9
Who is Stomping on Whom? Catherine Wishart Adjunct Instructor Historical Perspective to Literary Analysis

Who is Stomping on Whom? Catherine Wishart Adjunct Instructor Historical Perspective to Literary Analysis

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Who is Stomping on Whom? Catherine Wishart Adjunct Instructor Historical Perspective to Literary Analysis

Who is Stomping on Whom?

Catherine Wishart

Adjunct Instructor

Historical Perspective to Literary Analysis

Page 2: Who is Stomping on Whom? Catherine Wishart Adjunct Instructor Historical Perspective to Literary Analysis

The Importance of the Historical PerspectiveHistorical novels often make important comments

on the human condition in a particular era.Understanding the human condition and social

pressures helps understand the workHow can we understand Uncle Tom’s Cabin by

Harriet Beecher Stowe without background knowledge about slavery?

How can we understand The Jungle by Upton Sinclair without understanding the treatment of immigrants in the early 20th century? The conditions in meat packing plants then?

(Guerin et al 52).

Page 3: Who is Stomping on Whom? Catherine Wishart Adjunct Instructor Historical Perspective to Literary Analysis

The Concept of Historical PerspectiveTraditional historical perspective asserts

that there “are ‘facts’ that we can know, with some degree of certainty, and as readers we… need to gather them…, and fit them together…, and cautiously relate them to literary works” (Lynn 145).

“A historical reading of a literary work begins by exploring the possible ways in which the meaning of the text has changed over time” (Kennedy 1474).

Page 4: Who is Stomping on Whom? Catherine Wishart Adjunct Instructor Historical Perspective to Literary Analysis

Historical CriticismGoals

• To strive to understand a literary text as a product of the social, cultural, and intellectual context in which it was created.

• To examine how the text was initially received by readers as well as how its reception has changed over time.

• To examine how the author’s own experiences may be reflected in the text.

Page 5: Who is Stomping on Whom? Catherine Wishart Adjunct Instructor Historical Perspective to Literary Analysis

Two Ways to Approach Literature from a Historical Perspective – Divergence of Thought

Old Historicism looks at the time in which a piece was written to determine how it was interpreted by its contemporaries.

New Historicism demonstrates how a literary work reflects ideas and attitudes of the time in which it was written.

(DiYanni 1565).

Page 6: Who is Stomping on Whom? Catherine Wishart Adjunct Instructor Historical Perspective to Literary Analysis

Why Examine the Time Period in Which a Piece Was Written?

Every literary work is written in a specific timeTime periods change how people thinkTime periods change views of the world

Every time period has specific social valuesSocial values influence how a piece is writtenSocial values influence intellectual beliefs

Example: ShakespeareShakespeare wrote in a tumultuous time when some in power

believed the theater to be an evil influenceDid he write “all the world’s a stage” to comment on these attacks?

Kurt Vonnegut wrote Slauterhouse Five during the Viet Nam War EraWhile the book is about World War II, how much of it is a commentary

on the Viet Nam War?

Page 7: Who is Stomping on Whom? Catherine Wishart Adjunct Instructor Historical Perspective to Literary Analysis

Why Demonstrate How a Work Reflects its Time?

Many literary works comment on power struggles that are occurring during the time in which they were writtenExamining other texts of the same time period, such as

diaries, records, and institutions helps understand the literary work better

Language influences how we interpret text (the diction of a piece)Comparing and contrasting “the language of

contemporaneous documents and literary works” reveals “hidden assumptions, biases, and cultural attitudes that relate to the two kinds of texts… demonstrating how the literary work shares the cultural assumptions” of the time (DiYanni 1566). Example: “A Rose for Emily” uses language that is taboo today.

Page 8: Who is Stomping on Whom? Catherine Wishart Adjunct Instructor Historical Perspective to Literary Analysis

A Checklist of Historical and New Historicist Critical Questions

1. When was the work written? When was it published? How was it received by the critics and public? Why?

2. What does the work’s reception reveal about the standards of taste and value during the time period it was published and reviewed?

3. What social attitudes and cultural practices related to the action of the work were prevalent during the time the work was written and published?

4. What kinds of power relations does the work describe, reflect, embody?

5. How do the power relations reflected in the literary work manifest themselves in the cultural practices and social institutions prevalent during the timer the work was written and published?

6. What other types of historical documents, cultural artifacts, or social institutions might be analyzed in conjunction with particular literary works? How might close reading of such nonliterary “text” illuminate those literary works?

7. To what extent can we understand the past as it is reflected in the literary work? To what extent does the work reflect differences from the ideas and values of its time? (Di Yanni 1567).

Page 9: Who is Stomping on Whom? Catherine Wishart Adjunct Instructor Historical Perspective to Literary Analysis

Works CitedDiYanni, Robert. Literature Approaches to

Fiction, Poetry, and Drama. Boston: McGraw Hill, 2008.

Guerin, Wilfred L., Labor, Earle, Morgan, Lee, Reesman, Jeanne C., Willingham, John R. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. 5th ed. NY: Oxford U P, 2005. Print.