Upload
hamish
View
22
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
What I learned From nsf conference. Wenjin Zhou, Ph.D. Computer Science and Engineering. disclaimer. Merely my personal take-home message Everyone’s opinion is different Discussions and questions. Three suggestions. Talk to Program Director Talk to Program Director - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
W E N J I N Z H O U , P H . D .C O M P U T E R S C I E N C E A N D E N G I N E E R I N G
WHAT I LEARNEDFROM NSF CONFERENCE
DISCLAIMER
• Merely my personal take-home message• Everyone’s opinion is different• Discussions and questions
THREE SUGGESTIONS
• Talk to Program Director• Talk to Program Director• Talk to Program Director
[Sayeef Salahuddin, NSF CAREER WORKSHOP 2013]
Faculty Field Trip
HOW TO TALK TO PD?
• Contact SOON• Avoid busy spring panel season (April - June)• Good time: Jan – Feb
• How?• Pitch your idea• 1 page proposal abstract• Mention to talk on the phone soon• 2-3 slides if meeting in person• Email one PD and CC all, DO NOT send separate emails
THE POWER OF PD
905 1,428
10612
17838
5095
12111,912
1 80
2189
3985 3355
No Score Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent
Declines
Awards
Distribution by Average Reviewer Ratings for Awards and Declines, FY 2012
10,721
10,254
9,757
10,317
11,352
11,024
14,642
13,014
11,185
11,534
29,024
33234
31840
31732
32752
32883
30573
42544
40366
37089
27%24% 23%
25% 26% 25%
32%
23% 22%24%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012
Awards Declines Funding Rate
NSF Competitive Awards, Declines& Funding Rates
PROPOSAL REVIEWERS
• DO suggest reviewers• Help the program officers, ease their job• Higher chances that your proposal is reviewed by proper
experts
• DO exclude reviewers that have “conflict of interest” with you• Names only• No reasons needed
“DISEASE”
• Very sensitive to NSF, especially NSF BIO• NSF do not fund any disease related research• NIH does• Focus on clarifying that the interest is not for the
“disease”, but the fundamental understanding of biology
BUDGET
• Budget justification is VERY important• Too high: 3-year proposal vs. 5-year• Too low: PI don’t know what they are actually getting
into• Ex. If you are proposing a massive project but asking for
only 3 Ph.D. students, reviewers will think that you don’t know what you are doing.
• Don’t get points for low budget
• Aim for REALISTIC budget
COMPETE WITH R1 INSTITUTES
• What helps?• Teaching release• “Does the PI have time to do this?”• Smaller institutes often lose the competition by over-commitment to
teaching• Waived overhead• Graduate support• Matching fund
• Important: Should NOT go into budget, violating “cost sharing”• Put into “facilities, equipment, and others” • Considered as “volunteering uncommitted cost-sharing”
LETTERS/SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENTS
• Reviewers are not required to read these• DO NOT put any information related to merits
• Letter of support from Chair/Dean are not needed AND not preferred• Story: PI gets asked the question by PD
• Except for NSF CAREER, chair letter required, not the dean
BECOME A REVIEWER!
• Introduce yourself and your research experience• Express that you want to become a reviewer for
their program• Ask them when the next panel will be held• Offer to send 2-page CV with current contact info• Stay in touch if you don’t hear right back.
NSF CAREER
• NSF encourage transformative proposals• BUT, in reality, it is hard for a transformative
proposal to get funded!• Risk factor too high• Most people don’t believe it• Most people will argue about it
• REALITY: NSF CAREER closer to be a career achievement award you need to build up a body of work before writing the CAREER
[Sayeef Salahuddin, UC Berkeley, CAREER 2012]
NSF CAREER
• What’s really different? • Comprehensive education/outreach plan
• Go beyond what is expected from any Assistant Professor in your field
• Must NOT eat up all the research time• Don’t be naïve!• Change something in high school education system?• Big turn down, unless you have already done so
• Must have assessment plans• Use data to show current involvements and results
NSF CAREER
• Keep trying!• Sayeef Salahuddin, UC Berkely• 2 submissions (2 years apart)
• Nate Foster, Cornell University• 1 submissions (actual 3 trials. 1 last-min, 1 withdraw, 3 years
apart)• Ani Hsieh, Drexel University• 3 submissions (4 years apart)
• Tommaso Melodia, SUNY Buffalo• 3 submissions (4 years apart)
RESOURCES• Award Search• see what has been funded and who was the program officers
• Research.gov • many useful information, outcome report
• PAPPG• Proposal and award policies and procedures guide
• GPG• NSF Grant Proposal Guide
• Program solicitations • especially important b/c they include instructions to follow;
collaborative funding opportunities• Dear colleague letter • Notifications of opportunities or special competitions for supplements to
existing NSF awards
G O O D LU C K ! ! !
ASK EARLY, ASK OFTEN!