Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Placemaking: Where Planning, Architecture, and
Circulation Meet
Gwynne Pugh, Gwynne Pugh Urban Studio
Eileen P. Fogarty, The Fogarty Group
Jeffrey Tumlin, Nelson/Nygaard Associates
Moderator: Francie Stefan, City of Santa Monica
paradigm
A set of assumptions, concepts,
values, and practices that
constitutes a way of viewing
reality for the community that
shares them, especially in an
intellectual discipline.
Planning
Arc
hit
ec
ture
Transportation
Planning Architecture Transportation
Height
Density
Use
Map Focus
Expression
Building Form
Materials
Site focus
Capacity
Flow
Mode
Efficiency focus
Planning
Arc
hit
ec
ture
Transportation
Integration to
Create Places
of beauty,
comfort,
function and
value
LUCE | City Council | 7.1.2010 November 24,2009 City Council 1
The Best Transportation Plan is a Good Land Use Plan: Integrating Transportation and Land Use in Santa Monica
Jeffrey Tumlin
www.shapethefuture2025.net
LUCE | City Council | 7.1.2010 Image: Theresa Bridget, http://theresabridget.wordpress.com/2011/04/15/877/
LUCE | City Council | 7.1.2010 Image source: Wikipedia Commons, Balazs Barnucz
LUCE | City Council | 7.1.2010
• Problem: Traffic Congestion.
• Solutions:
• Decide where to put congestion
• Provide better choices for Santa Monica residents and employees
• No Net New Trips policy
• Work with regional agencies for systemic solutions
5
Paradise Lost?
What did citizens tell us?
• Problem: Traffic Congestion.
• Solutions:
• Decide where to put congestion
• Provide better choices for Santa Monica residents and employees
• No Net New Trips policy
• Work with regional agencies for systemic solutions
6
Transportation and the LUCE
What did citizens tell us?
• Problem: Parking is hard to find.
• Solutions:
• Better management of existing supply
• Sharing
• Pricing
• Add supply where needed
7
Transportation and the LUCE
What did citizens tell us?
• Problem: How do we know all this will work?
• Solutions:
• New Transportation Demand Management Ordinance
• New Transportation Impact Fee
• More discretionary review
• Better travel demand model
• More ongoing performance measurement
• Most importantly: The EIR requires us to.
8
Transportation and the LUCE
How does it work?
• Starts with right land uses in right places
• Improves conditions for walking, biking and transit
• Forces new development to do more to reduce trips
• Charges development to offset remaining trips by reducing existing trips
• Collects ongoing performance data and reports back to council and citizens.
9
No Net New Trips
10 10
Congestion in Santa Monica: Where we are now
Rethinking our Streets
What’s important depends upon your perspective
Traffic engineer: F A
A F Economist:
Measure what matters
13
Why not consider…
• Economic Development
– Job creation
– Real estate value increase
– Retail sales
• Quality of Life
– Access to jobs
– Access to shopping
– Residential property value impact
• Social Justice
–Do benefits accrue equitably?
–Are investments spread equitably?
• Ecological Sustainability
–VMT per capita (=CO2, NOx, runoff, etc.)
–Land use/transportation connection
14 14 14
10 minute walk to Neigh-borhood Shopping
Walking
Bicycling
10 minute bike ride to 3rd/Santa Monica Blvd.
10 minute walk to frequent transit
Transit every 10 minutes or better
Transit
Demand Mgmt
18 18 18 18
What about Jobs/Housing Balance?
What about Jobs/Housing Balance?
What about Jobs/Housing Balance?
What about Jobs/Housing Balance?
School
Shop
Play Work
P P
P
P P P
T T T T T T
T T
T T T
T
Mixed Use, Park Once District
School
Work
Play
Shop
P
T T
Results:
• <½ the parking
• <½ the land area
• ¼ the arterial trips
• 1/6th the arterial turning movements
• <¼ the vehicle miles traveled
Where are PM peak trips going?
24
No Net New Trips
• 40% are commute
• About same share are errands, visiting, etc.
Different programs target different trips?
25
No Net New Trips
• 40% are commute
• About same share are errands, visiting, etc. Employer TDM
Districts Parking cashout
Safe routes to school Parking programs Transit passes
Transit investments Walking Bike facilities Parking programs
Existing PM trips = 60,100
1984 Plan in 2030 = 8% increase
LUCE in 2030 = 1% decrease.
Less than 10% mode shift required citywide to accomplish NNNT goal
No Net New Trips
Parking policies More parking cashout Public parking pricing
Transportation System Improvements Bikes Pedestrians Transit
Transportation Demand Management Subsidized transit passes Car sharing Bike sharing
Mode Shift Policies Safe routes to schools Carpooling Telecommuting Transportation Management Associations
New programs required in EIR
No Net New Trips
Location: 4 Ds
Residential parking Commercial parking management Transit pass program Safe routes to schools
Transit improvements Bike improvements Pedestrian improvements Carpooling/Telecommuting Parking cashout
Transportation Management Assns
Up to 17% commute trip reduction in TDM zones. Up to 5% non-commute trip reduction
No Net New Trips
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
November 24,2009 29
500,000
550,000
600,000
650,000
700,000
750,000
800,000
850,000
900,000
950,000
1,000,000
Existing 1984 Plan (2030) Proposed LUCE (2030)
AB 32 Target
Sustainable City Plan Target
Traffic is often a proxy for other issues Focus on making a better place, not just
slowing the pace by which it gets worse Rather than limiting development to
limit traffic, limit traffic directly. Locate congestion where it does least
harm. The best transportation plan is a good
land use plan. Invest in real public involvement.
Lessons Learned
Getting from NIMBY to YIMBY– Jeffrey Tumlin
For More Information
Contact:
Jeffrey Tumlin, Principal
Nelson\Nygaard
116 New Montgomery St, Ste 500
San Francisco, CA 94105
415-284-1544
www.nelsonnygaard.com
Eileen Fogarty, former Planning Director
Fogarty Group
914 Lincoln Blvd, Suite 108
Santa Monica, CA 90403
310-570-6724
www.fogartygroup.net
32