Upload
timothy-lam
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Who is Jesus? (Mark 15:6-7,27; Luke 23:33-43; John 18:40)
1/9
Hermeneutical Assignment on:
Who is Jesus?
(Mark 15:6-7,27; Luke 23:33-43; John 18:40)
By
Timothy Ching Lung LAM
The Second Assignment Submitted to Dr. Yiu Wing FUNG of
Alliance Bible Seminary
in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Course of
BS515-E: Hermeneutics
Summer 2003
Timothy Ching Lung LAM
Student ID Number: D023111
August 16, 2003
7/31/2019 Who is Jesus? (Mark 15:6-7,27; Luke 23:33-43; John 18:40)
2/9
Hermeneutical Assignment II on: Who is Jesus?
Hermeneutics Page 1 By Timothy Ching Lung LAM
I. Introduction
Throughout the following three sets of passages, the identity of Jesus is revealed in the
course of determining the charges against Barabbas, the two criminals and Jesus.
II. What Were the Charges Against Them?
1. Contents of the Passages
(1) Mark 15:6-7; John 18:40
In these passages, Barabbas was charged as insurrectionist and murderer, who
was then seemingly sentenced to be crucified. First of all, Mark 15:7 stated
that Barabbas had committed a murder in the uprising and was thrown into
prison with the insurrectionists. Secondly, John 18:40 confirmed the fact that
Barabbas had taken part in a rebellion. However, the term, rebellion, in
Greek is lestes, which means a robber, plunderer, freebooter or brigand.1
In this regard, Barabbas was considered as a thief, a revolutionary, and a violent
murderer, who might have a mixed motive of radical patriotism and greed.
Despite the fact that the guilty verdict of Barabbas was not mentioned in these
passages, it would probably be the same as Jesus for they were weighed the
same for the Jews to choose for release at the Feast. Therefore, Barabbas was
likely sentenced to death in the same way as Jesus, i.e. crucifixion.
(2) Luke 23:32-43; Mark 15:27
These two passages pointed out that two criminals (Luke 23:32) or robbers
(Mark 15:27) were crucified with Jesus, one on His right and one on His left.
In fact, what crime these two men had committed was not mentioned in these
passages except that their crimes deserved a death sentence as confessed by one
of the criminals (Luke 23:41). Luke described these two men as kakourgos,
1Crosswalk.com, The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon, s.v. lestes; available from
7/31/2019 Who is Jesus? (Mark 15:6-7,27; Luke 23:33-43; John 18:40)
3/9
Hermeneutical Assignment II on: Who is Jesus?
Hermeneutics Page 2 By Timothy Ching Lung LAM
a Greek term which simply meant malefactor.2 However, such description
did not give readers a clue on what they actually did. In Matthew 15:27 and
Mark 27:38, these two men were described as lestes, which was exactly the
same term used to describe Barabbas in John 18:40. Accordingly, not only
these two men had committed the robbery, but also they might commit the same
crime as Barabbas, i.e. treason. As mentioned before, Barabbas was possibly
sentenced to be crucified and that the execution date might be scheduled on the
same day as Jesus (as Jesus was a substitute for Barabbas). Since Mark
mentioned that Barabbas was in prison with the insurrectionists and these two
men were crucified on the very day as Jesus, the two might be the other
insurrectionists. Nevertheless, these two men were either robbers or criminals
of combination of these crimes as committing any of these would be sentenced
to crucifixion.3
(3) Luke 23:38
The charge against Jesus was shown by the placard on the cross saying, THIS
IS THE KING OF THE JEWS. When Jesus was taken to Pilate for a trial, the
Jewish leaders basically made up three charges against him, namely, (1)
subverting their nation, (2) opposing payment of taxes to Caesar, and (3)
claiming to be Christ, a king. (Luke 23:2). However, Pilate reiterated four
times that Jesus was not guilty of any crime deserving a death sentence (Luke
23:4, 14, 15, 22). Nonetheless, the Jews insistently demanded Pilate and cried
out saying, If you let this man go, you are no friend of Caesar. Anyone who
claims to be a king opposes Caesar. (John 19:12) Accordingly, Pilate appears
to have no alternative, but to grant their demand. Notwithstanding Pilate
regarded Jesus kingship posing no threat to Rome, he was apparently forced
to consider it as a crime of treason so as to sentence him to crucifixion (as
reflected in the inscription on the cross). Ironically, Jesus was truly the King of
http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicon/Greek/grk.cgi?number=3027&version=kjv; accessed August 10, 2003.2 Crosswalk.com, The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon, s.v. kakourgos; available from
http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=2557&version=kjv; accessed August 10, 2003.3
Crucifixion was a punishment commonly found in the Greeks, the Romans, the Egyptians, Persians and
Babylonians communities for crimes such as treason, desertion in the face of the enemy, robbery, piracy,assassination, sedition, etc. See StudyLight.org, The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, s.v. Cross;
available from http://www.studylight.org/enc/isb/view.cgi?number=T2426; accessed August 13, 2003.
7/31/2019 Who is Jesus? (Mark 15:6-7,27; Luke 23:33-43; John 18:40)
4/9
Hermeneutical Assignment II on: Who is Jesus?
Hermeneutics Page 3 By Timothy Ching Lung LAM
the Jews, but was rejected by the Jewish leaders as they asked Pilate to change
this placard as that this man claimed to be king of the Jews.(John 19:21)
2. Similarities
(1) Citizenship and Jurisdiction
According to the above passages, Barabbas, the two criminals and Jesus were
probably the Jews under the jurisdiction of Pilate. Actually, Roman citizen
was exempt from this form of punishment as it was regarded as the penalty of a
slave.4
Accordingly, they were not the Roman citizens but the Jews as they
were all examined by Pilate, the Roman governor for Judea who was the onlyperson having the authority to issue death sentence to people under his
jurisdiction (John 18:31). Although Jesus was once sent to Herod for
examination due to His nativity of Galilee, He was finally sent back to Pilate for
a verdict. (Luke 23:6-11)
(2) Prisoner of Conscience
As mentioned before, Barabbas and the two criminals were considered as
insurrectionists and Jesus was also deemed as a prisoner of conscience as
reflected in the placard. In addition, when Jesus was arrested, He questioned
the chief priest, Am I leading a rebellion that you have come with swords and
clubs? (Luke 22.52) The term, rebellion was indeed the same word used to
describe Barabbas and the two criminals, i.e. lestes, which further confirmed
that the charges against them were the same.
(3) Verdict and the Form of Execution
Possibly all of them were under the same sentence of death to be executed by
way of crucifixion on the same day at the same time in the same place of
Golgotha (if Barabbas was not released).
4Ibid.
7/31/2019 Who is Jesus? (Mark 15:6-7,27; Luke 23:33-43; John 18:40)
5/9
Hermeneutical Assignment II on: Who is Jesus?
Hermeneutics Page 4 By Timothy Ching Lung LAM
3. Differences
(1) Criminals vs. Innocent Redeemer
Obviously, Barabbas and the two criminals had committed crimes for their
deeds deserving death while Jesus was indeed innocent suffering for sinners as
the Redeemer.
(2) The Wills of Pilate and the Jewish Leaders towards Jesus
Pilate found no basis of charge against Jesus and thus would like to release Him
whereas the Jewish leaders, out of their envy, wanted to crucify Him as they
found Him threatening their leadership. As a result, both parties had taken
Barabbas as a political tool to fulfill their respective wills (i.e. Jewish leaders
wanted to release him while Pilate did not).
(3) Outcomes
Notwithstanding the above people concerned were sentenced to death, only
Barabbas was set free while the others were crucified. Nonetheless, one of the
two criminals who believed in Jesus was assured to be in paradise with Him
while the others were not (Luke 23:43).
(4) Injustice vs. Justice
In view of these passages, the only verdict that was considered justice was the
execution of the two criminals while it was unjustly for the just One (Jesus)
sacrificing for the unjust (Barabbas).
(5) Son of Abba
There was indeed an irony between Barabbas and Jesus in terms of their names
where Barabbas means son of Abba or of a father, and Jesus was often
7/31/2019 Who is Jesus? (Mark 15:6-7,27; Luke 23:33-43; John 18:40)
6/9
Hermeneutical Assignment II on: Who is Jesus?
Hermeneutics Page 5 By Timothy Ching Lung LAM
referred to as the Son of God (i.e. of the Father) in the Four Gospels (Matthew
14: 33; Mark 1:1; Luke 1:35; John 1:34, etc.).5
Actually, Jesus was surely the
Son of the Father, who, however, was rejected by His people of Israel.
Ironically, this son of Abba, Barabbas, who was only a notorious prisoner, was
chosen by the Jews to be released from the prison.
(6) Kingship
Should Barabbas and the two criminals be the revolutionaries, they were
supposedly to restore the kingdom of Israel and liberate their people from Rome.
However, they failed. On the other hand, Jesus, who claimed His kingdom
not of this world, actualized the Kingdom of God by accomplishing Gods
salvation of humanity (John 18:36).
(7) The Act of Deliverance
As the insurrectionists, Barabbas and the converted criminal were supposed to
deliver their people, but were actually delivered by Jesus the Deliverer.
Barabbas, being silent throughout the above passages, was passively saved by
Jesus symbolizing the redemption of the innocence for sinners although such
deliverance was only physical. On the other hand, the converted criminal was
delivered by Jesus who received the eternal life. Unlike Barabbas, he was not
silent but rather confessed his own sin in front of Jesus (Luke 23:40-42).
Moreover, he appeared to recognize Jesus sinless divine nature and thus asked
to be included in Jesus not-of-this-world kingdom, which demonstrated his faith
and hence genuine conversion.
It is interesting to note Lukes account of the criminals conversion, which
serves as a turning point in Jesus crucifixion that relates His identity to His
saving act. Before the conversion, Jesus was called the Christ of God, the
Chosen One, the king of the Jews, and the Christ derisively by the rulers,
solders, and one of the criminals on the cross respectively. (Luke 23:35-39) It
5M.G. Easton,Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary World Wide Web Version, available from
7/31/2019 Who is Jesus? (Mark 15:6-7,27; Luke 23:33-43; John 18:40)
7/9
Hermeneutical Assignment II on: Who is Jesus?
Hermeneutics Page 6 By Timothy Ching Lung LAM
appears that all these appellations were conditional depending on whether or not
He could save Himself. In the midst of these mocking, the criminal rejected
the taunts, confessed his guilt, and asked to be included in Jesus Kingdom.
From this point onward, no more railing and mocking was seen, but rather a
heartfelt confession was witnessed after the centurion had seen how Jesus died,
saying, Surely this was a righteous man (Luke 23:47; or the Son of God as
in Mark 15:39). Jesus was truly the King of the Jews and the Christ/Son of
God who saved others lives; however in a way not expected and accepted by
His people.
III.Conclusion
When juxtaposing with Barabbas and the two criminals in terms of the charges against
them, Jesus was indeed not an insurrectionist, a criminal, a robber, nor a murderer, but
rather the innocent redeemer who, as the Son of the Father, had succeeded Gods
salvation that He died unjustly on the cross for the unjust ones so as to deliver them to the
Kingdom of God. In short, Jesus, counted as the lawless one, was ironically THE KING
OF THE JEWS.
http://www.ccel.org/e/easton/ebd/ebd/T0000400.html; accessed August 10, 2003.
7/31/2019 Who is Jesus? (Mark 15:6-7,27; Luke 23:33-43; John 18:40)
8/9
Appendix
Who is Jesus?Similarities/Differences
Barabbas(Mark 15:6-7; John 18:40)
Two Criminals(Luke 23:32-43; Mark
15:27)
Jesus(Luke 23:38)
What were thecharges againstthem?
1. Insurrectionist andmurderer in the uprising(Mark 15:7).
2. Rebellion (John 18:40)
1. Criminals (Luke23:32)
2. Robbers (Mark15:27)
THE KING OF THEJEWS
SimilaritiesCitizenship Jew
(Not Roman citizen)Same Same
Jurisdiction They were under thejurisdiction of Pilate, the
Roman governor of Judea.
Same Same
Prisoner ofConscience
Robber and insurrectionist Robbers and probablyinsurrectionists
The King of the Jewsconsidered as the
prisoner of conscienceVerdict Probably sentenced to death
but finally releasedSentenced to death Sentenced to death
Form ofExecution
Probably crucifixion on thesame day at the same time inthe same place of Golgotha if
not released
Same Same
DifferencesCriminals vs.InnocentRedeemer
Criminal Criminals Innocent
The Wills of
Pilate and theJewish leaderstowards Jesus
1. Pilate: wanted to crucifyhim
2. Jewish leaders: wantedto release him
- - 1. Pilate: wanted torelease Him
2. Jewish leaders:wanted to crucifyHim
Outcomes 1. Requested by theJewish leaders and thecrowds to be released(Mark 15:11).
2. Such request wasunwillingly accepted byPilate (Mark 15:15).
Led out with Jesus to beexecuted on the cross inthe place called the Skull(Luke 23:32-33). But oneof them was assured by
Jesus to be in theparadise.
Sentenced to becrucified
Injustice vs.Justice
Unjust one was judgedunjustly.
Unjust ones were judgedjustly
The Just One wasjudged unjustly
Son of Abba Though the name meansson of Abba or of a father,he is indeed a notorious
prisoner.
- - Though He wasrejected by the Jews,
He was actually the Sonof the Father.
Kingship Fight for the Kingdom ofIsrael on earth
Fight for the Kingdom ofIsrael on earth (if they
were the insurrectionists)
Kingdom not of thisworld
The Act ofDeliverance
Suppose to deliver his peoplebut was saved by Jesus
physically
One of the criminals wassaved and granted an
eternal life in theparadise.
Surely the deliverer whosaved the humanity
(although not in the wayexpected by the Jews)
7/31/2019 Who is Jesus? (Mark 15:6-7,27; Luke 23:33-43; John 18:40)
9/9
Bibliography
Websites:
Crosswalk.com. The KJV New Testament Greek Lexicon. Available from
http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicon/Greek/grk.cgi?number=3027&version=kjv;
accessed August 10, 2003.
StudyLight.org. The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia. Available from
http://www.studylight.org/enc/isb/; accessed August 13, 2003.
Easton, M.G.Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary World Wide Web Version. Available from
http://www.ccel.org/e/easton/ebd/ebd/T0000400.html; accessed August 10, 2003.