Why Men Still Get More Promotions Than Women 2007

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Why Men Still Get More Promotions Than Women 2007

    1/6

    why men still get more promotions than

    women

    HBR ARTICLE SEP 2010 ISSUE

    REVIEW

    BY

    Abhishek Jha

  • 8/2/2019 Why Men Still Get More Promotions Than Women 2007

    2/6

    IMPORTANT ISSUE DERIVED IN ARTICLE..

    Are women as likely as men to get mentoring?

    Does mentoring provide the same career benefits to men and women?

    Women in Management: Delusions of Progress?

    Do men and women have the same kinds of mentors

    Aren't much of these mentoring programmes more like indocrinationprojects to shift female consciousness?

  • 8/2/2019 Why Men Still Get More Promotions Than Women 2007

    3/6

    ARTICLE SUMMARY

    The article in the September 2010 issue on "Why Men Still Get More Promotions than

    Women" argues that those women seeking top positions on the organizational hierarchy

    need more than well meaning mentors to succeed, they need advocates. While this

    finding offers an important insight about how to "help" women succeed, it downplays the

    underlying drivers that create and perpetuate promotion bias for marginalized groups.

    Fair assessment and open access to the top for all will only emerge when we

    acknowledge how those in power mold decision-making dynamics especially for

    pinnacle positions which involve stakes and rewards at the highest level. This power

    emerges in both formal and informal committee dynamics and in perceptions of the

    candidate as they are evaluated for suitability for the position.

  • 8/2/2019 Why Men Still Get More Promotions Than Women 2007

    4/6

    ARTICLE SUMMARY

    Committee dynamics including factors such as the selection of committee members that

    may favor some candidates over others, the adjusting of "criteria" to bolster certain

    candidates, the casting ofperformanceevidence as negative for some candidates and the

    showcasing of the indispensability of other candidates, the suppression of support for

    marginalized candidates during decision-making, behind the scenes bargaining for the

    success of different candidates and a range of other political dynamics all can sway

    decisions and outcomes significantly.

    In addition to committee dynamics, perceptions of

    the candidate are crucial. Indeed, we would suggest that visible attributes such as

    demographics and invisible attributes (religion, sexual orientation etc.) as well as the

    perceived degree of behavioral congruence or incongruence with the dominant

    organizational ideology act as "lenses" through which performance is viewed.

  • 8/2/2019 Why Men Still Get More Promotions Than Women 2007

    5/6

    ARTICLE SUMMARY

    Holding performance constant, the more counter-cultural the candidate is perceived

    to be (and note demographics and other factors may distort these perceptions) the less

    likely the candidate is to be promoted.

    Thus, while this article is on the right track because it alludes to the role of politics

    when it suggests that women need advocates to overcome being seen as "risky"

    appointments, tackling these institutionalized and embedded forces is what is further

    needed if historically disenfranchised groups such as women are ever going to be judged on their merit and accomplishments when striving for pinnacle positions

    within their organizations.

  • 8/2/2019 Why Men Still Get More Promotions Than Women 2007

    6/6

    ANY QUERIES