Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
WHAT’S T-REX?
• Control the synthesis of any protein of interest
• Silence the protein expression faster than using classic regulated promoters
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
This device is composed of two BioBricks:
• TRANS- repressor
• CIS- repressing
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
• Transcription of the target gene yields a mRNA strand;
• The mRNA with the CIS sequence at 5' end, is available for
translation.
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
• When the promoter controlling the TRANS coding sequence is active its transcript binds with the CIS mRNA.
• This RNA duplex prevents ribosomes from binding to RBS, thus silencing protein synthesis.
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
TESTING CIRCUIT
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
O2
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
1) Maximalfreeenergyinthesecondarystructure,reducingtheprobabilityofitsintra‐molecularannealing;
2) Minimalunwantedinterac?onswithgenomicmRNA;
3) Minimalprobabilityofpar?al/shiEedhybridiza?onwithcomplementarystrands.
BASER Best Sequence Research by Andrea and Elisa
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
HOW BASER WORKS?
Star?ngfromarandomlygeneratedsequence(currentsequence);
Conformitytest:a) morethan5adjacentrepeatsofthesamenucleo?de;b) restric?onsites;c) RBSsequences;
NO
YES
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
BASERreplace5nucleto?desrandomly(genera?onofnewsequence);
Evaluatescoreofnewsequence;
AddRBSat3’end
Evaluatescoreofcurrentsequence;
ScoreofnewsequenceisbeSerthanscoreofcurrent
sequence?
Newsequenceispreserved
Currentsequenceispreserved
NO YES
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
• BASER calculates a score for the current sequence:
1) the self score;
2) the genomic score;
3) the shifted score;
HowBASERcalculatesthescore?
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
ChooseofaCISsequence
AACACAAACTATCACTTTAACAACACATTACATATACATTAAAATATTACAAAGAGGAGAAA(RBSinitalic)
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
CCTCTTTGTAATATTTTAATGTATATGTAATGTGTTGTTAAAGTGATAGTTTGTGTTwitha7b‐longRBScoveringreen
ChooseoftheTRANSsequences
CTTTGTAATATTTTAATGTATATGTAATGTGTTGTTAAAGTGATAGTTTGTGTTwitha4b‐longRBScoveringreenunderlined
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
Morphology:‐Eccentricity[0,1];‐Area[min,max];
Focus:‐Clustering;‐Highfluorescence;‐Highcellnumber;
Output:foreachbacteriumtheareainpixelsandthefluorescence
VIFluoR
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
Part Characterization
• PromoterStrengths
• Plasmidcopynumbers
• InfluenceofO2operator
• Interac?onbetweenLacIandO2operator
pSB3K3 pSB1A2 BBa_J23100
BBa_K07919 BBa_B0034
BBa_J0431 BBa_B0015 BBa_J23100 BBa_B0015
BBa_J23118 BBa_C0012 BBa_B0015
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
Promoter Strengths
BBa_J23118 (1429)
BBa_K079032 on pSB1A2
BBa_J23100 BBa_B0034 BBa_J04031 BBa_B0015
BBa_K079031 on pSB1A2
BBa_J23118 BBa_B0034 BBa_J04031 BBa_B0015
vsBBa_J23100
(2547)
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
Promoter Strengths • Methods
‐DH5αcells‐M9medium‐37°overnight
• ImagingAnalysis‐VIFluoR
• FluorimeterAnalysis‐TecanM200
BBa_J23118
BBa_J23100
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
Promoter Strengths • OD/Fluorescenceover?meanalysisfromOD=0.1au
‐ GrowthCurve‐ Fluorescence‐ Fluorescence/ODra?o
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
Plasmid Copy Numbers
pSB1A2 (high copy) vs pSB3K3
(low/medium copy)
BBa_K201003 on pSB1A2
BBa_B0034 BBa_E0040 BBa_B0015 BBa_J23118
BBa_K201003 on pSB3K3
BBa_B0034 BBa_E0040 BBa_B0015 BBa_J23118
• Methods‐DH5αcells‐M9medium‐37°overnight
pSB3K3
pSB1A2
Plasmid Copy Numbers
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
• ImagingAnalysis‐VIFluoR
• FluorimeterAnalysis‐TecanM200
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
Influence of O2
BBa_K079032 (O2 absent) vsBBa_K201001
(O2 present)
BBa_K079032 on pSB1A2
BBa_B0034 BBa_E0040 BBa_B0015 BBa_J23100
BBa_K201001 on pSB1A2
BBa_B0034 BBa_E0040 BBa_B0015 BBa_J23100 BBa_K07919
• Methods‐DH5αcell‐M9medium‐37°overnight
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
• FluorimeterAnalysis‐Victor2
pSB1A2
Influence of O2
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
Positive Control of Testing Circuit
BBa_K201002 on pSB3K3 BBa_B0034 BBa_C0012 BBa_B0015 BBa_J23118 BBa_B0034 BBa_B0015 BBa_J23100
BBa_K201001 on pSB1A2 BBa_k07919
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
• ImagingAnalysis‐ VIFluoR‐ severalimages‐ >60bacteria/image
IPTG induction: Static Response • Methods
‐DH5αcells‐M9medium‐ 37°overnight‐ severalIPTGlevels
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
• FluorimeterAnalysis‐TecanM200‐ Dilu?ontoOD=0.1‐ 1°sample:NoIPTG‐ 2°sample:IPTG100μM
• GrowthCurve• Fluorescence
• Methods‐DH5αcell‐M9medium‐ 37°overnight‐ NoIPTG
IPTG induction: Dynamic Response
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
MATHEMATICAL MODEL • Transcrip?onandtransla?onprocesseswereconsideredsimilartoasecondorderkine?cs,likeanenzyma?creac?on:
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
MATHEMATICAL MODEL
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
PARAMETERS ASSIGNMENT FromLiterature
FromExperimentalMeasurement
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
PARAMETERS ASSIGNMENT
PROMOTERRATIO=1.2
PLASMIDCOPYNUMBERRATIO=4.6
Wesimulatedtes?ngcircuitwhenT‐REXdeviceisidle(Ini?alTrans‐DNA=0)
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
LacI SIGMOIDAL REPRESSION CURVE
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
WefiSedexperimentaldatainordertoiden?fyLacI‐O2dissocia?onconstantandLacI‐IPTGdissocia?onconstant
STATIC IPTG INDUCTION
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
DYNAMIC IPTG INDUCTION
Fiqngofthe100µMIPTGdynamicinduc?onwith?me‐varyingRNApolymerase
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
T-REX SIMULATION
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
T-REX STORY Wedidn’tmanagetogetthefinalcircuitbecausewedidn’tachieve
theassemblyingoftheCISandTRANSparts
Whichweretheproblems?
1. Partsareonly100bpinlength:Quan?typroblem,duetopurifica?on?
*P1010deathgeneliga?onprotocol.
2. Enzymeefficencyislowerwithshortflankingsequences:Wereourdiges?onseffec?ve?
*WeorderlongerPCRprimersanddoubledthediges?on?me.
CONCLUSIONS
Enterinforma?ondetailingatleastonenewstandardBioBrickPartorDeviceintheRegistryofStandardPartsanddemonstratethatworksasexpected;
SubmitDNAforatleastonenewBioBrickPartorDevicetotheRegistryofParts.
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
CONCLUSIONS
Characterizeorimproveanexis?ngBioBrickPartorDeviceandenterthisinforma?onbackontheRegistry.
HelpanotheriGEMteam:ClonedandsenttheBioBrickBBa_K201002totheUNIPV‐PaviaiGEMteam.
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
HUMAN PRACTICE- SHARING
We realized:
• An Online Survey
• An Information Booklet
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
ON-LINE SURVEY RESULTS
• General lack of knowledge about Synthetic Biology
• Most people expressed curiosity about Synthetic Biology and iGEM
• After reading the booklet, great part of the respondent recognized the importance of a responsible and conscious use of Synthetic Biology
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
Totalrespondents:484
Acknowledgements
• University of Bologna
• Ser.In.Ar Cesena
• Cultural Association San Sebastiano
Instructors: Silvio Cavalcanti, Francesca Ceroni, Emanuele Domenico Giordano, Alejandro
Hochkoeppler, Marco Caprini
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna
iGEM2009–UniversityofBologna