this.

Aftermath

We have no doubt that Sears will be filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the next few

years. We would be surprised if they survived through the 2020 deadline. With earnings

continuing to nosedive and the company selling off assets, as stated before, this will be

forthcoming. Even though Lampert continues to express optimism about the retail business, the

forecasts are leading to the gradual end of the longtime giant. However, Sears still owns

commercial property of considerable value. This property is arguably worth much more than

Sears’ market value today.


10 In an event of a Prepackages Bankruptcy, key investors like Bruce Berkowitz’s

Fairholme Capital and Horizon Kinetics should benefit. Lampert’s own hedge fund, ESL

Investments, can recoup a portion of its investment. While there is still the slight possibility that

Eddie Lampert will try to hold out on filing for bankruptcy, this will eventually lead to the

demise of Sears Holdings. There are very few people willing to buy Sears’ stock. In fact, the

stock has lost more than half its value in the past five years. Sears is still losing money, and its

response to aggressively sell stores has not worked. In 2013, Sears lost $1.4 billion, which was

worse than the $930 million loss the previous year. Going into 2014, management’s strategy was

to sell off the underperforming stores, in which they sold 235. Sears lost $548 million just last

quarter, proving that their strategy is a dead end.

If Lampert of course would like to avoid a Prepackaged Bankruptcy process there are

alternative courses of action. He already loaned Sears $400 million using stores as collateral.

Sears was so desperate for his money that they gave him a great deal. The loan is secured by

liens on 25 properties owned by Sears. This means that each of the 25 stores is valued at $16

million which is either a very good deal for Lampert or signals that the retailers remaining real

estate is not as valuable as they claim. Sears values its real estate at $5 billion and says its 400

most valuable stores are worth at least $18 million each.

Lampert’s next move may be to spin off the retailer’s best real estate into a separate trust.

In November 2014, Sears and its chief executive disclosed plans to form a real estate investment

trust (REIT) that would acquire as many as 300 Sears’ stores and lease them back to the retailer.

According to CreditSights, this was estimated to help Sears raise $2.6 billion. Based on Reuters

analysis of this proposed REIT and interviews with commercial real estate experts, there are

many conflicts with U.S. tax rules that will hold back this strategy. This includes the potentially


11 large ownership stakes held by Lampert. Sears has lost more than $6 billion over the past four

years. Considering this, Credit analysts have warned of the possibility of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy.

Fitch Ratings, who recently downgraded Sears’s credit rating to a CC, has warned the retailer

that they could run out of money by 2017. So, in order for the REIT to work, the spinoff must be

structured so it could stand up to scrutiny under federal provisions. Given all of these issues we

feel you can basically dismiss this alternative.

Finally Lampert will want to avoid the same consequences faced by another celebrated hedge

fund manager, Phil Falcone. Phil Falcone was a hedge fund manager of Harbinger Group who

has had a tumultuous career. As of December 1st, 2014, Falcone has reportedly stepped down

from his CEO position at Harbinger Group due to a financial debacle in large part to his

investment in the company Lightsquared. Falcone began his illustrious financial career by

gaining substantial wealth through his bet against sub-prime mortgages. However, with his most

recent gamble, his venture in Lightsquared, he came up with a losing hand. Falcone’s plan for

Lightsquared was to establish an untapped telecommunications resource that could compete with

the market leaders, AT&T and Verizon. The venture collapsed as the FCC ultimately rejected his

plan claiming it would interfere with navigational GPS systems. Subsequently Falcone has faced

investor recrimination, and severe regulatory problems.

Edward Lampert could be on the verge of following in the footsteps of Phil Falcone as

he has seemingly put himself in a similar predicament. Like Falcone, Lampert has extended his

hedge fund, ESL Investments, by loaning $400 million dollars to Sears. If the issues concerning

Sears continue to manifest themselves, Lampert could potentially face parallel consequences.


12 Conclusion

Edward Lampert has been an investor who has always kept his shareholders in mind

when considering his alternatives. If Lampert decides to go through with a Prepackaged

Bankruptcy, he could propose a deal to his equity and debtholders in which they would receive

some value for each dollar invested. On a positive note, Sears owns iconic name brands like

Craftsman, that resonate in the canon of American retail lore. Perhaps a deal struck with an e-

commerce power, such as Amazon, can help revitalize this struggling giant. Sears can then

maintain a significantly reduced commercial real estate presence. Smaller stores can serve as

showrooms, while the bulk of its transactions happen online. This would allow Lampert to

monetize his real estate holdings while keeping his brands alive. In many ways he would be

following the same strategy used by the auto dealers who have proven to remain relevant during

the same period. We feel that this is Sears’ next course of action and thus strongly confirms our

thesis.

Documents

Why Sears Holding Corp. Will Go Bankrupt · 2017-12-05 · Why Sears Holding Corp. Will Go Bankrupt 4 closed 300 stores as part of a larger strategic refurbishment in order to free