19

Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List
Page 2: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

Why are we here?

Page 3: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

Evaluating Alternatives

1) No List 2) Comprehensive/Historical List3) 3rd Party List4) Preferred Lender List

Page 4: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

No List

• No information provided on private loans• NO ONE at your institution provides any guidance• Residence hall, Bursar, President

• No detail on types of loans • International • Past Due Balance • Certification programs through Continuing Education

Page 5: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

Google “Private Student Loan”

Page 6: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

Google Your College’s name & “Private student loan”

Page 7: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

Comprehensive or Historical Comprehensive Lender ListList of all private education lenders that provide private student loans (thatare currently providing private loans) and cannot exclude any lender

Historical Lender ListList of all private education lenders that were used by students attending the institution within a defined time frame (last academic year, or last three to five years, etc.) and cannot exclude any lender

-The DOE recommended that the school must have a process defined for when they review the lender list (i.e. annually, semi-annually or evenmonthly)

Note: It is required for both comprehensive and historical lists, that youprovide the Application Solicitation Disclosure (ASD) link for each lender and it is“recommended” that if you have an electronic lender list, that the ASD is provided electronically (i.e. on the list) as well.

Page 8: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

True Historical List

Page 9: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

3rd Party list

3rd Party Lender List Entity that maintains neutral, comprehensive list and institution ensuresthat the list is broad in scope, does not endorse any lender and lenderdoes not pay to be placed on the list or pay the 3rd party entity a fee basedOn loan volume generated

Please note: The DOE recently shared that 3rd Party Lender lists that rank the lenders compromises the neutrality of the list

Also note – your institution is 100% liable for information linking from your website.

Page 10: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

Private Lender Arrangement (PLA)

As defined by HEA, a PLA exists when both of the following conditionsoccur:- A lender provides or issues education loans to students, or the families of the

students, attending a covered institution; and- The covered institution or an institution-affiliated organization recommends,

promotes, or endorses the education loan products of the lender

You do not have to have a formal agreement with a lender to have aPLA. A PLA can include providing brochures in your lobby, listing

some of the lenders who have lent to students at your institution ona website, verbally providing information on lenders, etc.

[HEA §151(8); §601.2(b)]

Page 11: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

Preferred Lender List

Page 12: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

The Value Of A Preferred ListStudents and Families :

• Provides a starting point for families to begin researching private loans

• Makes it easier for families to make private loan decisions by having reliable information in one place

Schools :

• Helping to Educate the uneducated • This is a completely different process than anything other loan

• Allows faster, easier private loan processing• Lender representative that will keep you updated and informed on

product changes

Page 13: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

Regulation Intention • When we published the final regulations, we expressed our view that a preferred lender

list can be an effective tool to help families looking for federal student loans to finance the costs of postsecondary education, when the list reflects the school’s unbiased research to identify lenders providing the best combination of services and benefits to borrowers at that school.

• Additionally, by providing this information, schools may help students and their parents navigate the increasingly complex student loan landscape.

• Further, we believe that a borrower’s choice of lender may be better informed by preferred lender lists and other consumer information on the federal student loan process, which play a useful role in assisting financial aid administrators in dealing with the large volume of requests for information and assistance, and in informing borrower choice.

Dear Colleague Letter GEN-08-06 posted May 8, 2008Subject: School Use of a Preferred Lender List in the FFEL Program

Page 14: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

Eight Step process to PLA

What you are already doing……

1. Publish your schools code of conductPart of Program Participation Agreement

2. Publish a statement that students should exhaust all Federal aid(grants and loans) before borrowing from a private loan

Of course!

Page 15: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

Selection Requirements

3-6. Evaluate and choosing – Quantitative or Qualitative process• List at least 2 unaffiliated lenders • Publish your schools method of choosing lenders• Publish the reasons why the lenders were selected• Publish that your students have the right to choose any lender not

just ones on your lender

7. Disclose rates, fees, loan cost, repayment terms, and eligibility criteria used by lenders by placing pdf’s or linking to lenders ASD

Page 16: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

Reporting Department of Education has yet to announce what this will look like

– It could be ASD’s from each lender you’ve selected– It could be a couple of statements as to why you’ve chosen a

particular lender

• At the FSA Conference in December 2010, DOE stated that there is a good chance the Department of Education will not regulate this and schools may not ever have to report

• In a June 2011 email Gail McLarnon indicated that they have not implemented the annual reporting requirement and it is uncertain when they will

Page 17: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

Summary • A lender list can be an effective tool for guiding students

and their families• Reporting on PLA criteria does not appear as though it will

be burdensome• Any verbal or physical distribution of lender information

creates a PLL (even if this information is shared by another office)

• Students and their families rely on you for guidance

Page 18: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

Sources

• Federal Register, October 28,2009, 34 CFR 601– http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-25073.pdf

• Dear Colleague Letter 08-06, May 9 2008– http://www.ifap.ed.gov/dpcletters/GEN0806.html

• Gail McLarnon, Department of Education Email & Supporting Documentation received on June 09-2011

Page 19: Why are we here? Evaluating Alternatives 1)No List 2)Comprehensive/Historical List 3)3 rd Party List 4)Preferred Lender List

Legal Disclaimer

This information is not comprehensive and is based onreview and interpretation of regulations. This document

should not be construed to be legal advice.