51
What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program Michelle Petri MD MPH Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

  • Upload
    juana

  • View
    34

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program. Michelle Petri MD MPH Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. 1. Classification Criteria Help in Everyday Practice. SLICC* Classification Criteria. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

What’s New in SLE?A Ten Step Program

Michelle Petri MD MPHJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Page 2: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

1. Classification Criteria Help in Everyday Practice

Page 3: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

SLICC* Classification Criteria

At least 1 clinical + at least 1 immunologic criterion (for a total of 4)

ORlupus nephritis by biopsy

Petri M et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2677-2686.

*Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics

SLICC has recommended that BOTH the revised ACR criteria AND the new SLICC classification

criteria be used

Page 4: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

SLICC Revision of ACR Classification CriteriaClinical Criteria1. Acute/subacute cutaneous lupus2. Chronic cutaneous lupus3. Oral/Nasal ulcers4. Non-scarring alopecia 5. Inflammatory synovitis with physician-observed swelling of two or more joints OR tender joints with morning stiffness6. Serositis7. Renal: Urine protein/creatinine (or 24-hr urine protein) representing at least 500 mg of protein/24 hr or red blood cell casts 8. Neurologic: seizures, psychosis, mononeuritis multiplex, myelitis, peripheral or cranial neuropathy, cerebritis (acute confusional state)9. Hemolytic anemia10. Leukopenia (<4000/mm3 at least once)

OR Lymphopenia (<1000/mm3 at least once)

11. Thrombocytopenia (<100,000/mm3) at least once

Petri M et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2677-2686.

Page 5: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

SLICC Revision of ACR Classification CriteriaImmunologic Criteria1. ANA above laboratory reference range2. Anti-dsDNA above laboratory reference range (except ELISA: >2-fold laboratory reference range)

3. Anti-Sm4. Antiphospholipid antibody

lupus anticoagulantfalse-positive test for syphilisanticardiolipin — at least twice normal or medium-high titeranti-b2 glycoprotein 1

5. Low complementlow C3low C4low CH50

6. Direct Coombs’ test in absence of hemolytic anemia

Petri M et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2677-2686.

Page 6: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

2. More Good Reasons to Avoid Prednisone

Page 7: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

A Prednisone Dose of 6 mg or More Increases Organ Damage by 50%

Prednisone Average Dose Hazard Ratio

>0-6 mg/day 1.16

>6-12 mg/day 1.50

>12-18 mg/day 1.64

>18 mg/day 2.51

Thamer M et al. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:560-564.

Adjusted for confounding by indication due to SLE disease activity

Page 8: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Prednisone Itself Increases the Risk of Cardiovascular Events

Prednisone use

Observed Number of

CVEs

Rate of Events/1000 Person-Years

Age-Adjusted Rate Ratios

(95% CI) P Value

Never taken 22 13.3 1.0 (reference group)

Currently taking

1-9 mg/d 32 12.3 1.3 (0.8, 2.0) 0.31

10-19 mg/d 31 20.2 2.4 (1.5, 3.8) 0.0002

20+mg/d 25 35.4 5.1 (3.1,8.4) <0.0001

Magder LS, Petri M. Am J Epidemol. 2012;176:708-719.

Page 9: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

3. Non-immunosuppressive Immunomodulators Can Control Mild-Moderate SLE, Helping to Avoid Steroids

• Hydroxychloroquine1

• Vitamin D2

• Prasterone (synthetic dihydroepiandrosterone, or DHEA)3

• N-acetylcysteine4

1. Petri M. Lupus. 1996;5(Suppl 1):S16-S22. 2. Petri M et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:1865-1871 . 3 Petri M et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:1820-1829. 4. Lai Z-W et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2937-2946.

Page 10: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Hydroxychloroquine as Background TherapyReduction in Flares Canadian Hydroxychloroquine Study Group. N Engl J

Med. 1991;324:150-154.

Reduction in organ damage Fessler BJ et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1473-1480.

Reduction in lipids Petri M. Lupus. 1996;5(Suppl. 1):S16-S22.Wallace DJ et al. Am J Med. 1990;89:322-326.

Reduction in thrombosis Pierangeli SS, Harris EN. Lupus. 1996;5:451-455.Petri M. Scand J Rheumatol. 1996;25:191-193.

Improvement in survival Alarcon GS et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:S726.Ruiz-Irastorza G et al. Lupus. 2005;14:220.

Triples mycophenolate mofetil response Kasitanon N et al. Lupus. 2006;15:366-370.

Prevents seizure Hanly JG et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71;1502-1509.

Page 11: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Hydroxychloroquine for Lupus Nephritis

Continuing hydroxychloroquine improves complete response rates with

mycophenolate mofetil

Kasitanon N et al. Lupus 2006;15:366-370.

Page 12: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Increasing 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D Modestly Helps Disease Activity and Urine Protein/CR

Disease MeasureSlope over range

of 0-40 ng/mL (95% CI)

P-valueSlope over range

of ≥40 ng/mL (95% CI)

P-value

Physician’s Global Assessment

–0.04 (–0.08, –0.01) 0.026 0.01

(–0.02, 0.04) 0.50

SELENA-SLEDAI –0.22 (–0.41, –0.02) 0.032 0.12

(–0.01, 0.24) 0.065

Log Urinary Protein/Creatinine

–0.03 (–0.05, –0.02) 0.0004 –0.01

(–0.01, 0.00) 0.24

Petri M et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2013;65:1865-1871.

SELENA-SLEDAI = Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index.

Model allowing slope to differ before and after 40 ng/mL

Page 13: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

20-Unit Increase in 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D

• 13% decrease in odds of having a PGA score of 1 or more

• 21% decrease in odds of having a SLEDAI score of 5 or more

• 15% decrease in odds of having a urine pr/cr > 0.5

Petri, et al. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:1865-71

Page 14: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Vitamin D May Have Cardiovascular and Hematologic Benefits

Targher G et al. Semin Thromb Hemostasis. 2012;38:114-124.

Page 15: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Vitamin D Reduced Thrombosis in Some Clinical Studies

• Cancer RCT: calcitriol+docetaxel vs. docetaxel (P=0.01)1

• General population lowest tertile of vitamin D: • 37% (CI 15-64%) increased rate of VTE2

• Higher rates of VTE in African-Americans3

• VTE are seasonal: highest risk in winter; sunbathing reduces rise of VTE by 30%4

• Honolulu Heart Program: Low vitamin D predicted 34-year incident stroke in Japanese-American men. HR 1.22 (CI 1.02-1.47), P=0.0385

• Asian Indian cohort: mean vitamin D lower in CAD P=0.0366

1. Beer TM et al. Br J Haematol. 2006;135:392-394. 2. Brøndum-Jacobsen P et al. J Thromb Haemost . 2013;11:423-431. 3. Grant WB. Am J Hematol. 2010;85:908. 4. Lindqvist PG et al. J Thromb Haemost . 2009;7:605-610. 5. Kojima G et al. Stroke. 2012;43:2163-2167. 6. Shanker J et al. Coron Artery Dis. 2011;22:324-332.

Page 16: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

DHEA (Prasterone) 200 mg Daily

• NOT FDA-approved

• In women with disease activity, reduction in prednisone to ≤7.5 mg/day achieved in 51% vs. 29% on placebo (P=0.03).1

• In women with disease activity, improvement or stabilization achieved in 58.5% vs. 44.5% on placebo (P=0.017)2

1. Petri M et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:1820-1829. 2. Petri M et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:2858-2868.

Page 17: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Prasterone Reduces SLE Flares

Page 18: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

DHEA and Bone Density

• Prasterone provides mild protection against bone loss

• At month 18 with 200 mg vs. 100 mg: Dose-dependent increase in spine BMD (P=0.02)

Sanchez-Guerrero J et al. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:1567-1575.

Page 19: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

N-acetylcysteine

• Blocks mTOR in T cells• At 2.4 and 4.8 g, it reduced SLEDAI at 1, 2, 3 and 4 months• But 4.8 g caused reversible nausea in 33%

Lai Z-W et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2937-2946.

Page 20: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

4. Mycophenolate Mofetil: The Good, the Bad, . . . . .

Page 21: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Lupus Nephritis Induction Therapy:MMF = IV Cyclophosphamide Therapy• In non-Caucasians, MMF is superior

• In renal transplant literature: African-Americans 3 grams Caucasians 2 grams

• New issue: MMF interferes with oral contraceptive dosing“It is recommended that oral contraceptives are coadministered with MMF with caution and additional birth control methods be considered”2

1. Appel GB, et al. J Am Soc Nephrol.2009;20(5):1103-1112; Ginzler EM, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(1):211-221; Tornatore KM, et al. J Clin Pharmacol 2011;51:1213-22. 2. FDA Warning label for MMF.

Not FDA-indicated for SLE

Page 22: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Lupus Nephritis Maintenance Therapy :MMF is Superior to Azathioprine

Time to treatment failure Time to renal flareN=227

Dooley MA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1886-95. Not FDA-indicated for SLE

Page 23: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Lupus Nephritis: Other Options• Belimumab

• Not studied specifically in SLE patients with active nephritis1,2

• Leflunomide• For mild-to-moderate SLE disease3

• Induction therapy for renal flare4,5

• Tacrolimus• Consider in MMF-resistant or partial response patients, alone or in combination6-

9,12

• Approved for treatment of LN in Japan• For severe nephritis (Class IV/V)6,10

• Rituximab• LUNAR trial was negative11

1. Navarra S, et al. Lancet. 2011;377(9767):721-31; 2. Dooley MA, et al. ACR/AHCP annual meeting. November 4-9, 2011;Chicago, IL; 3. Tam LS, et al. Lupus. 2004;13:601-4; 4. Wang HY, et al. Lupus. 2008;17(638-44); 5. Tam LD, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:417-8; 6. Yap DY et al. Nephrology. 2012; 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2012.01574.x; 7. Li X, et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr484; 8. Cortes-Hernandez J, et al; Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(12):3939-489. 9. Lanata CM, et al. Lupus. 2010:19(8):935-40. 10. Szeto CC, et al. Rheumatology. 2008;47(11):1678-81; 11. Rovin BH, et al. Arth Rheum. 2012; doi: 10.1002/art.34359. 12. Chen W, et al. Lupus. 2012:21(7):944-952.

Leflunomide, tacrolimus, and rituximab are not FDA-indicated for SLE

Page 24: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Time to Remission and Relapse After Rituximab Treatment and MMF Maintenance

Condon MB, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1280-6.

Page 25: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

5. Better Understanding of Belimumab

Page 26: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Belimumab Multivariate Analysis

Characteristics associated with greater treatment effect (p<0.1)

SELENA SLEDAI score: ≥10 (vs ≤9) Complement: low C3/C4 (vs normal)Steroid use: greater (vs no/less)

Characteristics not associated with treatment effect (p>0.1)StudyRegionRace

van Vollenhoven, et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2012. [April Epub ahead of print, doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200937].

Page 27: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Low C/Anti-dsDNA + Subgroup:SRI Response Rate over 52 Weeks

van Vollenhoven RF, et al. Presented at EULAR 2011; May 25-28, 2011; London, UK

Page 28: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

SELENA SLEDAI Organ Improvement (Week 52)a

Improvement = decrease in SS score within an organ domain

Manzi S, et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2012. [May Epub ahead of print, doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200831].

Page 29: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Belimumab vs Placebo: Severe Flares

Cervera R, et al. Presented at EULAR 2011: Annual European Congress of Rheumatology;May 25–28, 2011; London, UK

Page 30: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

6. Don’t Forget New Information on Common Drugs

Page 31: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

http://www.medpagetoday.com/PainManagement/PainManagement/44253 (accessed on 3/12/2014)

Page 32: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

New Data on PPIs

Page 33: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Proton Pump Inhibitors and Fractures

http://www.fda.gov/drugs/resourcesforyou/healthprofessionals/ucm221672.htm (accessed on 3/12/2014)

Page 35: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

7. Progress on Coronary Artery Disease

Page 36: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Coronary Artery Disease in SLE

• Substantial increased risk that cannot be completely explained by traditional Framingham risk factors1

• Hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) 2.3 times higher in SLE2

• Risk of cardiovascular events is 2.66 times higher in SLE vs Framingham cohort3

1. Esdaile JM, et al. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44: 2331-7; 2. Ward MM. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42(2):338-46; 3. Magder LS, Petri M. Am J Epidemiol. In press.

Page 37: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

How Can We Detect Cardiovascular Disease Early in SLE?

• Coronary calcium CT1

• Carotid duplex2

• In the FUTURE, techniques such as coronary CTA can detect early noncalcified coronary plaques3

1. Kiani AN et al. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:1300-1306. 2. Maksimowicz-McKinnon K et al. J Rheumatol. 2006;33:2458-2463. 3. Kiani AN et al. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:579-584.

Page 38: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Cross section of the left anterior descending coronary artery. In this view, calcium (pink), vessel lumen (orange) and noncalcified plaque (green) have been identified.

Kiani AN et al. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:579-584.

Coronary Calcium CT

Page 39: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Prevention of CAD in SLE

Page 40: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Atorvastatin Did Not Change

1. Coronary calcium2. Carotid intima media thickness3. Carotid plaque

Petri M et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;70:760-765. Schanberg LE et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:285-296.

Page 41: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

• Assess traditional cardiovascular risk factors and treat to target• Hypertension• Obesity• Hyperlipidemia• Smoking• Sedentary Lifestyle

• Statin did NOT reduce progression in mice3 nor in two clinical trials:• Adult1

• Pediatric2

• Mycophenolate: slowed progression in mice3 and transplant patients4

• Prednisone > 10 mg increases CV event risk5

Can We Reduce Cardiovascular Risk?

1. Petri MA, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(5):760-5; 2. Schanberg LE, et al. Arthtiris Rheum. 2012;64(1):285-96;3. van Leuven SI, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 ;71(3):408-14; 4. Gibson WT, Hayden MR. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Sep;1110:209-21; 5. Magder L, et al. Am J Epidemiol. 2012; in press.

Page 42: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

8. Prevention of Thrombosis in SLE: Are We There Yet?

Page 43: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Somers E, Magder LS, Petri M. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:2531–2536.

Time Since SLE Diagnosis (years)

Cum

ulat

ive

S(t)

Venous Thrombosis in SLE

Page 44: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Hydroxychloroquine Prevents Thrombosis in SLE

Study Study Design Outcome

Wallace et al, 1987 retrospective P < 0.05

Petri et al, 1994 prospective cohort OR 0.3

Ruiz-Irastorza et al, 2006 prospective cohort HR 0.28

Tektonidou et al, 2009 case-control HR 0.99

Jung et al, 2010 nested case-control OR 0.31

Petri M. Curr Rheumatol Reports 2010:13:77-80

Page 45: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

9. Don’t Make Fibromyalgia WORSE(It’s Bad Enough as it is!)

Page 46: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Treating Pain and Fatigue: Tai Chi

12 weeks79% of tai chi group vs 39% of control had clinically meaningful improvement* (P=0.0001)

24 weeks82% of tai chi vs 53% control had clinically meaningful improvement (P=0.009)

FIQ=fibromyalgia impact questionnaire;*”clinically meaningful” change in FIQ = 8.1 points

Wang C, et al. N Engl J Med.2010;363(8):743-754.

Page 47: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Fatigue• Among most common complaints in lupus patients (50-

80% of patients)1

• Chronic fatigue does not correlate with disease activity2

• Highly correlated with fibromyalgia, pain, depression, sleep abnormalities, poor quality of life2-5

• Associated with reduced physical fitness6

1. Tench CM et al. Rheumatology. 2000;39(11):1249–54; 2. Wang B, et al. J Rheumatol. 1998;25(5):892-5; 3. Gladman D, et al. J Rheum. 1997;24:2145-9; 4. Bruce IN, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 1998; 41(suppl.9):S333; 5. Carr FN, et al. ACR/AHCP annual meeting. November 4-9, 2011;Chicago, IL.

Page 48: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

Exercise for SLE-related Fatigue

Clinical global impression change score

No (%) in exercise group (n=33)

No (%) in relaxation group (n=28)

No (%) in control group (n=32)

Very much better 3 (9) 4 (14) 1 (3)Much better 13 (40) 4 (14) 4 (13)A little better 5(15) 4(14) 3(9)No change 6(18) 10(36) 14(41)A little worse 4(12) 4(15) 10(31)Much worse 2(6) 2(7) 1(3)Very much worse 0 0 0

Tench CM, et al. Rheumatology. 2003;42:1050-54.

Page 49: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

http://www.obgynnews.com/single-view/naltrexone-hyperbaric-oxygen-show-promise-for-fibromyalgia/f2d53e04496f14b0294457246f645741.html (accessed on 3/12/2014)

“Overall, 11 of 22 patients completing a 90-day treatment with naltrexone had a robust response with 41% improvement on the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire.”

Page 50: What’s New in SLE? A Ten Step Program

10. Headaches Aren’t Usually Due to Lupus