WHO- International Corporate Project Management

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 WHO- International Corporate Project Management

    1/13

    1

    Table of Contents

    ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS USED ............................................................................ 2SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 3INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 41.0 FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................... 4

    1.1 PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING .................................................................... 41.2 EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT (EVM) AND PERFORMANCE

    MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................... 61.3 STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ................................................ 7

    2.0 REFLECTIVE STATEMENT ........................................................................................... 11BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................... 12APPENDIX 1WHO- STOP TB PARTNERSHIP INITIAL REPORT .... Error! Bookmark

    not defined.APPENDIX 2PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ......... Error! Bookmark not defined.

  • 7/31/2019 WHO- International Corporate Project Management

    2/13

    2

    ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS USED

    CSF Critical Success FactorsCPS Contracting and Procurement ServiceEVM Earned Value ManagementFLD First-Line DrugsGDF Global Drugs FacilityHRD Human Resource DevelopmentHRM Human Resource ManagementKPI Key Performance IndicatorPDP Personal Development PlanSHRM Strategic Human Resource ManagementSTBP Stop Tuberculosis Partnership

    TB TuberculosisTRC Technical Review CommitteeWHO World Health Organisation

  • 7/31/2019 WHO- International Corporate Project Management

    3/13

    3

    SUMMARY

    This report is constructed by evaluation of three themes of Project Management practice i.e.

    Procurement and contracting process, Earned Value Management (EVM) and Performance

    Management and Strategic Human Resource Management in light of STBP governance

    framework. Procurement and contracting process based on four levels: Planning, conducting

    the procurement and contracts, administer or monitoring the procurement process but finally

    level procurement closure is termed as on-going cycles of procurement stages. As this

    programme is based on eradication of TB disease form world procurement and contracting is

    also on going which is mainly related to procurement of drugs and contracting of healthcare

    personnel services and procurement closure process can only take place when there will be no

    more procurement will be required. Further this report evaluates the Procurement process in

    light with academic theories and framework and their correlation. EVM and performance

    management is evaluated in STBP on the bases of KPIs and CSFs to determine if theperformance targets have been met or research the required threshold in order to achieve the

    objectives of the programme. Role of leadership is evaluated in management of conflicts and

    implementation of SHRM framework. SRHM is considered as a vital process in the

    programme as performing health workforce is vital not only to achieve the goal of

    programme but also to develop a performing healthcare system. SHRM in the STBP

    programme is supported by various academic HRM framework models (i.e. Harvard HRM

    framework, Contextual, and dynamic framework for SHRD) are evaluated in depth in this

    report to construct the correlation between the theory and practice within STBP programme.

  • 7/31/2019 WHO- International Corporate Project Management

    4/13

    4

    INTRODUCTION

    This report is continuity to initial report which was on various practices of the International

    Projects Management such as; Project governance framework and organisational

    transformation in WHO- Stop TB (STBP) Partnership programme (See Appendix 1). This

    report will focus on critical evaluation of three aspects of PM practices in STBP programme

    such as; Procurement and contracts management, Earned Value Management and strategicHuman Resource Management in context with STPBs Governance framework.

    1.0 FINDINGS

    In this section of report, findings from of literature will be compared and analysed in context

    with findings of STBP programme.

    1.1 PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING

    Procurement process is employed for every project to acquire the necessary resources in

    order to achieve project objectives. It includes Procurement strategy or planning contractingof suitable suppliers or buyers and at last those procurement contracts are managed and

    procurement process is closed. Four levels have been identified in the project procurement

    process (PMBoK, 2008:313; APMBoK, 2006:75; Ribeiro, 2009:29);

    Plan Procurement

    Conduct Procurement /contracting

    Administer Procurement

    Procurement Closed

    In STBP procurement process is a complimentary to the WHO/Contracting & ProcurementServices (WHO/CPS), is a team of purchasing and logistics specialists, that supports WHO's

    efforts to provide essential health products worldwide. Purchasing of high quality, low cost

    diagnostic and drugs for disease treatment has to be done by a representative in the WHO

    regional or country offices on behalf of the ordering organization, using WHO intranet

    (WHO, 2012). The WHO/CPS catalogue which is available to WHO staff via the WHO

    intranet ordering site known as WebBuy, where all latest drugs for various regional diseases

    can be ordered to be delivered to WHO regional community health centres. All WHO

    programmes are responsible for their own procurement and contracting under WHO/CPS

    guidelines. In STBP procurement is mainly done for drugs/medicines for its member statesand affected communities. Total value of STBP worldwide GDF procurement for year 2010

    was $132 million. This figure includes freight, insurance, procurement agent fees, quality

    control and pre-shipment inspection, as well as the value of goods procured (STBP-GDF

    Report, 2010). It is worth mentioning that as discussed previously in initial report (Appendix

    1) that STBP does not fund its projects or programme but its only provides a platform to

    effectively manage those projects within it programme. All GDF procurement is 100% donor

    funded by International Organisations. According to Walker and Rowlinson (2008:126)

    corporate governance framework of project facilitate the procurement and contracting process

    with accountability and ensures ethical standards are in place for the process in order to safe

    guard the interests of stakeholders of project. STBP-GDF Procurement is governed by a

    technical review committee to approve orders and assistance requests. Countries who are in

  • 7/31/2019 WHO- International Corporate Project Management

    5/13

    5

    need of GDF grants for FLDs must submit an application to the Technical Review Committee

    (TRC). The TRC has 12 15 members nominated by key GDF stakeholders, including

    potential donors, technical agencies and countries. The composition of the TRC reflects the

    need for expertise in several areas, including TB control, procurement, and experience in TB

    programme management and contracting. The TRC reviews grant applications and makes

    recommendations to the Stop TB Partnerships Coordinating Board. The recommendationsoutline which grant applications to accept, the amount and nature of the grant, the steps

    necessary for programmes to meet conditions for GDF support, and the non-drug aspects of

    the programme that require assistance. The recommendations and decisions of the TRC are

    approved by the Board and implemented by the GDF Secretariat (GDF-TRC, 2012). As

    mentioned above WHO main policy standards is to procure high quality drugs to achieve this

    objective while procuring or contracting for drugs or related services quality. In STBPs GDF

    project procurement or contacting must pass through a six tier authorisation and

    recommendation process which includes getting authorisation from related Drug regulatory

    authority to WHO medicine monitoring and surveillance programme for quality assurance.

    Purpose of this quality assurance process is to ensure global consistency regarding quality

    standards set for the procurement and supply of anti-TB medicines and diagnostics items and

    to avoid duplication of effort.

    During the project implementation, many procurement cycles are undertaken concurrently or

    sequentially in order to produce the deliverables and attain the project objectives (Ribeiro,

    2009:29). In STBP- GDF procurement planning is consists of five procurement cycles as

    illustrated in the Figure 1.1;

  • 7/31/2019 WHO- International Corporate Project Management

    6/13

    6

    These procurement cycles are; Initiation state, Procurement stage, Stage where purchase

    order is process with suppliers, Logistics, Administer or monitoring of procurement process.

    These procurement cycles have explained how procurement is planned in each cycle with the

    duration of the cycle and how that cycle is analysed. Procurement process at STBP and its

    projects does not close as programme consists of on-going social development projects and

    until TB is eradicated from the affected communities these procurement cycles will beplanned and implemented throughout the programme.

    1.2 EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT (EVM) AND PERFORMANCE

    MANAGEMENT

    Solanki (2009) has interpreted EVM as historically an essential part of procurement process

    because after acquiring resources the project management needs to implement performance

    management mechanism with the project governance framework which facilitates on the

    issues of overall performance of project. KPIs to project performances are used as a measure

    to focus of aspects of project performance towards objectives rather than detail of progress of

    work packages (Parameter, 2011). Morris and Pinto (2011:21) has described KPIs as projectspecific performance that is performance of project processes such as effectiveness of project

    control mechanism, degree of project cost reduction by using designed procurement practices

    and by measuring the amount of change happening in the project. In STBP KPIs are of four

    types as Rockert (1978) cited in Howell (2009:2) which are specific to its industry of this

    programme, organisation strategy, environmental KPIs and the ones which are temporal to its

    funding targets, Budget Targets and its Global Plan 2011-2015 where KPIs for Programmes

    have been set to meet the targets of its projects. (CSF) are defined in the Global plan 2011 -

    2015 which are critical to success of its projects such as development of TB vaccine for

    children who are most vulnerable to disease all over the world (Morris and Pinto, 2011:22).Latest guidelines from STBP for its working groups to set KPIs which are achievable under

    current circumstances, promotes partner organisations and stakeholder engagement, defines

    stakeholder roles and responsibilities, promotes transparency in funding process, and improve

    overall communication, coordination among all stakeholders, promotes accountability and

    evaluation of goals and should be strategically aligned with STBP Goal 2011-2015 (STBP-

    the partnering initiative, 2012). Bourne & Bourne (2011:9-15) have mentioned that

    performance management of an organisation or project is not an exact science but it is related

    to environment of organisation and leadership is responsible for creating such environment

    and culture in which good performance can be delivered. Leaders have to support

    management in their development and use of any performance measurement system which

    must be strategically aligned with organisation core strategy. Role of leadership is to build

    competence within organisation to avoid the conflicts to be avoided and get underground

    which occasionally flaring up in dysfunctional way or lead to large conflicts with in

    organisation (Runde et al., 2007). In STBP 16 stakeholders from various partner international

    organisations had contacted the Governing Board and coordinating committee in 2011 to

    raise a conflict with WHO-TB department on funding disputes and demanded transparency in

    allocation of funding for TB projects as it was perceived within stakeholder organisation that

    70% of STBP funding has been allocated to WHO-TB department which was seen as an

    unfair distribution of funds. In response STBP coordinating board had formed a sub-committee which was supported by WHO-Director General in order to set KPIs on

  • 7/31/2019 WHO- International Corporate Project Management

    7/13

    7

    performance of funding and spending aspects of project with measures to increase

    coordination between stakeholder organisations with WHO-TB department (Treatment

    Action Group, 2011). Role of project leadership and Strategic Human Resource Management

    (SHRM) are critically inter-related with each other, Human Resource Management (HRM) is

    essential for a project to manage the issue related to performance of employees and conflict

    resolution at work (Bratton and Gold, 2001:56)

    1.3 STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

    The resource based view of an organisation or project postulates that internal knowledge and

    skills represent important sources of competitive knowledge (Garavan, 2007). Torrington et

    al. (2008) further explains that HRM in a project organisation is used to fulfil various

    objectives and roles those are employed in accordance with project organisation specifics or

    to match the needs. According to STBP Human resource development (HRD) for

    implementation of the Stop TB Strategy is integral to overall HRD in the health system and

    the development of the health workforce is concerned with the different functions involved in

    planning, managing, and supporting the professional development of the health workforcewithin the health system. HRD aims to secure the right people, with the right skills and

    motivation, in the right place, at the right time. SHRD in STBP can be firther explained with

    the help of The Harvard analytical framework for HRM by Bell et al. (1984) cited in Cakar

    et al. (2003) which is consisted of two parts; HR system and HRM strategic map (Figure 1.2).

    The Human resource system represents labour realtions and personnel administrative

    perspectives under four human resource categories: which are employees influence,

    employess resource flow, rewards and work systems. HRM strategic map show that how

    HRM is closely connected with both external environment (i.e. stakeholder interests) and

    internation organisation (i.e. situational factors). In STBP it has been identified that

    Developing the health workforce is one of the key issues in overall health systemsdevelopment. The quality of service delivery, including interventions for comprehensive TB

  • 7/31/2019 WHO- International Corporate Project Management

    8/13

    8

    control based on the Stop TB Strategy, depends largely on the performance of personnel,

    enabled by the availability of sufficient facilities, equipment and drugs, and a supportive

    environment. Garavan (2007) has presented the four levels of contextual and dynamic HRD

    framework (Figure 1.3) which are necessary to understand the contribution of SHRD in an

    international organisation these levels are; global environment, strategy, structure and the

    leadership, job value and uniqueness, individual expectations, employbility and career. Thismodel recognises the importance of multiple stakeholders and partnership that has emerged in

    STBP programme in the design, development and implementation of SHRD.

    Figure 1.3: Contextual and dynamic framework for SHRD (Source: Garavan, 2007:17)

  • 7/31/2019 WHO- International Corporate Project Management

    9/13

    9

    The STBP Human Resources for Health (HRH) Action Framework (Figure 1.4) has been

    designed to assist countries in developing and implementing strategies to achieve an effective

    and sustainable health workforce. This framework was developed with the contribution of

    representatives from various stakeholders of programmes such as partner countries,

    multilateral and bilateral agencies, donors, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), and the

    academic community.

    Figure: 1.4 The STBP Human Resource for Health (HRH) framework (Source: (STBP-HRD

    planning, 2008)

    the Framework is applicable in all countries, its use will be influenced by the elements

    specific to the country context (for example, the economy, the political situation), including

    the labour market (the capacity of the health workforce in general, international labour

    influences). The outcomes of applying the Framework will also be influenced by the strength

    of other components in the countrys health system (for example, the availability of drugs and

    equipment, the level of technology available, and the number and condition of health

    facilities) (Garavan, 2007).

    In recent STBP-HRD strategy planning report (2008) it has been identified that STBP

    programmes and its related projects are facing HRM challenges at three level i.e. macro level,

    intermediate level, micro level. At the Macro Level, the main issues and challenges relate to:

    the size and composition of workforce, distribution of workforce across the projects in

    various countries, the general parameters of working conditions, incentive systems, payment

    mechanisms and labour relations for health workers. At the Intermediate Level, health

    workforce issues relate to the application of policies and decisions made at a higher level,

    which are addressed in a more or less autonomous manner, depending on the degree of

    decision-making and management decentralization. Also important at this level is the

    capacity to provide and ensure that the peripheral or micro level is appropriately equippedand capacitated to do the job. At last Micro Level, health workforce management is less

  • 7/31/2019 WHO- International Corporate Project Management

    10/13

    10

    concerned with groups and categories of personnel, as is the case at the other levels, but

    rather with individuals. Issues are more likely to be performance management, including

    relevance of acquired skills, supervision, evaluation or conflict resolution (STBP-HRD

    planning, 2008). At all levels, health workforce decisions and practices impact the outcomes

    of the health-care system. Without incentives to encourage providers to work in remote or

    poorer regions of a country, workers migrate, with subsequent inequities in access to services.Basic training that is not relevant to the needs of the population results in a health-care

    system less effective at improving health status. Poor management of personnel and

    unsatisfactory working conditions, usually associated with a discouraged workforce, which

    make it difficult for health-care systems to respond to consumers expectations. A greater

    involvement of stakeholders leads to psychological ownership which is a precondition for

    implementing effective HRD programmes and other learning interventions (Wognum & Fond

    Lam, 2000; Nohria et al., 2008). The projects those are based in developing countries on

    average there are 1-2 health workers available for in the healthcare system per each 1000

    persons and there performance depends on various factors, including motivation, training,

    supervision, salaries, working conditions, and job certainty and stability (STBP- HRD

    Planning, 2008:17). Factors which have been related to affect the performance of health

    workforce are Capability (Can do) and Motivation (Will Do). (Furgure 1.5)

    Figure 1.5: Factors affecting the perfformance of health workforce at STBP (Source: adapted

    from STBP-HRD planning, 2008)

    In recent STBP reports during the past years it has been highlighted that developing capable,motivated, and supported health workers is essential for overcoming bottlenecks to achieve

  • 7/31/2019 WHO- International Corporate Project Management

    11/13

  • 7/31/2019 WHO- International Corporate Project Management

    12/13

    12

    BIBLIOGRAPHY

    APM Body ofKnowledge (2006), Procurement Published by Association of

    Project Management. 74-75

    Armstrong, M. (2006) A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice.Kogan Page Publishers

    Bratton, J. and Gold, J. (2001) Human Resource Management: Theory and

    Practice, 2nd ed. Published by Routledge

    Bourne, M. and Bourne, P. (2011) Handbook of Corporate Performance

    Management, Published by John Wiley & Sons.

    Cakar, F., Bititci, U.S. and MacBryde, J. (2003),A business process approach to

    human resource management, Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 9 Iss: 2

    pp. 190207

    Garavan, T.N. (2007). A Strategic Perspective on Human Resource Development.

    Advances in developing human resources, 9(1), 11-30.

    GDF- TRC (2012) The Global Drug Facility Technical Review Committee [Online]

    Available at:

    http://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/gdf/applying/TRC%20Terms%20of%20Refe

    rence%20and%20Working%20procedures.pdf (Retrieved on 10/05/2012)

    Howell, M.T. (2009) Critical Success Factors Simplified: Implementing the

    Powerful Drivers of Dramatic Business Improvement, 1st Ed. Published by

    Productivity Press

    Morris, P. and Pinto, J.K (2011) The Wiley Guide to Project Control: Volume 1 of

    the Wiley Guides to the Management of Projects. Published by John Wiley and Sons

    Nohria, N., Groysberg, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Employee Motivation. HarvardBusiness Review, 86(7/8), 78-84

    Parmenter, D. (2011) Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing,and

    Using Winning KPIs. Published by John Wiley & Sons

    PMI Body of Knowledge (2008), Project Procurement Management Published by

    Project Management Institute. 313316

    Ribeiro, J.M (2009 Procurement of goods, Works and Services in DevelopmentProjects Published by Presses inter Polytechnique.

    http://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/gdf/applying/TRC%20Terms%20of%20Reference%20and%20Working%20procedures.pdfhttp://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/gdf/applying/TRC%20Terms%20of%20Reference%20and%20Working%20procedures.pdfhttp://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/gdf/applying/TRC%20Terms%20of%20Reference%20and%20Working%20procedures.pdfhttp://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/gdf/applying/TRC%20Terms%20of%20Reference%20and%20Working%20procedures.pdf
  • 7/31/2019 WHO- International Corporate Project Management

    13/13

    13

    Runde, C.E., Flanagan, T.A. and Center for Creative Leadership (2007) Becoming a

    Conflict Competent Leader: How You And Your Organization Can Manage Conflict

    Effectively, Published by John Wiley & Sons

    Solanki, P. (2009) EARNED VALUE MANAGEMENT: Integrated View of Cost and

    Schedule Performance. Published by Global India Publications

    STBP-GDF report (2010) Global Drug Facility Annual Report 2010 [Online]

    Available at:

    http://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/gdf/whatis/GDF%20Anuual%20Report%202

    010.pdf(Retrieved on 10/05/2012)

    STBP-HRD Planning (2008) Planning the development of human resources for

    health for implementation of the Stop TB Strategy: A handbook [Online] Available

    at: http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241597715_eng.pdf (retrieved on

    13/05/2012)

    STBP-The partnering initiative (2012) Review of STBP working groups, Ver. 1.0,

    [Online] Available at:

    http://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/about/cb/meetings/21R/Retreat%20Documen

    ts%20%E2%80%93%2030%20January%202012/Working%20Draft%20Review%20

    StopTB%20Partnership%20Working%20Groups.pdf (retrieved on 11/05/2012)

    STBP-Training (2010) Management of Tuberculosis Training for Health Facility

    Staff, 2nd ed. [Online] Available at:

    http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241598736a_eng.pdf (retrieved on

    13/05/2012)

    Treatment Action Group (2011) Steps being taken by the Coordinating Board to

    reduce conflict of interest and improve transparency in the Stop TB Partnership

    [Online] Available at: http://www.treatmentactiongroup.org/policy/atunletter

    (retrieved on 14/05/2012)

    Walker, D.H.T and Rowlinson, S.M (2008) Procurement Systems: A Cross-IndustryProject Management Perspective, Published by Routledge

    WHO (2012) The 3 by 5 Initiative [Online] Available at:

    http://www.who.int/3by5//en/(Retrieved on 10/05/2012)

    Wognum, I., & Fond Lam, J. (2000). Stakeholder involvement in strategic HRD

    aligning: the impact on HRD effectiveness. International Journal of Training &

    Development, 4(2), 98.

    http://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/gdf/whatis/GDF%20Anuual%20Report%202010.pdfhttp://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/gdf/whatis/GDF%20Anuual%20Report%202010.pdfhttp://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241597715_eng.pdfhttp://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/about/cb/meetings/21R/Retreat%20Documents%20%E2%80%93%2030%20January%202012/Working%20Draft%20Review%20StopTB%20Partnership%20Working%20Groups.pdfhttp://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/about/cb/meetings/21R/Retreat%20Documents%20%E2%80%93%2030%20January%202012/Working%20Draft%20Review%20StopTB%20Partnership%20Working%20Groups.pdfhttp://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/about/cb/meetings/21R/Retreat%20Documents%20%E2%80%93%2030%20January%202012/Working%20Draft%20Review%20StopTB%20Partnership%20Working%20Groups.pdfhttp://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241598736a_eng.pdfhttp://www.treatmentactiongroup.org/policy/atunletterhttp://www.who.int/3by5/en/http://www.who.int/3by5/en/http://www.treatmentactiongroup.org/policy/atunletterhttp://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241598736a_eng.pdfhttp://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/about/cb/meetings/21R/Retreat%20Documents%20%E2%80%93%2030%20January%202012/Working%20Draft%20Review%20StopTB%20Partnership%20Working%20Groups.pdfhttp://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/about/cb/meetings/21R/Retreat%20Documents%20%E2%80%93%2030%20January%202012/Working%20Draft%20Review%20StopTB%20Partnership%20Working%20Groups.pdfhttp://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/about/cb/meetings/21R/Retreat%20Documents%20%E2%80%93%2030%20January%202012/Working%20Draft%20Review%20StopTB%20Partnership%20Working%20Groups.pdfhttp://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241597715_eng.pdfhttp://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/gdf/whatis/GDF%20Anuual%20Report%202010.pdfhttp://www.stoptb.org/assets/documents/gdf/whatis/GDF%20Anuual%20Report%202010.pdf