Upload
gordon
View
47
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
When the Auditor Comes Knocking -- What We’ve Learned and How to Prepare. Bonnie L. Graham, Esq. [email protected] Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013. Non-Compliance Findings. Audit OIG Audit A-133 Audit Monitoring 3. Federal 4. State. Preparation. Key to successful outcome - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
WHEN THE AUDITOR COMES KNOCKING --WHAT WE’VE LEARNED ANDHOW TO PREPARE
Bonnie L. Graham, [email protected] Brustein & Manasevit, PLLCFall Forum 2013
Non-Compliance Findings
Audit1.OIG Audit2.A-133 AuditMonitoring3.Federal4.State
2Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Preparation
•Key to successful outcome •Self assessment - critical
3Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Self Assessment
• Identify potential trouble spots• Review significant violations
from other processes• Review prior findings• Conduct self assessment
4Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Review of 27 OIG Audit Reports$1,398,564 unallowable personnel costs
Employee compensation charged to grants in which the employee did not work on
$826,183 unallowable non-personnel costs Unnecessary or unreasonable to carry out the grant or
not-for-program purposes$810,055 unallowable non-personnel costs
Contracts were: missing required elements; unfulfilled; not approved; or included expenditures that exceeded the contract amounts
5Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Review of 27 OIG Audit Reports (cont.)
• $66,666,155 inadequately documented personnel costs• Time and effort documentation (both semi-annual
certifications and PARs) were missing, incomplete, inaccurate, or untimely
• $16,010,550 inadequately documented non-personnel costs• Missing or inaccurate supporting documentation
• $2,693,004 in lost or unaccounted for property • Improper inventory control systems
• $2,504,617 unallowable supplanting of Federal grant funds
6Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Review of 27 OIG Audit Reports (cont.)
• Pervasive non-compliance issues• Inadequate policies and procedures (34 times)• No policies and procedures (15 times)• Not understanding the regulations and guidance
(10 times)• Policies in place, but not followed (5 times)
7Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Audit violations deemed “significant” by the U.S. Education Department
8Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 9
1. Time Distribution2. MOE3. Supplement Not
Supplant4. Unallowable
Expenses5. Procurement
Irregularity6. Ineligible Students7. Lack of Accountability
for Equipment/Materials
8. Lack of Appropriate Record Keeping
9. Record Retention Problems
10.Late or No Submission of Required Reports, Inaccuracies, Inconsistence
11.Audits of Subrecipient Unresolved
12.Lack of Subrecipient Monitoring
13.Drawdown before they are needed or more than 90 days after the end of funding period
14.Large Carryover Balances
15.Lack of valid, reliable or complete performance data
Evaluate Areas to be Examined
1. OIG Audit• Notice of Audit: Correspondence
2. A-133 Audit• Prior Audits (Findings)• A-133 Compliance Supplement
10Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Evaluate Areas to be Examined (cont.)
3. Monitoring• ESEA Flexibility Monitoring; SASA
Guide• CrEAG; RDA• Perkins IV Checksheets • Request for documents
Make a separate set of copies of all documents provided to ED
11Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Remedy Problem Areas
AND / OR
Develop Corrective Actions (Plans)
12Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Corrective Action Plan
Critical – in place at time of visit – even if implementation - FUTURE
•Specific Measurable Objectives•Timelines•Clear Lines of Responsibility
13Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
PREPARATION FOR VISIT
14Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Logistics
•Secure Space•Copy Machine
15Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Audit Records• Can the auditee refuse to provide the auditors with requested documents? • GEPA 20 USC 1232(f) requires that ED and its representatives (which arguably includes A-133 auditors) “shall have access, for the purpose of audit examination, to any records maintained by a recipient that may be related, or pertinent to, grants”
• EDGAR 80.26(b)(5) also indicates audit access to records without qualifiers. • If requested records are not provided, likely receive an audit limitation.
16Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Communication with Staff
•Formal (governmental) inquiry•Provide any information within personal knowledge• No guessing• No speculation
•No time to settle grudges•No gossip
17Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Identify Key Staff(Audit Committee)
•Audit Manager:•Key contact for all questions, interview arrangements, documents requests, logistical arrangements
•Agency Leadership:•Entrance, exit conference
18Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Identify Key Staff(Audit Committee)
• Relevant Staff: • Assure staff are prepared for interview• Subject matter awareness
• Terminology/Definitions• Time and Effort• Necessary and Reasonable• Inventory
• Familiarity with job description• Familiarity with prior problem areas• Familiarity with likely areas of inquiry
19Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
The Visit• Entrance Conference
• Leadership•Set positive tone
• Audit Manager•Review process/logistics•Request all interview requests go through manager
•Request periodic updates (especially problem areas)•Do not wait for exit conference
20Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
The Visit
•Keep extra copy of all documents supplied!!!
•Debrief staff after interviews•Clear up misunderstandings
21Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Exit Conference•Press for specifics• If issues:
•Documents requested?•List and send
•Potential noncompliance findings•Review carefully – •If confirmed, develop corrective actions proactively
22Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Next Steps
•OIG Audit, A-133 Audit•Draft Audit Report•Final Audit Report•Final determination (ED, State Agency)
•Respond carefully at each level•Problems always easier to resolve at earliest level
23Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
For example: Alabama Audit
Cash Management Findings•Draft Audit Report - October 2011
• Alabama Response: Policies and procedures, internal controls
•Final Audit Report – February 2012• Alabama Response: Disagreed with some findings, but addressed OIG concerns; acknowledged Federal requirements; implemented corrective actions.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 24
For example: Alabama Audit
“With all these facts and circumstances, we find that the State has been willing to implement and to also require the prime recipients and subrecipients to implement corrective action that complies with the draw down, transfer, disbursement and maintenance of excess Federal grant funds and the internal control requirements applicable to Federal grant funds. Therefore, we do not request the State, prime recipients, or subrecipients to refund any of the Federal grant funds they have received . . . It is our determination that this finding is resolved.”
•Program Determination Letter – May 2013
25Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Next Steps
•ED can: •Accept finding as is•Accept finding but
•Reduce or eliminate liability•Reject finding
•Letter of final audit determination• Establishes prima facie case
•34 CFR 81.34
26Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Review by ED•ED accepts finding with $ liability•Appeal to Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA), 34 CFR 81.37
•Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are independent
•Caution – •Time limits•Other Rules of Procedure for Appeals
27Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Review by ED
•ALJ Decision –•Appeal to Secretary
28Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
AUDIT DEFENSE AND RESOLUTION
29Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Common Defenses
•Harm to the Federal interest•Equitable offset•Statute of limitations
30Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Harm to the Federal Interest 34 CFR 81.32 and Appendix
• “A recipient that made an unallowable expenditure or otherwise failed to account properly for funds shall return an amount that is proportional to the extent of the harm its violation caused to an identifiable Federal interest associated with the program . . . ”
31Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Harm – Always
•Ineligible Beneficiaries•Example: IDEA, Part B program funds for students without a disability
•Unauthorized activities•Example: Migrant funds used for local agency staff to attend conference unrelated to Migrant program
32Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Harm - Always (cont.)•Fiscal
• Set-aside• Example: SEA spends more than 10% on Perkins state leadership
• MOE• Comparability• Supplanting• Excess cost• Matching
33Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Possible No Harm
May argue “no harm” if:•Did not obtain required prior approval•Missing required time and effort documentation•Missing evidence of procurement
Caution: ED takes more limited view – may require litigation
34Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
ALJ Decisions - Reconstruction• Application of the New York State Department of Education (April 21, 1995)
• After-the-fact affidavits and other pertinent documentation are admissible as evidence.
• Consolidated Appeals of the Florida Department of Education (June 26, 1990)
• Accepted affidavits completed by supervisors years later as credible and useful evidence.
35Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Equitable OffsetIn effect, an equitable offset permits the substitution of any costs paid under the grant that are subsequently disallowed with otherwise allowable expenditures paid by the grantee, and thereby reduces or eliminates a liability due to ED.
Application of Pittsburg Pre-School Community Council, Docket No 09-20-R, May 16, 2012
36Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Statute of Limitations
No recipient under an applicable program shall be liable to return funds which were expended in a manner not authorized by law more than 5 years before the recipient received written notice of a preliminary departmental decision.
•20 USC 1234a(k); 34 CFR 81.31(c)
•For purposes of measuring the statute of limitations, funds are “expended” as of the date of obligation.
37Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Resolution Strategies
•CAROI•Compromise•Settlement•Litigation
38Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Monitoring Findings
•Opportunity to Respond •Generally, Corrective Actions•No Liability
39Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Disclaimer
This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice. Attendance at the presentation or later review of these printed materials does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 40