1
Join Our Mailing List Why Have We Gone to StrengthLevel Wind Loads? Posted on 20140423 Topics: 2012 IBC, ASCE 710, Wind Provisions, Seismic Provisions, Load Combinations Return to Blog Index Question: Codes and standards are continually changing, and it makes things difficult for us designers. Back in the 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC), the switch from service level earthquake loads to strength level earthquake loads was first made. Now, in ASCE 710, the same switch is being made for wind loads. Why? Answer: ASCE 7 leadership believes that all environmental loads should be specified at strength level. Specifying userimposed loads such as live loads at service level makes sense. Those are the loads expected to be imposed on the structure during its service life. We are concerned about "serviceability" (no excessive cracking, no excessive deflections) under those loads. When it comes to wind or earthquake loads, our main concern is providing strength to withstand designlevel loads, not serviceability. As you point out, the switch to strengthlevel earthquake loads was made in the 1997 UBC. ASCE 710 has gone to strength level wind. If things go according to plans, snow should be at strength level in ASCE 716.

Why Have We Gone to Strength-Level Wind Loads

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Why Have We Gone to Strength-Level Wind Loads

Citation preview

Page 1: Why Have We Gone to Strength-Level Wind Loads

Join Our Mailing List          

Why Have We Gone to Strength­Level Wind Loads?

Posted on 2014­04­23Topics: 2012 IBC, ASCE 7­10, Wind Provisions, Seismic Provisions, Load CombinationsReturn to Blog Index

Question: Codes and standardsare continually changing, and it makesthings difficult for us designers. Backin the 1997 Uniform BuildingCode (UBC), the switch from service­level earthquake loads to strength­level earthquake loads was first made.Now, in ASCE 7­10, the same switchis being made for wind loads. Why?

Answer: ASCE 7 leadershipbelieves that all environmental loadsshould be specified at strength level.Specifying user­imposed loads suchas live loads at service level makessense. Those are the loads expectedto be imposed on the structure duringits service life. We are concernedabout "serviceability" (no excessivecracking, no excessive deflections)under those loads. When it comes towind or earthquake loads, our main

concern is providing strength to withstand design­level loads, not serviceability. As you point out, theswitch to strength­level earthquake loads was made in the 1997 UBC. ASCE 7­10 has gone to strength­level wind. If things go according to plans, snow should be at strength level in ASCE 7­16.