1
Wheels on Anything - Design Process Summary Mike DeLancey, Emily Evanchak, Kenan Sindi, Molly Streiff Problem Statement: The goal of this design project was to create a portable wheeled product that can be used to move large objects. This product would have to be adjustable to accommodate any size object. It would also need to be user friendly so anyone could use it. The design would allow for all types of movement in all directions to ease the moving process. We also aim to make a design that is very strong and durable, so it can last a long time and not need to be replaced repeatedly, thus making the environment. We also want to design a feature to assist in getting heavy objects up onto the The Design: The final of this project can be divided into three parts. The base utilizes a diamond design that can be adjusted with different size supports to accommodate different sized objects. A smaller support would make the base long in width and short in height whereas a larger support would make the base short in length but tall in height. The wheels used on the product are similar to the wheels used on shopping carts and office chairs, but they are bigger and stronger to hold more weight. The wheels swivel so they allow smooth movement in all directions. The product also comes with a ramp made of cylindrical tubes to allow the objects to roll onto the platform and ease the lifting process for the consumer. Comparison Criteria Evaluated Qualit y Consumer Friendly Versatili ty Sustainabil ity Aestheti cs Total Weight Quality 1.00 3 5 3 9 21 0.37 Consumer Friendly .33 1.00 3 3 7 14.33 0.25 Versatility .2 .33 1.00 5 7 13.53 0.24 Sustainabili ty .33 .33 .2 1.00 5 6.86 0.12 Aesthetics .11 .14 .14 .2 1.00 1.59 0.03 AHP Pairwise Comparison Chart: Final Pugh Charts and Design Selections: Physical Quality Sustainab ility Consumer Friendliness Aesthetic Appeal Versatility Sum Rank Relative Weight 0.37 0.12 0.25 0.03 0.24 Concepts Ball and Socket -1 +1 -1 +1 +1 -.23 2 Triple Wheel -1 -1 -1 +1 +1 -.48 3 Heavy Duty - - - - - 0 1 Basic Wheel -1 -1 -1 +1 +1 -0.47 5 Shopping Cart Wheel -1 +1 -1 -1 +1 -0.29 4 Physical Quality Sustainab ility Consumer Friendliness Aesthetic Appeal Versati lity Sum Rank Relative Weight 0.37 0.12 0.25 0.03 0.24 Concepts: Building Rod Kit -1 -1 -1 -1 +1 0.53 5 Four Corners +1 +1 -1 +1 +1 0.51 2 Diamond Rods +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 1.01 1 Adjustable Platform Ramp - - - - - 0 3 Wheels on Side +1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -0.2 4 Wheels Base Lift Assistant Physical Quality Sustainabili ty Consumer Friendliness Aesthetic Appeal Versatilit y Sum Rank Relative Weight 0.37 0.12 0.25 0.03 0.24 Concepts: Rolling Ramp +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 1.01 1 Jack +1 -1 +1 +1 +1 0.77 2 Rope Assistant - - - - - 0 3 Strap Ramp -1 +1 -1 +1 +1 0.23 4 Top: product base with wheels Left: ramp lift assistant Features to Improve Undesired Results Principles Design Solutions Stability of Object Weight 26 Copying 39 Inert Environment 1 Segmentation 40 Composite 1. Separate the bars into an assemble- friendly kit Strength Durability of moving object 27 Cheap disposable 3 Local Quality 26 Copying 1. Make the bars out of a more inexpensive and replaceable material Adaptabili ty Waste of substance 15 Dynamism 10 Preliminary Action 1. Adding a another stabilizing Heavy Object Manuall y Lifted Consumer Functional EMS Model Heavy Object Push Rolling Ramp Assistant Movin g Base Adjust Base to size of Object Solutions EMS Model TRIZ Contradiction and Solution TRIZ EMS Models: The functional EMS model shows the current problem with moving large objects. The solutions EMS model shows the design solution to this problem Wheels Base Assembly Sustainability Charts

Wheels on Anything - Design Process Summary Mike DeLancey, Emily Evanchak, Kenan Sindi, Molly Streiff Problem Statement: The goal of this design project

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Wheels on Anything - Design Process Summary Mike DeLancey, Emily Evanchak, Kenan Sindi, Molly Streiff Problem Statement: The goal of this design project

Wheels on Anything - Design Process SummaryMike DeLancey, Emily Evanchak, Kenan Sindi, Molly Streiff

Problem Statement: The goal of this design project was to create a portable wheeled product that can be used to move large objects. This product would have to be adjustable to accommodate any size object. It would also need to be user friendly so anyone could use it. The design would allow for all types of movement in all directions to ease the moving process. We also aim to make a design that is very strong and durable, so it can last a long time and not need to be replaced repeatedly, thus making the product better for the environment. We also want to design a feature to assist in getting heavy objects up onto the wheels.

The Design:The final of this project can be divided into three parts. The base utilizes a diamond design that can be adjusted with different size supports to accommodate different sized objects. A smaller support would make the base long in width and short in height whereas a larger support would make the base short in length but tall in height. The wheels used on the product are similar to the wheels used on shopping carts and office chairs, but they are bigger and stronger to hold more weight. The wheels swivel so they allow smooth movement in all directions. The product also comes with a ramp made of cylindrical tubes to allow the objects to roll onto the platform and ease the lifting process for the consumer.

  Comparison CriteriaEvaluated Quality Consumer

FriendlyVersatility Sustainability Aesthetics Total Weight

Quality 1.00 3 5 3 9 21 0.37

Consumer Friendly

.33 1.00 3 3 7 14.33 0.25

Versatility .2 .33 1.00 5 7 13.53 0.24

Sustainability .33 .33 .2 1.00 5 6.86 0.12

Aesthetics .11 .14 .14 .2 1.00 1.59 0.03

AHP Pairwise Comparison Chart:Final Pugh Charts and Design Selections:

  Physical Quality Sustainability Consumer Friendliness

Aesthetic Appeal Versatility Sum Rank

Relative Weight 0.37 0.12 0.25 0.03 0.24    Concepts              

Ball and Socket -1 +1 -1 +1 +1 -.23 2Triple Wheel -1 -1 -1 +1 +1 -.48 3Heavy Duty - - - - - 0 1Basic Wheel -1 -1 -1  +1 +1 -0.47 5

Shopping Cart Wheel -1 +1 -1 -1 +1 -0.29 4

  Physical Quality Sustainability

Consumer Friendliness

Aesthetic Appeal Versatility Sum Rank

Relative Weight 0.37 0.12 0.25 0.03 0.24    Concepts:              

Building Rod Kit -1 -1 -1 -1 +1 0.53 5Four Corners +1 +1 -1 +1 +1 0.51 2

Diamond Rods +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 1.01 1Adjustable Platform Ramp - - - - - 0 3

Wheels on Side +1 -1 -1 +1 -1 -0.2 4

Wheels

Base

Lift Assistant  Physical

QualitySustainability Consumer Friendliness Aesthetic Appeal Versatility Sum Rank

Relative Weight 0.37 0.12 0.25 0.03 0.24    Concepts:              

Rolling Ramp +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 1.01 1Jack +1 -1 +1 +1 +1 0.77 2

Rope Assistant - - - - - 0 3Strap Ramp -1 +1 -1 +1 +1 0.23 4

Top: product base with wheelsLeft: ramp lift assistant

Features to Improve

Undesired Results Principles Design Solutions

Stability of Object

Weight 26 Copying39 Inert Environment1 Segmentation40 Composite Materials

1. Separate the bars into an assemble-friendly kit

Strength Durability of moving object27 Cheap disposable3 Local Quality26 Copying

1. Make the bars out of a more inexpensive and replaceable material

Adaptability Waste of substance 15 Dynamism10 Preliminary Action2 Separation & Extraction13 Other way around

1. Adding a another stabilizing part that can be put on or removed based on object being lifted

Heavy Object

Manually Lifted

Consumer

Functional EMS Model

Heavy Object

Push Rolling Ramp Assistant

Moving Base

Adjust Base to size of Object

Solutions EMS Model

TRIZ Contradiction and Solution

TRIZ EMS Models:The functional EMS model shows the current problem

with moving large objects. The solutions EMS model shows the design solution to this problem

Wheels Base Assembly

Sustainability Charts