31
Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? • Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes • Describe change over time • Compare different landscapes

Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

Why Quantify Landscape Pattern?

• Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes

• Describe change over time

• Compare different landscapes

Page 2: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes
Page 3: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002

Changes in forest cover (shaded green) since the time of European settlement for Cadiz Township in southeastern Wisconsin. This pattern can be observed in many areas and illustrates both the changes in the abundance and spatial arrangement of forest in the landscape.

Page 4: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002

Changes in conifer (green) and other forest types for a private and public landscape (2,500 ha) with similar initial conditions and rates of change that are relatively high for the ownership types. Landscape metrics were used to quantify the differences in landscape pattern between ownerships.

Page 5: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

What is landscape pattern?

• Number of types

• Proportion of each type on the landscape

• Spatial arrangement of patches

• Patch shape

• Contrast between neighboring patches

Page 6: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002

Two principal methods for representing spatial data in a GIS: vector-based representation and raster, or cell-based, representation.

Page 7: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

Basic components of metrics

• Fraction or proportion (p) of landscape occupied

• Number of land cover classes present

• Probabilities of adjacency among classes

• Contagion or ‘clumpiness’ within a class

Page 8: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

Basic components of metrics—patch based

• Patch area or size

• Patch perimeter

• Connectivity/fragmentation within a cover type class (e.g., mean interpatch distance)

• Patch shape and edge characteristics

Page 9: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

Caveats for landscape pattern analysis

Page 10: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

Landscape classification scheme all-important

Page 11: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002

Examples of how the same landscape looks very different under different classification schemes. Both panels show how a 5- by 5-km section (100 grid cells) of southwestern Yellowstone National Park. (a) The landscape is classified based on forest community composition. (b) The landscape is classified based on successional stage of the forest stands.

Page 12: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002

Page 13: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

• Goals and objectives must precede calculations

Page 14: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

Scale must be defined- grain and extent

Page 15: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002

Effects of changing extent on a landscape of southwestern Yellowstone National Park. Note that the presence and relative proportions of the different land-cover types change as the extent of the map varies.

Page 16: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002

Page 17: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002

Identification of patches (shaded) on the same map using either (a) a four-neighbor rule, in which the horizontal and vertical neighbors are considered, but the diagonal neighbors are not, and (b) an eight-neighbor rule, in which the horizontal, vertical, and diagonal neighbors are all considered.

Definition of what constitutes a ‘patch’ matters

Page 18: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

Most metrics are correlated

Page 19: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

One index is not sufficient--but how many?

Three-dimensional pattern space in which three subregions of the southeastern United States are characterized by three landscape metrics.

From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002

Page 20: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

Major limitation of any indices—information lost

Page 21: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

A useful set of metrics--

• Are selected for a particular objective

• Measured values are well-distributed over range

• Metrics are relatively independent

Page 22: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

Research still needed—

• Relation of metrics/pattern to process

• Sensitivity of similar metrics for detecting change

• Statistical and sampling properties of metrics

Page 23: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Turner, Gardner, and O’Neill 2002

Page 24: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

US Geological Survey/NASA http://astroboy.gsfc.nasa.gov/earthasart/index.htmlUS Geological Survey/NASA http://astroboy.gsfc.nasa.gov/earthasart/index.html

Garden City, KansasImage taken 9/25/2000

Center pivot irrigation systems create red circles of healthy vegetation in this image of croplands near Garden City, Kansas.   Garden City can be found on Landsat 7 WRS Path 30 Row 34, center: 37.48, -100.51.

Page 25: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Mladenoff et al. 1993

Page 26: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Mladenoff et al. 1993

Page 27: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Mladenoff et al. 1993

Page 28: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Mladenoff et al. 1993

Page 29: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Mladenoff et al. 1993

Page 30: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

From Mladenoff et al. 1993

Page 31: Why Quantify Landscape Pattern? Often have hypotheses relating pattern to ecological processes Describe change over time Compare different landscapes

US Geological Survey/NASA http://astroboy.gsfc.nasa.gov/earthasart/index.html

Florida EvergladesImage taken 2/5/2000

Spanning the southern tip of the Florida Peninsula and most of Florida Bay, Everglades National Park is the only subtropical preserve in North America. It contains both temperate and tropical plant communities, including sawgrass prairie, mangrove and cypress swamps, pinelands, and hardwood hammocks, as well as marine and estuarine environments. The park is known for its rich bird life, particularly large wading birds, such as the roseate spoonbill, wood stork, great blue heron, and a variety of egrets. It is also the only place in the world where alligators and crocodiles exist side by side.   The Everglades can be found on Landsat 7 WRS Path 15 Row 42, center: 26.00, -80.43.