Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
WhatsApp in CML ?
From Cutting Edge to
Future Horizons…
Pia Raanani, MD
Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center
1
PP
-BO
S-IS
R-0
046
WhatsApp in CML - Topics• Introduction and general aspects
• Age Adjusted Treatment• AYA
• Pregnancy
• Pediatrics
• Elderly• CVS complications
• Treatment Free Remission• Clinical trials• Real – life (out of clinical trials)• Predictors for TFR
• Treatment Failure• Adherence• Mutations (NGS)• Management
• PROs and QOL
• State of the Art and the Future
2
Philadelphia Chromosome
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 10 119 12
13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 x Y
The Philadelphia (Ph) Chromosome Leads to CML
The Philadelphia (Ph) Chromosome Leads to CML
Clinical Course: Phases of CML
Chronic phase
Median duration 5–6 years
Accelerated phase
Median duration6–9 months
Blast crisis
Median survival3–6 months
Advanced phases
Blast Phase
CP CML: scoring systems
Eutos
10
11
12
13
14
Age Adjusted Treatment
Pediatrics, AYA, Elderly
15
CML in Adolescents and Young
Adults [AYA] & Pediatrics
16
Challenges & Special Issues in AYA with CML
• No specific current standards or recommendations
• Only 13–27% of the total CML population: lack of clinical trials
• Fast achievement of sustained DMR of utmost importance
• Young women – pregnancy
• TFR and cure - especially important for the younger population
• Adherence to treatment is a major issue in AYA with CML
• Fast achievement of DMR is important in this group
• A challenge and Achilles heel in AYA
• QOL & PROMS - main issue for AYA: limited by side effects of TKIs
• Allogeneic SCT - a more readily available option for AYA
17
Analysis of Outcomes in AYA with
CML Treated Upfront with TKIs :The MD Anderson Experience
• 468 pts. treated in MD
Anderson – 61 AYA
• AYA defined as 15 – 29 yrs.
• Difference between AYA
and older patients:
• Incidence of splenomegaly
• Distribution in Sokal risk groups
18Pemmaraju et al. Haematologica 2012
Response to Therapy According to Age Group
• Rates of CCyR, MMR and CMR significantly higher in
older patients compared to AYA
• A favorable trend for EFS for older
patients
• Transformation free and OS similar for
both groups
19Pemmaraju et al. Haematologica 2012
Kalmanti et al. Ann Hematol 2014 20
• AYA presented with
more aggressive
disease parameters (spleen, WBC, blasts, Hb)
• AYA –higher rate of
> 10% ratio @ 3 mos.
21Kalmanti et al. Ann Hematol 2014
• No significant difference in
cumulative incidences of CCR,
MMR and MR4 between AYA & others
• No inferior survival in AYA compared
to others
• No difference in progression to AP / BP
22
young patients do well in spite of poorer
prognostic indicators
Kalmanti et al. Ann Hematol 2014
Two Most Relevant Studies in AYA CML
Patients with Contradicting Results
23Pemmaraju & Cortes Acta Haematologica 2014
24Hijiya & Suttorp Blood 2019
25
Pregnancy in CML Patients Treated with TKIs
• CML accounts for 10% of all leukemias diagnosed during pregnancy
• Incidence of CML in pregnancy : 1/100,000 per year
Courtesy of Dr. Adi Shacham-Abulafia
Pregnancy in CML Patients Treated with TKIs
• What kind of response is needed before stopping TKI?
• Should IVF be considered to minimize the time
between stopping therapy and getting pregnant?
• How to manage rising PCR during pregnancy?
• Which treatment should be used?
• What is the likelihood to respond after delivery?
26
Suggested algorithm for management of CML diagnosed during pregnancy
Evaluate- WBC, Plt & gestational age
WBC <100-150X109/L
& Plt<500-1000X109/L
AP CML
no action, except
aspirin +/- LMWHFailure to control
hematologic parameters
CP CML
Start TKI
+/-
Pregnancy
termination
Elisabetta Abruzzese, Expert Review of Hematology 2016
R. Palani, et al., Ann Hematol 2015
WBC >100-150X109/L
& Plt>500-1000X109/L
Leukapheresis/INF
HU/TKIs*
after organogenesis & placenta formation
Courtesy of Dr. Adi Shacham-Abulafia
27
*Basically, TKIs not
recommended &should be avoided during pregnancy
Options for Planned Pregnancy in CML
STABLE MMR OR DEEPER FOR 24 MOS.
Stop TKI @ CMR
If CMR sustained for several months stop
contraceptives
On/off approach
Stop TKI at ovulation and
monitor b-HCG
Restart TKI if menstrual cycle
occurs
Stop TKI @ 1st
positive pregnancy test
(7-10 days after ovulation)
28
Pregnancy Management in CML Patients: Report of 224 Outcomes of ELN Database (Abruzzese et al.)
• CML patients can pursue a normal life including planning a family, with several caveats
• TKIs should not be used during pregnancy
• Selected TKIs, specifically IM and NIL which have little placental transfer, can be started after organogenesis
• Tx. can be delayed w/o jeopardizing outcome
• If therapy during pregnancy is deemed necessary, IFN can induce and maintain hematologic remission
29
Men Desiring to Conceive a Pregnancy
• Available data do not indicate increased risk for
infants conceived under TKI (most data - imatinib)
• A shared physician - patient decision whether to:
• Continue TKI therapy during efforts to conceive
• Delay initiation of TKI therapy
• Interrupt TKI therapy to facilitate conception with TKI-
unexposed sperm
• Consult on sperm preservation prior to TKIs Rx.
• Termination of pregnancy conceived while a man
is on TKI therapy - not recommended
30
• CML constitutes 2% of all leukemias in children <15
years with an annual incidence of 1 : 106
• There are clear differences between CML in
children and adults in terms of:
• Disease presentation and progression
• The underlying CML biology and host factors
• Treatment considerations
• The validity of the existing scores
• Treatment complicated by growth retardation
31Hijiya et al. Blood 2016
Discontinuation of TKIs in Pediatric CML
Results from a Japanese trial
• 21 pts. < 15 years of age at diagnosis
• TKI may be safely discontinued also in children if:
• treated for ≥ 3 years
• had sustained MR4.0 for ≥ 2 years
• Included patients who relapsed after HSCT
• Indications for allogeneic HSCT in children:
• Failure of TKI therapy
• Progression while on a TKI
• CML-BP
32
• Growth abnormalities are associated with imatinib
• Less experience with 2nd & 3rd generation TKIs
• A few case reports describe a decrease in markers of
fertility in children treated with TKIs
• An important goal :avoidance of life long treatment
with TKIs
• Treatment must take into account minimizing
toxicities for 6 or 7decades*
33*Only imatinib is indicated for pediatric CML patients, namely for children >3 years
Hijiya et al. Blood 2016
CML in the (Very) Elderly
A Change in the Paradigm..
34
• According to the SEER program registries’ data -
28.6% of CML patients are 75 years or older
• Only 3.8% of them are represented in clinical trials
(compared to 79% of patients < 65 years old)
• All TKIs have shown efficacy in elderly CML patients
• Their use is accompanied by toxicity in the elderly
35Kanapuru B, ASH 2017, #861; Steegmann JL Leukemia 2016
Several Trials That Demonstrate Activity of TKIs in Elderly CML Patients…
36
Age did not have a
relevant impact on DMR
associated with nilotinib in
newly diagnosed patients
Older patients on IM 800 mg,
in contrast to IM 400 mg,
achieved MMR & DMR as fast
as younger patients
37
Low-dose (< 20 mg)
dasatinib generates an
adequate MR in most elderly
patients without severe AEs
A “real-life” cohort of 65
CML patients > 65 years
treated frontline with
dasatinib
• (30% ≥ 3 comorbidities)
• MMR in 77% of patients
• Dasatinib has important
role in the frontline
treatment of elderly with
comorbidities
Several Trials That Demonstrate Activity of TKIs in Elderly CML Patients…
How to Treat CML in Older Adults
38Luskin & DeAngelo Journal of Geriatric Oncology 2018
39
40
Treatment Free Remission
41
42
Cure In CML In The 3rd Millennium:A Target Or A Dream?
>3000 pts.
Pierre Laneuville, 2018 43
44
TKI Discontinuation In CML
TKI treatment:Deep and sustainedmolecular response
TKI discontinuation:Treatment-free remission (TFR)
TKI-discontinuation:Molecular relapse
Hematological relapsein the absence of
TKI reintroductionSTOP
Normal HSC
Normal progenitor
LSC
Leukemic progenitor
Leukemic mature cell
Predominantly normalhematopoiesis
Predominantly normalhematopoiesis
Predominantly leukemic hematopoiesisIncreasingly leukemic hematopoiesis
Courtesy of Dr. Delphine Rea
45
Can We Predict If And When TKI Treatment May Be Stopped?
• The probability to obtain a deep molecular response during 1st line TKI treatment depends on:
– CP-CML prognostic score at diagnosis.
– Treatment:
• Potency of TKI (Standard dose imatinib < 2nd generation TKIs)
• Single agent TKI versus combination therapy (IFN)
– Time on treatment.
– Early molecular response:
• BCR-ABL1 ratio at 3 months: 10% IS < 1% IS < 0.1% ISLarson RA, et al. Leukemia. 2012.;26: 2197-2203.Hochhaus A, et al. Leukemia. 2016;30: 1044-1054.Cortes JE, et al. J Clin Oncol . 2016; 34: 2333-2340.
Preudhomme C, et al. New Engl J Med. 2010. 363: 2511-2521.Hochhaus A, et al. Leukemia. 2016;30: 1044-1054.
Courtesy of Dr. Delphine Rea
46
Can We Predict for a Successful TFR?
• The British Group introduced a predictive score for
successful TFR in CML based on a Hammersmith Cohort
and validated by other British centers
• Variables strongly associated with prolonged TFR :
• Age above or below 40 yrs.
• Previous TKI resistance
• Duration of MR4
• Type of transcript
47
Time To Relapse After TKI Discontinuation
STIM trial
1: High risk of relapse soon after TKI discontinuation(usually between 3 and 12 months)
2: Few late relapses (usually during the 2nd year): decrease in the relapse risk as time passes
Very late relapses not reported yet
1 2 3
Etienne G, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(3):298-305. Courtesy of Dr. Delphine Rea48
49
50
TKI Withdrawal Syndrome During TFRthere ain't no such thing as a free lunch
• Timing:– Occurs within 1 to 2 months after TKI discontinuation.
• Frequency:– About 30% of patients.
• Symptoms:– New onset or worsening of “inflammatory-like” musculoskeletal pain,
arthralgia, usually mild to moderate.– No systemic marker of inflammation.– Unrelated to molecular response status.– Exact mechanism unknown.
• Duration:– Resolution during the 1st year after TKI cessation or upon TKI resumption
in relapsing patients.
• Treatment:– None or analgesics (very rarely requires TKI reintroduction).
Richter J, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014 ;32(25):2821-2823. Courtesy of Dr. Delphine Rea 51
Treatment Failure:
Non-Adherence & BCR-ABL1
Mutations
52
Genotypic
changes
53
BCR-ABL1 Point mutations
Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)
54
Recently, a French trial showed:
• NGS can detect low level mutations in patients treated
with first line 2GTKI±Peg-IFN after only 3 to 6 months on
therapy
• Before these become detectable by SS
• Despite achieving an optimal response according to ELN
2013
• This might be a trigger for earlier intervention although
more studies are needed 55
1st line 2nd line 3rd line 4th line
Dasatinib
Nilotinib
Bosutinib (I, R?)Nilotinib (I, R?)Imatinib (I)Ponatinib (R)
Ponatinib (R,I)Other 2G TKI (I,R?)SCT (R)
SCT (R)Other TKI (I)Novel agents in
clinical trials (ABL-001)(R,I)
Bosutinib (I,R?)Dasatinib (I,R?)Imatinib (I)Ponatinib (R)
Ponatinib (R,I)Other 2G TKI (I,R?)SCT (R)
SCT (R)Other TKI (I)
Novel agents inclinical trials (ABL-001) (R,I)
Dasatinib (R,I)Nilotinib (R,I)Bosutinib (I, R)
Bosutinib (R,I)Ponatinib (R,I)Other 2G TKI (I,R?)
SCT (R)
SCT (R)Other TKI (I)Novel agents in
clinical trials (ABL-001) (R,I)
Imatinib
56
Bosutinib
Nilotinib (I,R?)Dasatinib (I,R?)Imatinib (I)Ponatinib (R)
Ponatinib (R,I)Other 2G TKI (I,R?)SCT (R)
SCT (R)Other TKI (I)Novel agents inclinical trials (ABL-001) (R,I)
Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs)
& Qulaity of Life (QOL)
57
Patients’ Perspectives About Discontinuation
• Breccia et al. collected the results of a questionnaire
administered to 1133 pts during regional meetings in Italy:
“If in the future there is a perfect and long-lasting response to the
treatment, would you accept the opportunity to interrupt the
treatment for your illness?”
• 49% answered that they would prefer not to interrupt
treatment being afraid of losing the results achieved
• 16% would like to discontinue
• 20% did not have a firm opinion 58
Breccia M. & Foa R. Curr Oncol Rep. 2018 20(3):23
PROs Show Superior QOL of Patients Treated With 1st
Compared to Newer Generations TKIs
• 195 patients on Imatinib,
Nilotinib or Dasatinib
completed a QOL
questionnaires
• Overall, the symptomatic
profile was more severe in
patients who received either
dasatinib or nilotinib
compared to imatinib
• Since patients on 2nd
generation TKIs were almost
2 decades younger, these
differences might reflect the
significance that
"Generation Y" gives to QOL
• Questionnaires were provided by the EORTC
• Questionnaires were composed of functional, symptom and global health/QOL scales/items
• Questionnaires included 34 items related to symptoms experienced by patients within the week before
59
Shacham-Abulafia, Rosenman, Leader, Sharf, Raanani, Rozovski, EHA24, Amsterdam 2019
60
61
62
63
64
65
IdeallyIdeally
66
67
68
69
70
71
On a personal note…
72
• Galit Granot, Ph.D
• Ayala Gover-Proaktor , Ph.D
• Alona Telerman, Ph.D
• Adi Shacham-Abulafia, M.D
• Avi Leader, M.D
• Ofir Wolach, M.D
• Oren Pasvolsky, M.D
• Alon Rozental, M.D
• Uri Rozovski, M.D
• Giora Sharf
• All the medical and lab team
• Our Collaborators from other hospitals
• CML patients’ group
• Our patients….
73