Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The way in which we use language determines our relationship with problems. This, in turn, establishes the courses of action available to us in attempting to lessen problems’ effects on our lives. If stories of a problem are left expressed as an identity claim (adjectival, e.g. I’m depressed) or a personal property (possessive, e.g. my depression), there is a risk that they become naturalized (it’s the way I am, my personality, my character, my fault/weakness). How can the person then take action against the effects of the problem, if they are perceived as the problem themself, without acting against their self? Alternatively, externalising the problem by using a pronoun and noun (e.g. this depression) positions the experience as both a separate and specific entity with which to engage. Externalising a problem provides a linguistic shift that objectifies the problem in a way that positions it at a distance from the person. The relationship with the problem, rather than personal performance, can then be re-‐appraised and renegotiated. Leaving problems as identified through adjectival and possessive descriptions also risks decontextualizing them so that their relationship with lived experience is obscured. This has the added hazard of reinforcing the idea that the effects of the problem are a matter of personal failure rather than the difficulties of living in trying circumstances. Johnella Bird1 provides a useful linguistic tactic, to ensure the problem remains specific and contextualized, by speaking it thus: (e.g.) This depression you experience when . . . . Michael White2 identified a number of ways in which the practice of externalizing problems is helpful. These include: • decreasing unproductive conflict • undermining a sense of failure • uniting people in a struggle against the problem and escaping
its influences • opening up new possibilities to take action • opening up more effective and less stressed approaches to
problems • presenting options for dialogue rather than monologue about the problem. ___________________________________________________________________________________ 1. See Johnella Bird’s handouts, at: http://www.cybersoul.co.nz/hearts/handout-‐intro.htm 2. Michael White originally published these ideas in ‘The Externalising of the Problem’, Dulwich Centre Newsletter, Summer 1988/89. The article later appeared as Chapter 2 of Michael White and David Epston’s seminal work, Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. (1990), New York & London: W.W. Norton & Company.
In narrative therapy, the person is not the problem. The problem is the problem. The person’s relationship with the problem is the issue of interest. Unlike in the Freudian tradition, where ‘externalisation‘ refers to the ‘projection’ of one’s thoughts, feelings or motives onto another, externalization, in the narrative therapeutic sense, refers to the distancing position a person takes in relation to the problem.
Mandy has brought her daughter, Alley, to see me. Here is a (very) potted version of our first conversation:3-‐ Katy: So what’s brought you both here today? Mandy: I’m just fed up with Alley’s behaviour. It’s driving me crazy. (holds head in hands and sighs a very big sigh). Katy: Could you tell me a bit about the behavior that’s troubling you? Mandy: Well, it’s all these tantrums; I mean she’s 7 years old but she’s behaving like a 2-‐year old. Katy: When does this happen and what would I see if I witnessed one of these tantrums? Mandy: She screams and hits when it’s time for bed. Katy (to Alley): Have you noticed this too, Alley? (Alley nods). Katy: Alley, what do you think it might be that invites all this screaming and hitting at bedtime (seeking Alley’s understanding of the problem)? Alley (looks sat her feet and whispers): I’m . . . scared . . . when the light goes out. Katy: So this Fear-‐of-‐Lights-‐Out (externalization) invites you scream and hit? Alley (looks up, a little relieved): Yep. Katy: Mmm, I’ve met a few Fears-‐of-‐Lights-‐Out before. This one that’s been bothering you; what’s it like (seeking specificity)? I mean could you draw it (inviting specifics)? (Alley nods and smiles. Katy gives Alley some paper and crayons and she proceeds to illustrate with vigour). Katy: That looks pretty ugly! Has it got a name (personification)? Alley: Yeah! It’s really mean! (adds fierce eyebrows to drawing). It’s name is Rex-‐the Wrecker. Katy: Gosh, is it? What has Rex-‐the-‐Wrecker been getting up to that’s so mean? Alley: It tells me there’s monsters under the bed and to watch out! And . . . that I might die if I close my eyes. (Frowns). Katy: And what do you do when that happens (initial recognition of agency)? Alley: I do this (pulls in her arms tight to her body) and try to stop Mummy turning off the light. Katy: So, is that OK with you, that Rex The Wrecker that turns up at bed-‐time and pulls these mean tricks on you? (seeking Alley’s position in relation to the problem) Alley: No. Katy: How come? (seeking identification of values and intentions that guide actions) Alley: I don’t want to be scared . . . and I don’t like that it makes Mummy upset too. Katy: (holds up the drawing and considers it) It sounds like Rex-‐the-‐Wrecker has been getting away with scaring you and upsetting Mummy and this is not what you want? Following on from here, we identified some moments when Alley resisted the invitations to kick and scream at bed-‐time one night recently, which involved being more interested in thinking about the dance concert in which she had just performed. This opened up a conversation about her skills and knowledges in overcoming some bullying which almost stopped her from going to dance classes, which she loves. Through this process, acts of ‘not-‐giving-‐in’ were articulated that made more visible to her, and to Mandy, her ability to resist acts of bullying, which were applicable to resisting the ‘bullying’ of Rex the Wrecker. 3. This is a pastiche of several cases.
What is externalisation in narrative practice? An example of an externalising conversation
N E W S L E T T E R
S U M M E R ‘ 1 1 -‐ 1 2
The importance of kids’ own ethics in therapy Life’s challenges are not the sole preserve of adults. However, children’s expressions of distress in response to experiences of danger, unpredictability, humiliation, loss, unfairness, powerlessness or inability, tend to be interpreted quite differently to those of adults. This can, sometimes, lead to problematized behaviours becoming the focus of adult-concern. If this is at the cost of understanding the meaning a child makes of their experience, and the significance to them of the strategies they attempt in order to deal with the problem’s influences, an important opportunity for ethical development can be lost. The risk, then, is for kids to learn how to be seen to do the ‘right thing’ and not to get caught doing the ‘wrong thing’, rather than learning to take action based on ethical decision-making processes. I have been using a narrative-based approach to working with children and young people across arrange of settings since the late ‘90s. In this way of practising, children’s ideas about the problem, and the ways they go about shrinking its influences, are at the forefront of conversations. By acknowledging what children value and intend for life, and the skills and knowledges they use to honour this—even in the face of problems—narrative practice helps them build ethical agency in their world. A key practice in this way of working is the externalization of the problem. This can open space for acknowledgement of children’s values and intentions for life and their skills and knowledges. It can be highly influential in shifting relationships with tricky situations and experiences for kids, and their families, whilst building abilities in using ethical judgement. In this issue, I have focused on the narrative practice of externalization. I hope you find this valuable.
Using externalisations to help support kids: Fantastic free resources available online
Supporting preferred connections and actions in living through narrative-‐ and critical theories-‐influenced collaborations
Liverpool supporter and anti-‐Fear person -‐ a paper by David Epston In this paper David provides an elegant account of his work with a 13 year-‐old and his parents. In the pursuit of a shift in the relationship with Fear, the problem is externalized and the young persons’ skills, knowledges and values are engaged, and documented in therapeutic letters, to great effect. An inspiring read! To access the PDF of the paper, go to:-‐ http://www.dulwichcentre.com.au/explorations-‐2011-‐1-‐david-‐epston.pdf
Hold on to Your Horses Sandra Taylor says, “Hold on to your Horses exists because my daughter needed a story that helped her visualize and control her impulsive ideas”. In this tale, beautifully illustrated by Angela Call, Mommy explains to Amy that her ideas are like horses and she needs to take good care of them and keep them safe! This book provides a fine example of externalization used to invite a different and non-‐blaming relationship with the impulsive forces kids sometimes struggle to tame. The book is downloadable free in PDF-‐form, or can be ordered in hardback, at:-‐ http://www.holdontoyourhorses.com/
Beating Sneaky Poo Faecal soiling can be a real bummer (?!!) for everyone involved. This was one of the first problems Michael White very effectively externalized in working with children1. Psychiatrist, Terry Heins, and clinical psychologist, Karen Riche, have teamed up with illustrators, Geoff Pryor and Quantum, to provide an educational guide that explains the problem and its tricks, giving guidance on how to beat that Sneaky Poo! Access Beating Sneaky Poo online, at: http://www.narrativetherapylibrary.com/img/ps/spoo2.pdf
1. “The goal of treatment is to interrupt the vicious cycles associated with the symptoms and to trigger more desirable ones.” Michael White. “Pseudo-‐encopresis: From avalanche to victory, from vicious to virtuous cycles.” Family Systems Medicine, Vol 2(2), Sum 1984, 150-‐160.
124 Lord Street Newtown NSW 2042 email: [email protected]
web: heartheadhand.com.au
Katy Batha mob. 0421 345 156 Registered Psychologist • Narrative Therapist Accredited Supervisor • Trainer
Heart Head Hand Newtown
I will be available over the Christmas and New Year period (except 13 -‐16 Jan.) so please feel free to refer people during this time. Best wishes for 2012!
In this issue:- • The importance of kids’ own ethics in therapy • What is externalization in narrative practice? • An example of an externalizing conversation • Using externalisations to help support kids: Fantastic free resources available online
PD
F co
pies
ava
ilabl
e at
: hea
rthea
dhan
d.co
m.a
u (s
ee ‘F
or G
Ps’
)