275
WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT to , I DTIC ftELECTE V&R25~8~ D ACN 070846 MARCH 1985 STUDIES AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITY HEADQUARTERS US ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND FORT MONROE, VIRGINIA 23651'5000 ,36 ~24 u)

WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEBVEHICLE STUDY

FINAL REPORTto

, I

DTICftELECTEV&R25~8~

D

ACN 070846

MARCH 1985

STUDIES AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITYHEADQUARTERS

US ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMANDFORT MONROE, VIRGINIA 23651'5000,36

~24 u)

Page 2: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (WRten Data Entered)REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE READ INSTRUCTIONS

BEFORE COMPLETING FORMI. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION No. 2. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER

4. rITLE (and Subtitle) IL TYPE OF REPORT A PEIMOD COVERED

Final ReportWheeled Versus Tracked Vehicle Study Final Report Jun 84 thru Mar 85

6. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBERTRADOC ACN 070846

7. AUTHOR(*) S. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER(a)

* Mr. Kenneth L. Boyd

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS I. PROGRAM ELEMENT. PROJECT. TASKHQ TRADOC AREA & WOP.K UNIT NUMBERS

ATTN: ATCD-ACFort Monroe, VA 23651-5000II. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS IIL REPOR DATEHQ TRADOC Mar 85ATTN: ATCD-AC IS. NUMBER OF PAGES

Fort Monroe, VA 13651-500014. MONITORING AGENCY NAME 6 AOORESS(ff dIffeftnt .mfr Cmont.hU O0ce) I5. SECURITY CLASS. (of fhi. report)

Unclassified

Is,. OECLASSIFICATION/DOWNGRADINGIIGNEDUL.E

16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of thle Repoft)

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.

17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (o. the ebetr.c agte#dIn Blec& 3, al4fidtis A w R"Neff

IS. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

I10, KEY WORDS (Contine m reverse side it necessary iond-detl' p iMck awnIn')

Wheeled Vehicles, Tracked Vehicles, Light Armozed Vehicles, Mobility,

Strategic Mobility, Light Tank, MPGS, AGS, MPUS, APC

The Wheeled Versus Tracked Vehicle Study was performed by the HQ TRADOC Studiosand Analysis Activity in response to a tasking from HQDA ODCSopS (DAMO-FD). Thepurpose of the study was to conduct an analysis of the factors used in developingwheeled and tracked vehicle requirements and to lay the foundation for develop-ment of specific criteria upon which to base future vehicle requirementsdecisions. The study team made, extensive use of existing data and examined the"wheels versus tracks issue from the following perspectives: engineering and

.design, mobility, ..cost-- and foreian trends. The final revort is oresented inDOFORM,DOA n af13 t"Of OV I Nov645 Is 00BOLE191

iS9ZNITV 0LM*""CATION OV ThiS PAGE (8b" Dfte AW..• i . .. .... .

Page 3: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

SUCURY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGCWIM "a he.04

briefing format and contains the main briefing, answers to specificqlastions contained in the original tasking message and backup material.supporting the conclusions ccnta;.ned in the main briefiag.

r.

1 C Oo'

4..

I . ... 1Iii iF ' ,", . , + .+

qi ii '

Page 4: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

UNITED, STATES ARMYTRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMM AND

WHEELED VERSUS TRACKEDVEHICLE STUDY

ACN 070846

FINAL REPORT

31 March 1985

Page 5: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

NOTICES .

.DISCLAIMER

The findings of this report are not to be construed as anofficial Department of the Army position', unless so designated byother official documentation.

DISTRIBUTION

Initial distribution of this report was made by the HQTRADOC Studies and Analysis Activity (S&AA). Requests foradditional copies or correspondence concerning this report shouldbe addressed to: Commander, US Army Training and DoctrineCommand, ATTN: ATCD-AC, Fort Monroe, Virginia 23651-5000.

FINAL DISPOSITION

This report may be destroyed when it is no longer needed.

I

Siv . ,

Page 6: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

0 a

This study was initiated by HQDA ODCSOPS (DAMO-FD) andperformed by the HQ TRADOC Studies and Analysis Activity (S&AA)at Fort Monroe, Virginia.

This report has been approved by the Commanding General,TRADOC.

The conclusions presented in this study are those of theCommanding General, TRADOC and are based on data analyzed by theHQ TRADOC S&AA. Support to the study effort was provided by tleUS Army Tank and Automotive Command (TACOK), the US Army Corps ofEngineers' Waterways Experiment Station (WES), the US ArmyForeign Science and Technology Center (FSTC) and the TRADOCSchools and Centers.

The TRADOC study team consisted of Mr. Kenneth L. Boyd(Study Coordinator), LTC Melvin C. Kadel,. Mr. Herbert L.Russakoff and Mrs. Leslie E. Lampella.

Support from organizations external to TRADOC was providedby Mr. Cliff J. Nuttall, Jr., WES, CPT Robert F. Unger, WES, Mr.Lynn A. Martin, TACOM and Mr. James D. Nix, FSTC.

Accasbtn ForNTIS CRA&I

Unannounced 0Jusutstwcin

Avallabflty Codes- Avail and I w

v

Page 7: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Intentionally Left Blank

I%�

-. �. -- .

II

. I- 4

* -

* . vi;�.. -*.

''-'I. 4

Page 8: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

TABLE OP CONTENTS

FORWARD

DD 1473 iTitle Page iiiNotices ivAcknowledgement vAbstract viiiExecutive Summary ix

CHAPTER 1 - Main Briefing

Scope 1-5Background. 1-7Purpose 1-17Methodology 1-19Terms of Reference 1-25Foreign Trends 1-31Mobility Analysis 1-41Engineering Analysis 1-61Cost Analysis 1-81Study Conclusions 1-91Perceptions of Wheeled Armored Vehicles 1-101Future Vehicle Requirements 1-109

S"= CHAPTER 2 - Specific Questions

Trailer Towing 2-5Onboard Power Generation 2-9Exclusive Mission Roles 2-13Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

' Relative Importance of Terrain 2-31

CHAPTER 3 - Backup Slides

Definitions 3-3Foreign Trends 3-5Mobility Analysis 3-23Engineering Analysis 3-53Cost Analysis 3-63Wheeled Versus Tracked Vehicle ACTV Case Study 3-71Light Armored Vehicle Producers 3-83

APPENDICES

Appendix A - Tasking Message A-1Appendix B - Study Plan B-1

___ Appendix C - Classified Slides (published separately) C-I

BIBLIOGRAPHY,

vii.

___ __ U

Page 9: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

-L------- -,,,- - - --.-

The Wheeled Versus Tracked Vehicle Study was performed inresponse to a 15 May 84 tasking from HQDA ODCSOPS (DAMO-FD). Thestudy provides an overview of the wheeled versus tracked vehiclesubject area and answers several specific questions contained in '

the original tasking message. The study report is presented inbriefing slide format and addresses the following subject areas:engineering and design, mobility, cost, perceptions oz wheeledarmored vehicles and foreign trends. The study team made'extensive use of existing data.. The report provides a generaloverview of the wheels versus tracks issue as it' appliesto military vehicle requirements.

• N

IN

viii

f%,

?'. ,s ,o•

viii '""

Page 10: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. INTRODUCTION. The HQ TRADOC Studies and Analysis Activity(S&AA) conducted the Wheeled Versus Tracked Vehicle Study in theJun 84 thru Mar 85 time frame. The study was performed inresponse to a HQDA ODCSOPS (DAMO-FD) tasking of 15 Hay 84.

2. Pug or ..7

a. To conduct an analysis of the factors used indeveloping wheeled and tracked vehicle operational requirements.

b. To lay a foundation for the deva.lopment of specificcriteria upon which to base future decisions regarding wheeledand tracked vehicles.

3. Discussion.

a. Background. On 15 May 84, HODA ODCSOPS (DAMO-PD) taskedHQ TRADOC to conduct a Wheeled Versus Tracked Vehicle Study.The tasking resulted from questions raised by the Secretary ofthe Army in the Fall of 1983. In Jun 84, HQ TRADOC S&AA assumedproponency for the study and with assistance from the US ArmyTank and Automotive Command (TACOM), the US Army Corps ofEngineers' Waterways Experiment Station (WES), the US Army

SJ Foreign Science and Technology Center ([STC) and the TRI'DOCSchools and Centers, conducted t.•e study in the Jun 84 thru Mar85 time frame.

b. Objectives.

(1) Identify the mission essential factors that- should

be considered when developing vehicle operational requirements.

(2) Identify the inherent engineering, mobility andcost differences between wheeled and tracked vehicles designedto perform similar missions.

(3) Identify the current uses, rationale and projectedfuture uses of wheeled and tracked vehicles by allied, WarsawPact and major nonaligned nations.

(4) Lay the foundation for the development of .'quantifiable and defendable criteria to be used in thedevelopment of future wheeled and tracked vehicle requirements.

c. Assumptions. None.

ix

Y.111

Page 11: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

d. Methodology. The general rnethodology employed in thestudy effort was to survey the professional literature toidentify what was known about the wheeled versus tracked vehiclesubject and consolidate the material into one coherent package.Generation of new data was held to a minimum because of the timeavailable to perform the study and the fact that most of therelevant variables had already been exhau3tively studied. Thestudy was conducted in the following phases:

(') Phase I. HQ rRADOC S&AA tasked the supportingorganizations to conduct independent analyses of the wheeledversus tracked vehicle subject as it applied to their respectiveareas of expertise. These independent analyses were conductedin the Jul thru Nov 84 time frame.

(2) Phase II. HQ TRADOC S&AA integrated the results.ofthe various supporting analyses into one coherent package,prepared the final briefing and publiahed the final report.This effort was accomplished in the Nov 84 thru Mar 85 timeframe.

e. Findings. Wheeled vehicles are superior for all vehiclenission rcles that require either Tactical Support (15% off-road/65% on-road) or Tactical Standard (30% off-road/70% on-road) levels of operational mobility. For vehicles requiring aTactical High (60% off-road/40% on-road) level of operationalmobility, wheeled vehicles are competitive with tracked vehiclesin cross-country petformance up to around 10 tons gross vehicleweight (GVW).. Above this level, wheeled vehicles must rely onhigher levels of mechanical complexity and larger overallvehicle sizes in order to provide acceptable levels of cross-country mobility. These efforts tend to become ineffective atabout the 20 ton GVW level where the size and mechanicalcomplexity of high-mcbility wheeled vehicles render themimpractical for military use. Above the 10 ton GVW level, the''mobility trade-offs imposed by the wheeled configurationseriously compromises its effectiveness as a direct fire combatplatfc~m. The cost advantage associated with the use of wheeled-vehicles was found to lie principally in the operating andsupport (O&S) arena and is on the order of a 25 'to 33 percentreduction in O&S costs. The general advantages associated withthe use of wheeled vehicles tend to be in the cost andreliability arena and are purchased at the expense ofoperational utility. Tracked vehicles are intrinsicallysLperior to wheeled vehicles in the cross-country environment,especially in the softer soils found in the temperate areas ofthe world. The zeview oZ foreign trends revealed that there isnot a significant movement amcng major nations to embrace!

xhi

Page 12: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

wheeled armored vehicles for tactical use. France is the onlymajor western nation that has made a substantial commitment towheeled vehicles. Other countries that use wheeled armoredvehicles tend to restrict their use to mission roles thatcomplement the tracked force.

4. Conclusionh.

a. Wheeled vehicles are preferred for all vehicle-rolesthat require either Tactical Support or Tactical Standard levelsof operational mobility.

b. For Tactical High levels of operational mobility:

(1) Up to 10 tons GVW, wheeled vehicles are preferred.The cross-country performance of high-mobility wheeled vehiclesis competitive with tracks and significant O&S cost savings canbe realized through the use of wheeled vehicles.

(2) In the 10 to 20 ton GVW range, tracked vehicles areprefer~red for all combat roles. Wheeled and tracked vehiclesshould be looked upon as competitors for support roles. Thedecision of whether a wheeled or tracked configuration ispreferred for a particular support role is dependent upon whatthe role is and where it is going to be performed. Thisdecision is best, left to the cost effectiveness analysisprocess.

(3) Above 20 tons GVW, trauked vehicles are required.The size and mechanical complexity of high-mobility wheeledvehicles renders them impractical for military use.

xi.

Page 13: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Intentionally Left Blank

.d.

Page 14: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Chapter 1

Main Briefing

AO

Page 15: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

J@

34

E4 XE-4 I

041to .

SC1-2°. . **

. ~1--2

Page 16: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

>- 3E

zm 004P a ZIP

ac CC (

D ~C4

(J. ZZ

~~INC coEWZ

cjz zcr

(AJ

LA

Page 17: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

/

7 'I.'a

'a"'Ia

* I.S

*1S'I

I* ft.M1-4

'1 ft.m

.1 r� 0.

I a4 ft.

NMC12

N

1-4

I1-4

Page 18: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

wa w

wL ww

zi Zl LU-

C)'- zOwo.two

>-l A. iad z0 z000 L

La LAMLAA1ac

Page 19: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Wu.0

A 0

0 9:

10~

-41.. 0 14'f

4 O00

1441 0. @

005

"454

4A 04

0 14

P41 b 4 4100

Aj 4441",

ANOa'

410 w

Page 20: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

• -, ,,-.

ac coap

cmi- w-C3 co :M "

== h a.= C.

=-rn = =I=l

z N

cE I=h =• ',E L

0 'LIE

-ALI - 31:EEa

•:0.

=

ww

~W La

L"CDlmaj C

ElME

Orn~ ~ C = ~'U~ 'EL LIICA

C"-

Page 21: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

C 41 Aj910 A41 01

C2 040.41

041.00 39 -

S0

%,"4 r-41 0

0 0i

$~4 02 Li4.0

0"g4 E4 414

4go 0 0- A

2 40

0 A41 410>

~40 40.4440- 0 AW

.I0 0o 41

%4 0 041041 40 c > ou cLi

*. w 0 4100

0 3 0.00 dnw.4 cc141to41

0~ 041 s

0~ M1LU@104

42 4 > 00)m4 0 4

In 1 41410

woo 0 0 41WC41 wOlo

14 0-. w >q (A00o 40 Ci -4

o ) co04 oVm 0. "j ad C4> 41 -.4 ~41

ca ' i-4 & 41io 041~

0 e .41 JJ A0>

V E-OV w0 l

Page 22: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

017

0 0z

Im= IE I 0-LA I

I- CA 01 0 0c0

J~w ao

W ,1111 Us a

AZL Z Az I.. L I~ca i a

co0m 0 ( Q 4

LL. AJ mqCinZ

0' 0.

Go=

>.,:

Page 23: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

agoa

"6 -4

39.4

03

0 c0

a

ON

ad

InIo00

"4

A <@01010

Page 24: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

loniz

OC z

:mp=

a~ 0a C

z za j

0 4 LiJ Pn m-i m

OiM Zi

LA * =Z

0LQ= i 3C

LA0-

La Zw0 eL

z Law 2E ;A1-11)CLCCW

UJ = = %

gm

Page 25: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

0S

eta010

0 "4

410t 44

'4. lam

*Q'

gA

AjJO

I ea

'0

* .41 P-4

L-4,'

"-V0a "

Aj0

~ 1-12

Page 26: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

(AA'

0n z = U...

f5 LalU 1 C.) Z, =l

u - ci 0 PLii C.)Z 0m Zo 00

__ Li = ;;CA ~ Lai. L' Aý0jLIowIJ Lai b(A

La C.) 0 = Vj.Lv:10C. ( LJ4 m~>- Omlm .hhI-l

z -E w-

oa =uj uj = --

"".MOO Lai QZ 0 LWX LA o OWz 0t~g *

0A 0 -I 1 - A,0

0'00 f.

1-13 t.

Page 27: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

414

04'

S 1

.1-1

Page 28: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

4.. ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ *f~LAW . -. . - U. ,-

w 00:0=

0U& C---EI =: z ~~ c.

Lwzi

o. mW (n* -~ -J

Ob. iZCZ(AIW

.a OwNCaFWQ CJ Li 1--S Qo~

L4 _a z=j U

oc4Lai zip

C - LA -w"4 wI-

==

* * 1-15

Page 29: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

4 fr4

*ca

Page 30: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

u -i L16 '~

CIO gm W00

am.L16 - 0 -LIUZW

0= zu 0.LZL

I> UJ -j

zI-

z zm

LIZZA

~m1~ ~Ulow

1-17

Page 31: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

"4 4J 0

0~ 0 41

AI 0 >9A4)0 U P E-4 r-4'a~ 0 00go 'a Li r-4 -4 -

0w 01 0, * J M 0)

c 9U-4 to .

fa w v20 0'-4Oj0C 20to C00c 10 go 0 0

V%0 0 U id Ai "40dc UV 0 0 = t

00 VAJ 00-4-.40 a 40 40

0 to -0 0.-c

wr'via0409

a 0-4 4) IQ ~41

a 0'. 0-4 F -4A 0am V 4 0 1

x 0 UJ0 c 0

00 44 0 V

* 20 W 0 to '

40 t

04 0 = UWa r. 4 1W 4) 4

~ VOA 0440,.> E41 r-4 to 0 cc

0.44 :3 0Ul 0 4 J 3 C:@4@0 AJ0E . 0a

04 0C 0-U0 -4M*wO 0 000W- 4

4j," 92 C Ax m w-A OOM0

08 MIC 41-W1

Page 32: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

D00

ca I-ZI-

00.

0. A

woU

1-19

Page 33: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

V 0

/U

0 a

d ,, 9 41

9 4

,~J0

00W

so 0E-4 v-

o .41 3

ca 4- 1 - 0w

wA

190

--2

W4 "4 P

02 0-

0V02

Page 34: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

c)

I-6

Ow

1 -21

Page 35: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

EV0

bd 4 Q04

~Au*v41d 6

0 0 c-4

bP4 r. 0

.* 00

o tp

0 .0 Wbe

* 0 - t0 > 39 c

b4 q4'> IO

NA r-4

. 41

IQ 3941 0

to w0e-4A3c WIou

i IdP4 0 M

m 4 S 3100

-4.el C:S

A2 l.5

P-4 4U

o 45610L

z1 2

Page 36: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ww

iiiW

> 0 0

ZWLA.

cr. z

La ~UJ

0U

Page 37: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

w~ U9310

bi

r4

C.94

hi1-24

Page 38: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

w

Z aim

ww

• III.

,1--ý25

Page 39: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

C V-4V to i

01.V 0 0 M4 -ý#-rh0Do C

.41 0 "4 4J 4J 4J AW 41 >o-4 41 1.4 4.iJ0 aI0 041".4 04j 0 -9n V 0a L4 IA -04

0 r- M4 w3 c >, Aa o-A045000w4000400c 0OIA

W A4 o4.-4 4) "-4 00r4 C Q0 -4 0 JWr4 W CA 00a4 41 40N M (00000 4 1~

JV0 PC 0 -4 >> U.UA0oi4 $ t C 0 Aj a 4

14 A -4 00 is p -4 >, 00

Ot P '4J wr. 0E-0 'ft'4 r- ) (0 00-4 tv .- 4 E-4%. r. -4 004

W ,.4 4J 4 -4 U A

P-4 4.4.A 0 to> C0 m 4400400 W P-4 N a aX "r40

w04 CU~~ 0 tJ OC= PC-P> AJ. W CJJ 0 0 -r40 r. w00

'q.40@ 4 0 w4 *jM 40 >io A P4 MiV1E4 410- 0r4 ; 0

14 0~ 0 0 r-4~K r-i 4F, b

0 r.-4UUN04 C o 4 w00 r C04 44 -4-4 4) C J 0 .. 4 0"q4 is0 is > A A UCD Uj 04JP4" 0 .D 41 U' 04 a 010 A u4J-Aie.4w'U000P 4 A-4>0Z 40C 0 ri-44C 041 E4 jr-4 ,C4A"

"~4 W-4UN 0 C 0 41 > w "4

045ol0 v-4 .45 0 J >q W > W 00aVA E- 0%4 -. 4~ 4151i A ac

t40 0 05 0 -:) 40U4 4 1 -40) -I tV40 r 94 -40'4ZJrZ4 0i r-4 H

.ta A .- 4-4C-44 0 A4N"Wu -.-I A V AACP 00 A - - -4&A W. 4 U 00P 0~ 0 1 - 0.0".O@4000-45 0 f- XAJX 4 a U0 ,1

AJC.) O UJ14 14 404 0%D 0 AU4 0*)

0 W0 4Jod 0 Qj-4. A 00' to..i

> A -45 -v UA CU OU =F0~ OJ.U. j 01.1 . 0 .4 A 0~~~~~0 0 MU1.,0~ .1.45

.100 V 4" 5 4-U4 Cr4I. OW~ 4M Cu U- 0 0 "4 6 .- P4 Q 0' > .. 00=.

41 w 19 00 -4 $4 0 V4 U4

f14 J.0@0450 r4A >1C h 1 0wW >I~4 ".4 0 19 ff..464 = C UO. 0.JE4( , r0 > A -63 4J vW 4 P M $4EV~ AU V4 UU A

U: 8 U O AJ -P4 *.0 >.C t.40 $44V C4 *~0U1 Cr4*. 4 at*)4 "q P0A

ow .A~ Ic0%4t 0 "-40 ow0 0ba t

p4 0 C40.'4U445444 '-P4 o- V4 C00140

La aU" 0 - r4 4~4 C OO00-spV0 V* "4 ad~ 4e 4 AJ0 A 0 VQ

0C.C4U C 4I 7 > p4)4 -A> : q

0CO N9$ U WW U44 O~0A 0 W o- C .. ,I J P UN4 60 0 Z - C $4 CV4 $4

0 $a 0 aC w -4 4 0 :1-A26

ý4 t a wVA $ E-4 -v4 0

Page 40: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

I-- -z -~ r.o _a

CO ca 4

z CD ME0 Lai C1

CA 0

I-1

MEM

0c gcC 0O

031~-- g - --ý =NP o

PmLWMM am. Cýv L1.

w~.. COD .I.-

low 0 0 0

1-.2

Page 41: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

() x i. w#a1 rA 4

1-4 xmW> >)j~Jca 4) rd0 0 > u 0

c~o $4 44 l 5140X0O 0414)0 4 -

0 c 8400 u (DJ

41 -.~404 4 -4>.=M Oc o 410

4)4 41w m 413&.4 4101-4 >I4 to 410 ra~W

0 0 .0 :3 r4 Il

0 4)i4e4V > 4)os 0

.941 - 0 w 0 '4.44r9-4 11-.4 004 0 U 18..

W4r4 41 0 4 c -r- .9410a.9441000.4W 0'0

*p co U% 4A M 0 4 w >

"-4W P4 W.0J0~ toaA.o4uto0.044 0 A w i ra > 40) c go ,a 04J 1W c ) r-4"4 3.0A r~U8. 0 4 '0

to' O 41 4100 0 '4)

ow.- .03 ty, -4 M CP =.1C rl4 V CD4to

0 VO 4J 44" " 04W1 4

V41 = 0 U4 U 4 *..-400jo w41W'4r4

4 >doW0 w W 0 0.4J 0 go.) 41

O4) 1M4 4 U (4100, "0w 09IVr-4 .0. '4

"o0 6 IldO. *J-4 41 S)

0w 00 to U IV0 0% c4) ( 'a03 > ~ .C-t

>**,* QWe- 4) 4 4C) '0O

0 WWl 0.1. 0~ .oAj 4 1 .&41 V-1H41 AW

to Of1~ .04 41 V W-4t)4 0 o) JJ14 0WH ~41go U

Z "41 44 . 0CC41 1

0 40 to)f 0439 0 4144

rm IV .4411J 0'A494- r 0u4 w8 to 44) - m09Id4) id0

wz w= = >a141 toU % 11.440 QW 41j 0 V 094 to 41 go *,4

r. A C: a H0 4 4 AW 94140 ,

.4 4 '4.04 U .41 c

4 04 0) r- t~ w.40~

0g >414)11 009 U(l

MS A* Ajr4 09144. .0..4. ?a

E4 AJ i- Go 39 C 00 44 u U

w 4 ý 0.VU00 IVA H 40 0 0

410w o0 >4 Ca w~9 0-4 4 r

40 0 H 0 4 [A 1-28t9:E4HavL)0" 004

Page 42: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

olmuft

oE Co 00w x

CD) c e. a*!=

uI-- z I--mw 5 aC0 Dc

La ".- !M

U Laa

= ~ L hJA -

WE _ =AiLin LbIm LidaC.

z - r

o oxCjA co~

w ~ L-~d i

.1-29

Page 43: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

"A4)

0.1. 414w41 ".4 A0$

410

VOrc

0 "40 )4

"*"4 a 10

.9400Ufa 10

c' W"4

to 4 0410c 0.

01.0

jJA CP 0 t40-4"4 r

04 W

41 0 r. r

A V4 0*

W~4 a)0

041~

0. 0 41 r4 g

o4 (A4

P4fl 411

* 1-30

Page 44: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

i zi

zJ:3 Q

1-3

00SIIll

Ii

1-31

Page 45: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

00.>14 V)4 9: '0 4 )

"*q4 - W r-r4 '0 -..141 44 m Wo0 3cto 0 041 (A 041 Mg ) 0co o.4 aa0w 0 .r4 0 >, 00 r 0

0 .4 04 400 4) 000 014cr-I 0 E4 r4V 0 4) C iJ 4A 41 4)qVu4 m02))1~ aW Q, O41 r- 400UV-

a 0 q 4 i0 041.JL ~Ua 0

12se4 4 14 0 $q 4 0 04 0 0 t

4.1 "q0W 0 041 0 4 41 r q 0 >'*W.' 0 13449 Uw-4 W0 0 > to 1 4)04

4)4)410) 44J 44-A0O 4) 4 -4W)C W C Wr-4Lw .> 00 W U08% 0 a4) ot e.4 0.

4r4 0 W U Wj ~ 1111 j4.1 rmwbdw>4og---W4 41)4r4e 4) A4At

V-4$4W r.M .0 )6 Lg a 0 ' 0-4 4) U.a 0 0 0 QA'04-A W)0 r-o '0 4)to

> 10 A4 "41Ora) 920a~ LaU0'N44) W >m4) 4) .'0 W E24.) O.r4)041

0AJ U'4'= 0 0 0-044 .0 0 .-4 -low = a

a).4 r414 La ISw>f 4 4 1r4 4) 10 01041 U4) 0 *04:1r *aJ 0 0#40U4I U4)110 R

4) C a M 4)40 0 -4 m -4A0 "4 )' 4Jro 4 04 10. 0 U.-4 4 ~04 r4 to W~

-A4 39 0: 4) 14- 4 0 W 14

4344 0 &4R a) A> Vc W 0L 4.)0 06hi0r4 4L0000 = '4 WWF4 0 cr -W Palo noto w044 14 4 4J4 r- 4 '01 '0.0 41n1

W4 40 LaS 04.4'11 041 .>"46 to 0114WF 0 0 0' r41

*,041. La (A.,4A a0' 0 Go A 0wo 4) A0>0 0111) M 39 id 4 C4U W A

0.0 4)U111AqU a 0 to0'

tM .044 0 . Q 41 V IV-1 E4) 41 0 C

4)0 1WM'0oto ~qWW4W "oll 46 WA> 0WWCZ 4 0 1J.I0 0 -A 4) Q0P4 A

~4)J A. AU0 1 C41 00.v4) ..4 0 10 a

0 - a.0~ :M t 14:*0 . 0 0

$4 d Wa C010.4 1I41-4 4MW 1414) - MID >140 W re4 MA0W'4In>$

.0 0M 0 C A 0-A4 00 4) 0 "34J-43R 0 i..4 0 r Ur-4 .0' 0 0.A-I

10 .84 o3 W0 "4~.-. -r400 u J. 0 La 0 4jW4C ~.a0at Vl 0 0 1114 4v 4) W4 0 -r0~4 (4

041'0 =to6 JJO' XWO m 1WW1.0j)toi0 E-4 0 4 C1 0 oj a 0 W 4)4W4)

04 4100 LWa41 to M z 0-4G44'I tW.44~0aa - j 0 W w 003114

a00 14 s4.x-ma 9.4- 40 = .L00W- 4W'I 00 4)c 1 W (P C pF-4 0 a ""WF4 04. m

0% J0 g3P-4 A 41.4 0W a.I. to )4La W -4A , f

0AL.4COW.&a 0W.A WUol 0 A 0.0 .ol 4

H4 0 U, 4) =G '0 0b041.4 0 o44 r.0WAca 4M Kr. r- >-4 0 V)C 4)0 >4( S 4)00

CK .0 44 W a t 41 a4) go V-4 4m a0' 41 0 W 0 A, "4 W 0 w)La 0 -M u41

to4 to C:-4.C 004M ) m4) m S0W0 toa o lA0 t A 4.0 >q 04L4)U03O. .40 -4 0 0

fon' -4 41" aaL, 1:11 i

0 4 00 4 " 0 N 4 4 4 0 J -432 "l

Page 46: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

z w

o L&JWfz IiM -oW i LIZ G) CA

;IM La~ LL cr.

z Lai 0-U

LAJ 0

LAhJ L 1U

La. w

Lai ~*0

1-33

Page 47: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

M0

0

0

21-1

o *•-4 ,-

*124

N.-3

Page 48: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

VNW

0-3- I-

1-3

Page 49: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

""4Ii

""4,-0

, , , .

Page 50: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

w

I-I

am

w

dI

1-3,7

Page 51: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

-.4 0 -Aa -404A - v45

0 A1 $ 0 Si SO 0 0g O 0 1 0 -4 .-4l*u0 w 0. f 6 J .r

to 100 0x OK.- 1

ah A -V4O4 0 - 64aU)hO' V S o A0W A&1

45 W 1-4 0 V-4 mi ri 0 so 0'3 ýwe A00 & _P,.61cut O am a4 0AWAS

0.P4 -4- .40 j r-

Ail4 >4 144 *S'4 1

".4 a0 10 -4 AS 0-4 woo 0 Wi94

-0 o0 04 104 0 0a Q.Qso =A trou S-4A "410 C

c0oo w 0~ 39 C u4 m AJ 0 "941S

C -r4 4; -4 W4 * 00 5 4) *0 V*0 .9-4 c G C) 54J -4G140~i NZ C c t A94 aJ00Jhw.j 4 4 39 " 4 .94 $4 3t 00 14.-4 0 C

All '4 0 P44 00 0 > -

)~~4JJJ0 0 i .,4,4i .

0 0:' A.0 0J 0 093'0 MU4: 0 60 45 44 >aJ 114 4 - w ao "

$4 4 o wi 0 0i 0 %~4S " 64 : Pq

in-&41M0' 10 4'0 -41 .0 0 P4A~ 04 00 > 0 Of "4 '0.9a >

0 00. = 4 A4 4A.C0 $4O 94 $4 to

1m 00 Q 0 4q "41 A' 461 S4 S004t>1 ~00 AC -.4 0 , O r. 4

r49 ".9 40 9r- A W00 -

r- OS4J~' M U f-0 0 0O UK4. 0Q

x . 00g 10 . 0 MA ui -ACar

10" Aj =,a' 4S e1 0' P141 P4

IS p > MS 013 " m wq S#4a0 = 4 > r A a&P 09 fS ~9M9 of 39

IM-PSM 0P' MAq#F0 a g 04545

.41 4 is A vC 0W 0~9 A

41 03964 0 m145 0 4 >0 .9450

8 4 0 41' .94-P4 wft4 0aLL4 0 W a 40 0 w0. *M 9 -4 A

AC45 AiU 0 -P40 0M 00.9 %4 h4i. Q 04 A0 =. >

u C Isl M a~h 1.04 45 V

%4 A A0 0 4 31 4 AOO' 00 "940

:I 0 C' qmO "4 9 4 4A 4mv410 A a40~392 4W 4J CP 0O 44 a -4 P4 hi b

Fl a". 0 a "4 00 W445A 91 ~0-P4 1 0 OS o 00 aN 04A5 3 41

m 41MG 0W0 t0450V 09 M."4 0hISO(3 OA O 0 4Ar. Iw$4 41 b 0 456 m 140V-4 P4ý-4 0 %A494 C 4: ft Aj 'OSU4m a0a wA

SU45 L"4 A) '00 0 r.4 a o " A

*.40G AC c 0% 1 W V 0-40 aAS 1940 45 CP GG 4r.0.4 U -

* 441 0~ a 0 q3 14 A GA r4 0'4

4'0.0 40 0 010 C At A51 rr4 0u0 uM 4 hi uG4 a G0> -4

3gI. 40 o . f t AtOh "4 G -4) QC

~~0 - 01'9450 A Q944a SOS p4*9 hi X4A94 m'o00 x

1-3i

Page 52: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Z. (A

a-zSOW

=IiE

CL- Wo I- W w(I

IW6' L1 in iJ

'"0 d.l a W-,wc 0

0 M CA 0 wa.. L w EL.g

m z.too.- ice cIIm

ZA 4c~ La Z az ca~-: 0 & 00-oa =L 0 JZ

OnbI .3 CJ Q=L L -zw 0 - 0 A.a

1-.39

Page 53: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Ab0 0

W04 A 41

*e4AJ

0 L 4

M0 =

0 go

W-4 is5

A~b

WAAji

be V-4 0400

.04 r4 b

" M 0

4. 4 'O.

* .6

04

W.4

.1-40

Page 54: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

w

1-41

U) 00- 00

Page 55: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

=~i 1.i w 041 400 -4

r4 .4.1 V a0 0 F-4 Coo 0 V o

> 0 0 1044 .0"~4 A 4= 4 MA "M 4 4-4 "

".4 .1.10 O0& tP44 4 > C

0) *X 44 41 W V-4i

A 92 (D404 04 to .Is Cdii-4 0 r-I 01E4400oU~f 1.dj Oi

Sd- id 0'04O

$4 r4 lut0 r-4, 0 4>4 e 0 cm 0 W

.4) "4 >A )A -0 0 16 Ae44 to 00".4 9C A10 V, 4).C

a x0 0 > 0 O.40'0

>~~~ 00061 4)0 0'W$40 aW4 31cor00 c 401

so06 000 .- w cp 0 r

0ao0 0) tr4~r-4 0~-0 0 OAAA.P4

A 0 01 00 0M0 #- ir4 F

> r40 ~ 0 0.4.4 A.-40 '0.4toQI

o C A~0 041..44U) 10' W 1 @-4 G ->4=0

" = -4 >1 to 4 ra fa o6o4A aCP A H -0A& 0.0 4H) 0 W 41 4 4 ~41 H >.Q

a=.=-> A0 Aj04S44wU ~ b -A $43 FU

" 4 ~4~0 0C4 v4 f 40w114to"4 X P-44J I r4 r00.4 U

0 .410 0-4 M S00M.4

31 w 41 - 14 "40 44W00 0V -4)C 0 0 di '0. p0.-r4 -P ~q.4 ') 0 C:00040P4r44=$ = 0i P43 4 9 pa V0 4 .0 fe

pp . 40 - ,M 4) " u'f.0)"

0 > 0 'no u 0 Oa a 0 .1-4 31M Aj 1 4"4 m 4'0 'di414' 0 41.~i row X0>4 M>-4 >9 0 0 9 0do (D

M- .4 cr .to 4 0 410 00 .1

0 - cci 01. go J04 "00

>4 A4 "44O A) "if4 464- o 4) 4 >u ra0.4 0 0 4

04 '4a mi0 0 0# A0AJ to

00 0 0 0 t 0M0 0 4) 4

U.) ri-4 0f~ 014 > we

-4 4J 3 A w .144t

Page 56: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

C. = =

Lai =OR

mm ai cc M cc-

'ha U-

cc. - O CD

Cs CA

- - Cs D i* ME~

- 0 C03

W- CA CL

o o I- 0 mCIn *m' 30 0)CO

0. -ELa a

1W4

Page 57: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

> "441 $4 4 0

00 0

4) 0 04

C.44.4 W 0.)4.14

ic d

*1 .041 P40

44 444".94 04

00

'.0 U .1"

P4 0 04r44

w .00

40 >~>00

0 41

E- 0 w

00.

feM 4)

hi0->0~ 0 4

E0 0 000 .0 0 Al

0 Jw*j A 40 -

044 4-4 id

4) ' 0'4 40

0.1-44

Page 58: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

WS F/

Laww0

- .J w

I-c() IW

P ZZ9

U) wLF. 3M Z

z amw0~ I m u

in -

jE j jCLAA (A t 0LCC)(n UJ

- ~w .WWWWZ"u~ u~c.wu~c.A

LL :li

* 1-45

Page 59: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

*A 0.41 ( I41 a c F 4j,

a041 41 0 -V4 04 :> 41 3

041.4 0 r.~ 41 ) 940w' 0 06 0~ C .g 4-4 A9: -

0 m r4 00 A jr U3,1 "1 0 4> Goo r0. 0Aw.C"4 a

$4.4 94 x .4s 40410 VA1-w

41 " .41 >,, 0 41 0 40

ea41 .9 -4b4C >.C 0 4.- -4 C ~4) 4J.40414 w 9 4 0AV AJ41UU.I 4 41 0 00 X044 1.

I4AC24 &Jh1 41Z44=0441 0 00 C 90 E-4 wJJ

W-.C0J AUrj .09 410 000~

41 >0-r4 4 . 0 r-.4 0U41'OV1 aRJ to A 0

0 0-4 w C trA 0= to .0O -41

O eCo ( r.41 00-40.0 C-r 040 410 "41v4 Ld 04.Q > 41UA0>I0 aAU A .41 1 41 A Cc1

41 goE4 41 u A ro41 C 941439 03 xC3 >-. iO ~4) a

to0 ) H 04 a~O 4Io 004)t W9.44U= 0,4bI AAU. o .C>41 C

0U4 r4 r-4 0 0 C a.

4) a 0JJ 0 0 4 14 4J10~41-4 t "944 "~4'?294 &4-4 4

0041 w 41 "4 C t 4

0 4 00 1 A )0

o _Pq04 r s 0 U94 U a4

A- O 6-410 094414141 14

E4 4194a04 > 14. 41.c) V4 0A I490. C 3t CU

4 d V41 P4J 0A0,.CA0* wto Q tois Ccc w 1 fU,41

.9"4 4ý1.4 41 *944C 4141R cc "4 t 4 .W4 0t

a? M-"4O "U.=4w 0.-4 0441 40 0 Q

0. 00 )49o o "41V~ in 4100a. 9to .44

1 4J"4a 41 r4w- 0U

Pa b410 J9 r- 41 0 - 0 "

0- 0h.Na

zid O0.444 r4 A 1 Ida H2

of (A0 Aj r-I 0 P 1-46

Page 60: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

mm'' wJ

Z Caizm - z c

ZfLiJ C.) Ada

EMCC QmaELI U, =

;w P Loa 5WWw

z U,L ~, un

W~aac

uE 06 L * aiUIV

0.

1-47

Page 61: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

is to 0 004 Ao At 0w "4 4.8 41

Id0101r4.4 4101 .4oA F4 "*- 0 A 0 W 0 A.J- 4 -4.A.04 0 -P4 W .0 0 40 r4

w0 L a *4) 'a44 LI a eM -0.04.0 r-400 of

0I 41 4 A 4.0 z J0 04 0 44 000 w I1.P4 1p 41 A0L >1 we M

U.O4AL~4.44 IV CI 0M"4 0 -4 04 0q

Vq4G1U-O > 00 V0 0 a >qi4.4.0W4 4414 $4 .0 - 4

VA a 4 6 id J P 0,3t0 t4J 0 to1=A.0

*.04 0 'w t 41 0 A41,-e4 00C . i 4J P-4 4) "4 00

$4 00 4 V-4 ca C'..c .- l z42ft0- -.414 W441

o .0 As 0 A0041c. 1. "4LI0 c 104

to 41.4 r $V0.4 0 d, >4 14 id A 0iJ4 a I " 0)*41.4 -A 0 '4~4 @0 g

V 0 =0 r-1 V w .9MUJJ 0

a 0 4 O 410a 0 14I*.u4 0 0 $4 A 41 0 to 0U410U 00 r- QUrn$

2 -P410 41 V4u Pa0a 93 AAA uq. "41 0-'0 00 041 1- -P4 14r- o'

2.1 * 0 A oo0 w.10 0 u a0 t > 0 .04 wa

14 '-40.0 44 a0 00wwt41 r-44 0 4 A '03 0 1 -P4 -40

I 0410A10 P4a41 0 In LI 441 r41"-1 0i4 04a4id1m 'e-A

0 41 A 00 O .Au04 Z 4014 4 w4I 0 m Aj aw a*w $42 * 0..9410 41 w O

o o 41144'0.0 .A4to1" c 0 V 4C-P> P-4 "41 U P-40 -@4' Lao"40 CO4 4 A FA 0 -r41* %40 ~ 0

P-1 V04 041o *4 ~40L >14pW.C* Or 4 w V m' P-410c %000

61 -4 .0 1.0 0 oo>qP4"41L a0 41 -a4011g0 0 6'q 0 0 040 a

A. A0'A04 4 M O4V0 '.-4 P4 , W14 04 A4100.4 A .4C' 44..aa1. '.44 fa L.PC0 $4 141 p 4r

4 a SC 0%.0 to04131 O.8.4 A 0 r P4-4 P04 .41.4 '44 "~4 41A . '41

X L a. t'oo 004 0 CP"4 4J 4 04 41410 no004 0 "V4.A0 (at

0010QVICla 0c >00 a "40 44Le "4 64 P4 > 41 M P4A -LaA04141IO &a4L 4414 41 to

04 04(A 4J 40)C0 04000 C 0.4 OW "4 4J 904 0 -A40 ab..4 40 04 t-4 C.

0-40 04ui 0 0-4 40 a04 .M "

-A 1.0.0 40 40 '4 age 0M e jo e* - 41~~~~4104 La 4.0 0 0

410 a 934a10.i

. 1-48

Page 62: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

L ZSL &J I--.

INPk- 0No C0 -J-CD- -1i C-

= , - ,, ,

CD L&i lm ccE

CC==

.C =C

"& 024 3E]

cc m-4am a)ld

>0J W- W4% -I U

CL. LaiC-

La ax= dA

ca -d2 C. $M- -6 Aa- C2

ae Lac = CK C, -cAm

O--a aw ap = " W

c O c0c 03%

oA =*C aw 0Ii UZIa)MLic

a acm-49 c = W

Page 63: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

0-4 C0 r.4 r4 9.

M W- US 4 r.- a

* J == 0 41 41 =.M v-•4 E0

C1 r-40 go In 3 L d 0J0 •0 00 - a

@4 I•t@oA .04..0 4 @ 4•-0€ 4 1 3 0 C > U A41 @" w 4.) C" 41-C*J AdU "40 ýQ 0.4 W4 w

0, > 4 -0• U.4%4 400.) U USC l4a 0 44 •.4 •3 0 > a .Id w W

t ,, a C, 4 w -04 $4 0,-0 w . -4

A4 Ot4 .4.4 0 At.04 t4o4 4 41 UI4: ' 0

e r 0 Ad a , .-4C0 4 1 a0W I. " 02 1 0- @"431 61 0 00 >94 1-414A.4

&v-4 -. A 4 Wa 04 -- 4 W0 W @ .=

.4 0 w4 -. 4 P4 04 0 4 -to.) 4'q5r4 A Q.140 >144 .0 .a = 004 394-V tp0

O 0 >4 00 INS 41 0P 4 of0 a$.= C0-,

.,* U. ,. ' .0 ,.I4 , '0O0 00- V0.4

E p4 =.44 CA014 a iz0a4

m. 10 6 .,_V > 4 4 a 4O 0 M , O@ I -0.1 w , 0-4 0I .13 414 (a C: a 4.144 40 *A > 1

04140 A w0 0 .a044 ".I44• f C 4

0 0 4 >1E 04v- 0 A 4V0 -V -, '0 4

0 1A -41J to C 40 0.. = . 0 -04ZP4 r40 *

4-4 A P % 0 o 4$ ,0•A - -A E-4

0, 13 a v-4 0 > .12l4 4 -r 4 4 1 '4. 0 41

) 0 4 -41 0 4) 4 w 41> V Q CC C r

Sid, t0 0, ,. >, V •. 0 ,4 V.m-

e .eADo •.1,, 0 11.. >.. > w

Z A 4a la s goA4 4 > 041 CO

0 1 •. > -0 o '-r4 0-- 41 4)

A1a" 00 .C ONO 0 z0 to.. a"q I

-04 V2A r40. Cb 0 41Aj = . '4 Aj W44 =t

M, 61 , 4 A 0 V C 00 aV .. . 1,.,

o,• ,144~4 .-.4 m 44 r-A 411.4@00Aj w a 0 0 0 C fa 0 A U 4 0 o 00 000

C a $44 A00 C, 3, W U >tA a ,'d I ,j

0 0 O 4 ' E 6,, 4 r 40 4 0a to .0 § 00

0 W 0 114 0C) .0 P4'.. OA U O., .0

E-4 v-041 XAVOC 0 a > g00 41 id0

.-4 . C. -r 4 %%4 . 0, 0 a0V• 0 w4'04 0' •

64 a 0 31 41 a 0 Cla 0 14 0 40•W4 a O0

=-, 0 444 0 a 041 =0 W 0 0 .4 .

41 C 412 IM44 0.lU to~4 w4 r O f A

V 00 M -A - 44 e C 0 , .4

-. V ~0 0 046 VA 00.0

V 0 44 64 0-" = o.- o 4=.44 v-4 0

0. 0 o 0Wld0 A CV A41 .4 00 - 41

Aj A 41.-40 W'4 0o w0 > 241 a1 to0

14 1~U 0 m 04144 o~V

41 0. PCG*. 0, is- a-te .4 , - 04 U• .,1 4 .1 a a

E-,44 0 C 01 w'U" Z.1"4 0'.4 0 U 0.1

0J 0A40' 00 0V 0 0. P4 Do 111 - 8

I~ ~ *, P4~~ * 1 0 04 -4.C A 40'44

V ,. 0 of 0 . 0 6.4C 0 t . a 4 '0 0 .

0 M C41 400 4jew -04 O= w A w

Ca 0 0410 to 0.l 4 j,*, ) C

I- x4 Aj ASa .0 V> '41e40 f 441gor4U 0

01. 04 0 Ob r.0 111 . 0'b.C ý> 4 4O0.40-

W P4006> n41 4.0 FS 0 z 10 Id 041 w 2

41 i 0 Q.0 to .4 041 0'0 PC' t P40 UA -

0 0 a .1 w1'>~ a~J $4A4A M OJ411100>0 -0w004 0 .40 .0410 0 w 0 9.0424

-64 415- Cp 0.0 0 0> ~ w C tr0 41

*100 0a= lr

Page 64: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

lug ca_ yu

cm*loftFM-

z CFOI- =ccGil C4-,

FE -9z U) 00

IAC.2 ca cc MA E

amI- ME ZE LA -

= w 90 c = In

#1)~~ COD ~

zalum =L o d h

U) U) = m 3E 9Si -D Co a -& oa>

>0 CA CA, =~

-J -I.)W idC mc - hi

now) L" W

in me -

Ln COD I , i

155

Page 65: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

to V4 0 w1 Uisc 0 AV4 9: 0OUO'

b ~ ~ t C". -V~UU .4 aJ"4U -ý WS~.CU 0 4 4)4J 0 U 0 41

0. Aj W44 02 Idh -F4J X94 0.Oe4r4 w etaAj.0 hi -f 4&Ja m- '41 10gU M0 0U onatC n .> ou

m UC44 0..C ) oO- VO V a =44to J~ct04 P 0. -V4 .00 0A a *Be 0 H

W0AfaGo0W 44' W U44 * 004 OU r- 0 A 4 -r * 4WJ .4J4 4

ca aC F4 m 0.0> 0) A . 04 4I

0 =VU-4 W o W 0 wiA 0 -A'444 0

S 14 W 0V S 0 )4 4 4M4 t

4 JJJu 0 -IOAC94 4) 4' A r-4.0.C0>~4 CaV 44 044 w J > i '4) V 3C - CPVO" 4 4 4COJ u 4 4) 3c0 > 00 '00 "UV140

wn .3'a to a :5 > 4 0)J 'I 0 U. IA44 n r c 40 Aib a 4)hi

41. :1 Aj W4 -4Va=c A 4 PC5 r- r-J4 M. -rCDr. to4 U 140 0.A 3 A 14 0. -r4 V0 CC(

m coC2 g 500.43 U, -A 4 '40040.000H P 0W W~41 > q0 $4 mVa 3IUU

> V 094 P r-4 00 C R 0 41 1 Pt cA> ~ JUA ' aV C'b3 4 $ O0J w I =A o fbc

o 0 1 tff ig 0 aC a " we to 4 A U00ao W94 0 UjL 4( w >09 e40 c U> O

-. 1.0 1 t40 -W 9 410CU0 0"4O0 A0 0U -4 -30 00 0 .00

W M > 41 C 0 0C C0) 4 C V W C0U14)ca 04 4 0J to~~w *'WU r4 I Qto >

.C0.0 UOUO'4 todh 2 0O a UC440 *0Uh. U o P.0 3 5.4J Q J 0iOW

2 j% * 41C U 0. c. 0SC U-ra 0 IAJ 4 Q w 0 431 "t4 0O.4164-b 0

0 i 4 )0 0~ 40 UC%- to44WOw O> MOw 0If *V (U w, W 44). 94 4 4) 3 OW.4200 .0

64 %4P 4 941VC OVhC 0 W U >0 U JIM4W"0 3 0-UO wV O -440 0 C C 0 " 4

~4 C 0. OffO .4 U A. 0r4 U.-4CAi U~ IN.hil0 rWJ *5 oaa IV V 0.. 0 ~~ 4J >- 4 0r t t .U4NV O SIC c'> OSA 0' - O P P

cc -1 JV.1 .>.0JJ 4 '40 04to 0 a 4A 0 to 40,04 PCOV 04W U 04~ 04.0 P4 >4 o4

ca AU640 Uc i hi >.04 U V 0 '-41c nowe14 0 a U 00'.. WWU-A iO0.

0 9)m 0 m 4 a 4 CO4J 0 Q.=-4UC Q'~ A54 = C V4 - 0 U 9 C >i. .4UJ0 .V 0 .94C,. : j to'"4 A 1 >-F 41 60 a a> C"4 >ra P

:0W -P AJ 4 1=c 044C o4w >.A w 4.MEd r V.4 "4 IJJ-4W. 44 4A Qo-4 0 0 41&E- C: go 9 ,4 4UU w0 cJ C-4 0 UQ WOC -

=4 -4 0.V0.0 C 0 L M3 "' .00 20 0 1 "4* j t0. "4 0 = .4J0 V0C .V44 U C' U

I C OW4 U > I 5.P04VA O C. 1 p.43 0 -4 JhU 44 V1M U A 44 a 4W c4 U 0- 0ff .. 4..

x *0.9~ 0lo."w0 a (a UWO UV > Ja-to 0$4 i 4WJJ U C0 .4.W. .f 41 004.A 0 a m 4U

%D 0 a "~ 4 z4U 9 A o Wt P4 OJe41 u-4 ca .f

014 = ~ 1AAV C044)01-4. as C A'4.U00 "4 40

14 U04 U 4J4 A 9v14 40. fl0f M 40 33U.- W r-4

1-52

Page 66: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

w

2-

I-D 000

Gl) amC- 04

(A _CA

CAb ZE =p

CAm C- USCO(AW-,

= I CD

cc &0 W

0D Ca La a '~ca

Lbd( OF b~.

* 0La CD0

Page 67: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ta w U3

AON.w41

1 0

0' Z'4 to- Of

*645 ~ 0G1 0

:04 t 0 -Aqw r 4 14a

0, E- S.4 C 164 AA0Z ma4

1-4 M'@%4' we=0 0.

X 64 Aj = aV dIm. A4 . rOU.>

m~~O 00OU44

P "4 A 6 p-a0V

C6 0 4 0E- ... A0 1% PC==- 1

=~ 044b

40 *w 0 10 0

UP4"4 041= 0 0.0A A U >'

0 coo 0341 * >

a 0 0 0 ".40 0

OM is bi A14 044:p .) Aj .1:40 CP

a _V.4 SI S.*'.400 SAA

3.4 c .U SO"' p~

Ca 41 U o-4S0 "4("4

64 *E to P4 0~

'. 4 1 45* -4.0d *e4

as Ad 0I -04 A e

~~~ Au4 0' 1 .S0 4

P4 tA11dSE1JA.4 0 0 1a l 40 l AjA04 a

(4 54Dw WOO 6% 031 ASW 4 A 00 4 '0

f) P-4-.4 2 5.9 AMA$4 t!m oo 40 A 4Ma> A.

.3l 0 .oAAU c *0 0CW.4 00jJ0'101 A 00

1-54

Page 68: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

uj£

z I-

ZAf

LUJILE

ELLLa ZIP

zC

~UJ~

Zl Z_1 L zC:PI

Page 69: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

"4 04 0a

."r ift 0 UO-400666 4* W0

-v446U, W4~ 0 4 0.W-60 0 4-

4 00E.0 0.44 >

0to00 Oner. '010W r 4. 4 4 4 1

6660v4 0 0V *

A 00U40 440 41 ;*39Vr- rq

4W v 4 * 44 >-0

14 0. 4d 'V4e4-V ~O0 A" 4 0 9 . CD -4 Do

iw 0 b, 0 Id

ai v6 60' "4 Be0 Sao CONIC .0 .0

U 6O 404 IOx to > 00 r. a1

0 *u4*a0 0 w U.4

41 coo 10 w5ato 0 rO. U "4w b w.04-# U 1 64*00 DO

m , ~ 06& 0 J '-404V06.4 > v-4 06A 4*

, 0 6~S 04 .0401.w4 B"40V C a V

AJ- 64A .~ 0 -r4o0W w a 0 0 t -4

- ~ 061 A.go :0 6. P-4

C r4* 44 -P 0 39 t

0 AV V 4a*j0,

0 66 1.L0. 0 04*66jo0 U -P4 0 0650C

v W= J.44*4 0 .ii v 0.404 0 do= 1 0 4

W1C 14 *0 =in .'4 31 - UP '

1-V6

Page 70: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

-D

La Z Zo CW.o 2 4 W QQ

CD ,- dL. C6.

Lai ~ ~ ~ -, I- a-.,4 Ab

6" ac~~ Dca-~ ~hI.I.-

-- 00£4. '3 C.

>0 ~ #' MJl 4 t om

LL Lai iti.D . -m m

, U--,j• ,-. - B- * • B-:WE • 'O 4D44

C#2 ,a :

o C -57 -ca

q L LA. -. a Wh -g M WELai - cc c= ~ CL .. ac B

_____ CCCA

- C.0 ME- ~... ... ... 4= = =IO

'I1- 57

Page 71: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

4/'

4 r) >.4A

",llc1 W[ S 4j C•=l I1 -A "4 0- A0 0A 4 W 4 0 1.01

10 > V4f_ ;

"q 540 .9D4.p4.44f 0 0 "4 410

0 L1 0 W 4194

0 is 00W > 94 toU1 044 A a4 a4

C004 4) 0 j0 -. 4 O

,-4 WP4- f -r4 0go to a04 004-10

A 41 W 40) > 000

0 0 0) 0 0)W . C.

•0(40

.0 V -.4P r. -V. 'o104-

.46~ 0 0W c 10 Rto41~

W.1 0 Q AM Q 0

cI4 .,= gv C.-4

> to to.- 0 WA 4Id

- -41 'P r-4 0 .- 4 0.A, 4

.0VW 0 m 0 V4401 C

.10 g. o W.C- 01

02 94 ,, 00 i•4 - r-'4 V40

I~~~~~~ Adl)•QO~JR . 4) X

94.94)41 W4 $4 f w44 3t %4 r4. law .of V

10. 0 40 > 1 Wq#aAr4U _4 4 0 .3 0 44 C

00 A- 0• j tol el u 0

'0 410 - 4) r4 -

b.1 u.€ m 0*£ •,. .

00.00 .- V>0 W4to CI..4 . 0.>9 P- 00 41V4 Aj o 144)0 0

034w -4 A00C- r.4 w10cmm000 r-4 4)41 " 0>4 0 0.C 0 40"q0-4 "4

c00'm 90~09.94(00: 4 4).9 '1-4 0"4

C1 W -- 4 00"4 IV a' 4

02 -58C• "

E4I.4 00 10J J -P l.0 r* 84 OOC 44ivc " A 3 4"4 V W 14' V a) A 000C

04 0o W 4 c 4100 t-- 404W I 0.44

x .0 4 0 o .4010 r a1

A ~0 ca 44 140Um94 410*00W4 . 0 00 P4 w1 4

Xr 4 C0 4> 4100. -r4.

410a i410 >"

4j WC !- 1V~9 40 #-444-P

Page 72: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

_~ Li.Jh

Lana LI. La j ME

Q Lu -g- IJ ImL. a . U 1-0-mml &J~ ME m

LU L&IUh

E~~~i~La CO_ U m J Lzip 21 a~ co

Eh = -~am gm c.L c m

zip -IJ ciLA F- k=o m mw C I-- 0

5Co

g= Cc -e5c

Page 73: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

40

C:

040~

41.9

041 t

4J.0.944.041 41

ra4)01 u

I""o

41 V~

-u 4C: 0

~1-6

Page 74: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

wI-6

In

4 -' 0)0

U,

* w

. 1-61 .,

Page 75: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

".4 a I '1. 0 b4e'O 40 Oro0 b4 0

lu0 Ce V4 P-0.4,400 0 o 0 WO U 0 0

ol f 1: L r.A 4, P4-C"" 0J-,4 0 WA 0o~bj AM4JOr0 Me 00 4)ihe

P.14 0 W ý4 40 0 4. C >. 0w.1 t. idv.42E0 0 0

aC 04 "4 0 Qer4 Oro C0 "4 0C 0 a 4 Wig0 '4.C .0

t '40 COM 4 0" D D

o Is C 0 04

044V to fo-443 Sw' Id "14 t0>' 0.0 wOwhahef 00

N 0 sc 0 mr d-4 V 01 4CMI 4>040 39 a : 4 0.14) O0 > W 44

C20 04 laf '0 0

04 Foq*~ hw do ?up4 V'Id F04 he- . o' V0 r00 4 w44

O- .- 4 C: 4 m 0 a 0 00 400

a V *j0 W4 1W04 U- C4".1It0. > 0 39 "4'r-4 0 to

r4 ~ . 1e 0 '0 - A4

*.4 40 W &~ ft-4 .46 04~0 ba~d0

ri 0 000 4 o 9Iw 420 34 he 10 OA v-4JJVh> W 4)4 Pr.3 0 0 -I Id V0 4

si .0 J.40cff (n h 0 -P444 b4 hew 0.C C.4 he 9 %4 0.4 >3

0 U .4"4 W41a 04-~4"-4v~ "14>i ow 40 >160 00 0 $4 a

Om r4 100 a FVa ".4 t Ve414 SU~h ld0e 14*00 0

4) 0 0 P4UQ 0 00 Q #

C) 04 008000 & of~u r40

"ff04 d .- 41 C -4 0 P4 r-4C1 0heer

0 W $4 1~ h0 '4 39 so,0 0 4

V 00A' O 0Os I$ V1 o-4= 0>,0Ji-4a4 V in w 0 P4 39 4) a4

#0 4)A u4N 0 V rois bd' V 00

413 t I a 0IV > 0 a04J 00a

.4 0 o c w 9e 0E' LAWId

S..ol . 0 P.-a0 C

r. fa -P14 .1.4 .4JJý U 0 09 0..4~0 01CU , W 0

>0 uJ o00 I=0 0 0 M4*V44 4 DJ I Z W-4

Ad 4) N 0ll e4 #4Ad-4 b he 0 0U0' to as0 OA.C a W4 -v4

24 4 dp4 he4 C0 0 he U 4K 40 S -0 A Cr.4 at~@ toh e b04O' W o 01

toW 4 jU L4 .4 0) C Auv-4 Oi-c a 3 >00 w VO a he.-4

010ale0 i.4 "4 0h W 4OW .4 C

-. t go0 041 Ig00 -4 0 h 0 0 Wfoo 40 C B o 0 C0 "4

to .I)atip0>-(A0 4 14 0 r-4

('.1 1 -. 4 00 SIMA 04A tr Ar0lbt1.e4= >"40 U -4 "4 0 "4 E-40 0

04 0 tA20 aW '0 c40 a ooQ = C 4 4 0.@4 " 4-> MU0 4 he0'&4hA', t1-4 U

a $4 oJ oh 000A'4 o0Vc4CU) 0 hM04J:.10 0, u :p4 >

1-62

Page 76: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Owl

lowNJ 4

W0 00A a I i

CO). Otw 49m

La ASLO

WA No, 5, LIW al ag( M1QL

0 0

Wr mJ c ANK Lu.La L.0L

zip *I inA

M G

Page 77: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

V4P4 .0 4 -4V4 -W =a t

r. 0 0 r1-4 -.4~ 4 i t3 41 4jtta (

0.0 Or x a .4 0.

04po 4 Aj C a c 4

* 0V44 0 0 041.4 0-0 0~f414 w 4 w -V > 0

*.u 0 -w U 1V0VA04l.e4 U-r 0Uf- 40 Ua 4 a o aL

a A.4a 10W- to~ w :a : 0" a a j~ 004 3 c U F444

ro 0 reJ .-A V*0WO- .~-V4

"4@ go o t441 r4 o46 0 go r4.0

to JJ..40)4 c A'4 W4 W4.

r. 0 4 .4 JJ -4q. $4 OsI 41oP 4 4w co 0 A 0Uf '0440

-40 4 0 . -A "44-0 4 al 0. A 1C 9.4 mA44 q4) 0 -0 w V 0 >

0J.4 0 0a 0~J .. 4 4 16 44W44 ~ 4 Aj to ".4 40 440 0

0 44 V-W4 31 to a14 41 eI>0 0 ~41 '.isot4 0 0 >1 a"144

r. 4 040 .0 U0 r-4"4 .440'41aI- s *0-Aj VV 4 4 $40040 to a 40. 41

W4 a ..0 "4J40 "qW *P4 U4 "q4 C: $4

Is VU4 so. M , g s "4

w4 0. V F 4 g C

9: cJ11U 0 id1.4 co > ~40 jM$a to r. 0. 0. fl 1 o > .

C- U '14 0i "-4 4~ .-A to00S0 '1Aam-40 w .0 is 000 V .404 W

ad ~ 4 V 00'44 1. s- 0 0J404Q*4 31 4AOW V 44 D004Q 0 V 0. sto .0

A1jU14* c j.- = O~ 9". r440*4 ) id c C) .04.A A1 Q.04V..u(n

I 0000 >.* 4 1 -A4~ 04 3.4 w -4

w 31 41~J 0M-4 A 0 "0C

0 QU0 41 U 4 0.- 0 U &O 14 WA>-

3.Ip41d4 V'w441J0p4fl14 0 ~0 -P4 r4""4 A.. 4) 4 "4I 040 W t 04

IV w -ow $4 0 O0' .0 :3 $ 4

A4 64 00 to 4 V-4 0 0cO

M P4A 0 C0 U ol-P xr.t "

41. q0 ~ 4 .04 .4 r4 wa w> P4 E4 TIC0~~~~~]- >4 o00 a0 1W$

0"cto c0) ""4 o UC 0

Page 78: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

WA)

-- --d 0 Q

IMI& i*.i LL 00LJ C,-m_ .6 D -CA 4-c

-• _. -=-M C0 CDC

M CD PC )0 =

1.- 00 ' O

at _ Ca -

_ MJ _o

, .rr • -- ,Z Z

>0 0 _.

cm iii ME

. D "miO +I' mi- I,- =~mm- me :.0 ca CMam ra = 0 E C

C6 .jCD g = 6C.mscLa ME ma Ca ~0 CDw -A =~ - c a w

Em. __J = C2 I" -- - Wii-a: 0) m aSE

-i 0r 3E WE

Lba 1-654

Page 79: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

94t-P 0- C"40

4 40 r4 0 41 w 0 a a 4A

.4~ W.9 c r4 L aa 00) 0 r- ea

> 0 3.0 c hat0 O~44'4>- 44 w

.04 AA E-4 - wP 4 0 0%, z4) .M

09 0J 4) h0 4.C 0 4)

Moo 4jh ,4 0 W-4 00 00 Pa-4 100

.~04 tp id 0. av r-4 0 O

>0 3ý400is 04 fi 0 "4 4 0

E- 4 C 0t 4&p4 W~4 a0 L 0 '4 r4

tbt C.0 0 NO0 A -4 0 - s- 0 4)q.w 0.94414 4 1 -4) cC wa0 6V'4J 4 Z 4) to 3t

q- ' 4 t 0 - "4~E >' . 0 to4 -A4 ) 4

%-4 V fa 4) 4 a r-4 0. >0AtV z4

4000 C:. 41t A 14 a- -m40 0 M u

&, 5 4 # 0 )- 0) 16 644 )

c ~ ~ ~ h isa60 140a >0 cc A 39 r ) 4) .0 >

"4 A 0 "4 *0'%94Ayr4 0063E-4 A * 4 0 p . 0 r-4 AO >- 00 0 0 i4 4 -

0 so =9~4 4j'.. 4 00'O a 0 0.

w.4 mC .9 0 04 >0%a a A 60'4 0e '4.M

14'400 $4 w 440aA 04 001.4. 46-4 I -4 4 .0' *10 0 b 41 P4 ag

cq0U 40.44)'F4 a0 a v-4 0~o%a U4 A0- 4) >, -4 .04a14 " to -4

:1 C -*4) OW A a0.4 0 0is1419 0 A: 4 4.03 "4aw0 -4,-e40'4 A0P4)' W m cA .94

MC0"0(P40 P4 0 a'44 )J0 0'44 4>Q C V -4 A0 - V"4 " w P4 0 0 4M -Ad .944,0

Fr_ 1c 40C b w 0 .41 Aa)

A4 0 Ci6 r-4)to IV 0 6 o - 0 04) 0

a 0000 0 0 so A W 4j JJO a d 0 M 0 41 to

0 i .K4 We 0 A4 4J4.494 0, w "q ~0Ai a '.041 u $a,4 0r %04.c 04) 0 At A

at 0''4 0 c:MI 6 tp U, 4005c 4)00gS.04 m0 0.4 44 4)-4h r6 f-4 04U) L )h41

P4 % .460 .09 p-4 f 0 4JhO W .00 v0as- U 31 '0-14 h0 $64 F AAW. 4) >I

>40 a a 0'0 60 9400a 0 4j ez 4C14 6 040000 X 4) r- .40 14.c

4 C0 0 "4 r. A60 a-4a j~ 0' "4A 04r44 0Aj '0 OUA) > -4-40a r 94 ~41

a P.-40 4) c*60 0~0'.4- 6a 6e44 4460.40 -V0 r4r4A = UOJ = l* 04 3 0 0"4 0

1-4 A)4) P-4 i s r * ~41 .04 to0 ha 40 haj r4,4w -40 > 0 .04) 4)0 0J A4)'.4 z

a O 4 = %4A -, 3M94A4 0 '00 4 6r w )0 V-4C4 h4 a66 1 ~hOA 0 4-*4 0 Z.0 4044'0A.

z )j00a6 C -4 0 'a z w 0 S4).0 4 1004 0046. 0 a 9 ".4 CP =.0 apu t

4 A)~ 0...4 1.A ha4a .0 0 '4.0 "-v 4)4).-4g4 1 I d.9M0a -4 to 9)j 0

@a)4)0 .O4 a0 0j a ~ ~4.4 ,0P-4 pA -4~ 31a 00 to0 F4 c A 0 0 )-4

00' A 4).94 0U>qA0 V'4~ 1 o-4 00 -404-40.I 0 "4 4aj of to V 04 0 '-t 4 4) 40)

31 a 0.-4~ c I=P 41) 4r u .94 0f" :9 M4 4) b'.00'.0-04 Q= 0' Z) 4c" -4A * 41 -0 is .9404 >j.'4 A A 0r 0 0 901

mtu P46 In ;0w r.'4 4A9-4ca $ 4 . > m4 a0 u go a 00'4 t 0 -4 (a 0 6* eP4

Ah -'SW OA4 N P-4 P-4%4P "4 4940 44 a 0 %4a0 0.%A0'..44a4 M 0~ c 44 $~4 %

U) 0. 0 C0 04-0 0--4 0OA.0 to .4~0400 4 )0 ) ) *,4 W4

1-66

Page 80: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

*vow%

w9 O a.

0 at

i coa zzz Co

UIsw

z 0 ca~

La 4

Zoo i -CA~. m wzw a )

1-67z

Page 81: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

a IsmEDOOS44 41 $4

P- w 0 r.

"00 mO 4 -.. 4 0 4

*r *g.46 00-4

>Jbi hi 0 a 4 w go

'0-0b4.0 x 0Co

jd 4 ED 0'O"44 41 a A

0 a 41~i 39 a00

&, tp i0~ t- Wr"- 4 4 5 4j4144~ INE6 0f

to 01W.0 0% 0. 0..4hz

CA "4 " 0104 ", b 4V4j AUDJ W a0 0-4

Go ll 4 ) toC 4 U. 0

2 hi -VU4 0 W a =moo

rhiSED 4' 00ED40

4) 0 -P4 v-4 -4 > -

A ~ r 0 ~O34 1 Aj 0 -A3 ti O4

00 W""4 Ai 0O a4x %A a W -4 6004W

- o- 0-,i1 0 j4 4 .0.J1l"".W 44 0 : %

10 I...40~~EDW O'Jr-4

PQ 0-w 0 FS' 4 a 41OtAJ "4 90 94 6 0,

*e r-~4 ' 0 o 0 A s0 >940 C U-4 0 P 4 a j 0 4.

W -P4 0 -P A NE >a

o:Le3 r D4 t x ol

0u440 *"4ED4 0" D

Z 0 UjU. 4 16O AJ0a 00A 0 W-4IP

8 a L a m co -4 10 a8I ?-W 64C-P4 jC AA I

Page 82: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

"LI

ME) CDc

C.." AdIa

~IW~ haJCD I.4

'h 0 'hi

ii( ka

A" ac

'h D 0

CDZ _b cm-L" cc ac-. CD

C6 'aINC & -

=Zip

~~coSE ~ MEW

r- rw..' L"La .- o 9.2'hmCA C2&J ma-

6R O cm, =o caC5 tLAJ -. j CD - '- CAC

1 '69

Page 83: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

- MRI6 C M6T Lv

41 04 0 h

0j 05 = 64-4'00hiS AJ -4 ,50 41 d

04 A.0-44 4JC iv a -4C-.44 W-.40. tP 0 Q -4 w.%4 P-4 ".4 -4 W 0 04440 c 8 0

W444 b-40ha 14 A c .w0 660w

.C660L 00 PC. .0454a5P6<1P- 0 01 '001 6

so -w 4i14'4 0=6 0U C 6 3 0 w .A

.41 -.4 C0. ha a '.6*jA A5J -V4 o-4 0jtP A5

hiC U-4 i6w 0Oi 44 0c0 .4 U00h 60 Vb4 wn 00r.4

ag 0.o 0 a451 x 0

0 0 W-4 @0 OC 45A0 r4 C: *0. 0i = OKw 0 j lV 0 " . %id Ss 14 0.-

a 46545J045J0 P4 .0 00 0 >9 41 L -U4 C 6 0 41506Ik o-4t%0' -,460 0% 639 0 o4 0 ia64 (00 a ..4h 645 0. A..444wdic v - d 40,00 0wG 06456

>'.C4 wj-4 0 >-4 6-" 0 .CC01 0 m= 0 a rOO-4 16-400 045ba, 06.-4 6040 45 j0 as i04 64150. bCh hC -4 0 0A'00co id CP z -4. CO a cUt) 0h C00 0 i a v w0a~4000 0 0 0S > 0 u0453c w4 0.0C Sc 0-4 i

Aj a b E4- -. 4 a a-6

16' '. 6156

64 e0t'%S --'4 -04 t.-4 s-4 45C 0* C OI" aZ V-4 a00~ ." 4 451 hibo g 066 0 -.4 6 to a 4 a. c

0 SAC 0-4 %-d 45 6 -4C 4 41 *0- - Aj Aj4 0=~d.44 5.Ail "4 = "4 46-

U) 0-4 4 0 z.C A a is66 414- -4-

a' %a 00 004VA 0 4 '00 -4 0 eA 4 bd4

39 45 00 r-4 A a a V -4P4' 045A 000O ~ -4 9 04J .6 --.45. wo 24 Co4 V40 9 0 444 3S0 C -4 -.4

* 0 0. 0 C.~.a'0 ).,hSJ 00'0

%"4 >q = C we-4A b 60Z j .-- 0 -4 -. 4 0-" 0 240.= V 4 a 6

9-4 hiC Ocr 0V a CO4 45 0 OC(30 S- 9.4'6. -O S 45 41SA0 0% 604O4

43 t)-45 0'.4 .. >9c r a&63 SC A0r.4 WC- -- 4 00r646 ba hiSO1

z - 431* - 0 aL Ue9 U 0 i. .44 a

Q 4f l .t c4~f .- 0. Li0o 0 .J 445 0 - 4 ld.4 b44o J t: -- 40

641 6Dj45 hi A~h --4

c06V 0di~C 41210. C"U), .i' 0. 4 A40 cd .c .O40 w 603j ,

a r toa . 4 v a. .4 a1-70- 4

Page 84: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

"Wfr.MC7 377A

z AAA

I. UJ

1_ cc W

4-. 4c V

*~c 4L- -

4- __EM at

-' U Cie

a 0 ".. CC

.44

ma WEM ja -

_ ma M 9l a a

cc 6- 1" e

z z

Z 1 cc w0 ZZi 4C c I

'm 0-jz4 dWE m

j B..4P

06x.4A La

dr..

Page 85: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

coo*

a 00

C...4

c 0

4 .- :09 * 0L I.I

0.4

14P4 01a CO

* .15U

-,P4

, 1-72

L*S.1'

Page 86: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

IA

LamJ I-c-m =

oAloU wI)

U)) a

03E

zzaz Co

Iii(=Z2u-i

j ZU::*IIzw-JWILAM

Page 87: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

39 0 U

E4 ' 4A ED. r4P4 J

:j 0 0 0.4 =

m . %.4V) a 0E4 04 ED s

mA Q

31 0 CD:4

a4 "4 G"4

I. * 4 Jr4300

E-4 0 oc4@JJ

14 0'4Oi

-V.4o 0 a~Mm #A P4

'4~ .au46 -4

a 0@60 PA

.c id 9-4 aa 4'

'4 ~ L 15I4 6EE

-04 0On on 0

O/ "4 -4'OED 0 Uc

3 M 1 4~ 4'0 0

*4 p46 *EDJ. 41 r

*r4 Aj .04

0.04 owsz0of>"40 go

Page 88: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

SE

*J zipa9 =w 00 Ly I I CF

.3, ____L1 A-a -Z -

-0 0 m l az 4 I .~= Z0~

LL, 0 0z L& (A W

Ca Law C=&A

z LA Ca-ILZI Z = U

E*Uz z .5.

LI

. ;

Page 89: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

0 >

4) .0do0= ) 9

>0 40-4 -r $4 3OAAAO 0 wig9.- .&J4 A .4I.41fl41 WX .- 41 0 0 W 4141

>8A4w 04'1 L4a r-4 9>>4 .14 0 *4100A MG14Ao- tP414J v >.4h V >1 014

0 )4)41 044004 V .>94)

A4 A0 V 4)r1-4 .1W OA.- 044A-

ow AA0 41 -r4 0V 4I. AA 0 a 0 -W 04 $ 4 t J .~ 0 4 .A4

-, -4 0D41 id o t ~ . 04

A0 d A~ 0 o d440i O40A

to 4%4 a 441 c '00H 4 r-O41-4 0%. Id4U

0 ~ ~ ~ wG tpH 1d >-4V4b0 .- aC V0 4 ) f- r44 4j

"0 4l4woer0 r- 0

414 4.4 10r4 41A -10 " 0~ *41A tOW0 r4) ASA o a

Q~ 04. .4"4~ -r 00v4Aj -0460 4 w 41 HG)w:1

>4 4)":. is top4 JJ 0 C

41 -.Lr4) 46P4 ) 0 OA 64 0> 4110.=414 4 ) aS a 0

is0 r04)H340 a~ L4-4 P4) 404As a) 6 0~

" 4 s64) o.44 a1 IWA

f$ 4141 U x 09"- &41J W

41 w . 3 E Q 4 .10 P41 A 0V 60 U A go4 -4' .4.1%4W4A

00000414 0 41'0 UtO 4)

44 J9r4r- 0 41 0a )4

il 64-P4 fo 09 '041 0 4b.40 41 - 0'0 W V V

to 041>4 a >.64 o

O~q 016 4 &

30- 40' 4) 0 V4 #S 46

M I C.4' ý41 0 a 000 Aila -A tpo 0 a C "4S

" "4 en 00 A %4 o4 6 J 0. 04 0V

on >40 VO 4G0 0 ' oiota F 4)

a~~~~ 41 r.A OrH 1 A4

*- a 06 r. -P 09-4H (A 1.d0 "'0E9.04 1 ago co 841 0 C%4 0.1

41 so 04 Q% Q0 P4 r. 4* U 014) 0. 14 0 go $41

P4 140 %4 0* A 48.0 0'a j!c Mm A~400-41 41V P 0 pqr.&4 $0 40. 000a-14 C1 0 a0 0

* > 4 -P1-a6

Page 90: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Sw

E w

>0 0 =rZ

O~(n E flN J

w low,W I,

WEE ME EOn

1- 7a

Page 91: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

>F-

OA.O

104

41 0 0

44a

Loe r4 0

.00.

I @413

%4 :1 .41

0 aS 0

@0 Aj

0.4I

00 E0

000~ 0 is

Page 92: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

I-DC

z zm C0gi

w0IF-~EuLU oc

20 twoLA m Es

to-7

Page 93: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

00

go

0

00

r4

Aja Dh

0 I

r4

a.4,

4)0

00

O-.4

1- 4 he

1-8

Page 94: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

w

~wim

Page 95: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

to to a O

Va to cA ~r. r4 9-4 C)4 0V0 0 414 ig1 W a 40 U 4 41 41

U3 W. > ~ 9 41U - 1 r-4 cc 420 OA0a o 04) >,=c.JC G .0 00

JJ:a 0C 1494-. 4 a4 4A a0 0 0.-

0 )a0 -094 t a a= if! Aj OiJ4V r-4 to 0 r4'UjJ 41to 4 41MS Ad r0oc ofsc: =

0 0 0) 41 -. r 0C000 a ua0 t*AW>M SIfG we

9:. 0 -4 c P40 02 0 Ga 44 is 4 if W f $W=0 14.>430 e44 A 4 WMC)-s4&a 0 = W W 41 > 0 o 413Dow

0 4 e-P4 0"4 riz .0 S -4 P4 id 4 >41 U 00W9 f0 is caV 0 00a0 004U 06.4 c a 0 D.

e-4 W 41 D aO W .0 q) U341 U 5-i o41 toL6 it00 -04 9: o a>-4 a C 41 =0. 00Cc .- 080>444 0 0 -4 0040 >4 O0 do1 :1 f 0ra c 9 a >,VOC,.40C4 0-4 > r.a~ 0LA 44.c

0060 r-4 41A0c .0 43 .0 >4 0 -P42 x Xto0 393 U0 0 $ - 0 go to 0 0 06

c: P s-Ii4 r. #-4 0 uE1 4 0 4J CO 0 0 5>00430 0.9ý4 -v.4Oa > M 1W r. -4 0 0 000 fGa'0 >4 V0C > iga 0X 00 0 Wc ca PC64 4 "4

a 0 1 u 0 >,a0 h I49 f & E4V00iUf1to 0 ~ C)W 4 ofr '0 W.0 C)"4 - 00 9

jj,. Va Ia~o >' ig. o: M3 0ýq I xag 4 F -E- 4 :C 1 4C 1A 0 >,4) L 04Ga0,0C)4 co Ga C4.

E-4 0 g= De43 U C)040 4 0 tW0> "j >AV9 oCz -0 9: A PC41v4 -4C.349 i,0 3 0 A-f ~0

41 0 0 a .94 a 0a 11"C)Fa0 4. Cc 0 W0 ~ A P .4 0--fW 44 0 ~ L.4)a U 09 -1

O -000. .41 a 00 .0 .40,60 6 E AIVa0. a 090 E-04 -4- 0 43 44 44 "4 j-m44 O~t =IV

OVAC4. O~a a 0a' to ~C0 r. JLa0 ~ ~ '00:0 V- 'o4>U l c r- =a -V4 a00,a004% A 109 0 a 4 r40

04 43C 0 0V Ina~ A ...U94CcCP4)0 a 0r 0 e4 C940 W 1 copula a Ua 4 0Q 000 Ota.W 0G0a>a)

eM 1640c.940 && 0 0 T U &' 0'A 9 0.AO. 0.1~3c14 0 UC 4 0430 r- C6d Z 40 aoz W 4- 0

U 0 00 0 4 * 0 014~ W 34 w 0La go a'

AC) IV.-C945 i 0 410 0 = 0 43""A9r.j a043-4O.PO0.0 Ad >10 *10 " 4O

>14044 %4EO41 c0 4100003 0 4 LP-4 -P

AV 0 0 0~0-43 - 14.1-4 a 0 ma0 a 01AA 0 W r4 U 9: ola Ga , 0 C)Cg 1*SUV

C>Co1r4 0 f4 0 co -P W% 49 000a1N4ca 4-dGO L j 44 plC Ga P430 01 0 U0'0a39A -04 a La wS u 0.C 05 £ an0a a a0

E- 4 411 *.2.~ *'@ .- 40"9 * . in~ 01413= 0 ,~0846 1"

>. 0D a0. .60' . E-017-4 % 4 00 10Ua C40 $4 40 41 94 C&Oa r4 3.0 ta to

P430 C) 4 94 `0 -.4 #-43 W 0 e1 *4 0 a I en'a94 => U-i 0 b* P4 .44 v l

*O e logo0 %4ago0 L49.4 CG .''4 441c a64.A-aX ic s %

co06aV 090 0Q.-iMOO%4,P4 P4 0941 S>00 0 ` S640 0 =A 0. 0%Aid 000q0 U MOV- -

51.431 a -43 J'h0 41 '> 430 ,i)V G1ta& a 4jLCSps 0 p>,4 C "4 =Aj, N-040 C 1 00: a

"4jAj0 C L3~ .,I o 0 Ac Sp 40 .4. 0 a9 '0 -4 -49 a

0 C"4 ~0 i =$4A $4-V 0P43 : A S 0434 .464"0 a-

M t..> 1 O6e %.V0 4 40 0041.00I"3aC 4"40Aj0 L c Ah4 14 WO~ Aj .9 0a% j41 r 9 1 0.5 1

14 1W~ to 0 -P co 4@ 44 41V54~ 414W $ *A0 0. >14j 0 0 Q "P-04 0 PCS'a49 0).9~ .0 0 1t"0

W..W W0.~U m cr 0- d14-40a c F44 PA

400 -C Ld 0 04=c 0 4 Os'4d i.a000 14 -044_39 ~4 0 0 0U4 4 4 >0 A 1 -4 A0ha00 In c

-P4 4 31CA L > 0Aj aa AjAj -4 -

Aj 4 A 0 a N r W 1-8Ia2

Page 96: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Lai)L&Id

LLi.gj A0

La- Lia

Oki Lii 0 .

jam 0.q i0Zo a z C* a Lai

-A C ý- L

z 0,=uJ A..

w-o3 a a

Page 97: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

*0 4)*0w4 c 0 V4 A4) C4~.*"

Aj0 )4) >,4 .0 0*4 00.0E4

:> 0 E 0 >4140 c

ez)4 aa 4vwjw-40 W c 4) >0V4)-4WC-4ý C a V40 *44)0 41 m

Uw 0 04 *0 c " O4VI0 0 -r a -4 0 4)1 >10 -4 4)6> 3OC 04V A -) u L0. W0. C wO .)C 04-4 04))> > A)L.Q0 X04a

P-41 gj-4 c .J'.1") l..C > A.

14)4)4 Ou 0 c w 4060 ~ 4 0Co OtQ4 44 4,4 C

> 4 wa C~4 CO W-4 CO 0 id 40 A) W 4 0 001 > .0

la4)PC4a -P4 4W dP440 0> 4)4 .C Lin 1

..C 00 4) C CW4)CI4J %. 4)Aj 0 -4 Ai la.L 4.)

>)4 044n %4 10

0cW4 4) 41 s04e)Na24

.89C0 b4)4)bc 4).0IA04)

14 41 4 0 A to r40 ca

.0 to 04 CW 0,v

0 > 040 > 0.4= A4)%aVLLa 041)4 0 LA W 40.

V4 we La$ to 60.000 44).v4 CJ

0- -41 0~ 1 b4 0 4) r 0'

3c C:Alf4)1,p4 :04 04A 0 14A oL04)La04 PJ4)4) 0 r aw

I4 -P o-O144 -4 - 0 0@0 E. W4> g w . c4) , a41 c 00 4) "4

00 >1) 0044 V41 r 041

% 4 04)s v-4 41F4 sc @1 C1 E-404 41V 'L' Q '-4I o4 4A )

-Pa4..4 6c~ C if 3

0 Cs L40 1 c V4 4,0 a0)4 0 1c >)0 4)C. 0 c40j to ~ " &0 00)4) 0)4),J

z 0 0.41'. = 4..004 4) X is Oro,

-004 >0 4)W1J4

*w c4 -U 4 0. 40 4)w .0 4

1- 0 MCC 4 0. 4C -V -0 A4) 4

rA )IX n 0 04.140 (a 0>1 co "A 4 - P 4)0 .-0 w 4)

A( 61 La toC0. 0 0 4)w(.4OU, 4A 0 . V44) "e 0 to)C'0 -4A C -4 of t w ~0 .C l

0~~ 3cV0441A4 0'. 0 #-45w

1 L&4 40 a4) a -4 w c 4)49

P-4 0oaV 9: 6 now0

"4 aQ gAj ýlAC 4 -4 t 1L84

Page 98: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ciI

0i oL& ,. 00'4f0 444

(A~C E(I(w

zn=96

(n0 - 00 00

N>v i f 40V4W 4Vn0

z-

0 Z IEIQsZ Wee

f0 zýF- 0 Z, h .

wz 4c z E

41C CJ o-. ~~ 3E.. * 1 * * -. * t S.m ,. 44.,..

Page 99: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

4.1 A.) 41,-J 4 ) 0 -4 g 41~ 04004

4j. u U C 41 W 0.0 $41oVw 44 "94 ft6 a -4~ - 4 41e .C -4 t .0 1Iý 0

41V OW 4441 v.C9& 0 0 (41~'4. 0 10W" w -4j4 ''.C x.C 41 .9

V.a 9 0to 0 4) = .44 0 $4 0 ii t W. MC 0 " -4 w A.) A 414) V * X c 40 go o 41#6400.C CMO a *40 a a CJ 90AJ~ r:C J 4

C e>-441CJJ > 14 id 00 4) r-4 .41 2 39 0 0-r4 COW 0 1 v4 0A E414 C6~4 Ldw C 4 C0

CW~O Ide- jJ0 co a 0co>1

IV 04C 40 4 4 0. IV41J -4g 0 ~ >I AJ 64j * 41 .- I Aj aC 4 )

41O. 0 4 0 41 0 OJW~ 0 1 o =0of041 tE-4 4) b r- JJ4u 4)0.W-4 is - CJ t 1 40 toto V a 4 40 UWO 44 00.0.>0) V-4%

8 A Q'J V- W414# r-4 W V to m 00-04s0 4 4 CC 5 =0 $410Vb..C, -4 1. 0 W-4 C4W

99 >4*~#6 Z~ V I.)44 -44 0ýt 1 C.a6 4)

0. V41 0 V 0 WCCu A O v-41 $4 41 0%-4.4 00 J r4 W 0 w0 =~ .0 -A 0 00-0%. :~4 0 *4 ESA M(4.4 M 6% 0J 6J .4)4 N.) V

no ~ 1. 041 , 9cWX*4 L -dM > 0. t 4 $

0-410 C *4 -P4 M V 0 UDW4 d.0 wc aI. 4) .40 W r-4 0 .441 r -~44 r- W.C400 W1t-41MCA- "W-4#V4~ M -4 A419 q 0 A ra -P4 W )

0 44 a4u3sJ Z 0-4 1U 4go 04 AJP4 0A012 >(0A "40 - rI-4eq iV4 0.0*41 0.4 0 C

Q.C 4 29M - 00000 .0 4

V4 C2 40 4110 0 r L4J~ CUc .94 00 A 6 U90 0 c 4 1V.P4 r4U -V41' u ofVOCw r 441 W00 cý 0 41CJJ0. '444.- :N0 O -

.0 zWO6 0#6a zU w *j 0-4 40

X 4 * 39 3 M0 O-419 >,a0 to 0 t-

0 OO43 Ld P4 -r 1w41 A 40e r4 #6 wZ ra VC4 6)4040 a a 0 .,C%40 0.#601 o. bCU = -44 06. 04,

ca 0M E41Q..041> W Z 4 -vCC4q - 410A aw0 444 C' 40 Vat 0 r-a410 41 003- 0 Vi ~4A .0 .1400

00w.% 9 j 0 CCU,.J =04 0 toas t V-P4 -4 P41 @-4 P4 ie 41 .41 0 A - . or 0&41

4) 0>1 '..4 W0% JV-4. w 0 09 w14w W0Ac Uj 04 A041 #-40 4 C 4J 4 a.C36.S. 41 4h001Goo

000.P4 4 0 P4t M094 3 14C M jI C0> P-41 r't *0 w.Or L0 4JJ4 41 aC > IV, 0 C.0OaAMt

W r W 0.0 a. Ael '41 0 3t49S 4,.41- 0.9 gn 4 0.C @2. Ulu goW 0 -4 .41# .0 .0 ~ ' > As"4 - .

-P V0 .'4 W >0 #-4 904)41C. w 0 .a V .C 4 1W U4

40WVCr- o9 VS"46 W~.40 toIV )4 C 410 -40'

C 0V 0 Ct 0>'#V03M 4.1> .0 40) C#~ A.Aj1"4 0 0 Aj.190 &nU . 0 M-86

Page 100: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

z~- 0 z z

WW

-zmEOw JL z WA a

as Not I- j

:0 -A)I

VI 0IC ot R =a-

Ln-i AM: LA jC A f

~CL. CL Lo zip

z- V0 0l- Eli -c Wca=

wj =_ S SRI ca 41

wI - ,= 0a 40 V4iIA~~~~ 0oLJLA&1" JL

0 0j *~ia EQm0I W

1-87

Page 101: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

>0

0

"40X

14

64

1-8

oe-U3

Page 102: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

)Im. w

z0

U)d0jamo ~L j-m

Z~L Q.1L

zz= mmLIJ~~4?gan JC3u maLA I m - f

Ui zi C2 r Cc0 0 A :E

0: a0M

16E19

Page 103: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

.IJ14o'4.4

0

.1.1U

U"4

C.IJ

t�I.'40*

�,

0

0

*JJ

"4

4J

-�

o"414'.4

*

U

0

U

"4U0

0 02o �- S0 14

�.4 .4.4

O Ii

2I

U.

1-4*'.4 * 1**,

0 5hi �$-� �

1-90

,. �.

Page 104: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

U)

w

In 0000zo zIlim

In

-I0zoU'pm

aI-In

Page 105: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

W0 r.0 g va04Aj 41 P- 0r4 0.04 a 04.1 -4 01

P4 00a0 0"4V A r- A rotDea 444 4 0q 0 AIQ

a VA w 4 04 >.>4 05 "4 a

> 4 014 4 0 - 0-1O 00 Fa00 0 > r4A.COCA a 0 f4

000 ac41 c0 0% 00 AdOle'. 9 0r-4 -A % 41 Q "%0 rA.4 la 0"4 0e4 0 "A

.006144 0 A0 co4' w0E ~ 00 o >.t a CA 10 041 >~A'05 O.= r4m 1.01-4 a 4 c

W14 r4 w41 0 -. 10 -A Q

4 0 6% .C0 'j .I: A = g O 4 164d

00 0.25a "4.' O00244 4.0 e) 40'0 004 A0 >

.1441 14 '0eg0 0 . 4&0 V4J4

0 Q0eO 01 =44a 4q0 .01 to 0 Q-

r, 410b 0"q Ar4 M )02J01 00A .14.0 to0- 01~u0 r 4A V% m a

o0 a- 4 34 002 10 00w0 Is is0 .00.0 0 to 01 4

0& -P 0 A a 0~ 0. 00'0w

%400 0 t c0 04 10 "44 01 0c 4.10284 0 i ol A A r4.-$40 0 m 41 0. la 4 t 00.0 w04 > 44 Oita 00 :p P. 0 %

000 ba . 4 0~ F4 .

Aq40-4 A " A1 4w 4 0 va *.4 $4 w.> 0 OO 0 0r~ 0~ 1

0b6 W.4CA0 VA~ QA4 0 t0 WE- ~M0-'4 A 4llO 00.4

a 4440 z40 "q4 4441"4w002 0g.,J t)0 %4 1 0 00 1Aj to000.1 -A00 0'.a 31 0 A 104.r4 6.

o .4A0 -v414V1"0 .050 0A0 4 "a4 r4J'4p4 w '04 010. CA 00 V 4410

02 to5b U ~ is.~ -V4~ -4> AA0 0,

0 0 04 0 40 $4 N 0%1 IS".4

A A0 W"401 0 A4 -A 0 $4 V "

o 01.4 >0 44 I=., 3tJJ -V4 $ a>4 O4A >~ A0 04 j a 01.w.p4E4 ra 0 0414 -P4~~~4.ý to 0, 0 4 1

0 A 0 0-e0'a 04 V0 00'

ev > 001 "0 0 W 0101 -04 Of c 44 IpP1Aca> 4 0100 v44 0 40A 40.14 r.4

01 A -V4 to0 )m0 0 -V41 00 M P-4 4Jto ~ -". 'm,, 43.40 > N zO

m 0 o4 A - 01 to. > .4 >9 )40 Mr404 0 4.4 4"4 '~ 0.- 0 A 0 0r

rl 0 wg 0 O 410 004 V 00 1 -A~b' "1 V 401 -P . .A'aw 41 "40

>1 Au A 0AJ

84 01>.a00 0404 040. 0..>

0. .. 40A r .4 0 A.-4 01 P4 41P re A

L04 "4 4 W 0. N *U 0 X0 V4 . W A 04 r-

0-4 , 0 0 a 4 cl 0 Ma A 20~~~~ ~ ~ ~ 0> -4AV P >a0 j04

0 0 6A 00 U-4 -o

Page 106: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

00

low -aIPA..

Wf6 LU

z zip

LUa

- LA J~.J-

- $A

La

0

1-93-

Page 107: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

044,

V00

0-4) 0 0

40 V.141~

01 41 0.

Ao A c

fa -04 w.

0 V 9.L4.

*.C. 10 ML4.4 4

W -40004)X od-4.

a00VId

0 M 4.

t 0 4jilou 4J~

ou0A4 CJ 0V

"0.> 410do

go 0 .81 mr

00 W J4 i 0

0' a 11

A : jC r-4

00 00 .4

tp c Vou

Oro c0'J

0.4~I 0 I0 '0 > 4

a I=' to

0 c 0 c:

40 '0

I.4 4100it

1-94*

Page 108: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

44

~ LuJ Ice

_A C..7

- LhJJ ;IN-=

-m LA.1

31: m

-

LAM L"- 2M 6w

cn C O) - . C. ccL&J W . LbLA C.ý

I-i = I.l W=1

0z =

&* A

-AJ 6&- CC

*& L4. e

2M2

Page 109: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

PC 0

Voo 41 0 0D~4 a -

64 >.~ 04D~ 0

* 614 JJOCP4Sq39 J -.44 S .. wI-4 of

c W,4 >q w .. 4 COUGUOU

Aj ~ 4A .04eq .4

00-4 IQ o a0 '4r4 04

C4A .4~ 00 P- Q 04-4 0P4 0 L944 v 5

0 00.0 W -J4 h 4%-

a ~S- 0.4 toF4

"4~ --4 4-4 %4gQAA tj JuL C 10-4 U h'4 W-0

v 0 0U0 6d -4 X UC6

* hw r. a Ic

OW4 W% *o40 000.-aOh ii&#-4>% A A%

&Of~ -* 4J t* 46 P4vq La 0 a 4 M 4

4>q5 fJI4 C% a

41 0 4- 1.1

0 '4-4 v405

%A4% c U -04Ai0.'.u %

c~ ~ "4 0 V .0 A

a Ow >0 01-96

Page 110: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Lab

(urn) LaLa

z

uM I" E

cr. LU

0 CL

09 C6~

FMM

"mI 4E4low14m

1-9'N0 0 16

Page 111: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

"W4S-

044

0 Is1-9

bhi -4010 W nO.I r r - ý1. o %

Page 112: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

LW LIII LI

maim

"wai wL wLAJ us aA

LIj

CO) CA a cot=ma A A wua L

UA Lai AA Q C.;L-;A .,-- L-AJ

too=oa

I~l ~ ~b~AA~~(A

(Azpzp:B

1-99j

Page 113: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

40

"•0

•.m

c-4-

0o

0.4

14 o

0@

0.4 1.c1.0. 4 W.4

Id >I0

mlw

OU

P-4

3.4

1- 4

o . ,

1-100 •

io 6

Page 114: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

, %(Af

- -s

wwIL-

)1 0'

, a_ ", -I

z• ZI-!

, -

s•.;0.-.. s." •

i ii

w 0•

1-1 01

',

Page 115: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

V ~ 44. -4 4) 0 M' - V-Ssolo 0 r u id .4 4) r- 0Mo-4'c 0 -P4 to "4 j do 0)0.4 Ai0 o a.0 -04 4 A j -a .; A g0o-4 4w.

441 0 4 ,-4 4 4)4 o.4- 4 .UO * oa .wo0 w 0 : 0 P-4 r-4 A W o o W

aIJ N > 9 0 aA Aj0to 040 4) ooVW Ct>W .14 W 0

A4) r 4 Qs) AO b4 ) "4 W r0-4 "M-4 o0 r

we r~4 0 -40 R )0 *o4 edr- 2 0= r g

0h40 o) 0 t wA = 0040000 0'

L4 4.4 0 0.0 OW Uwow WAO4

(4*owa n 0 00 1.4 )W~ 04 16 $0

a r- Z P04 4) 41 9- P4 4 00)o.4..0'J Of'. 0000.0 >44 o0 nd)1> &: 0 0

w o$4. to0 .0 w O04 P40M04 W04 0 as V P4.4 go' o woo 0 o .4

04.-:4)0 V w 04, o0 (a 0) Q. t 1V 4> -4W.4 g 4 IM g~.o44. 0"aw0 = W.=

0 0) :1 M CM 0. =-40 r4t~i 0 aA

-r5 a v- o-~ .0 -r4 a -4 0 E-4 0-o6La .4gLO toa0 0 c: 4 t 0 4)oq M tfl.V4do00

W.0 0),00 - = j M&Vb 0Q 00 0 0A44 9 o v4 - -40 0" W r.4-4).= #0 0r

1 4) r-4 P0) -v4 0 V U. 04J 0 0aMZ4 &.4 u 1: 4V .0S *4) W 0#4 4.390000V

r4V 00 0 ' 4 M W0V hi A 00 W"4.4 OV000 > 044.0 WW W m 1 d-4>0 A C~

W400O~ 0. f04) @00 x0-41 aV #0 r4 :0 0 0 0.6-1#0 w-4 4 A

H 4 A 00 4)0 V P-4 > oSU 40 04o94 0 4) 03-4 094) UJ 0 00z @0 a = -. 0> V 0 C -4 0 V $4O El"4Q W 4 IS is 00 04a

S.-0 p0 00= s$ 0U'-4 4)I*0.won41 w

to X440 0 toV bU r.ijvtheM00 4 a-to&.o0,' 0@0b 4 o )00=4 w hiaCoVOm% Of 3 w Ad0 WV4m.4 8 .b0 0"440-40

'0.00 9 W- V4 0)0 -4-4 000W v Ao444A)t'

0 d04 4. 0) c 9 COM M 4 0(V

to 4) 9 U(a0 31 >. V bo C 14 N0 00 O0'00 OW a l wo o4) a to CO w

A 0"'4OVA0 r-4 44 0 =0 410 .v4 0E-4 R% > V 0 U 0 r4 4)0)L4 A : 0 14.44.4 Q.:

w L 0hi '0 0 Av~hv w w 0-4000)0 A0 a Cv, 0 a i o 4 0 P4

O-4w > af- aM o A 0 -A"4) 00000>0 l"'0 f"1 Oo 1 .4000 V-=4 V00 0hi U0' t )

0 o ,-40 P4" 0 41 '00 40 -.- 4 -4Wla #4 4 L

(20 11Mx 00v441 0 OOOV hi L. CO 0040~ Ld 4)Lh4 = 0 u fl) C 10 0) W4 j go a -4 0La

.0 a 0 ,Va W14.I w 040000 0-.C.O *0

0 3 j0 = 44i 0 h0 0 1s "44 ~ 0 0%

4)4. 4 0 0 0 -:.0. a 'hi 0 'a " )1 0 0 '-

0,$Qr4= 3VL b0,~.04 f- 01 k * 4 "4 M41c 0 1049 -Q 4 W00.4 of39Aj0 4 v4 6-4 0 o4 V 1: .04 V 1: t

PO $ ."44AAa aA l 0444 to4 10"4c.0 0 0 Jqm A.=0 0 0 04= .- 40A.4 S, AP-CVES 0.

lU0 0 W 0"4 "0 UA aj 0v40 .0 r4 0.o0.4g 0

" 040A. 2, "4 0 o.00.ih 04 %4E " 0OA0042 -v-4 A U U 4) 0 WCV 0 W C44 0

1-102

Page 116: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

WW

mllLAM

I.-WU) ~(A C, a

zNW

zi C.oo .*4

9uu.Cv-4 in 1 az

a.ap

.=J ** **

ej,\ w a

oc~~~ 49:0La.

cc C4

m La103

10 w ;~z =

- ~~ ~ ~ ~ L = 4a-- ~ -. -

Page 117: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

a 0- t

004 > #4 r-4) A 10 a)w a0 0w 41 cwJ 41

N 0 O-4)1.1 r

41 m . G0 to go aV4.0~- 10 ow 0 to 4 0 4

go0 a04)wCd w0 v w .- 4w0V aA 0 Q '0 41 ~ r- 04

04~0 4 ~ '4 410Aw0 a44109 >Im A4

w4 A 1 >0 01 X 0~0

o~ 41 0 WC0 0 c .41 001> - 1A4 0>1A~w 00 "4 w

.-4 W 3 01014 0 0)Z- 04 0P4

.9 ra0 3 01 j :L 1 94 V4"

Tw .I00 $ (A o41 t 0u0 A ' 94 I 9 f> m$

'0 3t w m9=0011 0IJO0 V o '9 4040 4 0Cu 00 0JJ

0 OV 0F 02 14 Ad >Aj00 aC 40C 4UV 0 A~ 14 4 P- 0.-

> 1 9c m" AC "0 "04" 01C J

-# 0~ $40 . 0 C"0- P4J . "401w.9 fa Jou 0 01

40 o- cJ -4 go 04m 00 A4 9SoA 4)14001m0 00.. 001

>1 0 b0. @-4 P- 40 0 4) 0 W Ca V1 1-4 0 M #4 P J " 0 -P94 00-P

64 41 0140.0 000.9w P 0-4 = 0ra 0a 00' =0 f-4 >01 >1Dca 01 9 > w0940VA 01.94 >.-4 0-

3CE4C I C -490 t r.41V)0 w~- 4 .0.-4.44 '41 941 0 94

ow. w - w U00 A 4 "4094.C s0a 0k t 00'4 *f0 >9 4J4 P

04 0 r4 90 OP4 g -4j Wd .441uC I-W a

94 00.000 >,a-49 4 0 0' to A P4. 0OS0 9;6 C 00 St -4 to.

05: 15 4 4J " C- '0 4 10 P4)(Pr 0 w AJ (D~ :10 > 0 1W t

0 A~ 0 0 ~0 C" 0 0 =4a0 '0W 4 4 01 41 0 . 401 3t 94

V4 01.. P4 001. .i'WO -'.s4 0 w.s

1 V A 0 C -4O 00 0-4 r A 0t40 c 010 a) $4 U) 0% r4 C:

C4O od i. d 40"4 P-4 (A C 00 e C I 0#-.94In X S i l >9 0 -4 4J 3: -P4 = 0

4 P4 0030 'uSW 10 *940 1 __a

0- to > W J .-4 woO %a0 dr0 i0v~ PC C: 0 000 .41 Id

41) .0 -404 -4u d 4 W

1-104

Page 118: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

00=% a

I" Z

I'I

E-ia40IAJ 03E=J ac

LU -

LW hiJ

0- z Ii0 > Z, C1w Z :E

IW6 0=Z 06 E a

z Z:lo

La ;lp1-10LLIJ~~~ z I 0 h

Page 119: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

IV J I4d 44 0 r(0 0 0 to0

0C "440 rU

0 0 0 Ic a 4 W0 - 0 ZG 0-44

0 go040 4 i ri 0'~0 r4 Idtr- VLA'0*' 0 0 0'Lc

FO w4) -4 M v4

00 Za 04) 0 0)ru4W 0 0'v4 44 .0

E-4o a v = -4L

V 0 W C:4 4 W

AV La -CE'04 0 =4

44 WA 4J 0 i 4.4

R~ V)4 > 044 01.d 0 P4 4L=

0 0 0' toV -4 .C

o 4 W LI aw0 0'40 w 1 3 r40 w

0J440AJ J W4.1 0. ~4) z C

Aj 00 -1w a u V440 ' 4 03

"m"4 Aj , 0> 4

0 OaUW0A.=40" ou. .e1

0 04)o- 1 LaAAa 0 0

A04W >40 w r.IA4 0-4t 06 0m

4.. 4.a'W W a0 $44

~ 41d > J 0 04 JJ> J -

f" 0,4)2 1 c> C r

0.O 0 U 1 " F W4

Aja

o-0

Page 120: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ww

Zc.

_:. 0A CJL) I

1..1 to! 0 -6

Z Z- 5~ CAI,La -A CAI)l (.LuI

_ W . Z=L- I

C)~Lai LU LA

z I =Iý I-I-

CLlU

*. b

1-107-

Page 121: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

q 10

a2 0

414

A'A

ow

Ln

o4 IL.0.Mob,

AA

'l10

Page 122: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

~cc

Wc

.Ju- 109-

-z~k

1 Lid

Lai0111-109

Page 123: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

C >0-

0'00

0 4w04 0

060 0 so

0 451

.c =4h ca w0

100 ic C t

0 to -4 0 0>

1.50 4) g:0-Ll La-V4 ~U

'0 41 V c 1"-4a

c #ab *4hihs

0) 0 to r- 0w

-0 u u0 0 VAO

= 05 0 1.4 r% $0

9% 0 41C

* -.. 0 ul

'.-4 "woo4 4j, 0

630 -P4 00 hi ush

Wd0 =.4 to (AU 0 -F,0 ýq

63095

F14 W.C Aj c4ov

A* "4 0. 0C-4 0*i04000 a

0 c~ If0C .44

o 40> O&, U. .s40

*~ 04 0 5jJ 00

to 00.Old

0' P-4 4510C0 10 A "a :' a

40 la 4i0 00

ca 0 400 t0

w @0 Ld 0h0

0011

Page 124: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

wm

II- 0a I-*c z a-

-L ij LA LijLiLai- z ra La

-r maIW WZ

LA W 0 30 AUQ 1- Lai z

oin

W Z 2 cma L

LAS m J* ~~- 0 Z

I.'.in zi . *0S

LAJ .J i-iL"L&A( a

Page 125: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

v- >,.- 4 -4>0 -4 W--'4 OV C 0

~i04 -C 0V.CO i0"4 S-eCO > - 60

-4j 0 %4 .0 a -44J "44) 0v 0 0O SC

0, 0 - C a 4J A-4 50W r-u 4JJ 00 S.C=~J~ a i'J>. A*ar )041 .0 041C w4 04r4 > - 04j

0 0 P41 "40 At>C 01 ()SO

A11. 0 9-4 .C .4 %4C "q ON 44 44 41 -4 tp $44)41ý4 0 4 wV -4-40 4) 19 "44C 0 r. -Abo J OLl

,.4.0 r. S) C $4 J LA Wi > 4

'0 a 4 L CSLa AJ tP4 Z

me 0 044 "a-44P4 ba 16iC ~Os to0

a C 0 0 Ah a I0

C., a~ OM- 0

00- B 41 C C 40 r-4 4 .A4

> C~i to 0 wr C 0u

a 4 41 a i42 0) t"4 Li4.~> 0 .C 0u0

CO 31 .4 c0%4 .. :a 41.141 4

Li, 00 Li A 9 Cto ti41 P4 0 w t w 0

14 u OooJL 41-

*q 4v6 C00inAj 0'0OL r OC-4 Li

41 0 .- 4e.44 41-PA S 0

=3 =O ý 4C 9~ 0~~

dC 400 0 %4 W 40 AV 9. -% y .4,

Page 126: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

z

ww w

(6 0 Cy

z cm W

W ~ozo

I.ICoo Lh,.IJ

*C 0 004

LIICC1-1413I W

Page 127: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

0 :4

tbdWOO A 4-410

41)02

401 0 $4 0

0 404 W 0 r 400 A

0 Qs= 014 '

.A.r 0 410 0 a

0.0a 4 -4 64

'.4 00 E9P-94 390 >

e-4P4 "4 a

".4A 0 Uj 40C40 r-4 AJ 444 h

~04

ago04 In0Aj Ad -4)4

-4 -a 000 0-A .0 A

0W4= 0 a V 0

P-0A4 0 0 A

0 06.

0..4 0 0- a -440 AIx 941 .- 0r4 * 3

a2 we) 0 )

a weeO *04)C :5 4

>4Oi 4A ar-4 -P 4) FA*

M 001. WA a P4o3t W.4 4.'h A

-4 A AAA CO too*> >

t ~ o AS 0

f2 4)'4 0V r, "4 A,

14 13U ,0UA.00.0 '40 01

0 OO P-4 . %4) 0in 90 ,0of Q0 o g

: 0 )-4 00

02 CO4) 00 W,

1-114

Page 128: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

(I)) low

wHmm t.

=wz~m 1mI U

~Z u-

LuL 6

iz EMoLiim

LLIoij =

~'LaJO.aWO

1-J11

Page 129: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Intentionally Left Blank

OMN

1-116

Page 130: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Chapter 2

Specific Questions

2-1 W,,

We .0 4.-

g .

o: I..

Page 131: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

A

041

400

0 c

a410

.44"4,00A

"0E4*"4

Mae

09

0.

0~ _

126 *4 Aj~

41 0"4

'0 31

01 00

4. U j"" "4 '0> ~0

~1.2-2

Page 132: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

2-3

Page 133: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

C-o

IJ~

!

laa

I I

C

1-4.

ca-

2-4NMo

Page 134: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

* S•

e'- -

-. Q

.2-5.

m~ji

Page 135: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

060JJ 841 &u4I 0094 44 .0mt

14 d 4 i r4 4) F-4 0 40 0 h0 90 Ur~4 9-4w o00

I= r-4 "4 -4 r-4 .94 04 0f~0"94hiw 0 0 39 w a

hi 00 O "4 041 ( 0 V94

.AJ0J N.4>a r-4V 044j.-004j 6000'94 to 0.4o i- to (a~ if.4 0A ) 0 04

A0 U0 0 414 mwhWA0.&J0U0 .0 s >.if.

0'~0 h hi> A$4 w. $i.4 4)-4oN".4 0'.4U(i A.94 4 .I41>~

0"= >000hi .~i0 -4

wu ~ 060 C U 09 044 1- 0 4toOj (P I C .0o1 0.= to 4 w~ 40 . a

0 -4 A -00 w t M 0-4 0>

V 14 .04 w 0 -r o 0 tto h0 0x 094 Aj 0 ) 414.a 60 w 10 04 "q

~0 tp"r4 to04J. 0 0 "C:0 4j 0>,V- hi 4Ato X

jJ hi V-4 V0- 0 0 -4 a

14Q 60 ( Wr4 0 0~4 >

0 r-4>.Ch~i 54t 94 0 P- )C'fau0 4 J0 r w41~ 0 44 -r4.-4.-r4

"4 4.44000V 4) to.0 0,4.4 4.' -P4 C' r.hi0) 0 D41 t@ C 4 4u C

"q4 IV0 9ý 0 a 4 .94 4 vr44A0W4 0 tp94 0 3 isf 00.aE40 4J 4'4 0 0 JO .4 * i0 C: o >r-4 0.0 >9

4) *0100 0 0h 0> jJAAGi4 hi 0.0A.-I- "4 41Is416

a m41A *0 0 -V4 0.41.00 n3 , -4 0> -4 t 4 s0 C

0 V'Z, >I,60 id 4 4 hi w is 0.-A.94 " r "4,- $4 hi60) J, -r4 0Aj I 94I-4 H =41V > r-4 w00 jJ.0ifS-, w v 4 s-4 >4 0of 4.1

4.~0.) .4. 0:.0 -P a.1 9.04J (Dh to DcJ60

CA 0.0.4E .JQ 00Ol =0 A -40 4) 0 1

'r~.Uf 4J -4lo I 4J 0 CP O:~ss 94* .0 V "94 = P4 FA

X 4 r"- hi jJ to hi 3 -4 4.1 to0 0 -r4 M 0 'p 40 0 -r4 060

' 4. 0 hipP4 o to44 L A%4.0a00m 41 "-' 0 0. u C% as 01 944 4WhM =h 14j01

0-A0 44 WtJH 0 M *9141 0014.1if44 0~.4 =""U0 00 00 C 4

0460 0 1000"0440 X -- 4J-i Cn0 40 (a w

0 0O"4 0 0. s-a > F409

$4 1 = Co0(D0Ohi Ahi.04

.2-6.

---------

Page 136: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

, 2-.7 . , :

-I

U"-.•'J

Page 137: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

*

20'-4

N2

U

* IN

I I

.q N

-b3 'S -

2-8

.* � '.� v*

Page 138: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

a l-

' 4 •

2-9

Page 139: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

a 4 01 M 0"-

614 56 40 -

M a 6 64.0 r4 to0 U. 0045

A4 01 F4 0 0.4>

14 £a 646145p

*041 '4 00AGO 450.

40 -P4 AJ C0 004 01.4 "4 .. ibi

0664j A )Aj 6-V£@p4 0a 60

00la , a4 016

4-0U a 0"4 M-4

0 0a 0 "A" 045.45b4 %44 04 UU£*0.w

41 W4 r-4 0 0 0 1

o40 "AIR 03.40A a 400*

x a q A al-4D 60 J1c o

-P4 14.I 4 "q

010 "4 'm oA

0 6141 0£.40

0 0 #I4.4 - 0 10 b4 ~ C 4514 *4 666a

"4 %401 CPO0.."

0 0 @14 CP m*V614 oil 5 0 moo 045c b

0 a %4 A 6J-

in 45

ui 0"4 4"4 4M

2-1

zi zr4 i 6 &Z ,4 A

Page 140: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

wm

OR-

-'LL

'Ii~i1! 11umI

~o

Page 141: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

0

hi!

0,l

2;*12

hii

Page 142: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

is

coo

ITt• •

S~~2-13•,

Page 143: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

AjW4a V W

44 10 b -40

w r- -44 W0. Ir1

AW c $4> a J 14 C "0Mr-AV 9- 0-4 4 -0 4) J r 41 b)Nr r

-4410 A.q '. 0 w 40 4a0 0 A

00- a4 (40 -p4 0 1.40.4 9 C(* -A.e .- 40C 04 V14.0 0 54 rw 1

GIAO .14A 4 ý041 0 0 000000 c0"-Ic01 .0j >~ c ) o 4j wo 4 "01 A *."J "0 0'10 .. P-40.5 t%=0 92 P > C$4'44 Mf PC4 -.r4OA 00.00 jr o 1 ( j-@4 0 0j a l.14 0 M .QC F4ifW0

O'A 0* 1.40 0 1.10.00, 0Aa

"-14 . " q4 t0 0V &f .- 0 0 ~0 W-Pm0 .w4) 00 0 -r " V C.~. 041'

0 -4 10 410 39 "44 U CO 0-4W 0f100r- "0 00 .0 in= 0 > 4 0 -A4 a

000 0.0 0 0 v401 0 >* > d) 460 0.04w.1 IM0 414>4.4 r4 01-p.4 > 0 w 0

M4 P-40 r.4. 93 ) 0000 41V " A If.W0e4 0r 00"4a-aa(aj *4 400 44 4

0040 04 0 0 >aIaA r 4 0~ 0 4101

"0 w -4 M 20 41"4 t Al 0 gj414 0 1W04W4 4 ONO4 %100 4 06. -4.

a"0 16f W o 390 0040 *00 0-4.p4.

0 M w 05.0 W0C0,4 .4.to0. 4 Pý,4 114 .p lw004 A-V4100 c 0414i001OV P C1 U4 0-r4f 4JW3 0 "4 0 01

"-0 C"4 a J 0 0A "4 x to. .0"qAWOO W a ' 0 LdarI 0 4j0C%141 40 0 w

0010 "0 J > a 0 CL* 41.l.1CJW A00 we 0>4 1 0 04 0 410 41 0 P14 -r C 0W4

A.04 0 A M-41 0C s1 WO 06 0-410 0ar40 0 0 E14-4 0 >,4 0.W0 I@4 0 0 0 0

' COW a% 041 to14 4J-v 6C w 0Wo,4 0 c A Ogg4 0P. "4 .041Ad0 4J 4

"0 _v40 041I r "0 W 0 COf W 0 $i4V a"000 VE4 Iw W 4 A.44 0`44"4 0rq4 0001

o 4r41 " 05V 01 0o -v4 A 4 0W40-A `40411- 100--40 :5 4 "4 0."4 4J"4 "A 4 .0 00

rA ra 0 4p0 ra0 "00 aA4 4 j o 4 a02 c.~1 0~1 A~ 04440 LI 01>W"

oA W w0 .4 %.ov- aa>0104 X1." to" .4~%4 ca w44 ra C;C 024 Oro 441 go41A AAa5 m 0 0 4J0 C A 0-4,0 W 0- F-4>w -41.4 CC #4$ 4-4- 0 "V 4 0 00 V4 0- 4elN~ 0 0. 0j C 0 411 OW1400 " >0 4J -,

W " 0 " 0W0U a 0jr J :A A11 01000"0 31 4V

> a00 A 04 01 -40413 0Ww w Il-041.14Of-4"0 Wp w 1400 W41 41 000 a 1

0 0.140 0 aV 41j4 Aco 0

P4 A41.) fa W4 " 0 v*140w 00 0

d . OO 00 "00 0 ;W ý >f - .t 0 W4-p W '0 .0 i

a1 WA 0 -. 0 " 00 A.) 1 0 U a 4j 0a

x1 :0WP Q 140 1a 4Al 0 000"00A00-a2 0014 >f" ova 0 w -0A`4 4 t 0 w 0

0 o14 "0* 414 "00 0 0 44 " W-04 -0"0 WF` c A41 14 >4~E 0 tP 0 00 441A .14.1 0 A -4

'J aWO "00. > t 0 4 j anW~0 >1 000 v- '0W a U O ".4 a 04 W ~ r, -v 0-rA g0j4 -A0 004 000n 0W14 01'.V A0W00 0 92.

ILI P4 a 0 "00"i 0 P0 4Q " 0 041 W410 4..1.4 0 041 0 j4

I Q"04 "4 $ A0. 0A 044. M640A.4 a 0a0w A 41 01d 2040 A0 41 00A

C4 "40W w ~ W>4 0 , W~ 0 .0r4to r NOV9

1'. AO40 00.4 002 .14

A.14 b410 ~ ~ W4"

Page 144: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

2--5• m

ii

Page 145: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

@A

02

04

E-4 >0

M

I I

be

E-4

cc

2-16,

Page 146: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

"amI-N

LLIt

2-17

Page 147: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

v-44 W 02 0 .a 4 ; 1 1" 0' to V t4, at 00 Od "4A 41 0 A 0 -

00 r r4, I>e0 00 0j4 o*Mj ~1Aj H64 > P 0 e41 00 $414.4 t 4 1 3t &,J4jC->

0 54 4jV '000 wo _V A, a03t0401 W.4 0 X -4 >0 v.-4 r-4 0A4 W0 w~

,4 4,1 4 4COW i 3 44 At W~ '0 1 4 WWAO r4 A at -4 A Q, 440 0

M f 0 4 0 64 =O.& 0 . 4,jJQ .,4%.4j4.4100rw44 41 -r4 c4, og Vr aw00 0 >0r.A 0 C-4 (SaA 0A3 £4J A -4 4-4 -4 9 39 41 4J C 4 10 r-4-4'Gov14 j; 0 V~xwO~r clai '00 40 0

ýý4,.4. M 0 W A ,, a Aj 00 0)iO10104 w' 0. = W CI-4

A a 4000 aJJ 64400 4j,4,4,WOA4 0' 44 0 39 O.04140 a1W 0 tC 0. xa0w

0-4 0~ W-O W CVO 0 4j ý4 w 00 =44 a0 O0w4 $4 OJ4J &,-4 4J-,-4 0 "4 fd 0~ 0 :C 0:

J= s 40. @-4 4, d -V0.4WW0 '.-S4 CP0.4 "J 0 0C0 U0 $4 A. S~q 41 a4j o WZ0 a aa 1 4

41 j 0Aa 4, FDA IN 0 C2 Lf V H 0 1444a00 WA

fA W 0A>00ZX -444,, W 4,0W 0 $O W 4 0 '4 jJ41E 4 , M'14 00=4 '.'0M ,qO> 1 00040'

00 W0 -4,4, 40s4,i C1 Wr. Vý4J 044 -C0 '4'

Z 4j 14'41V4J> 00- gA)bf >u 0*.AJW >4V"4 a go'w 4,4w00.4J > 40 0> W040 4 C41

A0BIC ~4A 04" ~0.A.)41 0O.'04 -P44W41w 4, 4, ) =4,1%4 0 0 : 0@ 414,$0, = >P4>0 r4WW 440A oA 4, r44 A0ooeoA FA41 4.1.0 to4 4,)-"4 0 0 w u'04.4 4,p0 a~ 4,4 4j a "4 3t A.

c u0L3Aj 04 to> 5q -V j 964 41-02 140 A~ 4,14 0f4, -41A0 CA& 0P4k394 $4 4143910t ~ 0 r4A41"0 0 tp40 4 Oil-04 0 d0

0 C -V-4, 0o 60 A0 0~421 > a tp'4 0.-je$4 410 4) 10 0 841 a 0-94 C 004j to

M 0.0441 -O1A 4 A *0 C4 3 4,b04 04,0'.awAO'a a rA1 0 0 o 4 M0 '0041140WA0ACO r-4 0 A 0.4 40 44 Q4j E4 0 % M4 4)'

.0 .4 41 001 (9 o A 00.4 ma 1 404 0 '0W Cra 4 41 9 ..400 -041. %4 u 4j4q14 Q46r. 1 >

~ 0 v4AI..4'4 w4 4404 411404A141 WA.44a aV4= w00 41410 -P4 0 0 Or jwa 4 Ow .0 4A

ir 0 '0 ra>q a 0 V. 44 0 MA 0"4. w Ad 4 to 920 0co0 M."000u410100 40 4 C:0"4 W v-4W 0QaOw AJO00'V 14 tor 1A0U> .W044dr4 14 Wr4 0

0 ) V 4 4,J N~. 0 W4,14w4 0-4"40e-44)U COA 0 A 0 A "-14 000 C2M4J C ~4j0 u-4 0 OL g t

a U~0 awe-40w"4 OCC 0 w 0 W440 Mv-4w w4) Z.4~ W W 40' ,Q60%~ 0 "4 0 0 "4Iff

0'0"44 "-44 w144, 144 .P4, &OQ 0 w 4.441 rd 41 03C r 044 4 D90 $144 SW -4 0to 4 a41 -4 >40

z 4j 4 xuwoo 0 w0a W.-4 0 $4 C0r-4 "4N3 E-40 -4 4, 4J Aw0 14 V 0Zw000~ W h. P-4 A141

14 30 410 >1 92 W r4 OW 0a 4, WI40.WQ4 0 a'W0 , '04)4 C.-4 01$4 -V0 >9 54 C:A 4 -4.4V0 0 C -4 0E-4 A40A'4~ WE4W A 0 O-A0W04 00W V 1840=09M) 041 P 00 8w44A4 0 XW p=0 40 4ACO APC 041.= 4 01 00441 go : [ $ 0 -P4 CO 41

iv 4 ,0 to0'>14>r.00 41 00 04, >4 0 Salo 4,>1 4) 040 W "4 v-4A 41, WOLu> *144Ora J103

U) 40"4 r % ~0U 4.4 10 -44 4,401 PC g>A41 = 144 D0) >q"4 "4O014 41 41 Io A0.40U -. 4 0W 4414.P4 0 0 r .- 4.-IA 4, *'0 ~ C CI 00 i-mV r0. UM P4 0 41 4> 4 ,~ 00 0v (a> 0tov4 a . Pe4 "4 C t 0 > 010 w40 V00 > L4 Wp44

414,w -P~4.'451 r. 4, 0 041A 0 r. W 4)

Cn ., '0 '0 zro0..4 0 a)4j ra W.4 0 w41 .04 0 4j3 ".400W 04 u .14Q00. 4,0 r 0 w1 4,114

a 4 041 A04to 40 0 -A0 41 14 w w (d 31 to044e-INo~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IV$ 1P4I o o. 4$4 wsg-4Wi 0U% -r4 0 0) c w 014..W1444 W

to 31 is> .06 4J1 go 0-180 4t a 40

Page 148: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

CD

0 11

III -iI I

' 2-k9-

4.4S

Page 149: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

El~

AY

941

II

2-2

04

04

to

2-2

Page 150: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

CY .

cc;

w

-1V

2-21

, ', ., ,, _ •',•_t_2;'•q'

Page 151: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

'wVgO0A 0 CP"~b4~U4,LE-4 w@ U b

M~~ 0 ý

04~* 04 IV "L 0 a 00

1=~~~~ .- 0 a am S

00 w 4 W tow :S o~

"4 0 1 r-4 ooU 0 W 41w.- 4) 0 P4 4 0 0. 0_6>1. e-4.4 0 W a 444J1

0'A 41 IVDal P -4 $4 -441

JJO 00 r-4 1"go4 ) 1.w'v4. 0 LlV o o~0 of.40w0 oW m1 a4 --. O 00 c V C4

0,4 -4 41 -P A'A i mJA4D4 C 4) 40 & 4410 a4i

to "4 A. 4 4 w0 0-4w 4)cA*41 a -4 w 0C1 .4 0 w

41 o 0 0 -d V41 a 1 04w1V

a UU $4 %4 V% .ea of V

W_ =C Aj c 4 > 4 v4

a 0 A -P S640 0.4is S Vw

0 -V~4 0.0 4) 41m

m $ Q... AU Z'41 "4J 0,1

w41Sc41 c 0 P4 JJ"44 4) 4Jw~ *.P4 >) 0 %

C: UJJ>h w.4S 0.4j 4 4 1w Is 44 r. -4 .,0 A'4q0 C w4'0..M

ca > 1 1 -4a 04.1 -W- 0 w"4MC r-.4 O0 40 41 a 4 00

w 0A U Do A A 0 0 P4AwA00 C4 0 41 41"0 ase

$4 w-4 *. 0 0 r4 ingor--P 04a J0> b &A4 8 04 A41 0% Sc 44 A3j Sw- 0 A'4"610 P-V4 C W4V 0 c0 a. 0

w-4 b4 0 -' 0 -V416 0 toto Aa is' -4 6 U0"4 'D 10041

q41 4A c 41~ c A Ij >94w -4 0 OV1.4 0 0 4.4 0 F4 .U.

0 39r 0g 4 0 %4 > A "40 P-~4

0 10. 0 Aj 0-4 01 .0UaS0OA0 fa a A dc >~

.41 to *.4 %A w1 C P40a

"4 %a "-I O4 *..41: j -4 4J .OfL 41 0"4M 11

".4~ 40O4 04 P.40v4 'V AJ-4a 0rq A.O z :0%4 A 4

A 0. 4A 0 V 410 0 a

.4 Q 0P o eu0 r

A_ AJ A~m F4 OndVi -14 0 44 CPA

Page 152: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

w 0

ao'N

v- v-

2-23

Page 153: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

9- 0 o

P-4 44 Uý 0 b #-4 0E4 P4 0 g

b .a 4IJ a4 ~ '41 wA.406. 41 A0 C 0

0U'A 40 SE0 0 hi0J S 164A 4A55$4":0 ,4U -4b AU

0 OS"L r 93a ab "0P4M DoA 4A 0 0&W -

*0 r.q@ :0 JJP 1 0

JmA ~ V 0 J MP4W :

V U 4 C! 0 0' VP4S -4 0 0 50A 4% % "Au44 8004 Mu4 4P4V

MU 4J Do 000O 00w4 0 MS a

*U64A06 4 0 4 00 aO.A0 0 5- '.41 0 5 % b

04 0 " C3. a US

CS 0 0 0 0 N~ wi A% V4M 054 CA '. m "M

48 ~ ~ . P4~. 4& "4~

5 54 51 0 0 C hui

ol 0 C& ia .4 a Oa-41 CCLam4 "p4mx P4 "40 -.49

a AUa.AO4 41 J%4NMA A A1-424 "4 0 A0

a 0 M 0S

*4 4 0 mA A0 *U a p~ 'wo %4 P4 0 "-to SoA *C 44if0" 0 m0.m4.. m "40

04 9 to 0 V -4 A SE40 P 30iS> *A M c .45

54 48 onW Psono 9bs kas P,-4t

410S U M*'14 %8 0 CO 5

I @aN0.4 ~IJ a %A W wf4 tpa "idJC a 0 V M MS

0 Mae=4C AS%41 '44P4it '~O.''41 am %0 A S

0 Aj P4Do, .0IH 404 Do X 048

N *"4 00 "-24

Page 154: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

0'Al

* 'U00

00

IInI mJ

-J IIn-- J -

I � iI�� �II _ I I - I

S

0 0

Page 155: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

00

ca

m*

ca o

24

N

2-2

N',.,:••F .•'"•'% ,, .' , .'••;,.'.'.T ,,, •• •',.'.,••"'• •• '- t "•• ",• , ',"•T- o" • ,• ' - • • ".",• '

Page 156: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

I...

00

-. I,J,

I.*

• '9

S~2-2"7

Page 157: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

'Id 040P-4 V c

Ala 0 r4.1414 t4*0 e-

". W P40 0 x~a.0

m Wwdro I a h4) 0O'o

4 041a b U-P4 04)

n00 & 0b SCC 0 oA W 1.q4 VqWf 04 O 0 r4 0 >

e .41* %.4 p4 31 14 41via4 0. CAJ a C) 0 4

"4 r a W law Ii 00

00 0 COO x q 0 M =

D4 -.414 C go* 0 o .4 Cs..4a* 0.4461 0 Co

-W4 -P4 0 4 :00 of 4*

a 1~ 41 >144 C t "40 0 > *'04J C,4 Ao

"Z.94 - IP 0

r44aw 0 Z4 0 i. 04*

0" ~4o4 a 00

u P4 WOf 41"4'4 OfWC4 is 4 A '.-4> 4 ;4 r4 AC

140 n7 V 0 Ae r 0. 4-4-

8 044 a P-4 A 4 4*AC.) .01 00 a cIJO

8 0A0M m "4Q 0

"'0el " C *IAm 0464 4 A 0 I

to O A-4 39 4 11 Q W 4 .10024 a W O P40a .- 44 P4 i -

0 oa0 e00Uof c 4 9

.- 4 0 , 0 40441 014 >S 0.0 3c W A 4 004

cO 04 4) 0 ANA,9044'e4 41

31 " V-C4 ~4 0 a 0 -40004 0 U IAC4"0A.me so644* §WO

OJ1 b411 Z*OI6

to 0 .0 e.4 0 ... ..."4"4 mdWOI4A oI40I40

P40004*0 041 P 0VJA

IV 0-.4"2-28

Page 158: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

w•

1..

nown

2-29

-l fi i

0 0i

Page 159: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

141

0-3

@2 -

z

Sn I

2-30 . " ,*

\ A-

" • U

Page 160: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

I'I,LI-

own.

2 -3

Page 161: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

P4 A"4 0a .

.4 4 c

P0.. 41

~ 00r4 0 -A ".4

41 * 41 41 '

A4040a -P4 0

0000.0001A"4 0 0 MA 01

A 0 4

444. 0.4 0.44 4j la 440 *A

0%40 ~a0

X14J.40 wo "

*O*0 a a

0 Q 0l.4 41*tA"1.4 a 4* '0 1

40 A4*0.~ V.

.0 A 4O 0 0. tr4

44.0 co 0 I 401 44.44* .14:0 01.woo 0

OA AOS d a w.%4P4*4*0 00

0 * 0140 a 4, " i 01.0b~p01..pA aA.

34 ~ 4 01 "4001J 4*(A.4h4 MA4 wO

A.2104 w&4 a 40 = V1. 3101

bd $444 01.1 CA~54 V L40 r4010 41a

"o 4 "L04 v104 00$4 010 01

00 .0010" to100J4*-4aw P4~ Do~

"34 41011

W 0 .0 0&I 4 0! .; 01

p4 $4 0 0*0 EA4

N .4~G" 41d a4.1

~~~ .4Id

2-32

4s.1

Page 162: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

V

I.,=

l2-13

Page 163: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

0 �t#��.:i

Intentionally Left Blank

.J.

,J.b .5

*1�.4.

�1

* -I

A

�J.

0-4

.1

I.

'�4�' :�:2-34 ,

p -.

Page 164: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Chapter 3

Backup Slides

3-1,

Page 165: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

'4 P4 ~A Whi%4 AS 044J aJE44I

4 go V t 0

a. 0 pIij4

*C @0 0 EO'04-41. bihi"A $4 -V4 U4 DJ &1v 04

04 0 PO O 04Aw&1J

0 0. ~A UdJ m -' 0 >

>44 Ibh *J4 c P4 ".aW 04 40 -P 4 j4go 00 00IQ Aj0L

MA. b 0O"0 0'ý 4 a

30 0-0 *'4 w 9:A4 44 0 J 0 $a-.4 0-46

*. c c 0 QA a 4C

0.a- >~*~40 :*4 a 0- OA 0 J =. .* -

a0 >~ m UAj 0 " 0S

A 144 tp -we 40 U**

A c, 15. ACO W0 -4 Ai

0 "4 j %4h&4 "4 aCS C A

#0 0 Uhi a. a v'>Ua@ -VC 610%4C 4 > 0 . -4 otW4 -0048.4 OW48

C48 .u4480- ý4 A)0

0 >399 0 0 Stp 044 00

4804 4UI' 9=0%-4 0 w.4U48~ 0') 000. h=N i A

C" 0. '-4 __ "4 uA

r. 40a PO004A1 40 .UA0 0ca c r 0 q0 Sd "iJD).4-

* 14 ~~~0 a hV88 a,"iU-A v r. - C4 CP( 0NU6a *C3, 10.6 0 ae 6.0%0 P4O -4 av -4 hi 0 '4 w a a hi00 ~.O44 *hwiC= 00

L-0 9 0 a 0-4 41 04

a ~ A ba V 40 AA A USbA :0-

48'48.4 '4 04C0

Ui *.4 -4 as4

,00. 64 U IS C-.4U 0 b

cf '.4 *-" U-02Q A Aj

a. "3-2wxQf-

Page 166: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

-J w

V. 3-3

AM-

3-3-

Page 167: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

loo 08 A

I0 .u4~ 0 c4 04 046 0 0 w 0S -1 -4V 0 a d8 6 " 4 0o

S0 4 0 0 01.O Aj-A 4 - -0 4 a@0 0-40 .4 03 >,-

P~4 w01boo 0 0:0 41O$ 0 4 60

w4. 8 610 w 0 P J1.4 9 0 MOc

truefo 0 0m-40' 0

0e4 0 .bCV A jU 0-P A 11 aOW60 We0.4

Oslo eAU4 u.408 0-3M Ui*~.4 ~ .l -4 481-4 *06 0

MO 0660 .40 a8 so~u0360 c w w 0 0. 0'0' 60

6001. A1.4 M 4.0 4

80 S"40 000-4 0 C60%4 a 63&4 4 w O. A > 0 -4 A 060 r48

I6000 .04 0406 ow 0 480 A606'4 6 U '0 4.14d A a

014066 w08.1 0 c0 .4 Aj0 *Aso 04o m 0.10 $4, P4 Q0

U4 0 0 a VA 0. 0ý Cs,4~ ~ ~ ~ 08. *40 : 4- 0 0b

=8.6 w .0G b*a004 $ 4 6u.4 6 441.

lp ~u gA 40 4) v-4 is a ow0 6 0034%40 1.460 6 cr 614A1 A 001.40 0 0c togoA4QA 0 to04~ 00 P014

omo i 60 601 6 0. 0W0 0 1..a-v

44 XA 04 "4 #-4 b0 A 60Aa WG46 .. 4E4 48 3 A 'A 94U

1.S43 Vo 6 0 .46.0 WA0 W W, so-40 .4.4lw46P4.0 00 8 4 3F .6%

48~0 A.4 *6u.1A0 "4.4 Ag ova:0 41 0 41 Q 3 040 4

a 41.4 o 41.461446 A'0 W.48 44e-0 1w V-4.0.44 30 a4 4A0.0

0 A0 A 0 Is$4.004 0 " 0606 a~a48 048 000 048A 0.t46 400

04 "4L 06 >9~4J P4 00:-40 A 00e>4C0 481.4

1..606.04 O~ 0 P4 u-4." .~480

1010 0004 0 do, %4 A '.00 0 %4OU 640 4AA3a

~~81e. ou04 014~ W .00aP'-9 me* a 44A6 4 M4 0 SAC0 mg.48 06

2 F-4 -04 a U S 040w0 9 14.0

r4 666 0~. V4 C 3r-004 NA "64400601A.8-4 A " 0 a 4A*

A 8,66 G64 a A 4 #.463 0 A80

2 4Z0 41 0 c 6 ~0 U 60 %44P4 0 :0 so 144 0 0 %4 00,@.44 W 1b4 :

0 A8 W.4P4 s 0 1.A a "4 0 :o4 M0 4.4 -w4 60% 4 6 a to

0 481. 486 0 6 A40.'.4~ 0.4 00~ 4) 6 0 6

(4 .A 1.4 f) . .1 064 31 .6 6 14 UPA 14, & ."~8.= tb4V 0 , C 0 04

0000 go,0 a 8~ 0, c 0 481 m0

" 'Ai 043 a %Am-48 0 v 0314 aa4 4641- 0.46 in ~ 0 W .. #60-40ý o4 4Q4

C 6.642 1"0 ~62W w04PC00 0.4, 61.A P 2.- WO .06 A CA C 4a A

00600 0 030 C: 48600.ena:0 c0 "4 48C"4 0 "q

0000-4 W. 14 12 c j cAd AM -4 as- 4 w.1.j a .4..4 "4 n

a W 140 A , 14W1 30 "

3-4

Page 168: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

AdlI

CDI

3-ZI-

zj

Page 169: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

> 0 r. ca1so 410 j 00 -

0~~~3 0. Et0'' ) ~J4) cn 41 t 0 Vto 0 4 M W.401W r-40 0

r-4 -r4 M 4 (a0 Mf-4 0 r8-4 c P4 M )EO $. '

0 44V-4 a >, v000 P- kr4>0 >-4V& 4 " A a

p4 p4 tZo - j .0&J4 Wi 0 1 W0 '40 m 0440 -4 u -4000. r : , 4J 4J .JVWto 0 0 w4.IV0w0 Gi 41 : 4 a

0,C .48V r:ccI= a =-4 4041 V to-to a >) aW 40 054C 0 08

.94. r4 a 00 .0. a SP 4)~ N 0 41 r4I=3c0 0 0.0 .4 4j40

.0 0 CU 0 0 a-44)r WO04 sU >4804 00.0c .3 t

">0 414.44.w 048 0 0 0: 04 00 E D igo C0 id 9.0 4 P-4 448 C 0)

41 0 41 4.4 0m4 C .0r-4 v-4 r-441 aj m 00 -40-4=-0 0>0.0O r-4 48 0 r.4 0 C:m o ) 00 = 4 00to00.-4

0La 1344.0~ a 9t)" r44- > "4 0 .0 v44 94J V M04E )tw0 tw0 41 100 ui qrir 4OV 00 W 00wW. 0944

w941 ia 48-4 >q9GI4 0~4004 00.04 004 0 " -P.4r-40 0a 94.4 >8 V0 M04

F. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .00- 1i 4 f4t ow >i 0 40 1.00.w-4V4

0) 4) ro w c W .4l0 w AO01=0 " is 40 c . 4 lw0.> > 4)4 Z t =4)E 0 X4 1064. .900u r4 mw

0- 0 0>d -r4 00.40 44 00 0 do m 0: 0 0

.0 .4 *V>1 c 0 Lr-I M04 I0a 00 .0 41 0 "40 .0

0 A 0 fa0 00 w 4 .90 a > C4 C: 00. w > 480Vm48'I0V ito 0 m = 4 W8b 0 -r4 03 0 WO 4 0

410 j '.-I >iG -p4 0 > 004 12 0V 41 w90A0 4194 0 AJ V 0 w 0 a8 U0 CD ".4 in > 0 44 0041 0w

44 PO ti4ac4-4 > m 00348 AV=.: -41.4 A V > 44 go r. 00

00 4) o -4 0)w .9140 01E4$4 4.40I 0 C: 4 141 fa0 CHccw "4 A848 3r-4 0 489.4048Aj048 3: M =00 11 1 -4 --- 94 480M1M

410 a; m M 310 r4, 0) &a W 1 C w.0 A0 - Ir. 4) 940"1= E 4JJ44 41 = m.w -4 ca ) : L 00 CD *e 4 41 9 >-94

i.0 m O00.40 0000 (a =E-4 V-944 0 M.01 P4 r-4 r-4.lu 0 0 .0 0~014j -A Aj a 0481 t 9 w 3 0 to A04'I

Ik w) 04 r-4 ca id 0Q0 0..10 C: 41a 0 0r.499 ~0go 04 04w 4 - 4 r. 000 4 *00 00 Afjf41u P 0 4.i0 -4ACCO-A W041

sin V 0 41 1Aa000 0940id4.4 4 > A48-P4V V-4 100 4 80f A.1of0 "00 0W -4 j x1 v-4> 0l.0 0 Ad0Ai0 V0094. > 14 go448

0 4 r-4Z.9 0 0 t 4D Va 0 0dvu 00w.00 w 0 .0.0a00> 00atoCE-4 C4 OW 4 -4801r4 C 944P4 04 .0 O 4M t 48 00 v1.w4"0-A

zd 0)-A".0 u 0 a C0@ 0$V ca w .0~0 .41 w0 41 4J 44~

o a.c0.0 44 M00-94 *48 40 -. 0)0 & 941 481 it .a 0w 0 a %041 4) :3 39 10S4J 0 >i 44 > A 4 44 fd 0 0041 040C0 w04a.00

0 40 la-4 A8 w10>0 ccL4*o Qa d 494 0V> 00r',0a 0

02 4) i r J .04) J-4V4 00 - d4 V > 04 m 0 4100 a 000 , 418>Vz 3L 4 = 41 04 v00C . -44 wO ill (D 0w 10 0tto >,0 "4 Co a w 0 0 $44100 A48 0 C toa0zw 009P4 a ~03c jv r-4 a% e co AH9 '44 " *94 V0 '0 M 0~ 0:004 0 0 Aj PCw aba>1 0.-a0 .0 0 4 C:0

i' a w41 u.4r-VV' 0) 0483 0w G0stho440 0 a A 0 .y A -4 40) t

4 >w > 0 r_ , UV 0 V w "49r4 as 04854-4 40 0 0) X44

14 wWO W -4 A8 0.00 0 0 4 400-4 C 048i0 0-4 P4 0 V x A m0 40

a >.O94 >1 t vw0 r-4S w 000 .0 -4 -4 "4 41.4 0 )000a0M.A0oIV0 00 0-4 41 w> 1 0 0 C M 4 A48C -4 010 co of Adw44."4.9941 I

E-4 a 0 MO -94 -444448 W 0-0.4 44V "940&G 4>0u 00. of0w 0.00 Vn P4 014 .040 _. 0~ = 4. 8".W0 3C0 -94 00A0of>to 414.400.) 4 0) -4O10 -4do0 0 39 9 $440 10. n 4 rw=I4 W0 4114489414.4 40

4V -P4 00-#4 0144 164J0 $41 toA %D8 004j800 = r. 4) m 0 6". 4 >1

.1 1~10 040V0CO W 4010 '>00 A wP4 o 0-04 40w : 410'.IVW q.

480> 00 IA489v-4 W 481 w a4.40 0.-40 0 -OOO494

en 034 )1% = wO .44 040.40 $644 -P4 0~ 9P> -40 Ato 0 0 9

300 4804.q 4 0ir.0 >q : 2r.O W~ -1.94 0 0 L, Ut w00)44800M4J94 0 * 0 04.403 0 X(Ar- M 0 0w 39 0to 1 =4 0 "48VW 0 r410 05 E4 0 (a0041 V0 a 0 C 00.9 -A 1 41 .8 ( A =a atv(a0 44d .'94 A0 0 to =I=4 > 0 Aj = 0 .i014 w00Q 41 0 4 4 o-v4 A80 4 0o

,J 41 0a C 04.4 fa 61 WQ W $40 I - 480d r.0 to0. at :) *4*.9P4 0-40 0 f 404)0 4j,0 u C b-4a "44 W 48431 tm0 N

1: o t .00i 4) -'U .00 ' I.4-P4 0 r. >,0 c t *9400t 40 940. b-4 0 C E-4r.0)w 41 0 Q m 00 . d 4 0-4 490 00 I. 140 41 4 .P4 PV-14 4

r -4 = C 0 -A C r-41

fS r 1 A 4048MiW4 t M00% (A 0 ii

) 00 0 w : (P4)04 a40~ a 0'ýA.0V~4 0 Q U 00P.0 .% -A w

( .00A 410.~ I440e .900a = w %10000

0au 314 U~3.. -3O0 .. > r4 4J 44 "4 8.4UV W -4 >0

3-6

Page 170: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

WU

-ai

tz-l

,I

ion

3-7.

Page 171: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Pal to Vl'ogo 41 Ai 0410 wome

froI .40 ) 9-4 41 41-4 .1 VriC) ON4'- 0000 4J 4J V

0 0 -A 4) -41,0 W1 11it>W1r

a0> )c a 0.w 00-(a toA4 a%0 E-4140 4J.) 10 0

C t r 0 A -r ; C a v ~0) 14.1.1 r-I 4

41 ~ 0 0 0 > mu L w4 s4.44.1La a -4-'4 0441C4 941Oa -A ' 1-4 0Ac:3

AV, L4p :w4 00. 00491iC) 0-* )W4P- ) r43 r-44 C0 0 4'4 P JP4 044

>110JN~ L Q 0w0U:a4)o41.-. 0to9: 0r"-4 t -A4 1 ~ -4~0 " 0" 4 x4

0 r-I 1 N 0.I r- > oq..0w u to q C-4) w 0 4 AdOI~ >1 >

'4 to W4) -AI j= 4 ~ra agUGJV 00441U a0 41 0-414w 41 lu .>04 i

>- A >w m o -4 041 *.4V Ad "4*.0 c &-F4 v s A 0 ~V A U 41 =

to 410 .0 00 04E-4 410t 04 40 >U A0 W 4 3 41 > 17 0 t)-4 $4 0

w~ 1 d0t 4 54 C:31 J V%

04000a>0oý 414 144 4 0 .4 c0) V= ) o&' me0 4110l"C14O 0 141"40041 =0 1e:3'0 4J :1 0W 0.f " r.-4 0 00 0 a

Ii 0Igoi4 044.Ofl! to001 W.0V 0.0 12. 0 - 4 w4 )emWc o0 0

.ZC !0 "4 '-4 .90 r40 V a Aj 0 4

)g-f W00 4 in~' a U41 41 1aix r- 0 FU ." to4to0 041 01 00Cr- -

N 0140Ct "-4 m 0)r- 0 r40w41 0 Vd 40 0 k g=Q0 40 0~- i41 Q- tw 0 .0 0

In44) PA 92~V U0 "4V Id4 )d" A

0 9 -00,000 Nr- -A '4000W0 Ad.4 V 0Vr-I.0 04U1 4) m= CA 04.0= P4.1 W W4 00 g

00 F1. w 4 .4 0 j o = a t0 0.0 4

E- C0 0>4:, U 0) A4 0 3ji " o o d ý 0 0 a * 494.-4

to wM - 4 10 "-4 .0 C . A L 0.C a ~ V u\ AQ 4) s to00 ie ' Of 9 W "4 0o4) 4J 0 Go 0.1

w $ 4 o 40 I C0t 0.0 to~ )0 0 004to 0.- coo0 wo 0 - 44 0 4.4 0 ul

O- 0. w 0 to w a Qa 0 444 W -4 a40'

.000.94.IS ..4 aV 1P4 0 W % -A A0.94V046%04~ 1444 to LI00-4 C) VVW. m1400 0C)CO)M.a 0 w UA y 4

4 .0.00>. a4 W1 _O> 00 0 3 0M,0. ME4 r Z -4 .- >9jJ 0 0 00.0401 ~Is -1410 1:,3 C4 ) AX9 w40 -4 0 "4~J

Z 14:1 41 014"a 140 u uv r4C)~ 4 tC4= oa 0 1.440 P =4wL 4-40. 2 4 0

caS 04 04- 1 29 -r 0 wow ON 00 11w4j, )E-4 W W 00'- 4 C C - . 13 V 0 $ 0' >14.

ro > 0 014 .1 J .a 4 -vq44 -4 F4W "

La 4 >0 M 4 4 4.-4to cg 0 1* o0.4 3 b444 C 39-4 u Q 4JE-4 . 00 001 4.4-4

AJ C 41 0 -P 310 41iA V u 1

Page 172: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Lii

- I-

I

00U, 00

-U'

zhIm V.8 .4%

4

-�

I .

�i:I-i

�i!B I'III

Y�dB B

I

0

* ... .-f�3-9 .

A

* * .

---- *

Page 173: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

A.44 to 0 031 .94

a z4 ' 41A 414 r40 a Q3 '

V~. 0-4 W4J 041 034 goaZego-6au41 4J41 wr. w0sjl .,-4 4 0. c 4 1

>I 0000 c:a A 0 00 M" 41 0j V z .L

0 Af449 4 3J 0 -4t -rO 41 10 J9s~-4 4) F0 4.0 90 4 Q C: -410>V 4u 0'

I44 V A r41 0P 44 ' ar 4V

V Id 04 41 w A -r4 w% rV ) 0)JJ 419U4 4:~4 A

0 10 41. *.$ 4 4 4 1 0 On so0 ) 4 )~- o4 (a0 to r4 &V01w or 41 1ago > j .0 "41Z01A. 4 4J -r>41

C: 440 ->j0 t ow -. 03aA 0 41a 41G1'4

".4 0 .0 P-4 w 41 -4 4 -4 4 u 0 ~0 C F4Vl441 0 0 .-4"J.4 444A 4) 40 f

A~~~~~~ 0 0 .. ZIA 4 wA .94Ac of4)4) 4 r-4 00UM04""144 I44.Z0 A1 41 41 r.

.Ad00 0 3C M w41 ~0604 0 O jJ A 4141V

P4Mw oo 41 'o "~4 40 =" 1to&d10 .. 10 I = 0.V W 41410eMJ4J O' V

W~41.4 ZV4O I r 041 r-4 C: -) c m0A r r44 41 0)eNOLs41 -4 0 A r. 4 V r40a

r-I a "4 00U O .0 4141 41 r. .a 0g Ie410 $4 >4 S 0Z% 0 -1> t $ 21 a

.94 q*00 F41$4La00( 4 94410 4. M0U0 MGJJ X N4 ~9:-40 r4 "4 c W4 to 0 31044 ? 0.820> "re o a >?4J 00410 4J C *v4 -4~ C1: .94"

r"4>00 W9:4 C0 -4 .0 f>4w $VO t4 01.4 Aj Z toM t P.94A34)

0440 0H.. 4 10 14 a44 -r CQ M 4 A -4 >bd 0 90~ *"4Ie a .. 4.4 0 m4) 410 r-44 00 --ft1:w 41 41 0040 >0. .. 0AAV00. a 0 0 V4J CA V ~0 IDe >041. o J

.0 -P4 >q 09' a.4 94to .001.' 094 L.0 to 9.4> A' to41 0 W tA AJ P 40 404J 4)'440 04.4) a -4-4 V" v--4 r4 1 1 ha'41 aa>. 4 1%0 jA 0 c o

o 4 0-4 41. A3 M a 9 4 0 44 W 119-4 -P4 r-4 F)0#4)44St 40V A (f 1G 0 m X r-0V0V Colola cx t

41 c .1 >~44i 4 E-4 0 4) 4Vt 0 Cad41~A to0 4 $41 - 0)U 41. 4 1940 c:W 3 410.

C!) wh 0.0 -4J9S Ua4 .0..A34.141 CA 404z p41 41 o0m34o M-'4 w a 03.-II la '0 f" 40

oO0104 :ýc 339a0 OA -4 r 44 .0 Vm. X: V 944 mA U 0 A14) 044 0a WA 41

"E4 r41-4 1c E-4t%40 *C ( e2.i0A 0 9r4 &$4.AS'00 la = I". r Fi-4 m )03 (a 1 VP to $4"-141

02 J . ChaO- ý ~4J W *940 WA 0 CPA 0J r 4104to c9403 A .944 ~4 A0W03r 41 W C4J 9 414 44,

E-4 VW C 0 g 43P4S wV JJ 03 :344 * IV $441-Ca 41 4100 A4 P-4 41>Q~.4 4 4J ~ U .0001c3jc

3c t mt 1 D ( 4.4 0 'I 0>44e4 -4 A4 Z3 d14 1 4A 0 -P41",.4 to 4 w. 14Uco1.4 t l"4 W. w . 0 w

w A is ca W E-94 0)4041.94.94A94 44J WO1(0c 40 3 c :-44 3 4c oQ w w4 )?

a0>3a0001 to A m0i to '14.44 sA0 A : "4 Do c

I 1 410 .411 0 ro d . r " l. 41 W"4 v04 140~ r c (o001.4.t041 .0 c 0 j0:i

.904 .94a94 w 944194F -41004E4 0 0 -P4 0 4144'000

ca VVOc :1 41 0#= -r403c: 4. 01 410 -Aw t 03 > 10A 440V 4)-- 0 ovommuomw c.4J.04 w449 V401

U40 hdO41 0 .- 4f-0 W 12.r41. 0 W t )-P J P4( Ui ((I C,04 4J :3 41 41 Ad0

AU 4, co w I m a e 0 0344 0 M 0Q3OCl) 41. of >q .4 0 0)- to 0 4) A 0 go

0A 41419 0*A W44M> AJ 041M0A E-4h031 W0 J0V

301

Page 174: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

'I

£fl

w�3U

4I44

IIi�i

* :111II,

B

C

3-11

Page 175: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ldhiA 0 1V0.0"441 " 4 C~A

44 0 0 V OJ *P4J 41 f

04 w l Ohi "4 4 J9 M E-4 Xi~ 02).C

02 0 .0.UJ M 0 w A>q U

0 0 a -4 $4 4 ( mu r4"4 or."4

* -V4 -0E-4 . - 0 -P~4 0 4 > C.

C ~ s~O C AUUU " A00 o - %ouw 04 0wtp A 1 0 Cr rk~ *r.4 "4G2 a m4 orto 9: mCr-4 0 LO -r4 44

CU0 ina0. V 10" > r4 0) .44 0Aj w

001 El w.a 0 Vra 4 C cr-4 O~j

f- f V0C4 0 0 . minJ041 aCj.Elf0 El04J DO W-0 0 0 0 -4 t 1w ~IVl hi

I-I $ a 0 0 r-4.4.0 6U0 o 'elr-l4.C00

0 wa 0 -ah4 C0 a 00 4)"61 uJJ I -0 4 0 06A0 000

a~ 0 Vah 04J u J. VtoA.wO *A 0440 P 0 0' r $4

0r4 4J in 0:04 0 El "4 ri w "I aa *0 0 4

a ' 1 e4) ~0 g aMC .- 0~ 3A %0 M=

4)r4 4 q0 C) ) t &4 A 94 c0a>9"4 m40 4 V44 a o . C:hi lW 4lrb0

V .41 Is4)h 41 a A> 0V ) El M.= 0z 0 FEl ZA.J=iO hi 0 a 0 w 0 4 0r4

.94

W'4 0E 0 N1 0 9: 4 4 Vi041' DA 0 "

2-t 0"- Pt :1O' O 04~ C04 -P4 C: 4J E-14o4 04 41 El El 'A >1".40J.1

0~ V)0 V 0 .0 0 W4 041 4V 0~.41 to lh V W10 r4 >0 0hiu.J

cUw 0 0UC4~ 0 O-40 404.4hi4weOl0a2 i 04 Id t" Cj 0) M 4 C 0 41 r4 .4 >

2a al $4 to rV4 P-A o 0 W--4 wcmin w

oH~ MC 0C4.4 .OA )t to$ r U

14 A *- 1t a61 0='w 0AJJ NOlhx.-IOA>A14 4M0u4=hIC0 El 0% W 4w :0tM 0 0a O4 00 ) 4 0 -f "hiO $4 =4

E4 a 4~ to El El V0 0 M ,M El -AE toc Elo@ 0 idC" .0 44 0 '4 to0.V4 a 9M a1 :34~ %1A VC1 >4i V-4 00 0 r4 wl

3c M V-4 t0'q 0-44. V wioo0 t M 04) 040VU 0 41 W 4 00 04JW M4.4V~ FUa emp.4 r4qt *A.d w 0-4E IV

$4.40 -M 04h goC,4 i 0w 0 44 4A C9C' El 0 hi El .4$

0-4 41 ~'4V.4 *-W ~ Ef 39> 9 I 4>H El4.4~0 C:-4>44"4V r-4 "4 .' &0L hi9W -

weI *40 0 go 0a% Oc 0014M2 r4 We- V CJ 4 Cl1 F-4 W"WFr4E M~

C. vO. u00 04 0 C0 4C40 -4VMPC

0 .lhr4"4 0 .r"0.r hu4 0 4)0 cp40.6W4J a 0 0.4V wC' "46 gA

ra 4 0to 0 t tn.4to ) r :If0

0p0 0 w 0 P1 o w4 10 4) to I= r" wr'VY

.3-12*

Page 176: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

w

too'

00

3-13

i ii

Page 177: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

-4 '44 V 090 0 ~A 0OO 0; M 03

-1- 'a ,J *0 94to 41- AJ.041 0VA ý4 Z.sq 41 0 413t0r4 w 41 A ACV

00 C: r_4 0 00"4U 001 w $4 C:* U Nx 4) avl0'a.40 M oEU $ 4

$4 4 AI 6I.4 r4 .41 0) 0 ON CEU4UEU0.4 0~0~ >1 Oz W 1.e

00440 w1 to4 4U 0go .U0.J 39 0001.1l

ow 0000 "4'-V.; 4 01 %.1O)Od-ha 41 P4 .0 41W. 41 go > 4 V1 01000I 00 oU ~0AW1C: 'a w0 w t w4JJ

0 re .0~ 0.-r.400 0 r4 Ca04 4 - o_40 0 0Avia~ U H V ra 0 A 4 0 0).-I

V AO a 31N " tpw "4 r.0 410w 00r U-.4 1z V 44 0 0>"4 OA* VAO 4 A 41

0 3>qrA- :A Uah'00 F U > V A4doA 0 r4''4W04 > 4 r a. ~40A,

00a 41 x V 'aE O.4) r4 " t4 to w.4 wA1.w4eON a 4 w0-i-4 0A ON 0 04V10 0

P4 "ra AU4 w P4 e0 M 4I4 "94 44.A=a " .4 3t ba0 041 4 U~ 0: 4 0 41 41

P.4 40 w V -0- 94) a 0>,"4"4O 10 V-4to C 4"0 4 6 m o d4.4 41 , U U .4 4 4 X0 .

"4 ~ .94'4 .0 A moo >4"40 0 "4 r4 410 W.1A w121 Q44094 A9 4 a w A>O40 0>Mr0, 0 04 V UA a. MM0 0 w A .. 4 41 "4

V o0A V 0 w A410 41aaUa0 >41 w 4 to ~0 4)0 we V 0a t~o

vs 00 j0 "4~ ON UUEwU4v 041 1 F,-U.4 a

u $4 0O044 0 w 0 0 4.0 w4EU aM9 UN4 0 UUhi 0014 = 0i0 NoEUA4.ov aU " * A00.w40041. A C 0 w 0 $441> 1D 2 4 A x 4)

M4 41 .94 -4 U -.4 V V '0 9.4.-4 V4140~ > I t ONw x 41 gor40 41 V EU

w 4AO 0 N0AA 1.i0000~4i 544 M a V Vov 041 0 0041 4J100- J9 44 0 00 0'a0044 V-4 V1 M u V4 w44U$ $4 .0 41 %4

004u aI w AN0 Id>4 wd 0U.4 0

w2 U A W41 0 0"4 0 9_4EU U1 W- fu 1.'a41.

14~~~ 9 o 4 .- 4 r V a I f Ai . 0 01 r.4 dPW r4t- 4 aU EU r. -4 u0 $4 ."4 V & VIZ '440 u00,g e0t A'E0 toa C 00 0 no t44 "*4."4 a Oo00j410 'a A r440 44.IA V-4M00"1-to

E4 WAA w r 4 Ui3CLl 2 a4 041 00 004

o 0At' N A MU$4Z W 4 06'0 A A uw E-14 04 C2Pu'4W 0 C 1-"q3=I

0tpa' EU a A141. -4 ~0 4) 0%E to' 4 0tC e 00p 0'4 ra 0W ~4J.00. ~00 0 0$4 0

(A 0 W14 -4 *,r.4 14 10 0U .01 w U> w u0z u00 0 >1M -4 N W 41 JaE0U.-4~ >ia W 0 F.. >o 414J P-4 10.0 Z.0 W44 I.I-4 0 41 FaO UCU0

14 0.-i 0'4 0 $4 $9A 0 04a4 0 0 C0 *000 W 4 A1 = 31 ~qI

04 E U A 0 r4"4'0 VC > 0 Qa a s-4 V29A >1 0 A0 Id E -4 0 0I~ a jC t

0A > A 41 J P4 9A V 4 0 to 4 A * 9 4 V

A"4 .r4 3 U4 0~e40 40 0 Llr.gal P.-4 a 41J C N0r4O 4) U4 .94 w4 A "4 wr4N

1-4 as 0 E94U.-4 0 W'A.C4 >q, >.4. I

",04 4E00 M- XAE "4U X0 -

3C MCf inCU)C4so0NP404 001.4 0 ~41 0 O0 > ta0."4 Z n.0l "4 >'WV = ) Q44 t w 044W40M

1 -94 e-4 14 f0 M ~ a t a 44100 9441 W~4 0 4)P-4 P4 O 0 1 '00439 0 "4 rO 0) M' -440 0 41

a 0 *1 4 0A 'aA >oz. toA . 4A0 >4 00 0 00C:V J r.O 0 414 a ~41041 V

14 we4~ r41 g ow40 >qO4 1.i 0~ EU 940 40 coca .4 41 4tor A qr,441 A 00 o o 14 A W,M4 M441 041VI.4 4J C 4 A1u-4 0 M 4 1-4 r. " )q.F4 4j V 4 ,

00 am 00000un 0 _H=A. 0 P.4 9002 MN $a494 A 0r ~0 >414 V4 0 940 (Aa0 0u

"A~4 0 W >0 V $4 40 H 4 C A. i 0 41 00.P4

14 -P4 41 4 "4 _4 o 4 _ 'aA 'A4 =to400 > t, E41 to x0 AJ91.0 0A .Ajto.' A0 "4 Ia t" 4 r 0) 00 &144

3-14.~

Page 178: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

'MID39)

I- 3

3-15

, . • .. "•~~.-,,, ::.!

Page 179: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

P4 (9 93

.a.Cdo Ur e W C

* ii i go W946 *41 .4 ]tg4i *a CC~ of 0 A0A 1L )A

W4 093 U O-4 J @ .4 0 2 -

bAC0:101 -. 4CIliICO%4

ba'04 a-4 -04 4> 4 .0 4Ja,4 '4C* A'0 >0 0 Oc-a

q~A -4h -.4 " . ' W.4 0~

* hieve O4 'O.4O41ba060 Ai a~ AlE 0 c w

0 Ow4 C-v*0 W.-4

W C4 U 0 > O.C Ad ba >j44bl

54 '0 v4.4 C . C0 > v ~r4 0 9 0 .eq4J.4 1*0 v40a w -Aa w.EIO 0- aWC Aj04aW

a 1 0 4 ?A j a .00C aA

0 o4UC0'0 i S, oa UP-4bi **9 j i 0 9 4

*. r s 1.0 -v ? Q. 4U4 -6h4A@44% a c S fo4 0 ai M

0 w ObC-4 0@0Ca9AC *34 -v A U b4 P

11 0 iU 0U ~ Sw44 0 0wri"

4 U 4 -4l A.,4f 0hAj a .4 4A Do

8 A* **** & 000at .j.4.U S 0 4 1

UC0@ -v0 4 UA Aj 00

0 "e4bE"" 14 a a c 0 go -4'A

4 U. C --4 hS -4 4J -.4 L4 aD 0091d W4UC ~ a'4 -.-. ". 0 wa ea

19 6. f4Ua3U 97 -C -4. %4%4UONCOWMA *aa 0* 0. 0

%4 Ov9 4 Q w 0 W W W.54 12 0 Oda

0 OpA L4 0@' > 03o.*bda0 o -. 4 t- *Poo 4A "if %44

400 o a0 in .04A asob s0a - a A Sq C b 41 W41

IAo0 C 1h -4 8-4 a asb94 *U0U 04x 0A=0 so -.4~h

A0 We A 0 .ý -4 0a4 604%4~i A 2.410 - "44 *41

C0 h 31 00AhO..4 aU944c bd P4 0140 0~

V. *s 4 cO 10 W 4 hI-4 0*j% 4 JA "4S~ a "4 v41DO %4"

01 - 4 A aVno d -4 wAj .4 tr A 3"i 16

e4 0% qf - j 1400A

Page 180: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

'II*IwI

3-17

~ ~ ~E ~.#.d~ Eidd.~.F ~ ~~P ~ ~f '. , u

Page 181: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

40 vac

'4U0V-*460 ::.0 0 -41 31 u

Ob.0 .c j W 1

A &da4, 3t Ad Z c ~ d f44

A~ j 04 0O~ ri- ,U .

4.~ =bdv.4 04

1 a M >

b4pd Id w .q v40

0 -. 4i 4jQ i ý 41 to >Mw . .0 4 0cA.0v ý

4 ' Im s q 0 -

Ii N'AJ. E ~41 &S Inb4 ~ ~ OW A 40 4 ,4i )0=400C

M~-P4 U9ld9a~

U0 S 31e. 4 v4

a@w6 M46 @0 aAUC 0- ZI. A r4%

A- a AUAto 0 fm t.

j4~q f- LA... U 6

lES- a I in &

AO 40P a . m~ Cbb4U

D 0%4 im 0 -W~ m :140

LAS W4 0,4.40U1 4w# 0VP4 0)

0 0 0 4A A~U -4 -Ua~I~I LAj Ad a4 0 4 31 4

lag -4 V4 M 4000 fm A aa -40

0-4 x 0 9 . -4 04 .

is*~ 0 0O 0 w bo -'40a 0 00 .04 g40 4 *4~

44 -44 0 0 4ý* =4W Si U

;,4 0C %aI bhi&SS:10 4 9 0 r. tgwi ,40 0.=A

0~~~ x .o-4 W 4U04 a ia* 41 44

= Ot 30.0 .0 0 *4.0

U)' A4 to Ott f; to I#4 5

w U4 41 O~7 C2 -0 - 14Jton$ C, la I 4i 0 14 0 - 0 4

x lb, 0 0h4.40.-O 0.C,

3-18

Page 182: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

i.E,

DU

W I* 1 00 I

4,!A -• -:.': ,.... ..... ....-I • -19"

B .I,4, ,i

Page 183: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

r. to 0

04 oom '00 0 w 0 4A0 aa0 A'

*hd.0. 0 *4w $ 0~ 41 0 Ut0-4 a Go =4~ $.W 41 >10 14 W4, A6 .Q 0 a4.0

"..1 4 4J A'0 toC "4 r.4kIA 0 C 390 0 050 $4 it000 6 -0 r4 at U &Ijr .4

f4-" 00I Gob4 0J

0 0A4 -4CP41 C 0- U4 A 0 Aj 4 V41

*0U 0 Z.C =CA A&4Jb'~a&~'~Cq4'0.e4 04 *4J r.. 0iQ'00 ~f >W =u~ 04J4 J C

* WVa. 0"X 041 0410

wd A E 641 ai is0 aA 4 %41 .40I

0 -4A q,'0U W S Qs000wWP 0 41hdS

s oo ab0o. so5. d ot., N0Uw4=UJ0U~.,I0A0 416

Aj16 V4 1

056 U4 UA P4 10 0CA a U 0. 4) C aU r4 > 0

%4"e4 W4C 40~

A 0b 40 .4 :xS * O .O A

POU 9I- U0U 0&j4

1.4 c0 S dA. 0 a41 4SAJ.-4O4A 3k 0)I0 A.)~s 0 A4 Ld r4. 0 [email protected] &1 ~ 0 c U4 J-t-44 J6 0 C500 0 @ 0 *J0 r A4 4*c ,0 >=

Sa 0 "u0% 0 0'. AO4 a~C A 40 .- 0 0 j- 00 'OS4) VAI.4w V s =W *.94 0 VA4.C P414CU4I0

age06*¶4 00 0j IM.Ch "4eI4oC

:0 0 a 0 r. A -P4 v-4 $: A= a0S1 a 40 0-42 4 041 U.4 A0 to logo a P-J4.I 4 04JJJ1c5JJ4=0 r441a jp uc P.C Q V In 1

'-4w 0 C41 ~ 0.-4 wU4U0 a 0-

~~S0A ý4 .04 6&d .- 1.wq

00 000' 03 0 03 U I "C6.3 W% *. .lW&D 14 C0 b0 S

4" 05P 0 90 U, r. S1 %4 %A O 0 U.C

O044 m 4.14J3 " Ve4Ae

0 - aA 1U a le r 410 &11 w~ do6

a C: 41~' WC " 06 .S4 64 C

0 c ( U--4 0ý4 d w a& 3-20'N

Page 184: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Adfrt

cz- 0

;I II2U

Page 185: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

............. . - - -

* 0 I

~'0A~ 04j '.4 CD to

> 416 44.-00*Umr.446 0 0p o a41 %4

,a Ui Q4J 4 1 "400A41 tp.XM "401 410a 41 0 41

W~ a*'1n41W r 4 An11j 41 *0 m -4 c 41~ r4

.4 41 A t0 a0 Is 9 V'4.04 V06 01. 4 41 0 6r-4 ONt 0 (P

r46 0 146 V0 *) g 4 $ .4 "P410 A0-4 W 046 W & A A41006

".4 v P.4 41 O.-4 ev0 60 a-4 " 14VA a A014 4 .4

m .4.-4 0 a0 U U, >9 > mmH4 01.4.r4 *0 -4 r 1.40. 0-4 m~

4.8 A0 m WA V4 2 60 = 641 .

~~ ca1 00 ~ 4 ~l00.0"4b 1 41 U014

r- w0' 0p "4 v0 WrI 0-4 "4 Vw~J

z 9:A P4 A U 0 ~0 A419 £14ao0 mv.4v a "a0 Ql 60).. 5" 41 o 14 f) -4 0 Wo-#W 0 A4

44P- 6 .W0'4 0 4 041U .1 0to4

611 0 W P46 t. 4 66 -4-0

Z 0.4 0 4t W 0 % AUA406~ ~ ~.-C 4 A V10-41

o 1r48*stf0fi4 d C. -4 t t0 60 1 a '14 31 0 *

0 v 14£ 044ul 0 p P40EI L 04 W.0 41 C4 4A 6j 6. C *

14M0 0' i -4, Q : r £00'

V 0 Po4 "4 W4 01' >44 140 4CA 4 V JJ 6141

41 v4g 0-14.4 = 40 40 04.4 Is a'0 ". 4 0 96-4 1v4> 64 -A 4 Q 6"

6.660 $4 X60 F A4A0£14a x. *O.. ~14 "~ CAUa V1

o 0460006,~61 m46.0am

J -r4 16 1404 00U 0 60P ýs14 1441 41 0£ >O' - 1 a66W o~

be *604J W ~ V P4A 014.4 aAo ~ W is1V4 O6 14 W'64 VP46 6 0:0~ U> 614 .0.P4 A

V 0 0 14 6 1460A "4 14a -0P4.0 U.4Vj U >a ha a $4 1"£1

P4 060 N4a6 04 $4 0 c go fs

P4 06t, W-4 14 O 1 4QV0 0 A 0614

14 4 0 04 0 41 c60 .06A41 vUI%3 i 6 0.4 NA 64

0 *gbt4 I4 V202410 6 =04,0 O@£41441 A WC4

@-4 "414WX 601 a~ W 0 c0 P-4 0 6604

0 V4 W V 64 Af 014 0 A 1W 41000..4 4 U~ 0W1

.,-22

Page 186: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

U,

W XF\ ow

I• .\ \o\ o

11.1o3 aimc

I I \ 1W~ .%..:!

> ao) cA4r

c0

oj , "•Lg ,

U 0

w 0

33-23a.an

3-23 l

Page 187: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

.41.0 0'6 04

400 x CreI cow r4 t O0

to8 A 000 >.0 44 XE OM%S4000 10 4 4)

SEUA al CI 41-

s@A0 - V6 0101044 C4

o 3 04J.,46b4 0 0Id

-94 -r0.'4 SW010 -4 a

a ECa 0 Q ý4 Q Ina 0 0C P.0 Ofl00-4

O0 W 00 CIO .5000.-4 0 *r 10 .4 0

m C46 0 wb 60AO S IdPA0 0.~0 0

*. AJ0A 1.4 0 a to

#-4 15 0*0 00 t 014 -4 I M -P , l .

14 R.U0 A0 $4-f 0 -4-v "4 10 *e w o -04N

M 4 4 000U, 0. 0a a C

64000 C4

tro IA a 40 v .

%04A 0 Cq.4 9a

>16 w 06 1 .~04-P4 *40 0~ 41 A

IN, 0 4 .4 0 AJ 'Wa0 a0 A FRh.=& C

C4 NP44is4 "4 01a41a

1- 40-4 % Wr4 - 0 4003 400. 00 C 09 10f' so .a 4j

0 Im bla ~ 0

"$ ~ .4 0

"C 4 00 04 a.. - C~4

P4 -4s .4 Lf 0W C P-4

sea Aj' w040 0"1hQ "4 0 U 0 AA"4

10q "4 14 0"4 -P

0, f4in0J t; 4jr. =25a8

3-24

Page 188: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

00

LaIV.V

uU

0*

U.i

CLC

0-

04

Ul~

3-25S

Page 189: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

meA

11 4 lb .1

0 40

c: 414.~

a ag4 2~IGo6 $

03 110*

tr~

34a W4

%4.

0 64 ei fi

0 *6..

t4390 X

04 A'Uj

r--.3 0

oj 0 aJs

04 a

IvAj ~

4*43-26

Page 190: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

t ,t

gIuI-,

al 1

3-2

, , o ..

, , ? '. .

Page 191: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

0 -r ~4M 0q0 PC 0w0 to

o-e4 ..J~ A b

a -4 .4 44AA"4 31 0044 U=

r4Mor4We r404

a 4 0% 1- 041.4 1

c 0 0 4) >1 d)

0- M0 a 4j,064.- 01"4AA OU "a 41 =

Ch -4 .u m 0 a sr.4 . 39I~l V o j 4-

0MW w0a1 1

V 40 4 4 [email protected] "40044 M 4 L40 > "044

AM 0 W4 tpm0'0 r.OW

.94 0~ " ..40 " C;

0 VI WA -A " ofIV 4.0 at V-4is .4)944

A 0 C" a t 0 0

O 0W-4 0 $40U AOOa Ar 0 a we 41M40 >

"a 1 lOQ~g- go0 j40 045I 0 oOa 4 0

f- p .4 .P"4W "WO4F".I =t W JJ A 0 :14

W44 00M>O 4 mg~M 0 AI 41 > r $ a00

144 A W -V4U 0 0 ar.4 1

Olina 4A 4) U04 tleca M:A00we05004 0 b40. 'a Ld"A US% 0 U a =CP

000 ~b0JJOr- a 044a _PU4 V q4 A 0Cm

a -iAM00 to a4 0 V> w.~ WUM. AW 14 1.

ro. ':. w' 1 0f

3-2 A 01w4464c41Q1 Q 41"4 0 ) 0 0

Page 192: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

DO ~*

c43.

V)I

cyI-

(0

OW

3:'

o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'o OD N (0 Vr ) N4

sBuissOjý) Ifl;ssaoflS IUaDJad

3-29,

Page 193: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

o>10 Ar-4 qr

j 1. g51.4 t0'1 c0 >10

0 P4 44 r-

> "q4 410 041w

r- M ) g

A 4100 g O~414~~ E 4)WOCP> -

>. -4004 410

9 0? 0 0 41Jr4

4 r4to0

00.014.4 Oi0-4V

00Id41

dw a . P40 4-0 0SA 0 0410 g

44

0~ X

-A 41

W00 tA-4

*~- Wq4 A 0'1

d 010W 0 0 40-

41. - 0C

0 10 0 C: 0

0 01. ~

w =N 4.0 01

0n$ P 00w r4 C wr4 0> M - -1

0400 w . .0 00

1.4a 4 -4 ..

0410-04

.3-30

Page 194: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

w•ZI,,

N' (E)

//I0.

8 0 II III_

3-3[

, , .z .MW

Page 195: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

r41 0

WAA 0 0 A 0

$41 0Id 4 caw0w V~ X 4 .10

00940 4) 0 W4i0a4U P400 1F

goq.,4 to0 040

E-4 041 A1.i. -4 X wW1 IL) 4.4004)

W 0 C: -4 U

M P20 V w 4141 -

W' 4041. 14 40f

44 040 .0) 41 40do 0 0 V 5 C r

do 41-i ow -r 0I aw 0 .4 , 1'.0 0

"46 Op 2i 0> 4 0-4t~ b0 .0AC0 04)

w% .0 .0 .1 P.J. 4.

0 0 0 *'0.0 041 0.0 Vgo - "4 r f~ ~0W 0 M1 '0cl o . 0 A >0 44u4. 0V "4I

o b0' to M .4)4101 0

.41" 0-4.4 00.4 4 t

0J1 $4 - 4 41 > t w41

=0 4 Qm 0.10 V4 -4a04 Oq 014.4 .00 Q.

0 444 39wgo Vo

0~ O. ww 0 - 4.4-Co 41~0OJ 01. 00.'

r-4J-4 410Md mfa 0 413 =A = 00A

S 41 -P t A>1 M ) 41 04 4V O Aa .- 4 t d 0400

0o -A 0. ' w-4h0e

to 00 0 = ogoU'410P41 A do 41 D4) 34

Co 0 m to 0 (A iv0.-4

63 0 0.4 to .00 s. 0 441 E4 0r4 A E 00Wrm.4h4A

0 0-4 3:J110'a 4 ý41

= r'-4 w A40 *..4

'3-32

Page 196: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

00cic

0

IL

01'0

(n0U) 0

0

.or<oOW

o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a0o 0) 0D N~ 0 U') N '

sbuissoajo Iinssaoons juaoaod

3-33

Page 197: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

o Aj 0 >4 39 .4J r-4

44 D w 0000'

re -I 0 00.0re 0 WC0h 0

41 A. -4>04A 400t c 0-'4 41

0 e> 31 b-I 0 r..A 0 w0 V-4'45.A' 2 A 0E w0

40 64 Ofr4 4.4 0 0 he

id-44504 '-4 S-

$4 0 > go'o00Va 410 00V

A 4 1e0 0 CP 1-4coA 0 0 -4 00 0' > r-4 40 c 1is94000410 0AE-6-- q4140.q4 0 C4

39 V5 r ~ 4 -4

-V0.4 M .a C V 00a.45 di 0 N, >0.

E-~4 00 0) 4V 0 JiloX 41 V W V ~00N

a4 U V45 -I N' 4

o 0 4) G U'0 = 1- 4to 0 E-4 4I4 ,45 it V 4

" "l04 c 0 O01I ~ 0 iea2a 04A0

0 0.>0 q3- U040 .0 w2-4 N04

o 0 go 0 e-4 045"1 4 '000 w 16E4 014 0he4> ~

fa aC V. 4 0

cal 94 f-4 001A 3 0 C (

u 0 C 0%

00 > 00 045j00445 -.4 -A w 04.444d M1 .4 04 0 05 he 4j 4)

1.4 is 80 14 Aj m045j094 0

0 C V A004 0 he a

".4 > 4 r4 0 39 "4soiICL '0 h0 "4 w t0

$4 4J0 FA 0 0 41.- 000045 0 h L 0

440h Va A0i 0 1 -4

>1000 -4 4) 4 4

~m w w 04 3: X'649 id 0 JUL 0'0 PC4 4

0 a 6

m 450'0 A,-P .m 1

3-34

Page 198: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ODI

z I

I(0 ,

O0EE<LCL

LLI 0o tI

-o 0 I

-0 /o

0 (0U, 4 '

> 9A

3-35

Page 199: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

A4. 0.

V 41 0. .

>., -AJ 0 jwr OIF -

>0 SV4 44aV

W0 w 0 JJJO

44 Ld0 V id:1 0 A0 9

-r40 V V V V4 0

4OVI "qr

u~ 0 Wi 0 V4

'0A4 r4 "4

0) .0.4 9) A 4EA Ild > > -4

>~ V".. 0i 0 a

If 0-4JJa u Co0 Aj 4'"4

V re4 AJ 0 w 4

4 A ~U 4J4 CO -4

0.0r4 V Co 41.0

o a Aj to 4

j A. Co m 0 4.iw 4 0 w.5 41'V0 41Jova

> a JJ 39 = r-

Colo A rw m.ao d V0 to0fMa elJ aV w

*4 A

00 AW 0 0

0 4 "4V w 3

0a 0 4J U -41

. 0 4 A4.) "44to

F4.44. Ocro0

04 w 0 w41 413t

Page 200: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

/. >

I~,

I•/ I "a

3-IoI I-- .,-

I •' b

L. I ."- I

/, IOXI . L r

* I

o o *o o 0 0 0 M(4duw) p.OdS

, 3-37

Page 201: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

r4

VI~0 0*

.41

0:I

ra OoA ,.9

ai 0 ~&

0 0%4i 0

0 000

*a 0 V

00ji4 0

14 0 0

1.4 C0 4) 4

a fa

I0.44JJ

w 0*j 4 a

toAc 0

000

to9 S

3-a c*~ 0

Page 202: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

0 I (I

z w0

.00

/ Id

/ (f

.00 /

/4w poodS

IdPtd~

U: - .-- 3-39

Page 203: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

410

$4 -Q 0

E-4 0- r

U0 VV

,4 04,to,0L4 0

1.4 U 0 .

04100

3cVe4, 0 ' 41V

IOit

.,- 4j gr

.49-4 W%4 0

.40 4, A0

c v f ".4

04r

cc 4, Ai 0'

0! 04000C1

: 41 0 -

.0 4.0 s4t

~* *he 3.40

Page 204: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

SW, %5

.I %VO

KI LA

ZIP-.

3-41

Page 205: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

0

L4J

".44

0WV

u Q.

014

440"

3-42

Page 206: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

I,,

C'l'

NU ~m

I I I0I II I I ll

I~ p

I C ~ L

II 'I,' V,. ,P

' `•``••. `` • •``i ` `• • • ` '.:• '.••..•.-.•!.•. -•,• , .•..•.. .. ,,.; .,.., .. ,.:,. . ,...,,..43.:

Page 207: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

%490~ A94 0 N0 Aj UNI

wo 0)UF >a94h >M 0.- 0,

*'4 AG0)-4P41 1 D 04

0 *-V4 .9.4

Vo w Oro

000 I j ~4J044

0a .4 00

"04~ .oa0-40

o> 00

V4 swU441

0r4 ai 0"04 0 I o

I co r AUc

go 0 (A w

0 0 C

~ 44 Uo 0 ý4 ofa0A :3 0 0

U 0 .&) of U i

04 0 0 (v4 -P4tow00

ti 0.941.so o 0A4 U

""4 *0.0 oleo

0 hiOJA

V0O 0h P4 o

0h 0 00

Co s:.4.4wr4 0Aw.46V

02 0.0 c 40

IdU 0 4Cka :p40 a~ in A

Page 208: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

0,

00

Q

0 00

0

L~i 0(1) 0oU.q

rxU0

IL0

0.00

0

It W) 04 0 GO- N (0 WOI) 0 4 '

sinoH

3-45

Page 209: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

0 tp Be

W.94> 0

Ai 0 '.4 >

V.~ 04 cr.9 Va moo c-

wa 0"4 04) V

A > A00)A V "4

0 .0 .9

cmI 0 80 :3AVA 0 A :0 1

OC 0410 4)a4O"- - 00~449W Cc

31 00 00U

A A0 M r4 $ A= 40 1

*9 1" a~~ >

0 0- S:0 44>is.00 0 44 v-40 O40&1.0 0O 4

1-4 0 1. 0 4

z 0A 0 94 $4 ".40~41..0 A'00L4W40

0%0 00 04. 0

~1 041 0 1 tOrAg .u4 Of d 00 41 40 ~40 A .9r

x' 0 o

U* r4 0 04 UA 0 0'w M~A wcj ifa 000

0. 4 0 of

o 0 (A 0 o4

".4 wha to 0

C: 0 A40.- 0

'.4 W 0) 0- 00

04 400 M OU >4 4 0

4 0.' 0 1.0 Id C

A0- 00,C"4

3-4

Page 210: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

0

00

L I -0

ru 0.

00Cal

(I) 1 wI I I *

1p1Lv0O O tY Nw

- - .

,3-47

Page 211: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

..-41 4) 4jr41 A 0

3t r. f440. -4 W

to 0.9>

-A. Os 4

w VJA 0

~4 "4 CA

>q 0 -rCX "4 .IV t

Oc t Adr. o 4

oW J*~~1 A9~ 41

og 0941

"4 t 0 X 0vE a. 4)0 00 4 >.

w 411U

0 1410C-I

92 ao 44190 C

0. re 411'j 0 I ' 0'

P4 0) aA1 .9.41>U41

o; a to~jW ~ t 404 U.94

0-4 W A.EDP

M w1e-4.

as 3 0 9: -a'0M

V4-0 5d $41

>4, 0 40%10

.344

Page 212: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

-0 w0

00

o -0

C n0 0Oil

0 0

0

0L

LLJ& _03:00

4!-q

3-4

Page 213: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

141.-40

0

A-40 0a

A a a.

C JO % 144r

a a00

"14 rw

No 41 0go

u .P4 m*

64 0 W4 10 0 $ 41

'0 004 4

14 40 u441

to p00V-0 410 a 04

~~A0 0

AWO

z41 P4 0-

:0 -4 "-4 41 l

'-4 "4j1 00

41>, a " A

ri014 4

Z'43-5A

Page 214: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

WI

cp

oL 000-A

0000

xi x___ U,'

00

00

0(1,P %0

I3--, 1

Page 215: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

4841O4P4 0

C4 0 M0E 4J

9 AU j so I

0 %"4 C v4 'A

1-4 45 0 E'4

**-4 A w 0 4

w = X P4 .

u4 4 JJ0 c a 0

O.6 0 1 Z P4"

~' *0 0 aaV

aq 0 04 4

o 1s U. "u4 .5

ponJJ'4 S0%40J U"4 A "

PeU A- Ux *go~ a

A 6 U4 beS3c -. 4 be 0

m A0314 0"0(4 08 *e40 41

see 049 00

co) 0.0 x 0 o

to be V e

0 0 aSP sw 01- 4A We aAj w V.4 a

w a P-4 $4 0 ow V

63 0 a 03a-52> 14 >AP

Page 216: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

LLI.L td

o G 0c I--

5L 0a.J

V) o

Z0 0

-~ 0 '5) 0 ') 0 0 i

6 .

\ 01

- 3-53.

Page 217: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

40 ol OO c a14 WA in r4I41

0 0- ad 0 0 "

14 4A 0 044

41 0 r. 00-

41 ~ 41 0cc4. Q 0I-4

m&- 01No410o 0

ca 0)0 3C.0 0r4 M Vw

03-40 a C:a "4 0 4 44

414 0* C* "

~ ~.JE40A "4S40 41j.Jc%oP C~ -PO

0 _ _ I

a r QJ .,h4) 0

~~> Lf 40 41 LI qd

M*A6M .-4 r4 C .

lind C4 0 0 -

oM 0 00 Ai440m A 0 14410

63 0 >0 -AAA

> 0'1 r £1w04( 34 4 *Ohe

16b4 a41Of OVIx4 W.4 a0 00

Z% 0

41i4 A 4W

PC JJ 0 Z~04 r4

a rj 0 a-54V4~~ 1w

Page 218: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

-- 1.1.

I I 3-55 '

Page 219: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

<Ia I&l

N N NN N

LU -

LA..- .. � . LA.. 4. 4. + 00

00z

7. �pmp.'.

a.

a. (wp� rw�

�!LLJ (�' U'U ra.- 9-

�rr1

I.

U .1 1.K:

t .*. �.

U.',K . 3.,57

................................................ .' . . -*

Page 220: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

41 410041 C- -4 . ,4 -41

.041~ ~ 41 41 .01.

'041 (aC1 ý 04ti 0' .0 0 -A 41 041 >1 C 1 0 =.I13m r4-A -a -A 41 e "')E4C a r

"1 4 r-4 A.4411 w mV 41 .0 '-1 is0 ot V 4) 9: 41 g

444 - 40 W ~4)4)~ X C14 V 41~61a14 . A 0 r-4 CO-4 M 4) r4 .. U0 041 04 Jr-4 w X e -40 Q

0%41041W 14) r4 .-dV% 0"010 4) A 041M1 041 4J 0>4.4 -A4J 0 41 .04.>>1 4 -I-V4~ 4..1 410a.A> a 3 ~>44) 0, X 04441 M A --4 4J $4 4-A4 0 0 0 41 0. V41 Cl

F-4 m fa V C w.a W % 391 41 4)0 0O~us410~0E+I4~4-4 4-4 -r4 "4

OW40Qi04C C 441 0 Or 0) r410041a9 t =4 >,.-4 0 0 3t 414100141 4 0 Aj 41 041-41 0 .4) C 4Ai W4 aC.0 tp 410 Ajto4 1 C0 W4 .0 r4 N001.a C 0-4UwA4 >-4 V 4 9"1 .5.4.14"

0 00410 UA 0 01WCt 4)14 4141.0Aw C C a > 0 4141 to13 0 C 0~ 41

C3 Aj A4 41 w 0 it 4) -4 to mto to 4 o0t40 L41 4J 0.1 r"44 (a41

0 r-4 t 04) P1 -41 0)41 0 w 00 4.4 :3IIC14141414w. o 0 4 Ur'A 41 m0 w0t 4j

*41 0 awa F- "4 a 0 41 ri4 t0W. Ct 041La1 4144 1v o>q1 41 Ilil0

0 3041 0 1-r4 C IV 4 r-I -v4 4U c0044 0 41 to 0 x 41 ra 4j M 4 4r. 44 c 1U 0 r-410 r.V C ow - gr 00

0-4,0R-4 W0.-4 a WWWW~OR 0 a0U 10 ) Ai 0.C4) a w M41, 41 to41

I W-4 04441 0 41.10 M 040 0OO. 4 4)1 41W 0 C 04419 we4.4 0 & 0 -4 15 41

'-4 ,41 w1to41 141 .4 ~0 0 N o V4 1.0E-4 (A 92 0 0U D W 0 .qA00

Mo V441Q0 00. 4 A4) 41 AA4w4 aw4>,"1 A cV41 V 414 to > 0

a 0 C-4 If Cw =41OX 40U 0 41

414. 00w U10a =g -r4144 0.0 F4C"o ft Ora4 04A. 0 ww4 41 4

0e Vd 0 0 W.,4441 d.0A0 0) 41 9 00. 410.E' 4141 W4 0A4 U 4~ 0 wd04w11Cm 410..40.4E4 41 0 O w0U.'0044 0 -4CE-4 00 W W "Q00W" 441 C0-'.4 U .44 .4q4a1a,-4V E-44 Vw.-4 wmt 1t .0->04

b4 A4 r1W 444 04141.C411C(D0 .. ) 414W, 00410 d 0 OA1 414 0.0-441> w s-4'44-- 0 0 r4 F 9441 W .r4 b414 1 A-

Z AZ 40 A 1 0P.0'41 00 a 400"41I 41>~ 0 .4 tr cmAjto al4 4) > ~ 041C

-V4 0 .U44 0,41w 0. 4 0 A4 a 0.0 IVPoo Cora 41.z0 & tp > 0 a 0 .s4w

0 "1 _V41E41 Ao W towlw1U040 W

0 41ww" 414 0, W0>W4441 >9 M 4Jm4 ~ 41 a ).C 4) r- 041 t w W (P

Id -M'0 41 41 CW . 4 at 941.en .54 .N E414 44.0 w "414L14

co 4.1 w w 0 041 (a 1 394) w 03-4'4A144M A0 0- 10 -40w>1 4 0 a u0 0-4"4w"

4 r-4 0 1 0)0.X4.e4 41 fa C= t

"4 0 N M41 F 0)M IV0 M-58C

0) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 0 M P )P P4r )M :4i )-

Page 221: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

:c%

CLL00

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * w r

ODU

< V) X AM

4<

0 xx 0)-0 E j

II 0'I4

0.

1' U)

Z. 0

LL 0/ N 0 toC6 6 6 6 6

1/PBIDWO

3,59)

Page 222: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

:)44-4

41c o44

41U'"4S UG4

to IVd 42 940 o 0.41

41 410' 0 A4I$413 41 A go w

041J0 w 000'Id'4 a b 00 a

-A X Ll 41 = Aj

co4 4) -4 m4 00w.4o0> .0

>Aju0 Aj >04

P.4 v a 0 41 a04.4 4 -41 0 4 01A, u 0 r. 0 ola

p441 A j P4 41~

00

tb A~

qA P-4 4A0 0O

14 *ur4 4u4 CA I-4 000U 0 a smiri

44 w v~41o

14 4 41 4) F-A

'-4 -a004a1 r41 r

04 14 w 40 - o1E- 44 4) WC %4r4 6r

>4 ,4a 0s >ill

4 4) 41 O= to

> 41 t4o a0%

0 0 '' JFf

A 0 4 wId.0 **1-9 >- (

o 041 -aFa 41 1

w 4041 01

Q JW 0 a~-r- 0 0 -M 1

I- .4A 4 r.~ = *

AO >ih -P4 41.

.0u.0 ff 4mi w .8

C4 0 4 W J(0 4

-0 tr 0I U~.q

-a 0 4)ad3-60

Page 223: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ily

I-

'R'

w CC

• p.-

3-61

Page 224: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

V 4) 0

1.0 40a

L4 0V 41 V Vt

14 41J

fa 0O0 "4 0

-A 4j 41J 0 L

mqb 00L

ac 00'4

OleW0 0-1Wa r44. 41 0

JV'4 L4 I0 .44 IV4

go 4e4 :3 U104440 .W.4

Ae 0.J~ j%041 .0 0 ws

m S *.IV04 >1

00 4PE4 40. S4 0 40 CD

*,-4J.0

he 0 01 ofw

0..4 he14P-OVS 0.hM 410r ''4.0 P4

r4 > 4 heO.$4J .- 0 0 -

I Mid 41 1 -4.&J>-IV 0 r4 o V 03.

do fj "4 w VoW W Ui 41 4.0I.

14 144*P-4

c 0W~10= 0N 0414.0 310

0' e 4u-I 0 0qM heO~ W= -4 41

0. h 00 0 l14444 WV LI4 41A

04 4 W 041 0

Ad .4 0LI4 m

~ U he~4 Id43-12

'~4JJA1'I -pe -.v

Page 225: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

I QiI- wIlow,

rO M .N

qVO i

o Cj.

/

* %. * *.

3-63 -

Page 226: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

W64

0 0

Pp 0

VI 0 t9-4~

0 A

mooIii .41400

0 0 b*

14 h~J

0 a*'s Ik

o 4 >1e

5144

A- 0 0

440A 144

)-4 m

Fa 0.0

I3-64-

Page 227: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

DII

3-65

Page 228: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Va,,

#-41 0ý > 0 f>0"

0 0 -Q.4:.4> '90

>.4 0 L44JAO,0-

04 0 ).I..r4 r.-

040-4 ac

-V4Whto 0 4 P4 '

a

'0 SO..as 14

a AJbS0.U 0 0 40

w -s46 w

a~ 0041 Se-4b w 00' a 41-4 04

0 0 -

p0 -r4q5

P4 '0US C

u b4 31l hPw44110 >~4A

f"4 in 0w441.1 4s 0.$ Vfn 0 P Ajq4

0~a El reQ -4

-A 0 0 1

"544 .04 A0w

- - 3-.66

Page 229: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

LiiI.-

ii(

� QK K

Li.. N m -

Zulu I.- �*

'Jm�

(n

I t�..

-

VC-

_ a

� - Ii!C

3-67

J. �.

Page 230: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

41 41 0 0 kw94

4JDa1 0 c

0 PC. _V4 1* 41

41 r.Ji. 1.

O 4J at heW 0

o E-o

.0 0 0

0 0 woe~CeG 08.0 0 ..

coo 0.00 c 1

a Aj 0.00Q

Sa 14.e UJ1 to r04 0. Q~ za

he PAh 0

41 414

a 41. t" 4.q

~c

o. r-4,40 ..

* 4 Go F-4

sw 41 o >d1

Do cc L..ie a e

0 019 .q

bJ o9 b) V-'A to a 60

Ld w'9heD01 We 0~4oGwG 0040

0J ~ -'5

44W a3-68

Page 231: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

V))31w

U fm El

3c o.NO0

Me c

30-;--

Page 232: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

P44

0 IV c

03

0u 0 0ra, 0~ C

W 0Iz~ &

8 ~

" 4 U*49*'

4js

0 01ý w

00

.a 0U

E4 IWVJQOc >

.00 0 4

0 t

o 0'.-.ldJJ

DOi2

3-7

Page 233: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

4

4

Ii I-

__ I �==

0%p..� - - I4 a,. I .5

4 *

* -- 'LA

K 81 1W

I. *�. -; I'

�4:j� �i2* £ * . .- -t -

I *1I -

'I..4

.�w �

Ad 3-71

* *,� * �w

Page 234: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

E-4

S 44

00

0

o •u

4 -r

E41

03-72

t 4

Page 235: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ICFOIi°

0%4 4

S,\ Ieel

II I III I I II I II It_ IIIl I

3-73

Page 236: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

-4PSPN

,.-4 ,--

go .J 0

-ru4 4jd

> go

W04

0 0•

0 > rAj.,

u V•

0- 41 Q,

0 FA0

.I UJJ•

13 744 r

Of 0'

a >~0 go

0 J4l

03 4 044)

~ 0 > 0

M11 4 4

80t 0 c"3r-4 V. P-4

2 S41 > ha

0 W 044 4

~4 AWD04tor 44 034

~ U'Ir4Su-

o 044 4.10

41. 9:

Gfo e41d

4414I to 'tM1 0.S'v-44JC

AM 0IAW t'

03 41 4141to

3-74

Page 237: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

LAC4.4 C4w

M QQ

• -

U I-

I I I

3-75

S, ... _ .'0

Page 238: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

.4)>hiS

50c"4Jh

0) >>a

401

"4).A4)

> p

41 r.

i-0 to

SAS

50c

Aj ou

di0E-4 AW 4

01 -44i

410

0 0

9a A4iJ)4)94

Aj1-4 "4 C:

0 'NS.4.

* 3-76

Page 239: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

I I i I a

_h UN

- I

2 w

%t %No•

I I I I i I I III I I II

3-77

Page 240: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

v0

# ~-44Jj0O4ca

A 0 U0.04 0 aS

>U .0 L

00 4104 ri

two D

wo 0 $4 M0 ~40

3 00 40'

1.4-4 "

044 hi

o 0 o0

$00 of~h

A Qq4 a0

0 P4

* to r-4

0J94 0 0 1

0 hi1mc

W~0 CP Wo 0.94 00 Ica P-4 s1W Wi

H- 0 01.W

A1 -44hM 4p

.UG -A-4t

3-78

Page 241: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

to~

, . L . i s;

ON

la w

3-49

.... I •I . "q'0 1'n~

Page 242: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

v.14 0 > 4J2 A.C 0 %0

934J -44 W r 4 $41 wg 4.4 s-4 1 041 E1Se

U 0..-0 V A -4 410>0 ) UI4 54 u ' A. 0 * .

.1.5 'J9 4 1 a; cc 0(P 04 a 0 8 -I V 0

> 4111.i "4D0 ~4d1U ~ ~ ~ 4 41 qw 0.0 r4. 0.0 0 w a4

W4L4 wV co > 0 -4 cCP c4.5 >. Aj 54 CP

.9. a ca o c104- a .4.5l0 owC U-40LiC) P4114j A 0 ~4j 4 0 410J d

-P.4L P- J 0 lA $~4P , 41 -1L v.44.5rA14 1-4 41 "4J0A.c4o' d"0410A .0~ ý41 041 41 041-A

0J 414 411Za9 4) 9: 0 M 40' 0 w 4Aj W AJ > i W . 0 -A A i0

%41'0. 41 4 1it C j 41 Ai a;141.8 f" 41.4 W w A'.0 m1 0. aP

34) 41 44W 0 41er_'.C 04.50 41q mW AC,4f 0 [ 0 9:4J- 4 0 100A 4 4)

v vi... .1 4 InI C4 0i .>04 a a -4-4.4> 41 00 1 : 414Jw4I4 >q 4jt 4j 41 C3

= u~4 0 "4Li.0.q41 ww odV IO .r4 L L-40444A " CAb *.4 4 a041 0 *41 10V 0 r_4V-

041 a A c 1 _4$ 0o (Pf Os- .J04 4J ap4 01 -4 Ul. a "i4 c : P ~ 0 A1 AJ P-4 4m 4) 0 4 004 0 04 V4 0 0 044a

r- 4 41 r4 w44 .4 00 .5 - .4 40a = .a 40 -r q 0 c 0 0 W14 0-4 1U a 41 0 41

x 30u (A w 14 0 U A14 P4. 41 pqI" tAj 4 4 4 0 - d 4 0 ) .1 . 0 ).8 *-.o ob 410Si Nw 0 41 ,-i.- oC

X J0 0 r.' r_4 "4"4 r-4 4' 4144'A>4 CP 01U m 0>90 00 4100 A14

>2 A c's- 416 If 141 P-4.1 .4 c P4 41 4' AJ"o b.-4 00 to U0 .0 4 )010. 0 4.1.14r. 041.4 CO 3 t 4 041 > 0 w41w 41 10e.

Ld 0sI41 4 000. 41 0.0j -

- j 3- r4 4 s0 v41 >3 E4100 0 0C0 r4 o w 4 A4 0 of 0 4

41 -404 Aj 00'~ 0 wa4'Q Q

uJ 0 0j 0iw, 4) A 0t8 V Ad a c 4 41 -A1C2 4 411 00 49 V-4'41 u A 041AO 40 mi 0. A V In r -0 90

ca 04 Nu A mt'41 400 4D1 04' 410 C= =041.5w -4 40 4 W o-4 r.1 80 C) 041 0 t3

0e1 A to w 04' -040 0c 9 4 ' 921 4 31 oo044.4 00 r 4 0 0 41444 to 00 )

a M1 14V4 ' t - La G34)00 0A

0 A1.- 0 0 0 0 tp so $40 * Q 4W 0 wA4 -44A -4 > 4414 4'>m ct C .

C 1 0w *0 0 W 4t'- 41.ýa0 " ff Ai 3 I 400444 _w > 4 10 Aiw 1 n 414i1 1 P-4 . 04

CD .4.14C a e40 w o (U404 V-4.40C41o 4141 0.1' 4'L Q__

W4r400 4)40 GO fCf41P40 0 w*%w.-P - 0 W4J s40 A 0, = 0 4. 4 -A.%'* 4

0 o-4 0 ~ 00WP4 >r- 40 0 0 .049: A

13 - 0 >4-1 0r ; 4W0-4W 0. 4.

r-4~~~~~i "4F4.m..-4w=

Page 243: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

++

CCFO

I-Inc

. z z W.;".-

3-91I

3-81

Page 244: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

W4.,.Z, ''

41

41

'0. 414%4 CI w 063 .a -0,4

41 0 :3

a oc41 0

a~ 0 PC a.

C4 w 640

444

c.~ 0 r.

.p4 a 1

41 w.q

""F4 r-

to c

A 0'U 0'.0 JA p

, 00 p.,-

to '0 $4 40.

1-4 0 0*.

of4 00 0* 1

U t'44h OII0

~ 'U ~fl9#% 3-82

Page 245: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

5 1.-

- cro

0 W%

%.o.

00%0

IVJ< z

3-03

Page 246: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

". :41 41J>

41 9 41 4)0441 41JAca 41~ cc

41 04 0 04>4

to w c 0 ýA94.94)4 Q40

cc to -140 41 .

-P4 041 J-F .4 .0A V4~ 41 I

A 41 w to4 Ad

V4 > 4194194 c

id 0 "4 0 m1u se m1fi

41 04r

m 4 to 4)1410A41P'. 4 >~ -4 .9

> 39C:0 w1 41

c 41 t oo3 -. Lr414c Q

EV 340 41 >4h L.41

$~p4 0 ri m

of $ -V4 to1 041 I0iWr4e4 A

0~~ 0i >h41

0 C: to0hV

- a 0.0Aca G.Oh 41 C4w1ca 4 C go 041 *'

o 01 39 = 0Id

4 4 041C,4 4141 0 1 00r 0.

Id 0 q41 A

to 4 41 ="1 4 Le C V 0 .0

1 0 "41h P- 9 "441.

I p-I 0.94.-40941 4

41 .04W 41 000410.0 0

#I .4 PI1w I=0 0hi - a 9 1

.. w V. Vi 4CI~ 4 41104141 cc4Q

.0-04 41 Q' C:C cIE-4 m4 144 4.094 E4.9P4

0 1.940w41 44

-P4 "4 oP4 .0

3-84

Page 247: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

4 ali i I II

~4 ~ A.,•h

"w

/ IIII I I

"" '- 3- 8

4.. .. L J

4.

Si. i .' l . . a : ( . .. H . . l l

Page 248: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Intentionally Left Blank

3-W6

Page 249: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Appendix A

Tasking Message

Page 250: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

IIntentionally Left Blank

0

Ar

A-2

Page 251: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

-PT 0 -it 1,Q69 P'IAE 03

STF *CR R TUU

AILI Da xR*.C ez~OFf

IRU.ft:RC fSTCON-% itF VcII1PD

A TP 1L.r AIOGC-:- FT E 1U*CLN

Auis~I~luaC TL W4AHUS.2 .T1-f

RULO~cpnoo TH PO CN F1 VRSv0 AN bNELF VHILE QbE CRT

&.Nv1QfleisJTaL SCORflSA CDC FT tMhTE~wRIN KS PEIrTTOSTT

RUES) GTiflR trCCNl1V FT LY VHF 1ACLRPt PEtIVES XfjllVL

RUWJrqACnRUS VFHCSE CS1PMACHUITT OV2 VPATMCitEOT~~O ERI

RAUT WC .

Page 252: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

PaL n? ouraoflmS? uoICLAs

1AN VWILLtE0 VUNLCLE CATErSOPlr,.. IHE'UFFQU, VUOUVST HO, TRADOC

PROVIOL A WRITTftE REDORT VJO PRIkIFING TO THIS 140v NLT 31 JULI 04

DETAIlING Thr CA'ARILTTIU:S SAwn LIPITATIO'ES Of W~r7L~rn A86M 1R'IKEO

VEHICIES WHICH T14U ARMY CANl tJ% AS fVALUATION CPTTrRTA FOR

D&.TERNI14146 WHICM.CATFFOPV OF VEHICILr IS OWFVFPAPLr voit EACH

MISSION ARFUA AND FUN0CTIONAL OPPLICATTON. FOP CAT9 CS 460 CS%

N1SSIflW ARrAi. Till RUA TIVE TUPORTANCF OF TERRAIN CONS!CER&TIOwSO

'IN CflUPADISON TO 0T14T9 FACTOP59S, HOMD RUf SPECIVTrD. ALL.IPPRO- '

PRlATE TERRAIN TYPES sauwLfl mP coto%flnREn.

3. THE FOLLOWINIA ourSTION% '%MOULD AU COINSInflRCO IN CONNPFCTION WITH

A* e ma T spr THE AflvANT~qrs. &%o nTSADVGNT&*ES OF WHEELrn VirMICLESPTR&CKED VVt .'16S? *A'EAS OF CON'SIOFPATION S14OULD T NCLIPOE? NORILJTY9

04Al NT ENANCE 'POPTS9, LIFE CYCLF COSIS. UNIT PRODUCTTON COSTS, RMYE

CCSTS.o IPSOOSDORTANILITY9 SIPVTVAbILITYt PAYLOOD CGPICITT. ETC.

It.* IS 7W~ hAR FUILY EXlvOtfllNf; THE An.VARTA~rq Olr IHEFLED,

VEHZCILS?

C. Aft. THUP 'ANY OISSJTMNS WHJC.H OUGHT TO Pr rXCLUSIVELY

A C&,W~ Ay tisHrn PY . HE ELrD VEHTIlES OR rICLUSTVULY PY TRICV~PD vr9$ICLrS?

FOR CXAMPIF9 MISSIONS SUCH M 4 LOGISTICS SUPPOOT. C0OP1s6" AND <PAUE n3 PUrEflWD~el7 U'JCIAt

CONVTRlL, IfW, COMMUNICATIONdS* ETC. wyiow1 wrT N~rF TO HAVE Vr"TCLT?.

WHICH C*P4hAPITUAtLY TR*VEOSv SOFT SOIL AND. PUSnrft TERRANINI

THLWCFORC, TMFSE PISSTIONS NIGHT of PPPVoomED RFETTUR PT UPUNA

W tL LED VEHIClES.

RTfU T NiA-4

Page 253: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Do. IN4 PVAPýE1IE COUtfl UMFEttO V5WI1CtrS PE SIJ%%T!Tulrfl FOR II~RACKEU~ VEHIICLES TO ASOVE PA!NIF?4AkiCE ASiD fTNEP C0~tTct

E, DO VF NEDCF In PROVIflF SOME SI"nflR DISTONCI MROPIiTY

ENHANCEMENT CAPABILITY FOR WHEFLED VENIJCLFS INd WSPTINV?

F.DOES THtE HAIP.-IR&CKC VFHICLE coNCrpy H'AVP eUFFTCIEtdl PIrRT

ITt WIARRANT RlTF?-

6. COMPAPE WI'EELFD VSO TRACK VEHICLE SHOCK #4n 'VIbRATION.

DOES EITHER CATEGORY CAUSF SIGNdIFICANTLY APEAlES nETRIPENTAL

EFFECTS TO SvfCZAI. PISSION FOUIPMENT: E.G. Hid E011TPMEFNT9 ETC?

he DOUS FlT'4ER COTEP"PY OF VENICLE H-GVFOGf *V)VANTAGBV IN

PROVIDINb3 ONdRO'ARO POhWrR BftFWFSTION?

I. is imE OERRAO1iinOO I POfi1L IT causEIO *Y TOUIWG TRAILPRtS

GREATER FOO tITHER CATEGORY (IF VChICLt? THI% SHOtILO PE CfGSS--

Rcjt.PENcEfl TO ThE POUFR P-NE!SATION, @taPSTjfN.8POVrT- lore IF EITHER

CATLG'IRY Of VEHICtES CANNOT MAR I1AIA.tV OrNEPSTF OfteCARD POUER9 THF

"O8(sIL17Y OF THlE RELATFD SYSI.TFPP PuSI Pr ASSESSUO Oft 6 OASIS UmTCH

PAbE 04 RUVAFlb1D3417 UCIA'S

f1kCLUDLS VHF TOWING OP ANY *PfPROPRIATr rUNER&TOP TRfATLEsi..

4e POC Thl.S hEAr)OU4RTERS ISII7C PIE1~ DALTON, 4V VPS-7ft6o

R Cu TI NEL A-ý5

Page 254: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Intentionally Left Blank 1

A-6

Page 255: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Appendix B

Study Plan

Page 256: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Intentionally Left Blank

B-2

Page 257: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYHEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES 0.MY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND

FORT MONROE. VIRGINIA 23451

REPLY TO

ATTENTiON OF: ATCD-AC 31 Auijust 1984

SUBJECT: Combat Developments Study Plan: Wheeled vs Tracked Vehicle Study

.HQDA (DAMO-FD)WASH DC 20310

i. References:

a. Message, HQDA, DAMO-FD, 151924Z May 84, Subject: Wheeled vs TrackedVehicle Study.

b. Letter, HQ TRADOC, ATCD-AC, 17 Aug 84, SAB.

2. In reference a, EQ TRADOC vas tasked by ODCSOPS (DAMO-FD) to conduct ananalysis of the factors used in developing wheeled and tracked vehicleoperational requirements and to lay the foundation for the development ofspecific criteria upon vbich to base future decisions regarding vbeeled andtracked vehicles.

3. In reference b, EQ TLADOC forwarded'a preliminary study plan to EQDA(DAMO-FD) outlining a proposed methodology and establishing a time schedulefor completing the study. Several minor changes were suggested for the studyplan and they have been incorporated in the attached version.

4. Request approval of the attached Wheeled vs Tracked Vehicle Study Plan.

5. EQ TRADOC POC is Mr Kenneth L. Boyd, ATCD-AC, AV 680-3037, ITS 931-3037.

POR THE COMMWDER:

1 Encl S ý.IN

as LTC, GSAsst AG

CF:RQDA

SAUS-OR (LTC Gardep.)/DAMO-FDT (LTC Dalton)Cdr

EQ AMC (AMCCP-EV (Mr Dodds)/AMCDE-SS (Mr McGowan)/AMCDE-SG (Mr Duggan)/AMCDI (Mr Howell))

USACAC (ATZL-CAM-S (LTC Kadel))USALOGC (ATCL-WGM (Mr Russakoff)) .(over)

B-3.

Page 258: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ATCD-AC 31 August 1984SUBJECT: Combat Development* Study Plan: Wheeled ve Tracked Vehicle Study

CY: (CON?)SIGCEN (ATZII-CDM (Mr Evans))OIDCZNSCE (ATSL-CD-CS (Cw2 Perry))JFK SWC (ATSU-CD (LTC Manning))T&COM (ANSTA-ZE (Mr Martin))FSTC (AMXST-CA-3 (Mr Nix))WES (VESGM (CPT Unger))INTEL BCH (ATSI-CD-Ma (CPT Summers))AVISCI (ATZQ-D-CC (MAJ Stempel))

Condt .

011.8C (Artz-CM-Co (CPT Hamp ton)) ~tAD ARTY BCR (ATSA-CDM-W (Cut. Webb))USAJOICS (ATSK-CML (MAJ Ansley))TIANS/AVNLOG SCE (ATSP-CDC (Mr Coen)/ATSPQ-IW (Mr Diggs))FASCE (ATSF-CML (KAJ Van Jordan))ENGR SCH (ATZA-CDM (Mr Runge))QNSCI (ATSM-CDM (SFC Prytula)) VINTSCH (ATSH--CD-CS (Mr Wright))I(PSCR (ATZN-MP-CCC (CPT Smith))ARMOR SCE (ATSI-CD-ML (CP? Grics))

DirTORA (ATOR-TA (Mr Shook))AMSA (ANISY-CM (Mr Niem~yer))

MCDXC (D024 (NO Brown)).,

'A.

Page 259: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYHEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND

FORT MONROC. VIRGINIA 23651

- I REPLY TOAT T9r4TION OF: ATCD-AC

SUBJICT: Combat Developments Study Plan: Wheeled vs Tracked Vehicle Study

HQDA (DAMo-FD)WASH DC 20310

1. Purpose of the Study Plan, To' conduct an analysis of the factors used indeveloping wheeled and tracked vehicle operational requirements and to lay thefoundation for thie develooment of specific criteria upon which to base futuredecisions regarding wheeled versus tzcked vehicles. Study is being done inresponse to HrDiA (DAMO-FD) tasking of 15 May 1984.

2. Reference3. Message, HQDA, DAXO-FD, 151924Z Hay 84, SAB.

3. Terms of Rc2ference.

a. Problem. A concern exists at the Under Secretary of the Army (USA)level that the criteria used by the Combat Developments comunity in definingvehicle operational requirements is not clearly delineated nor is itconsistently applied. To assuage these concerns, USA requested the Army staffdevelop a qu.ntifiable and defendable basis for defining future wheeled andtrackeoa 7-.icle operational requirements.

b. Impact of Problem. None ,specifically identified.

c. Objectives.,

(1) Identify the mission essential factors that should be considered'when developing vehicle operational requirements.

(2) Identify the inherent engineering, mobility and cost differencesbetween wheeled and tracked vehicles designed to perform similar missions.

(3) Identify the current ,uses, rationale and projected future usesof wheeled and tracked vehicles.by alliedWarsaw. Pact and major nonalignednations.

(4) Lay the foundation for the development of quantifiable anddefendable criteria to be used in the dove*opment of future wheeled andtracked vehicle operational requirements.

B-5

Page 260: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

TCD-ACUBJECT: Combat Developments Study Plan: Wheeled vs Tracked Vehicle Study

d. Scope.

(1) The study will identify the gross vehicle weight ranges whereDth wheeled and tracked solutions to vehicular requirements are feasible.

(2) The study will identify the mission essential factors thatiould be considered when developing vehicle operational requirements. -

(3) The study will identify the differences between the wheeled and -

racked vehicle Aesigrs related to mobility, engineering, RAM, and life cycle2st. 4 •

(4) The study will identify the force composition, rationale forslection, unique features, design innovations, and future trends of wheeledid tracked vehicle fleets of allied, Warsaw Pact, and major nonaligned

(5) The study will address the desirability of substituting wheeled,hicles for tracked vehicles during peacetime.

(6) The study will provide a foundation for the development ofasthodology to be used by the Combat Developments community in defining futureiseled and tracked vehicle operational requirements.

a. Limitations.

(1) Due to time constraints, the study will make use of existingits. Original work will be kept to an absolute minimum.

(2) The study will generate generic recomendations on the futursLrection of wheeled and tracked vehicle requirements definition. The studyL11 not make, any recomendations on, specific systems currently underrvelopment.

f. A'sUmptions. None.

$,Issuetial Elements of Analysis (33A).

(1) What are the inherent mobility differences between wheeled and.acked vehicles designed to perform similar missions in the following areas?talysis should be performed across the gross vehicle weight spectrum where)th wheeled and tracked solutions to vehicle requirements are feasible andIdress the various probable terrain types that will be encountered by US Army)rces. Additionally, the analysis should address any other factors (e.g.,

2

. .',

Page 261: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

i t•.•-; ATCD-AC

%• SUBJECT: Combat Developments Study Plan: Wheeled vs Tracked Vehicle Study

visibility) that influence operational effectiveness from a mobility'perspective.

C() Soft soil'mobili.ty.

. •(b) Slope traversing.

(c) Obstacle negotiation.

(d) Linear feature traversing.

(e) Average cicss country speed.

(f) Average road speed'.

(g) Percent terrain denial.

, (h) Gap crossing.

Ci) Trailer towing.

(j) Vehicle agility.

(2) What are the inherent design/engineering differences betweenwheeled and tracked vehicles designed to perform similar missions in thefollowing areas? Analysis should be performed across the gross vehicle weightspectrum where both wheeled and tracked solutions to vehicle requirements arefeasible.

-. " ICa) Vulnerability.

(b) Interior volume.

(c) Interior vibration level.

(d) Interior noise level.

(e) System reliability.

Mf) Petroleum, Oil and Lubricants (POL) consumption.

(g) External noise signature.

A-k,

.4;.

°m%•%3

li-Ip'I

Page 262: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ATCD-ACSUBJECT: Combat Developments Study Plan: Wheeled vs Tracked Vehicle Study

(h) Vehicle thermal signature.

(i) Vehicle radar signature.

(j) Transportabilit.y.

(k) Drive train ani suspension volume.

(1) System marteinnability.

(r)dv ehicle acceleration.

,, (n) Payload capacity.

bot (o),On board power generation capability.

(p) Sviming/fotdin. cap.bility.

S(q) Stabilitys da Seppons'platfor.

% (3) What are the inherens differences in cost between wheeled andtracked vehicles designed to perform similar missionp in the following areas?Analysis should be performed across the gross vehicle weight spectrtu whereboth wheeled and tracked solutions to vehicle requirements are feasible.

S(a) Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&t).

I

S~(b) Procur-emet.

(c) Operation and Support.

;(d) Life Cycleý

S(4) What f actors were considered critical vhen wheeled and.' ' tracked vehicle operational requirements were developed in the past?

- (5) What is the fe~ib 'il~ity and desirability of substituting wheeled,S~vehicles for tracked vehicles i.n the training base?

I (6) Are there any short distance nobility enhancements for wheeled

I vehicles that should receive additional development?

(7) Is it desirable to revive the half-tracked vehicle concept forfurther development?

44

B-8

I

Page 263: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

K/

•' ATCD-ACSUBJECT: Combat Developments Study Plan: Wheeled vs Tracked Vehicle Stty

(8) Do wheeled or tracked vehicles cause greater detrimentaleffects to on board electronic equipment thzuugh vehicle induced shock andvibration?

(9) Do wheeled or tracked vehicles induce greater operator/passenger fatigue when performing similar missions?

(10) What are the factors inherent in vehicle design that enhanceoperational effectiveness on the battlefield?

(11) What are the general mission roles supported by wheeled andtracked vehicles?

(12) What general mission profiles should be considered when anevaluation is made of a' wheeled or tracked vehicles ability to support variousmission roles (identified in EEA g(l1))?

(13) Are there any mission roles (identified in EEA g(l-)) thatshould be performed exclusively by, either wheeled or tracked vehicles.

(14) What is the current vehicle mix, underlying rationale and• g-., probable future direction for the wheeled and tracked vehicle fleets of

allied, Warsaw Pact, and major nonaligned nations.

(15) What factors should be considered when developing quantifiableand defendable criteria upon which to base future decisions on vehicleoperational requirements?

h. Constraints. The target date for production of an executive summarywith accompanying written briefing is 31 Oct 84.

i. Alternatives. Alternative vehicle concepts will be selected acrossthe gross vehicle weight spectrum and mission roles (Combat, CS, & CSS) wherewheeled and tracked solutions are considered feasible. The analysis will makeuse of historical performance and cost data from various vehicles, but -theresults of the study will be presented from a generic wheeled and trackedvehicle perspective. The analysis will make extensive use of the datagenerated in the Light Armored Vehicle (LAV), the Mobile Protected Gun System(MPGS), and the Armored' Combat Vehicle Technology (ACVT) programs. The costanalysis will make use of the cost data generated for the five vehicles (V-150, V-300', MOWAG, Scorpion and Alvis Infantry Fighting Vehicle) of the LAyprogram, the HEU1T, the MLRS chassis, the FAASV' and any other representativevehicles for which validated cost data is available.

B-9'

Page 264: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ATCD"-ACSUBJECT: Combat Developments Study Plan: Wheeled vs Tracked Vehicle Study

j. System Organization. None.

k. Mission Profile. Various general mission profiles will be identifiedin EEA g(12) that will serve as the basis of the comparative analyses in phaseII of the study effort.

1. Measures of Effectiveness (MOE). The objective of this analysis isto identify the critical operational factors that should be considered indeveloping future vehicle operational requirements. The primary MOEs of theanalysis will be an identification of the critical factors (evaluated in theEEAs) that affect a wheeled or tracked vehicles ability to successfullysupport the various mission profiles identified in EEA g(12).-

a. Methodology.

(1) The study will be conducted in two phases. Phase I will serveas the source data for phase II.

(a) Phase I.

(aa) Mobility Assessment. The US Army Corps of Engineers WaterwaysExperiment Station (WES) will conduct a detailed analysis of the relativemobility differences inherent in the designs of wheeled and tracked vehicles.The analysis will identify mobility differences across the weight spectrumwhere wheeled and tracked solutions to vehicular requirements are deemedfeasible. The analysis will be a compendium of past work at WES tempered withprofessional judgment. The analysis will provide a general delineation of theinherent strengths and weaknesses of the two vehicle configurations from amobility perspective, WES is responsible for answering the following EEAs:g(l)(a) thru g(l)(j), g(6), g(7), g(8), and g(9).

(bb) Design/Engi eering. The US Army the Tank and AutomotiveCommand (TACOM) will devel p a detailed analysis of the relative engineeringdifferences inherent in th, wheeLed and tracked design philosophies. TLCOMwill develop as complete a rationale as possible of the RAN differencesbetween the two design conI igurations based on historical experience.Additionally, the analysis will address the specific survivability andtransportability differenco s inherent in the two design philosophies. TACOMis responsible for answeriig the following EEAs: g(2)(a) thru g(2)(q), g(6),g(7), g(8), g(9)) and g(lO)

(cc) Cost. Head, uarters US Army Training and Doctrine Command(TRADOC) will conduct a pa ametric cost analysis to identify the inherentdifferences in system costi between wheeled and tracked vehicles. The

6

B-10

Page 265: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ATCD-ACSUBJECT: Combat Developments Study Plan: Wheeled vs Tracked Vehicle Study

analysis will make extensive use of the coat data from the LAV program and anyother validated cost data that can be acquired. HQ TRADOC is responsible foranswering the following EEAs: g(3)(a) thru g(3)(d).

.(dd) Requirements. The TRADOC Integrating Centers, in conjunctionwith the TRADOC Schools will: identify the factors used in the past indeveloping-vehicle operational requirements, identify the factors consideredto be critical to battlefield effectiveness, develop mission profiles to beused in evaluating the capability of wheeled or tracked vehicles to support

r various mission roles, and identify general classifications for the variousvehicular mission roles. TRADOC Integrating Centers are responsible foranswering the following EEAs: g(4), g(5), g(10), g(ll), g(12), and g(13).

(ee) Foreign Governments. The Foreign Science and Technology Center(FSTC) will perform an analysis to identify force composition, rationale fordevelopment, unique features, design innovations and future trends of thewheeled and tracked vehicle fleets of allied, Warsaw Pact and major nonalignednations. FSTC is responsible for answering EFE: g(14).

(b) Phase II. HQ TRADOC will integrate the results of the Phase Iefforts into a coherent package to identify the critical factors inherent inthe wheeled and tracked vehicle deF4.gn philosophies that affect vehicle

' operational effectiveness and should be considered when wheeled and trackedvehicle operational requirements are developed. This will be accomplished bya comparison of the inherent differences in wheeled and tracked vehiclesidentified in phase I (EEAs g(l) thru g(ll)) in conjunction with an evaluationof the effectiveness factors and mission profiles identified in EE~s g(12) andg(13). HQ TRADOC will identify areas where data voids on thewheeled versus tracked issue exist or where additional analysis may berequired to facilitate the development of a quantifiable and defendablecriteria to support development of future wheeled and tracked vehicleoperational requirements. Additionally, HQ TRADOC will do a comparison of theutilization of wheeled and tracked vehicles by the US Army and major foreigngovernments identified by FSTC in EEL g(14). HQ TRADOC is responsible foranswering EPA: g(15).

if. Models. Army Mobility Model (AAM).

o. Related Studies. The analysis will be base on existing dataextracted'from numerous related studies. The specific studies consulted willbe delineated in the bibliography of the final report.

p. Criterion of Choice. None.

7

B-11'

Page 266: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ATCD-ACSUBJECT: Combat Developments Study Plan: Wheeled ve Tracked Vehicle Study

4. Enviromenutal/Threat Considerations, Vehicle capabilities will beevaluated across the environmental spectrum expected to be encountered by USArmy forces. Threat will be considered from a system survivability/vulnerability perspective.

5. Sunuort and Resource Reguirements.

a. Support Requirements.

(1) Headquarters US Army Materiel Command (AMC). Provide HQ TRADOCthe life cycle cost estimates for following vehicles identified by TACOM asrepresentative of the wheeled and tracked vehicle fleets in the gross vehicleweight categories where wheeled and tracked solutions to vehicularrequirements are feasible.

(a) Wheeled Vehicles. Light Armored Vehicle (LAY) alternativevehicles (V-150, V-300, and MOWAG) and HEMMT.

(b) Tracked Vehicles. MLRS Chassis or FAASV, L&V alternativevehicles (Scorpion light tank and Alvis Infantry Fighting Vehicle).

(2) US Army Tank and Automotive Command (TACOM). Perform ananalysis to identify the relative engineering differences inherent in the twodesign philosophies. The analysis will include an excursion into what isknown about the relative differences between wheeled and tracked vehicles onvarious RAM, survivability, and transportability characteristics.

(3) Foreign Science and Technology Center (FSTC). Perform ananalysis to identify the status of vheeled and tracked combat vehicles inallied, Warsaw Pact, and major nonaligned nations. The presentation willinclude a description of the present force composition, explanation of whateconomic or doctrinal factors led to the present vehicle fleets, and adiscussion of the probable direction of foreign 'governments' vehicle fleets inthe future' with an accompanying rationale.

(4) US Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station (WES).Perform an analysis of the relative differences between wheeled and trackedvehicle design philosophies from a mobility perspective. The analysis willinclude an excursion into'various mobility enhancements that could be effected-on wheeled vehicles to improve their mobility.

(5) Headquarters US Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC). .Will provide overall coordination for the analysis effort. Perform therequired cost analysis using data provided by HQ AMC. Present the results of

8

B-12

%I

Page 267: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ATCD-ACSUBJECT: Combat Developments Study Plan: Wheeled ve Tracked Vehicle Study

the analysis effort to HQDA. Develop and publish a final report of thestudies findings.

(6) US Army Combined Arms Center (CAC). Delineate the criticalfactors used in the past for the development of wheeled and tracked vehicleoperational requirements by the CAC Schools. Develop a CAC position on thefeasibility and desirability of substituting wheeled vehicles for trackedvehicles in the training base. Develop a CAC position on the factors inherentin a vehicle's operational capabilities that serve to enhance its battlefieldoperational effectiveness for the various vehicular mission roles within thecenter's mission areas. Develop general mission profiles to be consideredwhen evaluating the capability of a wheeled or tracked vehicle to support thevarious vehicular mission roles in the center's mission areas.

(7) US Army Logistics Center (LOGO). Delineate the critical factorused in the past for the development of vehicle operational requirements bythe LOGC Schools. Develop a LOGCOposition on the feasibility and desirabilityof substituting wheeled vehicles for tracked vehicles in the training base.Develop a LOGC position on the factors inherent in a vehicle's operationalcapabilities that serve to enhance its battlefield operational effectivenessfor the various vehicular mission roles within the center's missica areas.Develop general mission profiles to be considered when evaluating thecapabilities of wheeled or tracked vehicles to support the various vehicularmission roles in the center's mission areas.

b. Resource Requirements.

(1) Level of Effort.

(a) HQ AMC 30 manhours4

(b) TACOM 500 manhours

(c) FSTC 500 manhours

(d) WES 1280 manhours

(e) HQ TRADOC 1000 manhours

(f) CAC 300 manhours

(g) LOGC 100 manhours

.9

B-13

SI'

Page 268: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

ATCD-AC %SUBJECT: Combat 'Developments Study Plan: Wheeled vs Tracked Vehicle Study

(2) Funding. Transfer of $49,950 from EQ TRADOC to WES to cover

industrial funding, requirements for their support of the study effort.-

6. Administrative,

a. Study Schedule. The folloving time schedule will be used forprosecution of the study. a

(1) Draft Study Plan 10 Aug 84

(2) Approved Study Plan 31'Aug 84.

(3) Complete Phase I 30 Sep 84

(4) Complete Phase II 12 Oct 84

(5) Draft Briefing 19 Oct 84

(6) Approved Briefing 26 Oct 84

(7) Brief HQDA 31 Oct 84

b. Study Advisory Group (SAG). HQ rRADOC vill host and chair aSAG to reviev the results of the avalysis effort.

c. Study Project Officer. Mr Kenneth L. Boyd, ATCD-AC, AV 680-3037, FTS931-3037.

7. Correlation. ACM 070846.

B-14

Page 269: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

4

'KKBibliography

16

SrN

Page 270: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Intentionally Left Blank

Ah.

4..

J.

se..

4

'V

* if

Page 271: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Besch, E. W., *Doctrine Regarding WFV for Light Infantry', ArmadaInternational Special, Nwember 1984.

Bescd, E. W., "Light Armored Vehicles - Pending Issues', Marine brys Gazette,

December 1981.

Bradley, C. D., 'heels Versus Tracks', Armor, Fort .o=, KY, May/June 1981.

Burel, J. P., "Tracked Versus Wheeled Vehicles', LUtter, French LiaisonOfficer, Headquarters, US Army Trainirn and Doctrine omand, Fort Monroe,VA, 20 August 1984.

OiMpion, G. C., Wheels Versus Tracks, Letter, Brtiah Liaiso Officer,Headluarters, US Army Training and Doctrine Ommwnd, Fort Monroe, VA, 4September 1984.

Ely, H. P., Sterling, J. W., Healy, M. and Zimmermann, A., lihe SovietBattlefield Development Plan=, (Secret/NMU" , Volume IV, Soviet GroundForce Weapon, Research, Develoment, and Aquisition: Process Outputs andOperational Imact, Office of the Assistant (hief of Staff forIntelligence, Washington, DC, May 1984.

Ferguson, OPerfrmance of MII3A2 and Piranha in German and Iranian Terrain=,US Army Materiel System Analysis Activity, APGp, MD, Novmer 1983.

Flume, W., 'Wheels or Tracks? - A Discusion of the Family of Light ArmoredOxibat Vehicles for the 1990s,, Wehrtecdiik, •GF, 1981.

Geerts, G. A., *Wheeled Versus Tracked Vehicles', Letter, Netherlands LiaisonOfficer, BHeadarters, US Army Training and Doctrine Qmmnd,, Fort Monroe,VA, 29 October 1984.

Gibet,, R., Kirt, D. , s,,••, D., Jennings,, J., stiml .0, D.? asynolcw, R.0,Kornhauser, B. and Druen, B., "The Mobile Protected St*y , (Secret), R•.US Army Infantry Sciool, Fort Beming, GA, NoMvber 980.

Gildirist, B. C., Wuheeled Versus Tracks Study', Letter (uadian LiaisonOfficer, Headuarters, US Army Training and Doctr C~bmand, Fort Mnoe,VA, 9 November 1984.

Goff, J. and Mirabelle, R., %Evaluaticn of (xioeptual re antrol Systems forLigrheight Arzmored Vehicles', US Army•Nateriel hAalysis Activity,APG, D, May 1983. •

Green, C. E., "Results of Soft-Soil, Acceleration, s, and Maneuver Testswith WES M113/2E HOW D, GN XM1, GH A3R, and a rary m Vl3,aTechnical Report GL-83-17, U Army aigineer Wate iperiment Station,CE, Vicksburg, MS, 1983.

SI, e0E.

Page 272: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

fimid and Asoclis, 'Vehicle Firing Stability Stimulation of the EvaluatedKinetic Energy Weapon Tedmlogy Deonstrator Vehicle', March 1982.

lAft'e, J. S., 'Future Cinadian Infantry Mobility in Europe: Wheeled orYMAdanized', xnadian Defence Quarterly, Volume 9, Nuber 1, Summer 1979.

Manes, R. S. N., "Scorpion: Tracks Versts Wheels Oxtinued', Marine (brpsGazette, September 1981.

Martin, E. G., "Brazil's Fledging Arms Industry Making a Hit with Weapons-Humgry Third World Armies', The Wall Street Journal, New York, NY, 4January 1985.

Murphy, N. R., Jr. and Ahlvin, RL B., "ANC-74 Vehicle Dynamic Module".Technical Report M-76-I, US Army Egineer Waterways Expriment Station,CC,, Vicksburg, NS, 1976.

MurjTiy, N. R., Jr., 'Armored (3tat Vehicle Technology (AMT) Program,(Oxfidential) Tvdmical Report GI-81-13, US Army Engineer WaterwaysExperiment Station, CE, Vicksburg, MS, 1981.

Nix, J. D. and Kirkup, S. P., "ombat Vehicle System - Free World, Volume 2:Armored Personnel Carriers and Infantry Fighting Vehicles',(Confidential), I "1-120s.022-83-., 2, US Army Foreign Science and •'wAd2ology Center. Oimrlottesville, VA, 17 March 1983.

Nix, J. D. Aker, J. R. and Kirkup, S. P., "Ombat Vehicle System - FreeWorld, Volume 3: Reconnaissanoe Vehicles and Tank Destroyers',(Confidential). DST-1120S-022-84-CL 3, US Army Furei•, Scieace andTechnology Oenter, Charlottesville, VA, 8 June 1904.

Nix, J. D., 'Weeled and Tracked Ligt Armored Vehicles', (Secret), Briefina,at Headquarters, S Army Training and Doctrine Ommand, Fort Monroe% VA,16 October 1984.

N&tall, C. J., Jr., "Cros-Oxbttry ( isons for Hon. Jam. Abrcse, UtierSecretary of the Arry', Fact Sheet, US Army 3gineer Waterways Experiment'Station, CE, Vicksburg, MS, 17 August 1984.

uttall, C. 3., "., 'An Assessnt of the Inland Water-Crooning Perform=o Selected Tactical Suport Vehiles (WACROSS)", Tcbadcal Reort GL-79-1, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, CE, Vlckdubug, M9, 1979.

Nattalle, C. J. , Jr. and Ranikolphe D. D., 'MOobility Analysis of Standard andHi'b-Mobility Tactical Support Vehicles (HIMO Stouy)", Tednical Report M-76-3, US Army Engineer Waterways Experizmnt Station, CZ, Vicksburg, MSP,1976.

NUttall, C. J., Jr. and Pandolph, D. D., "Rational, Qonsistent Criteria forSwiuming and Related Performance Characteristics of Arm OQmbat Vehicles(SWDKR T," Draft Report to US Arvy (xn.bpts Analysis Agency, US ArmRxgineer Waterways Experiment Station, C=, Vicksburg, Ms, 1976.

2

Page 273: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

r .r3I-5'. r1L. --

Nuttall, C. J., Jr., "Ground-Cravling: 1966 The State-of-the-Art of DesigningOff-ROad Vehicles-, WilsOn, Nuttall, Raimnd'Engineers, Inc., (Cheqterton,MD, 1967.

Pradko, F., Richard, L., and Kaluza, V., "Theory of Bhuan Vibration Response',Presentation at the Winter Annual Meeting and Eergy systes Exposition,American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, 1966. 7,ý

Puuri, Mottin, and Seyfirt, "Armored Combat Vehicle chnology Study', TACh.Report No. 12405, US Army Tank and Automotive omuand, Warren, kI, 1980.

Randolhl, D. D., and Grimes, K., Nobility Assessment of Mobile ProtectedWeapons System (MPS) Candidate Vehicles', Technical Report (I,-83-19, USArny Engineer. Waterways Experiment Station, (C, Vicksburg, HS, 1983.

Randolph, D. D., and Grimes, K., 'Nobility Analysis of Selected LightweightArmored Wheeled Concept Vehicles', Tcnical Report GL-82-10, US ArnmEngineer Waterways Experiment Station, (E, Vicksburg, MS, 1983.

Schroeder, R. H., "IPT Summary', Internal Msorandumr, General Motors of CanadaLimited, London, Ontario, 15 February 1985.

Smith, R. P., "Mobility Performance of C(udidate Vehicles for Corps SupportWeapon System', Technical Report GL-83-2, US Army Egineer WaterwaysExperiment Station, CE, Vicksburg, MS, 1983.

Tate, J., III, Saxton, M1. D. and Morris, W., "The Soviet BattlefieldDevelopment Plan', (Secret/NOFMO, Volume III, Soviet and Non-SovietWarsaw Pact Ground Forces by Region and Power Projection, Office of the'Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligenoe, Washington, DC, Agust 1984.

White J. J., 'obility Index as a tool for Mobility IDsign Selection',Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, (1, Septemer 1984.

White, J. J., Wheels Versus Tracks Study*, Batelle Columbus Laboratories,,bOlwr1bms, CH, July 1984.

Willothq4y, W. E. -Mobility Test Results for the Light Armored Vehicles, (Li"at T1entynine Palms, California*, Technical Report GL-84-3, US AMEineer Waterways Experiment Station, C, Vicksburg, W:, 1984.

Willou11 , W. E. and Schreiner, B. G., -'obility Validation Test Results forthe Armord Reconnaissance Scout and Conarison Vehicles', miscellaneousPaper *-74-6, US A Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, CZ,Vickbug, MSo, 1974.I

Wilson, D., "Air Transportability Criteria for Tracked Crmbat VcidclesO, FMC(orporation, San Jose, CA, June 1984.

3,' V°

i .* t

Page 274: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

Air Transportability, Dl 1-11, APSC Design Handook. •

"An Analysis of Wheeled and Tracked Vehicles for.Close C:mbat Weapon Systems",,FMC Corporation, San Jose, CA, August 1984.

"OAn Analysis of Wheeled and Tracked Vehicles for Close Combat Weapon Systemso,FMC Corporation, San Jose, Ch.

French Briefing, "Armored Wheeled Vehicles", French - United States StaffTalks, June 1984.

"Whels Versus Tracks for Ombat Vehicles', T(fl4 Advanced Concepts,?US Amy Tank and Automotive Omaad, Warren, MI, MWy 1984.

"Liht Armored Vehicle Special Publicationu, International Defense Review. 4

susllanu cocepts and unpublished reports, US Army Mink and Autcmotiveamnrad, Warren, MI.

'Mobility Obiiaison: Tracked Versus wheels", FSTC! Report, us Army ForeignScience and Technology Oenter, Charlc ttesville, VA, August 1981.

"Payload to curb weight ratio for future? 5 ton trucks", Letter to US ArmyTransportation School, Ft Eustis, VA, US Army Tank and Automotive Czmmand,Warren, MI.

Soviet Weapon System Oaracteristics Hancbook, (Secret/"CW , Headquarters,,US Army Training and Doctrine Omu'uand, Fort Monroe, VA, 12 Septenter 1984.

Strategy a" Defense Magazine, Septemr 1984.

T Major Item RN"-D Summary, US Army Tank and Automotive Command, Warren,MI, April 1984.

S9-28D0, OStandard Military Motor Vehicles,, War Departmient, Washington, DC,1943.

Qfraction: Tracks or Wheels," Ground Defense Intrl, May 1980.

US Army Wheeled Vehvcle Master Plan, Hadquarters, Departnent of the Army,Office of the Deputy (Cief of Staff for Operations and Plans, Washington,DC, Septeier 1983.

Various omz y publications and technological data.

4,6

Page 275: WHEELED VERSUS TRACWEB VEHICLE STUDY FINAL REPORT · Substitute Wheels for Tracks During Peacetime 2-17 Short Distance Mobility Enhancements 2-21 Half-Tracked Vehicle Concept 2-27

-N- -7.-7

5-6,

-..

' '. • w m